USA: Help Protect the Wolves of the United States – Before Man the Almighty Does the Wrong Thing Yet Again and Destroys Them All.

USA1

wolves7

???????????????????????????????

I am in favor of animal rights as well as for human rights. That is the way of the whole human being.
— Abraham Lincoln

I care not much for a man’s religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it.
— Abraham Lincoln

(Please take the two actions that appear in this email. Reading this email without TAKING ACTION accomplishes nothing for wolves.)

Demonizing, persecuting and slaughtering wolves is not acceptable any more. This sick and criminal behavior has nothing to do with science but is rooted in hatred, brutality, cruelty, selfishness, a dysfunctional culture and an evil tradition. But such evil traditions can and do change and we are going to throw this sick tradition on the trash heap of history where it belongs. The people of Michigan have begun the process of doing exactly that! And an accomplished wolf biologist in Montana has stepped forward for wolves in his state!

PROTECTING WOLVES IN MICHIGAN: POWER TO THE PEOPLE, THE HUMANE MAJORITY!!!
The state of Michigan has under 700 wolves and a fifty year tradition of protecting wolves. But Governor Rick Snyder, state legislators and the state’s corrupt wildlife MIS-management bureaucrats were more than ready to throw it all  away to serve a bizarre minority of sport killers, selfish hunters, sadistic trappers and other strange humans who get off on killing innocent animals. Just as in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Minnesota and Wisconsin, an immoral, undemocratic and corrupt state political system was poised to give the finger to the humane majority and serve a bunch of animal abusers and twisted killers.  

Not this time!! Michigan has a ballot initiative process that allows all citizens to vote and decide such important issues at the ballot box, for themselves. This democratic ballot initiative process places the power in the hands of the people and takes it out of the hands of corrupt governors, corrupt legislators and corrupt wildlife bureaucrats.

A coalition of over 2,000 Michigan residents volunteered for Keep Michigan Wolves Protected, a fantastic coalition of animal welfare groups, Native Americans, veterinarians, conservationists and faith based leaders. In just 67 days, often in sub-freezing temperatures, they gathered 253,705 signatures to place this measure on the ballot in November 2014.  After the signatures are certified (161.305 valid signatures are required), it is the people of Michigan who will decide whether to protect the wolves there, not the animal abusers, not the anti-wolf killers, not the governor or legislators, not the corrupt state wildlife bureaucrats, not the NRA, not the energy companies. The people of Michigan will decide.

???????????????????????????????

TAKE ACTION FOR WOLVES IN MICHIGAN:

Please support this wonderful endeavor at: http://www.KeepWolvesProtected.com
_______________________________________________

PROTECTING WOLVES IN MONTANA: A NEW AND POWERFUL EFFORT
There is a new and wonderful initiative to protect wolves now under attack in Montana, led by Montana-based wolf biologist Jay Mallonee. Jay recently wrote: “For over twenty years I have researched and taught about wolves. Having had the longest running behavioural study of these animals in Montana’s history, outside of Yellowstone National Park, my interaction with wolf management agencies has been extensive. I have found that managers have an appalling lack of knowledge about these animals, along with a disregard for science.”

Unlike the very strange wolf biologist David Mech, who has used his credentials in an immoral and perverted way, to enable the persecution and massacre of America’s vital and innocent wolves by those who demonize and hate them, Jay Mallonee and other accomplished, honest and ethical wolf biologists are coming to the defense of America’s wolves with knowledge, science, respect and decency. Please support his efforts!   

 ???????????????????????????????

TAKE ACTION FOR WOLVES IN MONTANA:

Sign and share wolf biologist Jay Mallonee’s petition at: 
http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-the-unjustified-killing-and-hunting-of-montana-s-wolves-use-science 
(When you click on this link, please take the time to read what Jay has to share. He has studied wolves in the wild for decades and knows these beautiful and innocent beings very well.  Knowledge is power.)
________________________________________________

Thank you for America’s ecologically vital, innocent and beautiful wolves,
Robert Goldman
Protect America’s Wolves! petition and action campaign
http://signon.org/sign/protect-americas-wolves?mailing_id=10862&source=s.icn.em.cr&r_by=4977271

P.S. We are approaching 20,000 signers from around the US and the world.

Please share this entire Action E Mail with everyone you know who cares, so they can help fight for wolves, too.

???????????????????????????????

Rabies: Why China Needs To Become A 21 Century Nation – And Dog Killing In Nepal – Disturbing Video – Please Take Action.

china

If a person can contract rabies from butchering animals that are infected with the rabies virus or have already died from it, a person can also contract rabies from beating a rabid dog to death  (as in the recent Nepal footage), as blood, saliva and/or brain tissue inevitably goes flying around in the process. This is one very good reason to discourage the public from the all too common practice of beating suspected rabid animals to death.

 A Side of Rabies With Your Dog Meat in China

People in China and other Asian countries are dying of rabies. But
it’s not because dogs are biting them — it’s because they are biting
dogs, eating 18-80 million a year just in China.

“Rabies is a major problem in China. The country’s Ministry of Health
says it has the 2nd highest rate in the world after India.” And it’s
getting worse. Human rabies cases appear to be on the rise in China
based on the most recent numbers available. “In 2007, there were 3302
confirmed human rabies cases in China, nearly 21 times the number
found from the entire period between 1990 and 1996.”

It’s not just eating the meat that causes rabies. Slaughtering,
processing and cooking it may be even more dangerous.
After a rabies
outbreak led to human fatalities in Viet Nam, government officials
“reported that 70 percent of deaths were from dog bites but up to 30
percent were thought to be linked to exposure during slaughter or
butchery.”

“In a 17 Mar [2009 — see comment below] study from Hanoi published by
the PLoS Medicine journal, researchers pointed to 2 cases of human
rabies in Viet Nam where the patients were believed infected while
butchering a rabid animal — in one case a dog, the other a cat.”

“In the 1st patient’s case, he had prepared and eaten a dog that had
been killed in a road traffic accident; rabid dogs were known to
inhabit the neighbourhood. The 2nd patient had butchered and eaten a
cat that had been sick for a number of days.” Other people who ate the
same meat did not fall ill.

According to the Welcome Trust rabies is a very serious — and in
nearly all cases fatal — disease. It is estimated to kill over 30 000
people each year in Asia, and the number of cases in China and Viet
Nam is increasing. Symptoms include agitation, severe spasms, fever,
fear of water and inability to drink liquids, and eventually death.
There is a vaccine for rabies and even a treatment that can [very
rarely] cure the disease after infection, but it must be administered
very quickly after the patient contracts rabies. “Once a person shows
symptoms, the disease is almost invariably fatal.”

[Byline: Piper Hoffman]
Communicated by: ProMED-mail <promed@promedmail.org>

This report cites figures in support of an assertion that rabies
virus infection is increasing in China and wishes to correlate this
with increasing consumption of dog meat in China. In support of this
contention the article cites 2 cases [which actually occurred in 2009
– Mod.CP] in Viet Nam where rabies was contracted by an individual
slaughtering an accident-injured dog [see: Rabies, via dog/cat
butchering – Viet Nam archive number 20090318.1092], and another
slaughtering a cat.

Eating dog meat is common in many Asian countries, but research
conducted as part of the South East Asia Infectious Diseases Clinical
Research Network identified a potentially lethal risk associated with
preparing dog meat. In research published on 18 Mar 2009 in the open
access journal PLoS Medicine, Heiman Wertheim and colleagues from the
National Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases and the
National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology in Hanoi, Viet Nam,
report on 2 patients admitted to hospital showing signs of rabies
infection. Neither patient was thought to have been bitten by a rabid
animal in the preceding months see: Wertheim H, et al: Furious Rabies
after an Atypical Exposure. PLoS Medicine. 17 Mar 2009 [available at
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000044].
It is clearly probable that rabies virus can be transmitted during the
course of slaughtering and butchering dogs and cats, if the person
involved has exposed abrasions or wounds
. However, rabies virus cannot
be transmitted through consumption of cooked meat since rabies virus
(and related rhabdoviruses) are heat sensitive and rapidly lose
infectivity at normal environmental temperature and humidity.

Vaccination and dog licensing are mechanism for controlling rabies
virus infection, not banning consumption of dog meat. – Mod.CP

NEPA0001

doggunhead

PETITION TO SIGN HERE:

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stop-cruel-dog-killings-in-nepal.html

(NP) Swift action by animal protectors in Nepal in the wake of botched stray killing

Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:35 am (PDT) .

Posted by: “Lisa Warden” foghorndoghorn

Animal protectors in Nepal were quick to respond when police in Kathmandu engaged in a botched killing of a street dog in the city last month. The killing was filmed and uploaded to youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkUNXTlcVJs).

The footage shows a dog hiding in a drain at the side of the road. The dog is shot and injured by a police officer. The dog then runs out of the drain, and one of the officers eventually manages to club it to death.

The issue was brought to the attention of Animal Welfare Network Nepal (AWNN), a coalition of animal welfare groups and concerned individuals working in the country.

Shristi Singh Bhandari, Communication Director at Animal Nepal submitted the following update to AWNN on March 6, 2103  (certain names have been redacted):

<<Dear all,

I am sending you my follow up on the recent shooting of the stray dog in kathmandu:

1. After receiving the video, I went to talk to the local people who had witnessed the killing about the issue. They told me that the dog had bitten several people and they were scared to walk by the street. SO they called the local police to attend to the matter. The police told them to tie the dog up to observe if he had was rabid, The locals obviously did not agree to do so. They again called the police to take care of the situation, so they came and you know the rest.

2. I went to talk to the nearby police station where they had reported the dog. The officer who was at the station told me that the police officers had been dispatched by the Kamalpokhari police station and not from the local section.

3. I went to talk to Inspector Kunwar from Kamalpokhari branch about the matter. He was very supportive and said that they indeed had make a mistake but the main order had been handed out by xxxx of Hanuman Dhoka district police station. The inspector proposed to work together in future that still needs to be discussed.

4. Then I went to Hanuman Dhoka t o talk to xxxx who was super rude and non cooperative. He said it was an emergency situation and he did what he had to do and that he does not have time to look for animal welfare groups and that he will not dispatch any letters regarding what happened and that we were more than welcome to stage a protest.

5. SO I got in touch with Rana bahadur Chand who is the head of Hanuman Dhoka and told him about the situation. He said he was shocked to find out how xxxx had behaved and that he himself had not seen the video. He said he will be more than glad to release the circular stating an order to contact animal welfare groups to handle such cases in future and a letter to AWNN stating the case. So he has asked to draft a letter for them so that they can sign and send it to everyone necessary. I on the other hand told him that in case he does that we will send a press release thanking him for his cooperation. So we are drafting a letter and will send him that by 2 today and hope to get it back by tomorrow morning.He has called us to work with the police in such matter. Once the strike is over I will be going to meet him with our brochures and information.>>

A letter was drafted to send to the police that they would then issue as an apology for their actions, plus a circular for the police to issue to their officers regarding future handling of suspected rabies cases. AWNN was subsequently invited to attend a still-to-occur gathering of police to sensitize  them about animal welfare issues.

Kudos to the animal protection community in Nepal for swift and effective action.

Lisa Warden

REPLY

Re: (NP) Swift action by animal protectors in Nepal in the wake of botched stray killing

Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:49 am (PDT)

Posted by:  “Lucia Animal Nepal” animalnepal

Thanks Lisa.

Today our team met Kathmandu Police Chief Rana Bahadur Chand, to hand over our petition with 4000 signatures (see http://animalnepal.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/take-action-against-brutal-dog-killing-by-nepal-police/).

He informed us that he has send out a circular to all police offices to not kill dogs but instead inform animal welfare agencies when dealing with an agressive dog.   Chand promised to send a letter of apology to the Animal Welfare Network Nepal.

The chief said he loves animals and that he and a number of colleagues oppose animal sacrifice.

We have also been asked to educate police officers about animal welfare.

This is an encouraging development but much work remains to be done. Poisoning is still the preferred method to ‘limit’ stray dog populations by virtually all municipalities in Nepal. AWNN in August organised a seminar on humane dog management, during which a number of local government promised to stop the poisoning, see
http://animalnepal.wordpress.com/2012/11/14/national_seminar_on_dog_population_management_nepal/

We request international campaigners to continue to be involved in the Nepal situation. With no animal welfare legislation in place, and hardly any humane dog management taking place outside Kathmandu Valley, Nepal really needs encouragement in this area.

Thanks,
Lucia

****************************************

 FROM Animal Nepal website:

Take action against brutal dog killing by Nepal Police

Kathmandu, March 1, 2013 – Animal Nepal today expressed its shock at the brutal killing of a dog by the Nepal police in Baluwatar, Kathmandu. The dog, which reportedly bit two people, was killed brutally with the help of a gun and bamboo sticks, in full view of the public. The killing was recorded by video and uploaded on youtube. 

Animal Nepal today handed over letters to the Inspector of Police, the Chief District Officer and the Kathmandu Municipality, requesting the authorities to take immediate action.

According to Animal Nepal, “the images of ‘man’s best friend’ dying such an agonizing death are heart rendering and deeply traumatizing for children and other members of the public.”

Despite the fact that humane solutions like Animal Birth Control/Anti Rabies have been introduced in Nepal a decade ago, authorities continue to kill dogs inhumanely using strychnine poison, guns or sticks. The incident shows that Nepal badly needs an Animal Welfare Act, to provide protection for canines and other animals.

The campaigners invite all concerned citizens to sign this petition, as well as send emails to the municipality through this link, and to the Nepal police at  info@nepalpolice.gov.np. The CDO can be reached by fax at 009 771 4267619.

Spain: Please Sign The ‘Galgos’ (Hunting Dog) Petition Below.

SPAN0001

galgos1

Bitte Petition unterschreiben und weiterleiten

PLEASE READ, THEN SIGN AND SHARE THE PETITION BELOW.…..

http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Stop_the_barbaric_and_cruel_treatment_of_Spanish_hunting_dogs/

100,000 + galgos abandoned at the end of hunting every year – work it out for yourself!…….

People say the figure of 50,000 galgos abandoned every year is exaggerated – usually i…t’s the hunters who say so, of course, as they don’t want the bad press.

Vera of Galgos en Familia, Malaga province in southern Andalucia says, ‘Co-inciding with the end of the hunting season at this time of year, more than 5.000 galgos are abandoned by hunters in our province.
It is estimated that 1,500 galgos are collected each year from the streets of Malaga province and the majority of these from the valley of Antequera, where they are used as tools to capture hares, a hunting activity that is banned in other european countries but is still very much allowed here in Spain.

The galgos, classed as useless and not worthy by the hunters are punished beaten and abused for not doing what is expected of them before being left to their fate on streets, motorways and countryside of Malaga.’  Vera saves many galgos and podencos from Malaga perrera, El Paraiso.

So, 5,000 just from one province in the region of Andalucia. This link, lists the 50 provinces in Spain, including the Canary Islands. Most of the names you will recognise as suffering from abandonment of galgos and podencos.   So, even reducing the number down to, say 30 – that still qives a figure of 150,000 abandoned at the end of hunting every year!
# Galgo news.
www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Stop_the_barbaric_and_cruel_treatment_of_Spanish_hunting_dogs/

galgos2

 

 

 

New Zealand: Way Behind Other Nations – Plans To Undertake Legal High Drug Testing On Animals – Petition and Letter – Please Sign.

NZ

NZ Testing

Petition Link

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/the-new-zealand-house-of-representatives-hon-peter-dunne-leave-animals-out-of-legal-high-testing

Petitioning The New Zealand House of Representatives; Hon Peter Dunne

The New Zealand House of Representatives; Hon Peter Dunne : Leave Animals Out of Legal High Testing

LEAVE ANIMALS OUT OF LEGAL HIGH TESTING

The New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society (NZAVS) has joined forces with SAFE and the New Zealand SPCA to prevent the testing of psychoactive drugs (“party pills” or “legal highs”) on animals.

These tests would involve suffering and cruelty to both large and small animals (rats and dogs) leading to pain, distress and death. Using animals as the subject of tests for recreational drugs is unethical and unnecessary.

NZAVS, SAFE and the SPCA want the New Zealand Parliament to include a clause specifically prohibiting animal testing in any proposed legislation aimed at the regulation of these substances.

***********************

If you’re in New Zealand email NZAVS at nzavs@nzavs.org.nz for paper petition signature sheets and get your friends, family, workmates and acquaintances to sign them. You can add your signature to both the paper and online petition.

What is the Government planning?

A Bill is being introduced to regulate the sale of low risk psychoactive drugs (“party pills” or “legal highs”) for recreational use. This will require safety testing. The final stage of the testing will require human trials. Some indication of the risk to people needs to be known before that stage. The main proposal the Ministry of Health (MoH) is considering requires four rounds of fatal animal tests to be carried out on both large and small animals (usually rats and dogs). For these tests the animals will be exposed to large doses of the drugs until adverse effects are found (acute toxicity); repeated long term exposure before being killed to allow internal examination; carcinogenicity and toxicokinetic tests (long term fatal tests that look at the drugs’ passage through the body).

Why oppose animal testing of recreational drugs?

Using animals as the subject of tests for recreational drugs is immoral and unethical; and not only that, it is also unnecessary. The UK has banned all use of animals for the toxicology testing of the recreational drugs tobacco and alcohol since the 1990s, Canada requires three toxicology tests for all tobacco products, none of which use animals.

Investigating the potential harm of these drugs does not require the use of animals. The very idea that animals could be used in this way and killed to facilitate the sale of recreational drugs is something to which the majority of New Zealanders are opposed. By signing the petition you can add your voice to this opposition.

What are the other options?

There are many types of tests available that serve the required purpose that do not use animals. Tests using cell cultures, bacteria and advanced computer modelling can provide all the information, and more, that animal tests do. For example, there are long established carcinogenicity tests that are in common use as they give better results than animal tests. There are non-animal tests that have been approved for use by many regulatory bodies internationally, including in both Europe and the US1, that can be used for all four types of tests the MoH is considering.

What else can I do to stop this happening?

Make a submission to the Select Committee considering the Bill. NZAVS is providing information on how to do this to anyone that is interested. For an info pack send your address by email to nzavs@nzavs.org.nz and one will be posted.

You can also email NZAVS for petition signature sheets and get your friends, family, workmates and acquaintances to sign them.

Peter Dunne is the Minister responsible for the legislation; you can let him know what you think about this issue by contacting him via email: peter.dunne@parliament.govt.nz or by post with no stamp required: Hon Peter Dunne / Parliament Office / Private Bag 18 888 / Wellington 6160.

To:
The New Zealand House of Representatives; Hon Peter Dunne

PETITION TO STOP ANIMAL TESTING OF PARTY PILLS

To the House of Representatives

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that the New Zealand Parliament includes a clause specifically prohibiting animal testing in any proposed legislation aimed at the regulation of Psychoactive Substances
(“party pills” or “legal highs”).

Sincerely,
[Your name]

China (Again): Plans To Destroy Cambodian Rainforest By Flooding – Please Take Action (see below).

cambodia

china

Cam forest 1

RAINFOREST ACTION ALERT              PLEASE SEND, SHARE, LIKE, FORWARD!

Massive Chinese Dam Threatens Cambodia’s Cardamom Rainforests

By Rainforest Portal a project of Ecological Internet: http://www.rainforestportal.org/ with John Seed, Rainforest Information Centre: http://www.rainforestinfo.org.au/

March 14, 2013

TAKE ACTION to ensure Cambodia’s Cardamom rainforests remain standing:

  http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/alerts/sendsm.aspx?id=cambodia_dam

The Areng Valley in the Cardamom Mountains of south-west Cambodia is threatened with flooding by a Chinese hydropower dam. This biodiversity gem – home of the Siamese crocodile and indigenous Khmer Daeum – is to be destroyed for a relatively small amount of electricity. Standing large, connected, and ecologically intact old-growth forests are required for local and global ecological sustainability and well-being.

Please send the following alerts to protect old-growth rainforests as well:

Tell Avon, New Jersey: Old-Growth Rainforest Boardwalks Cause Abrupt Climate Change
http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/alerts/sendsm.aspx?id=rainforest_boardwalk

Protest Tasmanian Old-Growth Logging in Proposed World Heritage Area
http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/alerts/sendsm.aspx?id=tasmania_forests

Ecuador Tribe Will “Die Fighting” to Defend Rainforest #IdleNoMore
http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/alerts/sendsm.aspx?id=ecuador_oil


Please support Ecological Internet’s campaigns to protect and restore old
forests at http://www.rainforestportal.org/shared/donate/
cam forest 2

Romania: Whats New About Romanian Politicians ? – Bent and Corrupt Mayor (Emil Boc) Refuses To Take Action Against Animal Abusers – Typical !

RMNA0001

lily 2

Corrupt and bent Mayor of Cluj – Emil (Bent) Boc

PETITION HERE:

https://www.change.org/petitions/emil-boc-mayor-of-cluj-romania-and-his-police-department-to-investigate-and-bring-justice-to-the-horrific-abusers-of-two-small-dogs

Emil Boc, Mayor of Cluj ,Romania and his Police Department: To investigate and bring justice to the horrific abusers of two small dogs

lily 1

lily 6

INFO AND OTHER ACTION TO BE TAKEN HERE:

http://afrasos.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/demand-justice-for-lily-dog-beaten-and.html

1) Sign the petition by Clicking Here and remember to leave a reason why you have signed as this does get sent to the mayor and other targets we have included

2) Contact Emil Boc by email  and leave a message on his Facebook demanding that he orders the investigation to go ahead by his police department and do all they can to capture and prosecute the abusers.

lily 2

Corrupt and bent Mayor of Cluj – Emil (Bent) Boc

  • Remember, keep your correspondence polite but stern. (You catch more flies with honey than you do salt)
  • Remind him of his mayoral obligations to uphold the law as the leader of City Hall.
  • Remind him of the recent scandal of Horsemeat in the UK and his own president claimed that Romania does take care of its animals

3) Notify your own European Parliamentary member of this petition ( Find there contact details by clicking here )and tell them why you have signed expressing your views on this matter, Remember to be polite but clear in your correspondence. request they contact the mayor as your representative within the EU
lily 3

SHARE AND CROSS POST THIS PAGE TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW…FOR ONCE LETS SEE SOME JUSTICE DONE FOR A VICTIM OF ANIMAL CRUELTY IN ROMANIA

Demand Justice for Lily, a dog beaten and stabbed, impregnated with diesel fuel and left for dead. Then authorities allow abusers to go free

lily 4

This is about a small dog called Lily and her brother. Two small stray dogs just trying to survive in the cruel region of Cluj Romania. Here as with the majority of Romania, dogs are seen as vermin to treat as you want, to do what you want, abuse maim and torture as you want. Abusers of the animals know full well that regardless that there are laws in place to protect domestic and stray animals, they can do whatever they want.

Because the corruption and greed of the regional government and national government will protect them.

lily 5

lily 2

Corrupt and bent Mayor of Cluj – Emil (Bent) Boc

They know that Cluj’s own mayor Emil Boc and his police department care not for the law nor the animals that are meant to be protected by these same laws. After all, dog killing is a profitable business in Romania and every human along the way makes a nice tidy profit from the brutality and inevitable painful death of each of its victims.

So what does it matter to Emil Boc and his merry men if two small dogs have been brutally beaten? Lilys brother having died from his injuries, both of them have had one of their eyes gauged out with sticks and defenceless small Lily was held down and forcibly impregnated with diesel?

Clues to Lily and her brother’s abusers lay everywhere, the pole that was used to beat and impregnate Lily, the sticks used to brutality beat both dogs time and time again, over and over. There is no doubt fingerprints will be found on these weapons, the scene itself will without doubt have traces of the abusers DNA.

lily 7

The fact is the Mayor and his police department they can not be bothered with what they would deem a waste of resources and time. Some people out there may think the same, one vile incident, sometimes these things happen. You would be mistaken, you see in Cluj, as with all regions of Romania this type of crime happens to the strays every single day and time and time again Emil Boc as do all the other city hall officials and police departments in Romania choose to ignore it.

We refuse to let Lily’s torturers and abusers be let off so lightly. We refuse to allow her brother’s horrific death to be in vain. There lives were NOT worthless, and they deserve justice.

The evidence is there to catch the abusers if the police department so wished, and even if they did not wish to pursue this case the mayor has it within his powers to order them to investigate and bring the abusers to justice.

Join with us today to demand The police department of Cluj and the mayor and city hall, once and for all actually stand by Romanian law and do all they can to investigate, catch and charge the abusers. For once, not to make mockery of the Romanian legal system, for once……To give worth to the lives of two small dogs and for one who is still battling for her life.

lily 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UK (England): The Live Animal Export Battle Continues.

uk

Vita KAALE Logo 9 9 2011

Kent Action Against Live Exports (KAALE) – http://www.kaale.org.uk

Lesley last 1

Petition Link – Please sign.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/740/060/667/better-identification-for-box-type-livestock-carrying-vehicles-throughout-the-eu/

Not all animals being transported by road across the EU go in ‘conventional’ livestock trailers which have exterior air vents fitted to each tier, providing air to the animals. Some trailers are completely sealed as shown in the photograph (this truck has several hundred sheep in its trailer) giving most outside observers the conception that anything other than live animals are being carried within it. We feel that this should be made much more evident to outside observers and especially emergency services should an accident occur.

Lesley last 2

 Lesley last 5

RSPCA seeks hearing over live exports ruling

Wednesday 13 February 2013

The RSPCA is to seek an oral hearing in the High Court to determine whether it can take its live animal exports judicial review application to a full hearing.

The animal welfare charity applied in December to seek a judicial review of the arrangements operated by Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) for the approval and supervision of live animal exports through the port of Ramsgate.

But permission to bring the case to a judicial review was refused last week by Mr Justice Males following a consideration of the court papers.

Currently, live animals are transported over to Calais on an open-decked, flat-bottomed converted Russian tank transporter, the MV Joline.

The Joline - photo 2

But the RSPCA claims the AHVLA is acting unlawfully in failing to require the exporters to use ports with appropriate facilities and also in failing to impose sailing restrictions on the MV Joline to ensure that animals are not injured or caused undue harm while being transported by sea.

A lack of facilities at or near the port to deal with emergencies, the use of an old tank transporter to ship animals across the Channel in rough weather and the failure to thoroughly inspect animals at the port are “all unacceptable” and have “serious issues for animal welfare”, it claims.

RSPCA chief legal officer Ray Goodfellow said: “We are taking this stand because we believe AHVLA’s approach is failing to safeguard animal welfare and is in breach of European laws designed to protect animals from injury or undue suffering during transport.

“We believe we have a strong case that deserves to be heard.”

The charity also believes that changes to the inspection regime introduced by the AHVLA following the September incident are also unlawful in failing to provide proper checks at the port to safeguard animal welfare.

The RSPCA has vowed to fight on for the animals after Thanet District Council lifted its temporary ban on live exports at Ramsgate in November.

The local authority had closed Ramsgate port to live exports in September following an incident when more than 40 sheep had to be destroyed. But the port was reopened in October after legal action by Dutch exporters.

The AHVLA said it would not be commenting on the case while there was still an option for the RSPCA to appeal.

VITA Photo

RSPCA legal bid to ban live exports from Ramsgate quashed

Thursday 07 February 2013

The RSPCA has expressed its disappointment after a High Court judge rejected its legal bid to stop the live export of animals from a Kent port.

The animal welfare charity lodged a claim in the High Court to seek a judicial review of the approval and supervision of live animal exports through Ramsgate port.

The RSPCA launched the legal challenge after Thanet District Council lifted its temporary ban on live exports at Ramsgate following an incident on the vessel MV Joline in September in which more than 40 sheep, considered by officials as lame, were put down.

Launching the legal proceedings last month, the RSPCA said it believed the Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA), which is responsible for checking consignments of live animals through Ramsgate port, was “acting illegally”.

The RSPCA accused the AHVLA of failing to impose sailing restrictions on the MV Joline – which it described as an “open-decked, flat-bottomed converted Russian tank transporter” – to ensure that animals were “not injured or caused undue harm while being transported by sea”.

Joline10

Joline.1 resize

Joline.3 resize

Joline.4 resize

It also accused the AHVLA of failing to require exporters to use ports with appropriate facilities and failing to provide proper checks at the port to safeguard animal welfare.

But in a High Court ruling on Tuesday (5 February), judge Mr Justice Stephen Males dismissed the RSPCA’s case on all three grounds and said it was not even arguable.

Commenting on the ruling, an RSPCA spokesman said: “We are extremely disappointed by the decision. We still have an opportunity to ask for a reconsideration of the decision at an oral hearing.

“We will be considering the options with our legal team and also consulting with our trustees. Our deep concern about the lack of appropriate regulatory safeguards to protect the welfare of animals involved in this trade remains unchanged.”

The AHVLA said it would not be commenting on the case while there was still an option for the RSPCA to appeal.

In December, farm minister David Heath announced new, tougher rules for live animal exports from Ramsgate port. AHVLA inspectors have been told to increase inspections and take a “zero tolerance” approach to any breaches of welfare regulations where unnecessary suffering is caused to animals.