Indonesia: Palm Oil Company Gets What it Deserves for Destroying Orangutans’ Home.

Indonesia

Some brilliant news just for once !!

palm oil 3palm oil 2

Palm Oil Company Gets What it Deserves for Destroying Orangutans’ Home

January 15, 2014

http://www.care2.com/causes/palm-oil-company-gets-what-it-deserves-for-destroying-orangutans-home.html

Past SAV posts associated with this issue:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2013/06/30/indonesia-robbed-of-its-forest-home-by-palm-oil-producers-a-mob-has-now-taken-the-baby-elephant-captive-and-held-it-to-ransom-the-real-side-of-palm-oil-production/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2010/10/02/palm-oil-how-you-as-a-consumer-can-make-a-difference/

An Indonesian court issued a big blow to a palm oil company for illegally destroying forest land in Sumatra’s protected Leuser Ecosystem, which provides critical habitat for orangutans and other endangered species.

In what’s being called a groundbreaking verdict, the court found palm oil company PT Kallista Alam guilty of illegally burning large areas of the Tripa peat forest in the province of Aceh and ordered it to pay roughly $30 million in fines. An estimated $20 million was allocated for restoration efforts. The court also confiscated land and will be charging a fine for every day the palm oil company delays repayment, reports the Environmental News Service.

In 2011 the government placed a two year moratorium on logging in certain areas, but PT Kallista Alam still got a palm oil concession permit that year that it shouldn’t have, which was later revoked. The attention that the company brought to the area and the continued destruction by several other companies garnered protests from around the world and calls for greater protection for the peat swamp forests of Aceh, which include Tripa, Kluet and Singkil.

The case against against PT Kallista Alam was brought by the Ministry of Environment, and environmentalists are applauding its effort and the ruling. They believe it will send a strong message to other companies and hope it will mean improvements in law enforcement efforts to stop deforestation and protect biodiversity in an area that’s vitally important for the future survival of critically endangered orangutans, along with other species including Sumatran tigers and elephants, Malayan sun bears and rhinos.

“This is a clear message to companies working in Aceh who think they can destroy protected forests and get away with it” said Muhammad Nur, Chairman of WALHI Aceh (Friends of the Earth Indonesia).

For orangutans, efforts to protect the the Tripa peat forests and Leuser Ecosystem could be their last hope. There are only an estimated 6,500 orangutans left in Sumatra who continue to face threats from deforestation, habitat fragmentation caused by roads, the pet trade and being killed as pests. Conservationists from Sumatran Orangutan Conservation Program (SOCP) estimate that as many as 100 of Tripa’s orangutans have been killed in fires so far.

“Tripa is one of only 3 remaining peat swamp forests left containing orangutans in Sumatra and its impossible to overstate the importance of protecting every last hectare of each of them,” said Dr. Ian Singleton, SOCP’s director, in a statement.

The Price of Palm Oil

According to the Rainforest Action Network (RAN), nearly 90 percent of palm oil is now grown in Indonesia and Malaysia and the growing demand for it has caused the destruction of some of the earth’s most valuable rainforests and continues to do so.

International companies continue to put palm oil that has been produced at the expense of the Tripa peat forest and other areas on the market, while its use as a key ingredient in a variety of foods has made it virtually inescapable. This past September RAN called out major food companies, otherwise known as the Snack Food 20, for not ensuring that their palm oil was conflict free.

While advocacy groups and consumers continue to pressure companies to do the right thing, environmentalists are still working to get tougher protection for the earth’s irreplaceable rainforests.

The court ruling was a victory, but the Leuser Ecosystem is still in danger. The government is now under pressure to finalize a controversial and short-sighted spatial land use plan known as Qanun RTRW Aceh that would threaten Aceh’s protected forests by opening the door for palm oil and timber concessions, mining and the development of roads, which will fragment precious habitat, encourage development, cause more conflicts with wildlife and create more access to rare species for hunters.

Not only would this be a huge blow to orangutans and overall biodiversity, but it will also harm local communities. Environmentalists predict that further deforestation will lead to natural disasters that include more flash floods, landslides and erosion, in addition to destroying livelihoods that are forest-dependent and threatening the water supply that millions of people rely on for drinking and food production.

The plan also ignores the environmental and economic benefits that the Leuser Ecosystem provides. According to Graham Usher, Landscape Protection Specialist with the Swiss-based PanEco Foundation, “For Aceh alone these have been valued in excess of 400 million dollars per year, and the region’s contribution to mitigating climate change, through its carbon sequestration function probably stretches into billions of dollars.”

Environmental and animal advocacy groups including RAN, SOCP, the PanEco Foundation and Humane Society International, among others, are now urging the government to reject this plan, in addition to urging Aceh’s governor to protect the Leuser Ecosystem as a whole by supporting its nomination as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The Leuser Ecosystem was recently named one of the world’s most irreplaceable places and the international community is fighting to ensure that it gets the protection it deserves.

TAKE ACTION!

Please sign and share the petition urging Aceh’s governor to protect wildlife and local communities by supporting a nomination of the Leuser Ecosystem as a World Heritage site.


Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/palm-oil-company-gets-what-it-deserves-for-destroying-orangutans-home.html#ixzz2qZLvP7nU

 

palm oil 4

Time Out – English History Lesson !

England

The fabulous Lord Flasheart,  Blackadder bloopers and some RAF Banter.

Time Out (English) history lesson:  Enjoy !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKfbSHW9uGA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LqoprkGLGI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rKYL0tW-Ek

Serbia: ‘Tug o War’ Video Using Horses Requires Actions – Please e Mail Using Sample Letter Below.

Serbian  Flag

UPDATE 14/1/14 –

We first had this disgusting video footage sent to us this last weekend – now we have followed up urgently and we are pleased to say that:

The police of Valjevo city have now been following up this footage – as a result they have worked with the Public Attorney of Moinica City who gave an official report of the incident on National television on 10.1.2014.  We understand that all persons involved in this incident who undertook this animal abuse and caused suffering have now been arrested and will be charged under Article 269 of Serbian law for animals.  This has a maximum punishment of 3 years in jail.

Whilst we do not expect anyone to be sent to jail for 3 years, it is hoped by us and many others that the prompt action since the weekend will send a clear message to the communities that animal abuse will not be tolerated.  If Serbia wishes to join the EU as a member state, then it really / seriously needs to address the issue of working to the good animal welfare laws which it currently has in place; rather than keep ingoring them.  We have shown enough examples on this site where the laws are just ignored for the benefit of some, whilst the animals continue to suffer.

This is a start of actions which we very much hope will now continue.

Well done the Serbian campaigners who have worked so hard with us over the last few days to get a quick and positive result.  They know who they are.

———————————————————

On 12/1/14 we have been provided with the following very disturbing abuse of horses in a kind of ‘tug o war’ type event. 

You can see the video here: (note you may need to copy and watch on Google; or try the video link in the Sample Letter below)

 

Video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYF06B8tRGo&feature=youtu.be 


At first we were unsure what country this event had taken place in.  We consequently made contact with Serbian activists.

With their very valuable help we have now identified that this abuse of horses is taking place in Serbia; at a village known as Milavac.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milavac  

and  http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milavac 

And also   http://webot.org/?r=e&search=Milavac 

Milavac is a village situated in Ljig municipality in Serbia.

Serbian activists are now making a written charge to both the Ministry of Agriculture and also to the Ministry of Internal Policing.

This crime showing clear abuse of animals is punishable by Article 269 of the Criminal Code of Serbia.  Proof of this video has now been made as evidence of the crime, so that it can be presented to the police.  Without a hard copy of the evidence the police will dismiss this crime; and so we have to copy in onto a reliable database for safe keeping and future evidence.  If a record is not kept, the police will ignore and dismiss the evidence presented – thus the abuse will be un-recorded and the police will take no further action to investigate and punish those undertaking this abuse.

The Chief Veterinary Inspector for Valjevo city, Kolubara region; the area of Serbia where this has happened, is Mrs Slavica Sreckovi

+38114292690
regionalnava@gmail.com

 

The e mail address of the Serbian police is

muprs@mup.gov.rs,

 

The Director of the Serbian police is Mr. Milorad Veljovic

milorad.veljovic@mup.gov.rs

 

This information is only now being posted onto this SAV site, once copies of the video have been made – now we have clear evidence of the abuses that the authorities and the police cannot ignore.  This evidence is being presented to them in the form of a charge, asking them to take action.

We hope to be able to give you an update on the situation in the future.

We request that you all write a few lines expressing your disgust at this video, and demand that the police and the authorities take action.

You can write your own e mail, or alternatively, copy and send the following short sample letter:

Send to:

regionalnava@gmail.com,  muprs@mup.gov.rs,  milorad.veljovic@mup.gov.rs

 

SAMPLE LETTER.

Dear ladies and gents of the Serbian police and government authorities;

I write regarding the following video which I am informed was filmed in Milavac village, Serbia.

 

Video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYF06B8tRGo&feature=youtu.be 

 

I now request that you undertake full investigative action to ensure that all those involved in this clear abuse of animals are prosecuted under Article 269 of the Criminal Code of Serbia.

This type of animal abuse does not do your nation any good regarding its global audience.  You need to act and act now to ensure this does not happen again in future.  This is also not a good advertisement for Serbia and its wish to become a future member of the EU.

I may consider that is necessary to provide this video footage to the EU Parliament / Commission for their review.

Pending this; I ask once again that you act to prevent this kind of event ever taking place again in the future.  Today in the 21st Century, Europe must grow up and ensure that animal abuse becomes a thing of the past.  If it happens now, then you should be taking action to ensure that it does not happen in the future.

Thank You;

Yours truly,

 

YOUR Name and nationality.

Canada: Stop the Export of Canadian Sheep for Cruel Ritual Slaughtering – Petition to Sign.

Canada

Petition link:

https://www.change.org/petitions/stop-the-export-of-canadian-sheep-for-cruel-ritual-slaughtering

 Petitioning Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Gerry Ritz, Minister of Agriculture, and Dr. Bruce Archibald, President of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency

Stop the export of Canadian sheep for cruel ritual slaughtering

canadian sheep

In October of this year (2013), for the first time in Singapore, Canadian lambs were killed in the annual korban ritual during Hari Raya Haji celebrations. Identifying a need for another supply chain, Singapore had explored Canada as an additional source of sacrificial animals. The Canadian Federal Government obliged and 500 lambs were shipped to their inhumane deaths. This method of ritual killing has been increasingly criticized due to animal welfare concerns. The animals slaughtered are primarily goats and sheep who are killed by having their throats cut while fully conscious. New Zealand has already banned the live export of animals for slaughter, and Australia appears to be well on its way to doing the same.

The BC SPCA’s position statement for humane killing includes “In reference to slaughter of farm animals, it is imperative for animals to be rendered unconscious and insensible to pain prior to slaughter, notwithstanding religious or ethnic custom.” They further state that scientific evidence indicates there are greater risks of suffering of animals during ritual slaughter conducted without prior stunning than for conventional slaughter; this suffering is due to increased restraint, pain experienced during throat cutting, and pain and stress experienced by the conscious animal during subsequent bleeding out. 

Even a draft document of the Canadian Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Sheep (2013) states that the acceptable methods of euthanasia for sheep are gunshot, penetrating captive bolt, non-penetrating captive bolt guns, IV barbiturate overdoes, and blunt force trauma. Being slaughtered alive by using a knife to their throats is not stated as an acceptable procedure.

Please Sign this petition and tell the Canadian Government that Canadian sheep should not be exported for purposes of religious ritual.

Further readings:

http://www.mfablog.ca/2013/12/canadian-lambs-to-slaughter-killings-too-cruel-for-australia-but-a-ok-for-canada.html

http://www.spca.bc.ca/assets/documents/welfare/position-statements/humane-killing.pdf

http://app.mccy.gov.sg/Newsroom/PQonPlansforKorbanLivestockSupply.aspx

http://www.meskorban.com.sg/singapore/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JKMS-Media-Statement-Korban-2013.pdf

http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapore/canadian-lambs-sold-out-korban-21-mosques-hold-ritual-mark-hari-raya-haji

http://www.stasiareport.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/canadian-lambs-sold-out-korban-21-mosques-hold-ritual-mark-hari-raya-h#sthash.0mw4czWJ.dpuf

 

Canada: Canada Transport truck outside Toronto slaughterhouse Jan 8′ 2014 animals frozen to sides & floor.

Canada

Transport truck outside Toronto slaughterhouse Jan 8′ 2014 animals frozen to sides & floor.

Link:  http://twitpic.com/drnch1

SAV Comment – you would think that knowing the current extreme weather conditions in Canada and the US, drivers, managers and authorities involved with live animal transport would at least have some little amount of brains between them to stop this kind of transport in such conditions ! – obviously not – brain dead people.

 Slaughter animals freeze in truck

Indonesia: Lion/Lioness Hanging – A Killer in the Surabaya Zoo – Petition to sign.

Indonesia

hung lionPhoto – cee4life

PETITION

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/460/875/313/surabaya-zoo-animal-welfare-action-cee4life/

http://cee4life.org/press+release.php?ac=post&id=11&p=1

Lion/Lioness Hanging – A Killer in the Surabaya Zoo

On Monday 6th January 2014, a Lion/Lioness of Surabaya Zoo was found hanging from a snare inside of her cage.

The lion/lioness had lived in a dark dungeon like cage for a number of years and had displayed numerous signs of having deteriorated in a mental capacity.  It is thought that this deterioration was caused by her barren and desolate environment which consisted of a cement cell.

From first report, it is likely that someone from within or connected to the Surabaya Zoo has slung the hanging noose inside the cage then awaited for the lion/lioness to be near enough to tighten the noose around its neck and pull it up, eventually hanging the creature.

Director of Cee4life, Sybelle Foxcroft, said “This is a shocking development.  To resort to the killing of this Lioness/Lion by hanging, is something that is not only deplorable but a heavy insight into the characters in or involved or have obvious access to the Surabaya Zoo.”

Foxcroft continued, ” I am so shocked that I have barely any words for this heinous crime. I support the Indonesian authorities in finding those responsible and urge that the Indonesia authorities allow Cee4life and other organisations into Surabaya Zoo to help immediately with aid to the other animals and education and training to the staff.”

Cee4life urges the Mayor of Surabaya and the Director of Surabaya Zoo to immediately act on this crime, apprehend those responsible and prosecute them for the murder of a protected animal.

The death of this lioness/lion has sent shockwaves throughout conservation and animal loving community.  This brutal act is highly condemned worldwide and once again the Mayor of Surabaya is urged to act and allow animal welfare, veterinarians and animal skilled specialists and professionals into the Surabaya Zoo to bring immediate aid to these suffering creatures.

We understand that some people believe and/or think of animals as lower life form, resulting in horrific abuse on animals in both captivity and in the wild.  Over the years, via science and intense studies in animal welfare and behavior, it is well known and documented that animals in captivity have specific needs, have emotions and display specific behaviors when lacking any of their needs, they feel pain etc.  Education is vtial ingredient in preventing the human abuse towards animals type of thought process. 

With the huge amount of media on the Surabaya Zoo exposing this abuse, along with the enormous amount of aid offered to Surabaya Zoo from conservation, animal welfare and zoological organisations, and now with the obvious deliberate killing of the lioness of Surabaya Zoo, again, we urge the Indonesian Authorities, the Mayor of Surabaya, the Director of Surabaya Zoo to allow conservation, animal welfare and zoological organisations into Surabaya Zoo to aid these animals and provide education to the staff.

The hanging death of this long suffering Lioness/Lion is unacceptable in any form.

Cee4life has a current petition which will be handed into the Mayor of Surabaya in the early part of 2014. Please take a moment to sign this petition – 

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/460/875/313/surabaya-zoo-animal-welfare-action-cee4life/

For further information, please contact Public Officer, Donna Reynolds, donna@cee4life.org

 

England (UK): Badger cull cost £4,100 per badger, claim campaigners.

England

From: North West Hunt Saboteurs Association
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14:36:29 +0000
To: <undisclosed-recipients:;>
Subject: Badger cull cost £4,100 per badger, claim campaigners

By Western Daily Press  |  Posted: January 05, 2014

The cost of the badger cull pilots in Somerset and Gloucestershire has been put at £4,100 per badger shot, campaigners claim – and put the cost of a four-year trial at £19 million.

Animal charity Care for the Wild almost doubled its previous estimate, made in October, of £2,200 per animal, and now puts the total cost of the cull trials, which began in August at £7.3 million.

Taxpayers will pick up £5.8 million of that, with farmers paying directly to cover the direct costs of shooting the 1,771 badgers.

badgers animal aid.org.uk

badgers this is somerset.co.uk

The figures increased after the culls were extended, with both coming to an end last month – the Gloucestershire cull being abandoned due to a failure to achieve its targets.

Charity spokesman Dominic Dyer called it “one of the most disastrous and expensive wildlife culls in history”.

He added: “This is being done to the sound of scientists almost universally saying that culling won’t have any significant impact on TB.”

Derived from answers to parliamentary questions, statistics from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and Freedom of Information requests, the figures out the cost to farmers who paid for the culling itself at £1.49 million. The policing bill was put at £2.66 million, made up of costs for manpower, transport, equipment and accommodation.

A further £3.17 million was attributed to costs at environment quango Natural England, the Food and Environment Research Agency and Defra, and included trapping, monitoring and data collection.

A spokesman for the NFU said: “If marksmen had been allowed to go about their lawful business, there wouldn’t have been any policing costs.”

The annual cost of bovine TB to the taxpayer has been repeatedly put at £100 by the NFU and Defra. A large chunk of this is compensation paid to farmers who had TB-infected cattle slaughtered. This reached £34 million in 2012-13, up from £30 million the year before that. The costs go further, however, with the plummeting value of cows under restriction and the huge mental strain on farmers who see swathes of their herd lost. Some of the costs to Defra are regained through the onward sale of infected carcasses.

A report from the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee last year put the cost of an injectable badger vaccine at £2,000-£4,000 per sq km, with the vaccine itself expected to cost £5-6 per dose and the DIVA test (which differentiates between infected and vaccinated cattle) costing £25, in addition to existing testing costs.

http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Badger-cull-cost-4-100-badger-claim-campaigners/story-20402185-detail/story.html

North West Hunt Saboteurs Association

07960 038230
www.nwhsa.org.uk
info@nwhsa.org.uk
Blog – http://nwhsa.wordpress.com

Direct Action Against All Forms of bloodsports

Subject: OPINION: £7.3m badger cull is most disastrous, expensive wildlife cull on record

By Western Morning News  |  Posted: January 05, 2014

By Dominic Dyer, Care for the Wild International

In between taking calls from senior editors of national newspapers asking me if I could confirm reports that Environment Minister Owen Paterson was on a skiing holiday in France, leaving David Cameron to face the anger of flood victims, I spend some of my Christmas break getting to grips with the outcome of the badger cull pilots.

Using a number of key sources including freedom of information requests, answers to parliamentary questions and leaked documents from Defra and Natural England, I put together a picture of a badger cull that went wrong from day one and has proved a complete disaster.

To start with the free shooting of badgers at night by National Farmer Union-employed pest controllers has proved a complete and utter failure.

Despite claims by the Environment Minister that this method would deliver a quick and efficient way of killing badgers, within 10 days of the culls commencing only 90 badgers had been killed in both cull zones by free shooting.

This resulted in panic in Defra and a major deployment of Government-employed traps teams with heat seeking equipment to increase the kill rates.

At the end of the initial six weeks for each of the pilot culls, no more than 25% of the badgers killed were as a result of free shooting.

It also quickly became apparent that four monitors in two cull zones the size of the Isle of Wight was completely inadequate to gauge the humanness of the shooting operations.

As the culls progressed, wounded badgers were picked up outside of the cull zones, badgers were left overnight in cages in freezing muddy damp conditions, cages were not cleaned down between kills and the shooters found they had the wrong type of ammunition, to kill badgers at point blank range in a caged environment.

The aim of the pilot culls was to kill 70% of the badger population in each of the zones, however at the end of the six weeks trial, only 19% of this target had been achieved in Gloucestershire and 20% in Somerset.

Rather than accepting defeat, Mr Paterson played for time and faced public ridicule with the claim “the badgers had moved the goal posts”.

He then announced a shock 66% drop in the estimated badger population, which he blamed on bad weather and disease, although most experts in the field believe the sabotage of hair traps by anti-cull activists and the illegal killing of badgers by farmers and landowners was a more likely factor for the huge decline.

Despite serious concerns from Natural England’s chief scientific advisor and a number of its board members, the decision was taken extend both cull pilots.

However, the NFU contractors and government trap teams could still only reach 65% of their kill targets in Somerset after nine weeks and 39% in Gloucestershire after 11 weeks.

Also by going beyond the six week trial period, it is widely accepting by leading scientists and badger behaviourists that the trials have significantly increased the disruption to badger colonies and the risk of perturbation and TB spread.

Then we come to the staggering costs of the badgers culls which Mr Paterson has done all he can to hide from MPs and the public.

If we take account of policing costs, Government trap teams and equipment, Whitehall staff costs in Defra, Natural England and Food and Environment Research Agency and badger sett monitoring and data collection, it is estimated that the total costs of both cull pilots is around £7.3 million.

If we divide this figure by the total number of badgers killed (1,771) we are looking at a cost per badger of £4,121.

If the culls are to be extended as Mr Paterson plans for a further 3 years we can add a further £12 million to the costs giving a total figure of £19.3 million for four years of badger culling in West Somerset and West Gloucestershire.

This figure is all the more worrying, when you consider based on DEFRA estimates that even if the cull pilots were 100% successful and reduced the increase in the spread of bovine TB by 16% over nine years, this would only deliver a knock on benefit of £2.5 million to the tax payer.

So based on current projections the costs of the badger culls in Somerset and Gloucestershire outweigh the benefits by over seven times.

Taking this into account, it comes as no surprise to see Owen Paterson become as elusive as Lord Lucan since the end of the badger cull pilots, leaving his inexperienced junior Farming Minister George Eustice to take the heat in the media and Parliament, for what is increasingly seen as a disastrous policy.

Defra officials are now playing down any talk of roll out to 10 more zones in 2014 and the director general of the NFU has recently stated that even a limited extension of the culls into Devon and Cornwall in 2014, would be a bad move.

Pressure is now building for a full debate in Westminster and a further vote on any extension of the badger cull pilots.

Talks of secret reports and efforts to influence the Independent Humanness Panel behind closed doors, has also further weakened Owen Paterson’s position and credibility.

Many Tory and Liberal Democrat MPs are now becoming increasingly concerned about the growing public anger the cull has generated as thousands of protesters take to the streets of cities and towns across the UK from Manchester to Leeds and Brighton and Bristol in what is now called the “Badger Army”, which is one of the fastest growing wildlife protection campaigns in Europe.

At a time when families are seeing the biggest squeeze on incomes in over 40 years with many having to make decisions about heating or eating, this Government has delivered one of the most disastrous and expensive wildlife culls on record.

In 2014 David Cameron should listen to scientific and public opinion and stop the disastrous badger cull policy for good.

The Government must now focus on bringing farmers, landowners and wildlife protection groups together to find a long term solution to reducing bovine TB.

This new approach should be good for both farmers and wildlife and be based on tighter cattle movement controls, improved TB testing and TB vaccination for both badgers and cattle.

– Dominic Dyer is policy advisor with Care for the Wild International

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/OPINION-7-5m-badger-cull-disastrous-expensive/story-20400673-detail/story.html


North West Hunt Saboteurs Association

07960 038230
www.nwhsa.org.uk
info@nwhsa.org.uk
Blog – http://nwhsa.wordpress.com

Direct Action Against All Forms of bloodsports

Owen-Paterson_2077475b

Above  – Lord Lucan or ? – No, its Owen Paterson and the other leading plonker, David Cameron.

Paterson is as good with badger culls as he is with live animal exports – UTTERLY USELESS

cameron hitler

Badger goirls

Brian May Badgers

Above – Brilliant Campaigner – Brian May

save me 2save me header