USA: EARTH MEANDERS – What Would John Muir Say ……….

sierra c 3

SAV Comment:

As someone who has had the pleasure and experience of visiting Yosemite and the beautiful South West States (Utah, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico  etc) many times, I feel it necessary to include the following article simply as a discussion topic.

Standing at the base of El Cap is awe inspiring; visiting the giant redwood forests on the way up to half Dome is something everyone should have the opportunity to do once in their lives.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_Sequoia

So, yes, as the following article says, what would John Muir have said !!

Mark

SAV Founder – Kent, England.

———————————————————————————-

sierra c 2

EARTH MEANDERS
What Would John Muir Say..

About the Sierra Club being led by Michael Brune, Accountant-in-Chief, and old-growth forest logging apologist? And as we prepare to celebrate Earth Day, will Madison Progressives see through his greenwash of logging ancient, sacred wildlands for toilet paper and books?

An Ecology Essay by Dr. Glen Barry, Ecological Internet
April 20, 2013

“The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest wilderness.” – John Muir

“Any fool can destroy trees. They cannot run away; and if they could, they would still be destroyed — chased and hunted down as long as fun or a dollar could be got…” – John Muir

“The battle we have fought, and are still fighting for the forests is a part of the eternal conflict between right and wrong, and we cannot expect to see the end of it.” – John Muir

“By choosing to sell FSC-certified wood, The Home Depot is walking its talk.” – Michael Brune, Executive Director, Sierra Club

John Muir was one of the greatest protectors of forests and nature that ever lived. He was connected to my hometown Madison, Wisconsin, where he attended college. He later went on to drive the creation of the National Park system and to found the Sierra Club.

sierra c 1

Most importantly, Muir took an uncompromising position that old-growth forest wildernesses must be protected for their intrinsic values. He was bold, and brash, and waged verbal and written warfare with the likes of Gifford Pinchot, the founder of the U.S. Forest Service, over the fate of old-growth forest wildernesses. Their battle over the relative merits of preservation versus conservation of natural wildlands continues to rage today as Earth’s final naturally evolved primary forests are industrially cleared and diminished.

Given Muir’s absolute commitment to not logging primary forests, I am certain he would be deeply troubled over the ascendency of old-growth logging greenwasher extraordinaire Michael Brune as the head of the Sierra Club. Mr. Brune is speaking today in Madison, Wisconsin, yet he is unlikely to mention his years promoting old-growth forest logging.

Mr. Brune is an accountant who has built a record of success, first with Rainforest Action Network and now with the Sierra Club, of raising money from celebrities and foundations, without much ecological policy substance. His record is also one of unequivocally supporting “sustainable” industrial old-growth forest logging around the world for throw-away consumption.

Much has been made of the myth that Mr. Brune in the late 1990s forced Home Depot into using Forest Stewardship Certified (FSC) old-growth products (try to find any sold there now, not available in many stores). But as John Muir knew nearly 100 years – and is even more true today as globally old-growth forests dwindle to such a point that biodiversity, climate and the biosphere are collapsing – there is no such thing as ecologically sustainable old-growth forest logging [1].

Industrial desecration of primary forests through even selective logging irretrievably diminishes ecological function, form, structure, composition, and dynamics. You might as well cut out little squares from the Mona Lisa and sell them, claiming the whole has not been damaged. Choosing to work for better old-growth forest logging rather than outright protection is a bit like working to treat slaves better, rather than freeing them. Both slavery and industrial old-growth forest ecocide are irredeemable and must end.

As practiced, selective logging almost always means selecting all the high quality, large trees, and logging them. Such high-grading leaves behind trees but not an old-growth forest with all the soil organisms, wildlife, and naturally evolved genetic diversity. Such forests are on there way after two or three harvests to being a tree plantation, with much reduced or even lack of ecosystem services that make life possible.

Under Mr. Brune’s leadership, Rainforest Action Network pursued a failed secret deal – along with pals Sierra Club of Canada, Greenpeace, and ForestEthics – which legitimized first time industrial logging of 2/3 of Canada’s Great Bear temperate old-growth rainforest – the largest in the world – for vague promises of protection of the other third, which have since been broken.

Mr. Brune has been a staunch supporter of “certified” old-growth forest logging by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). Others and myself have estimated that some 200 million hectares of old-growth forests are threatened by the greenwash behind the FSC label – a massive area two times the size of Texas. Mr. Brune and successors’ RAN market campaigns in support of FSC herald certified old-growth logging for books, furniture, and even toilet paper as being sustainable [2]. Such environmental NGO greenwash is critical to FSC’s business model of dressing up business as usual old-growth plunder as being green.

Perhaps the saddest part of Mr. Brune’s ascendency within the forest conservation community has been his unwillingness to dialogue with ecological scientists and others who question whether logging old-growth forests provide protection. Some five years ago my organization Ecological Internet approached Mr. Brune to discuss the matter of RAN, under his leadership, greenwashing old-growth logging and consumption. Mr. Brune didn’t even know basic facts about RAN’s forest positions – not knowing they falsely claimed FSC old-growth logging was “sustainable” – or that their Great Bear “victory” did not even achieve FSC standards, instead settling for meaningless promises of “ecosystem management”.

Since then, tens of thousands of global forest conservationists wrote to Mr. Brune [3] asking for RAN to reconsider their position and resign from FSC to focus upon protecting and restoring old-growth forests. New York activists disrupted his book signing campaigns with protests. We simply asked for far more ecological science based policies; that Mr. Brune and RAN stop greenwashing old-growth forest logging, insist FSC limit itself to certifying secondary and non-monoculture plantations, and instead work for old-growth protection and small-scale community eco-forestry.

Mr. Brune and associates appeared outraged that their “Great Rainforest Heist” be questioned [4]. RAN first promised to review their FSC membership, then broke their promise, choosing instead to stonewall and vilify their critics – including his staff publicly calling me mentally ill. This after I had worked closely with RAN for 15 years, doing many action alerts together, and being granted a rainforest protection award by them. Apparently Mr. Brune is above reproach, and does not have to answer basic questions or account for his organization’s public policies.

Mr. Brune is speaking today in Madison for Earth Day. I don’t think John Muir would appreciate a bean counter running the organization he founded, his past reckless and clueless support for logging Earth’s last naturally evolved forest wildernesses, or his remaining silent on old-growth forest logging since taking over Sierra Club. I would go and protest his presence if I felt he had any moral bearing or ecological prowess on the matter of old-growth forest protection. So instead I write ecological truths, hoping reason prevails before global ecological collapse engulfs us.

Even given this scathing critique, I have seen some reason for hope. Mr. Brune abandoned his similar reckless and misinformed promotion of natural gas as a bridge fuel upon moving to the Sierra Club, where he quickly exposed and dispatched their secret funding from the natural gas industry. He has been particularly effective on coal and tar sands campaigning, and getting Sierra Club board approval for civil disobedience against the Keystone pipeline. Yet this too little, too late, play it safe strategy isn’t going to stop global ecosystem collapse.

Sierra Club doesn’t really speak out much about protecting remaining large and connected old-growth globally, or working to end markets for FSC and other primary forest timbers. Sierra Club under Mr. Brune continues to support FSC on its web site and in public statements, without mentioning the majority of its products come from old-growth. And Sierra Club – and even 350.org – remain silent on the at least 18% of carbon emissions coming from old-growth forest logging, even as they take an important – yet at this time largely symbolic – stand on tar sands’ 1% of global emissions.

At this juncture in converging ecological crises, it is more important to seek ecological polices that will actually prove sufficient to avert global ecosystem collapse if successful; than it is to pursue piece-meal reforms, that even if achieved, would prove inadequate. For the human family to thrive much less survive, together we need to end coal, tar sands, AND old-growth forest logging all at the same time. Large, connected, and ecologically intact old-forests power the biosphere and provide for local livelihoods forever; their loss threatens all life’s existence.

Mr. Brune personifies everything that is wrong with the corporate, PR, and image driven environmental NGOs. He is an accountant making decisions based upon maintaining his environmental bureaucracy rather than developing and implementing ecologically sufficient solutions to global ecosystem collapse. Sadly, he doesn’t know what he is talking about.

John Muir would certainly call out Mr. Bruin as a clueless San Francisco hipster that managed to latch onto celebrity and foundation money, and incautiously promotes logging old-growth forests, while stifling the grassroots ecological sustainability movement that expose and resist his old-growth forest logging policies. There is no more treacherous betrayal to John Muir’s legacy than greenwashing old-growth forest logging, and profiting personally from doing so.

Mr. Brune’s emphasis upon style over substance is ill-placed to address looming ecological crises. He will however feel right at home with clueless Madison Progressives who preen and pose, without really knowing what they are talking about. Namely, that global ecological sustainability, and human and all life’s well-being, depend critically upon protecting and restoring old-growth forests. Let’s hope – for old forests and Earth’s sake – that Mr. Brune and the Sierra Club are capable of self-reflection and turning over a new leaf that doesn’t including logging old-growth. Until they do, they are legitimate protest targets.

—————————————————-
More:

[1] Terrestrial Ecosystem Loss and Biosphere Collapse
http://forests.org/blog/2013/02/ecology-science-terrestrial-ec.asp

[2] EARTH MEANDERS: Earth Is Dying, Yet Climate and Forest Movements Lack Urgency and Substance
http://www.rainforestportal.org/issues/2013/02/earth_meanders_earth_is_dying.asp

[3] Action Alert: As Rainforest Action Network Prepares to “Revel”, What Has Become of Their Old Growth Forest Campaign?
http://ecologicalinternet.org/shared/alerts/send.aspx?id=ran_ancient_forest_logging_26_9_2008

[4] EARTH MEANDERS: The Great Rainforest Heist
How environmental groups gone bad greenwash logging Earth’s last primary old forests
http://www.rainforestportal.org/issues/2012/04/earth_meanders_the_great_rainf.asp


Please support Ecological Internet’s campaigns to protect and restore old
forests at http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/donate/

To subscribe visit:
http://www.ecoearth.info/shared/subscribe

————————————————————————-

Please America,

DO NOT ALLOW SUCH A BEAUTIFUL NATURAL WONDERLAND  TO BE DESTROYED !

Fight for Nature !

Regards Mark

earth butterfly

Tanzania: Stop the Maasai from Being Evicted to Make Way for Tourist Hunters – Please Sign the Petition.

Tanz

Massai

1,227,719 have signed. Let’s get to 1,500,000

Petition Link:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stand_with_the_maasai_loc/?cl=2678789281&v=23733

 

To President Jakaya Kikwete:

As citizens from around the world, we call on you to oppose any attempt to evict Maasai from their traditional land or require them to relocate to make way for foreign hunters. We are counting on you to be a champion for your people and stop any attempt to change their land rights against their will. 

Dear friends,

Within hours, Tanzania’s President Kikwete could start evicting tens of thousands of the Maasai from our land so hunters can come and kill leopards and lions. Last time Avaaz raised the alarm, the President shelved the plan. Global pressure can stop him again. Click to help us urgently: 

We are elders of the Maasai from Tanzania, one of Africa’s oldest tribes. The government has just announced that it plans to kick thousands of our families off our lands so that wealthy tourists can use them to shoot lions and leopards. The evictions are to begin immediately.

Last year, when word first leaked about this plan, almost one million Avaaz members rallied to our aid. Your attention and the storm it created forced the government to deny the plan, and set them back months. But the President has waited for international attention to die down, and now he’s revived his plan to take our land. We need your help again, urgently.

President Kikwete may not care about us, but he’s shown he’ll respond to global pressure — to all of you! We may only have hours. Please stand with us to protect our land, our people and our world’s most majestic animals, and tell everyone before it is too late. This is our last hope:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stand_with_the_maasai_loc/?cl=2678789281&v=23733

Our people have lived off the land in Tanzania and Kenya for centuries. Our communities respect our fellow animals and protect and preserve the delicate ecosystem. But the government has for years sought to profit by giving rich princes and kings from the Middle East access to our land to kill. In 2009, when they tried to clear our land to make way for these hunting sprees, we resisted, and hundreds of us were arrested and beaten. Last year, rich princes shot at birds in trees from helicopters. This killing goes against everything in our culture.

Now the government has announced it will clear a huge swath of our land to make way for what it claims will be a wildlife corridor, but many suspect it’s just a ruse to give a foreign hunting corporation and the rich tourists it caters to easier access to shoot at majestic animals. The government claims this new arrangement is some sort of accommodation, but its effect on our people’s way of life will be disastrous. There are thousands of us who could have our lives uprooted, losing our homes, the land on which our animals graze, or both.

President Kikwete knows this deal would be controversial with Tanzania’s tourists – a critical source of national income – and does not want a big PR disaster. If we can urgently generate even more global outrage than we did before, and get the media writing about it, we know it can make him think twice. Stand with us now to call on Kikwete to stop the sell off:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stand_with_the_maasai_loc/?cl=2678789281&v=23733

This land grab could spell the end for the Maasai in this part of Tanzania, and many of our community have said they would rather die than be forced from their homes. On behalf of our people and the animals who graze in these lands, please stand with us to change the mind of our President.

With hope and determination,

The Maasai elders of Ngorongoro District

SOURCES

The Guardian: Maasai fury as plan to lure Arabian Gulf tourists threatens their ancestral land
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/30/maasai-game-hunting-tanzania

allAfrica: Land Grab Could Spell ‘The End of the Maasai’
http://allafrica.com/stories/201303290873.html

IPP Media: Maasai villagers frustrate efforts to vacate for Ortelo
http://www.ippmedia.com/frontend/?l=52669

The Guardian: Tanzania denies plan to evict Maasai for royal hunting ground
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/15/tanzania-evict-maasai-uae-royals

The Guardian: “Tourism is a curse to us”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/06/masai-tribesman-tanzania-tourism

New Internationalist Magazine: “Hunted down”
http://www.newint.org/columns/currents/2009/12/01/tanzania/

Society for Threatened People: Briefing on the eviction of the Loliondo Maasai
http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session12/TZ/STP-SocietyThreatenedPeople-eng.pdf

FEMACT: Report by 16 human rights investigators & media on violence in Loliondo
http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/advocacy/58956/print

Rabies: Why China Needs To Become A 21 Century Nation – And Dog Killing In Nepal – Disturbing Video – Please Take Action.

china

If a person can contract rabies from butchering animals that are infected with the rabies virus or have already died from it, a person can also contract rabies from beating a rabid dog to death  (as in the recent Nepal footage), as blood, saliva and/or brain tissue inevitably goes flying around in the process. This is one very good reason to discourage the public from the all too common practice of beating suspected rabid animals to death.

 A Side of Rabies With Your Dog Meat in China

People in China and other Asian countries are dying of rabies. But
it’s not because dogs are biting them — it’s because they are biting
dogs, eating 18-80 million a year just in China.

“Rabies is a major problem in China. The country’s Ministry of Health
says it has the 2nd highest rate in the world after India.” And it’s
getting worse. Human rabies cases appear to be on the rise in China
based on the most recent numbers available. “In 2007, there were 3302
confirmed human rabies cases in China, nearly 21 times the number
found from the entire period between 1990 and 1996.”

It’s not just eating the meat that causes rabies. Slaughtering,
processing and cooking it may be even more dangerous.
After a rabies
outbreak led to human fatalities in Viet Nam, government officials
“reported that 70 percent of deaths were from dog bites but up to 30
percent were thought to be linked to exposure during slaughter or
butchery.”

“In a 17 Mar [2009 -- see comment below] study from Hanoi published by
the PLoS Medicine journal, researchers pointed to 2 cases of human
rabies in Viet Nam where the patients were believed infected while
butchering a rabid animal — in one case a dog, the other a cat.”

“In the 1st patient’s case, he had prepared and eaten a dog that had
been killed in a road traffic accident; rabid dogs were known to
inhabit the neighbourhood. The 2nd patient had butchered and eaten a
cat that had been sick for a number of days.” Other people who ate the
same meat did not fall ill.

According to the Welcome Trust rabies is a very serious — and in
nearly all cases fatal — disease. It is estimated to kill over 30 000
people each year in Asia, and the number of cases in China and Viet
Nam is increasing. Symptoms include agitation, severe spasms, fever,
fear of water and inability to drink liquids, and eventually death.
There is a vaccine for rabies and even a treatment that can [very
rarely] cure the disease after infection, but it must be administered
very quickly after the patient contracts rabies. “Once a person shows
symptoms, the disease is almost invariably fatal.”

[Byline: Piper Hoffman]
Communicated by: ProMED-mail <promed@promedmail.org>

This report cites figures in support of an assertion that rabies
virus infection is increasing in China and wishes to correlate this
with increasing consumption of dog meat in China. In support of this
contention the article cites 2 cases [which actually occurred in 2009
- Mod.CP] in Viet Nam where rabies was contracted by an individual
slaughtering an accident-injured dog [see: Rabies, via dog/cat
butchering - Viet Nam archive number 20090318.1092], and another
slaughtering a cat.

Eating dog meat is common in many Asian countries, but research
conducted as part of the South East Asia Infectious Diseases Clinical
Research Network identified a potentially lethal risk associated with
preparing dog meat. In research published on 18 Mar 2009 in the open
access journal PLoS Medicine, Heiman Wertheim and colleagues from the
National Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases and the
National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology in Hanoi, Viet Nam,
report on 2 patients admitted to hospital showing signs of rabies
infection. Neither patient was thought to have been bitten by a rabid
animal in the preceding months see: Wertheim H, et al: Furious Rabies
after an Atypical Exposure. PLoS Medicine. 17 Mar 2009 [available at
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000044].
It is clearly probable that rabies virus can be transmitted during the
course of slaughtering and butchering dogs and cats, if the person
involved has exposed abrasions or wounds
. However, rabies virus cannot
be transmitted through consumption of cooked meat since rabies virus
(and related rhabdoviruses) are heat sensitive and rapidly lose
infectivity at normal environmental temperature and humidity.

Vaccination and dog licensing are mechanism for controlling rabies
virus infection, not banning consumption of dog meat. – Mod.CP

NEPA0001

doggunhead

PETITION TO SIGN HERE:

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stop-cruel-dog-killings-in-nepal.html

(NP) Swift action by animal protectors in Nepal in the wake of botched stray killing

Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:35 am (PDT) .

Posted by: “Lisa Warden” foghorndoghorn

Animal protectors in Nepal were quick to respond when police in Kathmandu engaged in a botched killing of a street dog in the city last month. The killing was filmed and uploaded to youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkUNXTlcVJs).

The footage shows a dog hiding in a drain at the side of the road. The dog is shot and injured by a police officer. The dog then runs out of the drain, and one of the officers eventually manages to club it to death.

The issue was brought to the attention of Animal Welfare Network Nepal (AWNN), a coalition of animal welfare groups and concerned individuals working in the country.

Shristi Singh Bhandari, Communication Director at Animal Nepal submitted the following update to AWNN on March 6, 2103  (certain names have been redacted):

<<Dear all,

I am sending you my follow up on the recent shooting of the stray dog in kathmandu:

1. After receiving the video, I went to talk to the local people who had witnessed the killing about the issue. They told me that the dog had bitten several people and they were scared to walk by the street. SO they called the local police to attend to the matter. The police told them to tie the dog up to observe if he had was rabid, The locals obviously did not agree to do so. They again called the police to take care of the situation, so they came and you know the rest.

2. I went to talk to the nearby police station where they had reported the dog. The officer who was at the station told me that the police officers had been dispatched by the Kamalpokhari police station and not from the local section.

3. I went to talk to Inspector Kunwar from Kamalpokhari branch about the matter. He was very supportive and said that they indeed had make a mistake but the main order had been handed out by xxxx of Hanuman Dhoka district police station. The inspector proposed to work together in future that still needs to be discussed.

4. Then I went to Hanuman Dhoka t o talk to xxxx who was super rude and non cooperative. He said it was an emergency situation and he did what he had to do and that he does not have time to look for animal welfare groups and that he will not dispatch any letters regarding what happened and that we were more than welcome to stage a protest.

5. SO I got in touch with Rana bahadur Chand who is the head of Hanuman Dhoka and told him about the situation. He said he was shocked to find out how xxxx had behaved and that he himself had not seen the video. He said he will be more than glad to release the circular stating an order to contact animal welfare groups to handle such cases in future and a letter to AWNN stating the case. So he has asked to draft a letter for them so that they can sign and send it to everyone necessary. I on the other hand told him that in case he does that we will send a press release thanking him for his cooperation. So we are drafting a letter and will send him that by 2 today and hope to get it back by tomorrow morning.He has called us to work with the police in such matter. Once the strike is over I will be going to meet him with our brochures and information.>>

A letter was drafted to send to the police that they would then issue as an apology for their actions, plus a circular for the police to issue to their officers regarding future handling of suspected rabies cases. AWNN was subsequently invited to attend a still-to-occur gathering of police to sensitize  them about animal welfare issues.

Kudos to the animal protection community in Nepal for swift and effective action.

Lisa Warden

REPLY

Re: (NP) Swift action by animal protectors in Nepal in the wake of botched stray killing

Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:49 am (PDT)

Posted by:  “Lucia Animal Nepal” animalnepal

Thanks Lisa.

Today our team met Kathmandu Police Chief Rana Bahadur Chand, to hand over our petition with 4000 signatures (see http://animalnepal.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/take-action-against-brutal-dog-killing-by-nepal-police/).

He informed us that he has send out a circular to all police offices to not kill dogs but instead inform animal welfare agencies when dealing with an agressive dog.   Chand promised to send a letter of apology to the Animal Welfare Network Nepal.

The chief said he loves animals and that he and a number of colleagues oppose animal sacrifice.

We have also been asked to educate police officers about animal welfare.

This is an encouraging development but much work remains to be done. Poisoning is still the preferred method to ‘limit’ stray dog populations by virtually all municipalities in Nepal. AWNN in August organised a seminar on humane dog management, during which a number of local government promised to stop the poisoning, see
http://animalnepal.wordpress.com/2012/11/14/national_seminar_on_dog_population_management_nepal/

We request international campaigners to continue to be involved in the Nepal situation. With no animal welfare legislation in place, and hardly any humane dog management taking place outside Kathmandu Valley, Nepal really needs encouragement in this area.

Thanks,
Lucia

****************************************

 FROM Animal Nepal website:

Take action against brutal dog killing by Nepal Police

Kathmandu, March 1, 2013 – Animal Nepal today expressed its shock at the brutal killing of a dog by the Nepal police in Baluwatar, Kathmandu. The dog, which reportedly bit two people, was killed brutally with the help of a gun and bamboo sticks, in full view of the public. The killing was recorded by video and uploaded on youtube. 

Animal Nepal today handed over letters to the Inspector of Police, the Chief District Officer and the Kathmandu Municipality, requesting the authorities to take immediate action.

According to Animal Nepal, “the images of ‘man’s best friend’ dying such an agonizing death are heart rendering and deeply traumatizing for children and other members of the public.”

Despite the fact that humane solutions like Animal Birth Control/Anti Rabies have been introduced in Nepal a decade ago, authorities continue to kill dogs inhumanely using strychnine poison, guns or sticks. The incident shows that Nepal badly needs an Animal Welfare Act, to provide protection for canines and other animals.

The campaigners invite all concerned citizens to sign this petition, as well as send emails to the municipality through this link, and to the Nepal police at  info@nepalpolice.gov.np. The CDO can be reached by fax at 009 771 4267619.

New Zealand: Way Behind Other Nations – Plans To Undertake Legal High Drug Testing On Animals – Petition and Letter – Please Sign.

NZ

NZ Testing

Petition Link

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/the-new-zealand-house-of-representatives-hon-peter-dunne-leave-animals-out-of-legal-high-testing

Petitioning The New Zealand House of Representatives; Hon Peter Dunne

The New Zealand House of Representatives; Hon Peter Dunne : Leave Animals Out of Legal High Testing

LEAVE ANIMALS OUT OF LEGAL HIGH TESTING

The New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society (NZAVS) has joined forces with SAFE and the New Zealand SPCA to prevent the testing of psychoactive drugs (“party pills” or “legal highs”) on animals.

These tests would involve suffering and cruelty to both large and small animals (rats and dogs) leading to pain, distress and death. Using animals as the subject of tests for recreational drugs is unethical and unnecessary.

NZAVS, SAFE and the SPCA want the New Zealand Parliament to include a clause specifically prohibiting animal testing in any proposed legislation aimed at the regulation of these substances.

***********************

If you’re in New Zealand email NZAVS at nzavs@nzavs.org.nz for paper petition signature sheets and get your friends, family, workmates and acquaintances to sign them. You can add your signature to both the paper and online petition.

What is the Government planning?

A Bill is being introduced to regulate the sale of low risk psychoactive drugs (“party pills” or “legal highs”) for recreational use. This will require safety testing. The final stage of the testing will require human trials. Some indication of the risk to people needs to be known before that stage. The main proposal the Ministry of Health (MoH) is considering requires four rounds of fatal animal tests to be carried out on both large and small animals (usually rats and dogs). For these tests the animals will be exposed to large doses of the drugs until adverse effects are found (acute toxicity); repeated long term exposure before being killed to allow internal examination; carcinogenicity and toxicokinetic tests (long term fatal tests that look at the drugs’ passage through the body).

Why oppose animal testing of recreational drugs?

Using animals as the subject of tests for recreational drugs is immoral and unethical; and not only that, it is also unnecessary. The UK has banned all use of animals for the toxicology testing of the recreational drugs tobacco and alcohol since the 1990s, Canada requires three toxicology tests for all tobacco products, none of which use animals.

Investigating the potential harm of these drugs does not require the use of animals. The very idea that animals could be used in this way and killed to facilitate the sale of recreational drugs is something to which the majority of New Zealanders are opposed. By signing the petition you can add your voice to this opposition.

What are the other options?

There are many types of tests available that serve the required purpose that do not use animals. Tests using cell cultures, bacteria and advanced computer modelling can provide all the information, and more, that animal tests do. For example, there are long established carcinogenicity tests that are in common use as they give better results than animal tests. There are non-animal tests that have been approved for use by many regulatory bodies internationally, including in both Europe and the US1, that can be used for all four types of tests the MoH is considering.

What else can I do to stop this happening?

Make a submission to the Select Committee considering the Bill. NZAVS is providing information on how to do this to anyone that is interested. For an info pack send your address by email to nzavs@nzavs.org.nz and one will be posted.

You can also email NZAVS for petition signature sheets and get your friends, family, workmates and acquaintances to sign them.

Peter Dunne is the Minister responsible for the legislation; you can let him know what you think about this issue by contacting him via email: peter.dunne@parliament.govt.nz or by post with no stamp required: Hon Peter Dunne / Parliament Office / Private Bag 18 888 / Wellington 6160.

To:
The New Zealand House of Representatives; Hon Peter Dunne

PETITION TO STOP ANIMAL TESTING OF PARTY PILLS

To the House of Representatives

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that the New Zealand Parliament includes a clause specifically prohibiting animal testing in any proposed legislation aimed at the regulation of Psychoactive Substances
(“party pills” or “legal highs”).

Sincerely,
[Your name]

I Look At His Eyes …..

slaughter rabbit

Hi Mark,

look at this rabbit.  I look at his eyes and I  could see his mind.

He  wants to say to us:

Look at me now. Look at my welfare.  Never forget these are the most difficult  moments of my life -  until I am waiting  my own  violent death and  am hearing the screaming of my sisters and brothers. - those of  you who would eat me and wear  my skin, must think about  the last seconds of my life .

That was my one and only life.

If you are a  ‘thinking species’ – then think about this.. Where is now  my ‘welfare’ ? – what  about  your so-called ‘animal welfare; organisation’s speak’ ?

Maybe some of them could  try this ‘welfare’ on  themselves, maybe  then  they would not  further  to be  hypocritical  and maybe  they would not just think about the collection of  donations  by spreading lies about  my welfare.

My welfare – is my  right to live free to the natural end of my life .

 

Regards

Slavica (Serbia)

 

 

 

China (Again): Plans To Destroy Cambodian Rainforest By Flooding – Please Take Action (see below).

cambodia

china

Cam forest 1

RAINFOREST ACTION ALERT              PLEASE SEND, SHARE, LIKE, FORWARD!

Massive Chinese Dam Threatens Cambodia’s Cardamom Rainforests

By Rainforest Portal a project of Ecological Internet: http://www.rainforestportal.org/ with John Seed, Rainforest Information Centre: http://www.rainforestinfo.org.au/

March 14, 2013

TAKE ACTION to ensure Cambodia’s Cardamom rainforests remain standing:

  http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/alerts/sendsm.aspx?id=cambodia_dam

The Areng Valley in the Cardamom Mountains of south-west Cambodia is threatened with flooding by a Chinese hydropower dam. This biodiversity gem – home of the Siamese crocodile and indigenous Khmer Daeum – is to be destroyed for a relatively small amount of electricity. Standing large, connected, and ecologically intact old-growth forests are required for local and global ecological sustainability and well-being.

Please send the following alerts to protect old-growth rainforests as well:

Tell Avon, New Jersey: Old-Growth Rainforest Boardwalks Cause Abrupt Climate Change
http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/alerts/sendsm.aspx?id=rainforest_boardwalk

Protest Tasmanian Old-Growth Logging in Proposed World Heritage Area
http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/alerts/sendsm.aspx?id=tasmania_forests

Ecuador Tribe Will “Die Fighting” to Defend Rainforest #IdleNoMore
http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/alerts/sendsm.aspx?id=ecuador_oil


Please support Ecological Internet’s campaigns to protect and restore old
forests at http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/donate/
cam forest 2

EU: March 11th 2013 – A Great Day – Cosmetics Testing On Animals In the EU Is NOW BANNED !!

EU AW LOGO

CosmeticsBanner3

Cosmetics testing on animals in the EU is now BANNED !

http://www.rspca.org.uk/getinvolved/campaigns/laboratory/cosmetics?source=130311_CAMP_Cosmetics&utm_source=Campaigns&utm_medium=email&utm_content=CopyThanks&utm_campaign=130311_CAMP_Cosmetics&spMailingID=5259649&spUserID=MzA4NTgwNDY5OTAS1&spJobID=313744720&spReportId=MzEzNzQ0NzIwS0

The RSPCA has campaigned for ‘cruelty-free’ cosmetics for 30 years and from 11th March 2013, new EU legislation will ban the sale of cosmetics which have been newly tested on animals within the European Union. This means that multinational companies can’t avoid a test ban in the EU by carrying out tests in other countries - if their products or ingredients have been newly tested on animals then they cannot be sold in the EU, no matter where in the world testing took place.
This ban is a landmark for animals and we hope it will send the message to other countries, and to companies operating outside the EU, that animal testing in the name of beauty is not acceptable.

Amid pressure from parts of the cosmetics industry to delay the ban, EU Commissioner Borg, who has responsibility for this area did not waiver. This ban will no doubt spare the suffering of many animals, if you would like to thank Commissioner Borg on their behalf, please do so by using the form below…

Please email Commissioner Borg to thank him

From the RSPCA:

Dear Supporter,

It’s finally here! It’s almost 30 years since the RSPCA began campaigning for ‘cruelty-free’ cosmetics. Today (11 March) the ban which prevents the sale within the European Union of cosmetics which have been newly tested on animals, finally comes into force.

The testing of cosmetics ingredients and products using animals can cause significant suffering. The EU recognises that causing animals harm for such a trivial purpose is morally unacceptable. Despite pressure from some parts of the cosmetics industry to delay a sales ban on products tested on animals, the EU Commissioner with responsibility for this area stood firm.

Please email Commissioner Borg to thank him, on behalf of the animals and ethical consumers across the EU.

Many cosmetic companies are multinational but this new legislation means that they can’t avoid a test ban in the EU by carrying out tests in other countries. If their products or ingredients have been newly tested on animals then they cannot be sold in the EU, no matter where in the world the testing took place.

And the good news doesn’t stop there as in response to the EU ban, Israel has introduced its own similar ban, and India has stated their intention to ban the use of animals to test cosmetics. We hope the EU ban will set an example to other countries, and to companies operating outside the EU, that animal testing in the name of beauty is not acceptable.

Thank you for your support!

This ban is brilliant news for the animal welfare but it isn’t the end – there are still many animals being used all across the world to develop cosmetics products that will be sold outside of the EU.

We will soon be taking our message to these countries and companies to ask them to follow the EU lead. We will do our best to keep you posted on this issue.

For the most recent updates and other ways you can help animals, sign up for our campaign updates here. 

Thanks again!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 55 other followers