Serbia: Post Winter Repairs at Felix Shelter are Costing – Can You Help Costs With a Donation ? – Paypal Link Provided.

Website link:  http://catshelterfelix.com/

Hi Mark

It’s been quite some time since I had last wrote to you.

I’d like to ask you to please put my appeal for help on your website.

Workers are supposed to start repairing a roof and making a concrete backyard this month and it will cost a fortune! I desperately need help.
Thank you so much in advance!
Kindest regards
Danica

Urgent help needed
All of you remember this last dreadful winter, when Europe, including Serbia was caught in the grip of uncommon deep freeze. My shelter had been cut off by heavy snow for days. By some miracle, the roof and the wire mesh were able to sustain the maximum snow load but haven’t got through the winter unscathed. They’re severely ravaged by an extraordinary amount of ice and snow they were never meant to endure.

We definitely cannot get through another winter like this.  Workers are supposed to start repairing a roof and making a concrete backyard this month. The existing concrete surfaces which are cracked and worn out must be removed and replaced. When it rains, water collects and pools in my backyard so extra drainage needs to be added. I am worried sick because of the expanses as these repairs will cost a fortune yet they’re necessary. It all needs to be done, and done now. And again I’m forced to ask for your help, as I cannot do this alone.

As all of you know, my shelter depends on donations entirely. I’m very much aware that most of the people are strapped for money these days, notwithstanding your help is desperately needed.  My kitties and I are boundlessly grateful to all of you who support us through these hard times. You truly reinforce the belief that together we can make a difference

PayPal button is on our blog:
http://novisadcats.blogspot.com/
Dinarske uplate:    Felix-Felinolosko drustvo  355-1070729-96

Past SAV posts associated with Felix shelter:- full details of the shelter, including many photos of the cats can be seen by accessing these:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/serbia-the-felix-kitties-have-got-a-website-please-visit-and-take-a-look/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/serbia-big-freeze-across-europe-latest-pictures-from-cat-shelter-felix-can-you-help-with-a-donation/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/serbia-please-help-the-kitties-at-felix-shelter-with-a-winter-donation-thank-you/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/serbia-161211-latest-news-and-pictures-from-cat-shelter-felix-belgrade-can-you-help-the-cats-this-christmas/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/serbia-financial-appeal-to-help-the-cats-this-winter-at-felix-shelter/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/serbia-felix-cat-shelter-a-request-for-financial-help-please-can-you-give-a-donation-full-details-below/

Serbia: Is A Financially Driven ‘Animal Mafia’ Preventing Stray Animal Numbers Reductions ?

Re our recent post regarding dog killings in New Belgrade:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/serbia-dogcatchers-safari-in-new-belgrade-attack-on-human-and-dogs-life/

The situation, names and e mail addresses have now changed in Serbian politics.
These are the correct e mail addresses and persons associated with the killings – please contact them to express your concerns and disgust at what they are approving.

Minister of Agriculture  of Serbia is Mr. Dusan Petrovic,  office@minpolj.gov.rs
 
Mr. Zoran Micovic, is Director of Veterinary Department  of Ministerium of Agriculture  of Republic of Serbia.  Mr. Zoran Marinkovic  is the responsible officer for the Animal Welfare department of each Veterinary Department,   vetuprava@minpolj.gov.rs

Mayor of Belgrade is Mr. Dragan Djilas,  dragan.djilas@sbb.rs

Other block contacts:

omr@srbija.gov.rs, press@gov.rs, predsednikvladesrbije@gov.rs, kabinet.zpv@gov.rs, antikorupcija.savet@gov.rs, msp@mfa.rs, info@mod.gov.rs, info@mup.gov.rs, press@mfin.gov.rs, press@merr.gov.rs, mrkonjicm@mi.gov.rs, kabinet@mduls.gov.rs, info@mduls.gov.rs, kabinet@mp.gov.rs, office@mos.gov.rs, ministar@minrzs.gov.rs, pr_sluzba@minrzs.gov.rs, info@ekoplan.gov.rs, kabinet@kultura.gov.rs, kabinet@kim.gov.rs, info@mzd.gov.rs, kabinet@mbp.gov.rs, kancelarija@kornrp.gov.rs

——————————
 
Block addresses for copy and paste and sending protests and sample letter are:
 
office@minpolj.gov.rsvetuprava@minpolj.gov.rsdragan.djilas@sbb.rs
natasa.golubovic@beogradsg.org.rsnacelnik@beograd.gov.rspotpredsednik.prr@gov.rs,
kabinet@mpravde.gov.rsomr@srbija.gov.rs, press@gov.rs, predsednikvladesrbije@gov.rs, kabinet.zpv@gov.rs, antikorupcija.savet@gov.rs, msp@mfa.rs, info@mod.gov.rs, info@mup.gov.rs, press@mfin.gov.rs, press@merr.gov.rs, mrkonjicm@mi.gov.rs, kabinet@mduls.gov.rs, info@mduls.gov.rs, kabinet@mp.gov.rs, office@mos.gov.rs, ministar@minrzs.gov.rs, pr_sluzba@minrzs.gov.rs, info@ekoplan.gov.rs, kabinet@kultura.gov.rs, kabinet@kim.gov.rs, info@mzd.gov.rs, kabinet@mbp.gov.rs, kancelarija@kornrp.gov.rs

SAMPLE LETTER:  SAMPLE LETTER:  SAMPLE LETTER:

To
 
Secretariat for Environmental Protection, Belgrade
 
Goran Trivan, Secretary
Dragoslava Budimirović, Deputy Secretary
 
Ministry of Agriculture, Trade, Forestry and Water Management of Serbia
 
In Copy to
 
Mayors Office, Belgrade
Miroslava Dajč, Head of Office
 
Vesna Ivić, Head of City Administration, Belgrade
 
Office of Deputy Prime Minister of Serbia, Verica Kalanovic
 
Ministry of Justice of Serbia
 
Ladies and Gentlemen,

Links:  https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/serbia-dogcatchers-safari-in-new-belgrade-attack-on-human-and-dogs-life/

http://www4.clustrmaps.com/counter/maps.php?user=9b44b4e0 
 
please take note of the above (link) described events taking place throughout March 2012, in New Belgrade, as witnessed and communicated to us globally by Serbian animal welfare campaigners.
 
It is of the utmost importance that these rash, cruel and unprovoked actions against the strays of Belgrade – vaccinated, neutered and cared for by locals, posing NO THREAT, as they are, and were – be explained, and immediately stopped, pending investigation and discussion as concerns the continuation of the successful TNR programme these animals are part of.

As you can see through the above link, what you are approving and undertaking in New Belgrade is reaching a global audience.  Serbia will not benefit from these actions; quite the opposite.  It is up to you to move into the 21st Century regarding animal welfare, and show the rest of the world that you will not continue to ignore existing animal welfare legislation which exists within Serbia.

If you wish to become an EU member state, then you have a duty to enforce the rule of law.  Currently you are failing on this.  The choice is yours – but you are not welcome by many I to the EU if you continue with your existing abuses of animals.

Live in Century 21, not the 18th !
 
Thank you for your timely answer, and action.
 
Sincerely,

Name and nationality.
 
—————————————

Additional points you may wish to include in the above letter – optional:
 
 
· absent lawful control of responsible/irresponsible ownership (although the Law for veterinary and Law for animal welfare both demand  this control be undertaken by veterinary inspectors
· Non microchipped dogs and cats, owned by irresponsible owners, are regularly thrown out onnto the street; where they reproduce with other non-sterilised animals and produce a never ending cycle of stray animals – the alleged ‚problem’ which you appear unable to address in any suitable way
· The continual collection and killing of starys is a good money earner for both you and the animal mafia of which you approve.  You do NOT address the real problem of reducing stray numbers – you are only interested in the money that you can make out of the continual situation of new stray animals – YOUR FAULT as you are irresponsible with your attitude to stray animal controls
· By using Article 70. of the Law of  animal welfare: the owner of a microchiped dog/cat has an obligation to finance everything that is neccessary for that dog/cat until its natural death, even if the dog/cat lives at a city shelter, city pound or in its proper home .
· With Article 7. of animal welfare legislation, each Law : the killing of both healthy dog/cats, and also throwing them out onto the street as regularly undertaken by many citizens or by  city zoohigijena firms  – are both forbidden, so TNR  is forbidden way too.
· In an earlier period, before the Law for veterinary and  before the Law for animal  welfare, “Ovca“ Belgrade killed around 6000-8000 dogs per year (they did not even count cats – although they were killed also).
· Every year a further 6000-8000 dogs have  been thrown onto the streets by irresponsible owners – only then to be caught and killed by the city service “Ovca“ Belgrade.
· The people of the city are paying for your irresponsible approach and attitude towards the reduction of stray animal numbers.  One could suggest that the system is very corrupt and that corruptionn is a huge part of the system – why you are not acting correctly.
· In the last few years a new public firm named : `Veterina` Belgrade – city service, has started a TNR policy;  This firm catches and sterilises, and then returns to the street approx 2000-3000 strays per year.  At the same time, irresponsible owners throw out some 6000-8000 animals per year onto the streets.  .`Veterina` Belgrade  catches some 2000-3000 animals per year, less than 50% of the animals thrown out by irresponsible owners.  A recent report by .`Veterina` Belgrade  says that they take in over 5000-5500 dead dog bodies per year, or 400-500 dead dogs per month.  This has been the continual situation for the past 3 years.
· Animals continually thrown out onto the streets by irresponsible owners; city companies which collect the animals and kill them; veterinarians who are paid by the city to undertake the killings; the lack of a city wide public education by the mayor and government authorities – it could be said that this is an ‚animal mafia’ type system which is very beneficial and financially rewarding system to those who are in power.  A continual process of stray animal production and round up and killing – a continual process of making money for some, whilst ignoring the approach of actually trying to enforce the law and adopt a policy of stray animal numbers reductions.
· You are part of the system, and that system is an animal mafia that is doing nothing to reduce stray animal numbers.  The mafia would only appear to be keen on making money off the backs of dead stray animals.
· This is disgusting – you should all be utterly ashamed of yourselves and your lack of a decent approach to stray animal control and attempts at stray animal numbers reduction.
Information provided through ‘SAWN’ – the Serbian Animal Welfare Network.

Wording directly as written, with no modifications.

DOGCATCHERS’ SAFARI IN NEW BELGRADE  – ATTACK ON HUMAN AND DOGS’ LIFE                

On the 13th of March 2012 Veterinary Belgrade Zoo hygiene team started to „clear the ground“ of the street dogs in two New Belgrade locations: at large park between the Palace of Serbia (previously known as SIV) and Danube River and at the former building site of Energoprojekt at Španski borci Street.

The dogs by  the Palace of Serbia originate from dogs which have been living at the big building site in Proleterske solidarnosti Street. Upon completion of all works on the building site the dogs have moved into the uninhabited area by the Palace of Serbia. The dogs from Energoprojekt building siteoriginate from few dogs which survived the poisoning by strychnine in the vicinity of Belgrade Arena in September of 2005 shortly before the European championship in volleyball when Veterinary Station Belgrade ( the old name of Veterinary Belgrade) received an order of the Belgrade City Department of Environment and Ecology to “clear the ground“.

The lawsuit of the fosters of those dogs to the Prosecutor’s office despite all pathological and toxicological findings and autopsy reports as well as witness statements the findings did not go further than the County Prosecutor’s.                

On the 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th of March 2012 at Palace of Serbia the dog catchers were chasing the dogs driving in five new cars of Veterinary Belgrade with rotating lights on. The dogcatchers were chasing the group of distrustful, peaceful, well fed and healthy dogs which do not approach people on the lawns around the woods and bushes where dogs were hiding. The frightened dogs fled in all directions.

As the dogs were running faster, the dogcatchers were driving faster with no care about the direction in which they were chasing the dogs and driving them out to boulevards of Mihajlo Pupin and Nikola Tesla. Two young dogs which were driven out in that way in full gallop on Nikola Tesla Boulevard were killed under the wheels of cars on the 13th of March 2012. So doing the dogcatchers directly caused the death of the dogs and directly endangered the safety of traffic participants, i.e. they endangered lives of people who were driving or were driven the boulevard at the time. Except the direct attack on the lives of humans and dogs, the dogcatchers traumatized the drivers and the passengers of the cars by which the dogs were killed, as well as the passengers of the buses who were disgusted by the whole scene watching the chase during a stop at traffic lights.

Their “booty“, young dogs about a year old packed in two large parked vans. The older dogs as faster, stronger, more experienced and more skilled at hiding resisted a few more days.  On the 16th of March 2012 the dog catchers came in only two cars at Palace of Serbia going on to chase traumatized and already tortured dogs on the lawns. They hit the oldest bitch named Big Mama by the car then and they killed her right at the spot by smashing her neck.

The witness Aleksandra Dokić ran to the dog and photographed the corpse of it before the dogcatchers returned to carry it away. The fosters Nada Prokić and Mileta Kusurović were also at the spot.     After completion of the chase at Palace of Serbia the dogcatchers went over to an “easier“ job at ex-building site of Energoprojekt.

A group of about ten dogs lives, i.e. lived on the site which is no longer in function. All dogs in the group except one female dog were neutered, vaccinated and micro chipped by Veterinary Belgrade during the fall of 2011 and earlier.

The dogs are distrustful, non-aggressive, well fed and calm. They did not leave the fenced area of the former building site. The fosters called the dogcatcher and helped them to catch most of these dogs by using blowers in the fall of 2011 to be neutered in Neutering Center and Shelter Resnik and then returned to the dogs’ habitat at Energoprojekt. The dogs were returned from Resnik micro chipped on names of the fosters who helped the dogcatchers to catch the dogs.                

As it was in 2006, 2007 and 2008  Zoo hygiene again forces the fosters to accept status and responsibilities of the owners in order to return neutered dogs to their habitats. But there is a difference compared to the previous decade: On the 21st of September 2011 the City Assembly adopted the latest Strategy of Solving Non Owned Dogs and Cats Problem on Territory of Belgrade City. Veterinary Belgrade as a direct perpetrator of the Strategy is required to operate in accordance with and on the guidelines of the Strategy.

One of the specific objectives of the Strategy is the introduction to the legal status of the street animal fosters. On the contrary Veterinary Belgrade has been turning the fosters into the owners of street dogs for months now, thereby reversing the stated objective of the Strategy, as well as one of two basic methods of  the Strategy: Catch – Neuter – Release.

On the other hand Veterinary Belgrade usually does not inform the “owners“ of street dogs when their dogs are caught despite the Regulation on Conditions which must be fulfilled by Shelters and Pensions for Animals (Pravilnik o uslovima koje moraju da ispunjavajuprihvatilišta i pansioni za životinje), and which obliges Veterinary Belgradeto (Article 36 point 2) and which has recently entered into force.

If the “owners“ are informed they are not allowed to take their dogs over. The whole problem has the economic aspect too: catching and transport of owned dog is charged 5.500,00 rsd and a day of dog’s stay in shelter is charged 400,00 rsd.                

On the 13th of March 1012 the dogcatchers started to hunt the already neutered dogs at Energoprojekt which are registered as owned dogs of people who feed them and take care of them. One dog was caught by the blower on the first day  of hunt and another dog was caught the same way on the next day.

On the 15th of March the remaining, already traumatized, intelligent dogs hided under worker’s shack looking for security.    Finding out their hiding place the dogcatchers battered at the shack, moved concrete slabs on which the shack is placed so putting the dogs in danger of falling off the shack onto them. The dogcatchers used iron bars, wooden beams, iron hooks and wooden boards to blindly hit the dogs from one side of the shack while other dogcatchers  were waiting on the other side with wire ropes to put over the dogs’ necks.

They were caught by the wire rope and drew out  a terrified dog with bloody head then and they quickly gave him an injection of anesthetic to be able to towed the dog to the van. Witnesses who watched “bothered“ the dogcatcher by watching what they were doing, so  dogcatcher Marković cursed and insulted one of the fosters Emilija Barišić, an elder woman dressed in mourning clothes.

On the 16th of March 2012 the foster Nada Prokić came to the site to be witness of the way of catching the dogs previously gotten permission from the guard at the entrance to enter. The dogcatchers had just towed a long time ago neutered bitch named Ema.  Seeing Nada Prokić, they immediately stopped working and all of them were silent except the dogcatcher Marković. The dogcatcher Marković addressed rudely the  foster Prokić yelling at her “what she’s doing there“, and then he phoned a superior in Veterinary Belgrade.

The superior instructed dogcatcher Marković to call police, which dogcatcher Marković did several times in a row, i.e. until police patrol came on the spot. Dogcatcher Marković intercepted police officers at the entrance of the site and explained the officer that  Nada Prokić “hindered them in their work“.

Another witness, foster Veselinović joined Nada Prokić trying to talk to the officer. Having entered the site officer Trajković, badge number 10 56 92, asked identity documents of both fosters and  requested them to leave someone else’s property, because they “failed to indicate their arrival and they hindered the people who work“.

Nada Prokić told officer Trajkoviću that she had entered the site with the permission of the site guard, in order to be a witness – observer of the dogcatchers’ work, i.e. inhuman catching of animals that violate Animal Well-being Law, Veterinary Medicine Law, European Convention, as well as Veterinary Belgrade Regulation on Manner of Catching Animals.

For the above reasons, Nada Prokić refused to leave the site. The policeman grabbed her roughly by the arm, dragged her from the site and pushed her into a police car. Then the dogcatchers continued their action. Nada Prokić spent entire morning at the police station. A policeman who was standing right next to her; she neither could go to toilet nor to drink water.

To make the picture of what happened more complete it should be stated that Nada Prokić is a retired doctor and professor at Medicine Faculty of Belgrade University, a small and frail woman. Foster Veselinović is also Belgrade University professor at the Faculty of Mining and Geology.

On the 17th of March 2012 Deputy City Secretary for Utilities and Housing Services, Department Zoo hygiene, Vladimir Terzin answered by phone to a foster who complained of the cruelty with which the dogcatchers treat the dogs during catching them, hurting them with hooks, poles, rods…:

“If it is needed we will roll over even a shack!“

The dogcatchers stopped the hunt on the 21st and 22nd of March, and then they went on with pursuit of the dogs. Veterinary Inspection of Ministry of Agriculture, Trade, Water and Forestry responsible for supervising the implementation of the Animal Well-being Law as well as Veterinary Administration did not respond to any of many reports of violation of the Law by Veterinary Belgrade.

 

Some past SAV posts of interest:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/activists-4-serbian-animals/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/serbia-campaigners-request-for-proof-relating-to-unlawful-acts-of-animal-killing-by-the-republic-veterinary-inspection/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/serbia-190310-zajecar-city-alleged-rabies-outbreaks-without-informing-the-oie-gives-authorities-excuse-for-mass-stray-killings/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/12/17/serbia-new-information-of-terrible-suffering-at-smederevo-city-pound/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/serbian-animal-welfare-campaigners-write-and-ask-the-serbian-government-for-a-no-kill-sterilisation-policy/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/photographs-warning-animal-suffering/

 

 

Bulgaria: The Killing Fields of the EU For Stray Animals – Now More Than Ever; Time for EU Legislation on Stray Animal Welfare. This IS BULGARIA – 2012 !

This is the real face of EU member state Bulgaria we can show the world now !

These are the results of the Bulgarian government running a “cruelty free” political strategy against stray dogs population!

This little girl visits the animal “shelter” Seslavtsi for walking the prisoners every week.

She looks devastated, she IS devastated, because today she understands what is going to happen to the new puppies in the last cell.

Maybe this will be the last piece of decent, non political / non mayoral, humanity they would have seen before they are put to sleep, labelled as ‘aggressive’.  As the following photo shows; she puts her hand into the cell to pat the animal the Bularian government and authorities label as ‘aggressive’.

The photographs below show the world the ‘aggressive’ dogs of Bulgaria; a nation which is now the shame of the EU because of what it is doing – where political ‘put the money in your pocket for your own interests’ take priority over the welfare of animals, animal welfare which is funded by the EU.

Bulgarian MEPs should bow their heads in shame that they represent such a politically bent and corrupt system.

All healthy, neutered and socialized dogs from the Malinova Dolina district in the country capital – Sofia are going to be euthanized as ‘aggressive’, as a reaction to an incident from two days ago, when in the same district an old man was ‘attacked’ by aggressive dogs and is in a hospital.

Since there is no certified test for ‘aggression’ in Bulgaria, and the aggressive dogs cannot be caught (because they hide from people, unlike the socialized ones), the Mayor of Sofia – Ms Fandakova has ordered all dogs that happen to inhabit the district, and can be caught by the hunters, to be killed.

This is Bulgaria’s “cruelty free” politics!

Please spread the word and let the world know about the way a European country and EU member state called Bulgaria handles their strays problem in the 21st Century!

In the album you can see all the “aggressive” dogs – http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.352728011430693.72688.167390933297736&type=1

SHAME ON BULGARIA ! – Shame on the Mayor of Sofia – Ms Fandakova – and where are the Bulgarian MEPs to allow this to happen in ‘their’ Europe ?

** WARNING ** – the following photos show many ‘aggressive’ dogs according to the Bulgarian authorities.  As our visitors to this site live in the real world, away from Bulgarian politics, we will leave you to decide on what the pictures show.

The little Bulgarian girl in the photos above will hopefully continue to grow up with the compassion that she obviously has – unlike the Mayor of Sofia and other EU member state Bulgarian politicians.  She is the future – and a hopeful future of sense and compassion; unlike what is being witnessed with Bulgarian politicians at the moment.

She is the future – and a hopeful future of sense and compassion; unlike what is being witnessed with Bulgarian politicians at the moment.

 

 

USA: Wolf Torture and Execution Continues in the Northern Rockies. Further Updated 03/04/2012.

http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/wolf_torture_and_execution_continues_in_the_northern_rockies/
 
Wolf Torture and Execution Continues in the Northern Rockies
by James William Gibson – March 28, 2012
Montana Anti-Trapping Group Gets Death Threat for Releasing Photos

On March 16, a Friday, a US Forest Service employee from Grangeville, Idaho, laid out his wolf traps. The following Monday, using the name “Pinching,” he posted his story and pictures on www.Trapperman.com . “I got a call on Sunday morning from a FS [Forest Service] cop that I know. You got one up here as there was a crowd forming. Several guys had stopped and taken a shot at him already,” wrote Pinching. The big, black male wolf stood in the trap, some 300-350 yards from the road, wounded—the shots left him surrounded by blood-stained snow. Pinching concluded his first post, “Male that went right at 100 pounds. No rub spots on the hide, and he will make me a good wall hanger.”

 
(The here depicted Josh Bransford is a federal employee and public servant out of the Red River Ranger District on the Nez Perce National Forest in north-central Idaho. As a taxpayer, you have a right to call the Front Desk and complain about his behavior. Call for his resignation and/or ask that he be suspended without pay for a period of time for his actions 208-842-2245.)

All photographs were taken from Trapperman.com website are being reproduced here under Fair Use“Pinching” with the wolf he trapped that he wrote would make him “a good wall hanger.”
The Trapperman website went wild with comments. “That’s a dandy!! Keep at it,” wrote Watarrat. Otterman asked, “All the gray on that muzzle make a guy wonder how old he is or if it is just part of his black coloring.” Pinching’s picture of the wolf’s paw caught in the trap got special attention. “Is that the MB750 stamped ‘wolf’ on the pan?” asked one man. “Looks to be a perfect pad catch. Congratulations! Pinching confirmed the trap model and commented, “Oh an [sic] by the way, a wolf is a heck of a lot of work to put on a stretcher! Man those things hold on to their hide like no other!”

By late March some 117 Idaho wolves had been killed in traps and snares, and another 251 shot. Montana saw 166 killed, for a total of 534 wolves out of an estimated 1150 in the two states. Although Montana’s season ended in February, Idaho is not quite done. Both states have announced plans for increased hunting in the 2012-2013, and discussions are underway among hunting groups and state officials to allow private donations to establish wolf bounties.

                                                                                              Wolf’s paw in trap.

As recently as the spring of 2011, gray wolves in the Northern Rockies received protection from he Endangered Species Act. But in April, 2011 Congress passed a rider on a federal appropriations bill removing them. Montana Democratic Senator Jon Tester, facing a 2012 challenge from Republican Congressman Danny Rehberg, wanted to show Democrats hated wolves just as much as Republicans. Conservation groups filed suit in Montana’s federal district court, claiming the delisting represented an unconstitutional infringement by Congress on the judicial branch while it deliberated an ongoing lawsuit over federal wolf protection.

Losing in district court, the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Friends of the Clearwater, WildEarth Guardians, the Center for Biological Diversity, and Cascadia Wildlands appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit. On March 14, the appeals court rejected their arguments, upholding the Congressional wolf delisting as a lawful amendment. This decision might well mark the endpoint for the conservation movement’s decades-long fundamental strategy of litigating in federal courts to promote wolf recovery in the Northern Rocky Mountains.

                                                                                      A hunter and his dead prey.

Thus wolves, demonized by the far-right in the Rockies as disease-ridden monsters and icons of the federal government (see my Summer 2011 Journal story, “Cry Wolf”), now face a brutal campaign to radically reduce their numbers so far that extermination can not be ruled out. Idaho’s Governor Butch Otter declared in a March 25 news conference that his state faced a “disaster emergency” from wolves. “We don’t want them here.”

Skirmishing on the web escalates. Footloose Montana, an anti-trapping group, posted the trapped wolf’s pictures on its website, drawing over a 1,000 comments within days. Word spread. Nabeki, founder of Howling for Justice, opined that “This wolf will be the face of the cruelty and ugliness that is the Idaho hunt…Our forests are hiding acts of unspeakable horrors that are being perpetuated on innocent animals.” Protesters called Idaho and Montana tourist bureaus, demanding the hunts end. By Monday, March 26, Trapperman learned that its photos now circulated offsite. The group’s administrator demanded that Footloose Montana remove the photographs.

Footloose staff and board members also received an anonymous death threat in their email: “I would like to donate [sic] a gun to your childs [sic] head to make sure you can watch it die slowly so I can have my picture taken with it’s [sic] bleeding dying screaming for mercy body. YOU WILL BE THE TARGET NEXT BITCHES!”

FBI agents and Missoula, Montana police received copies of the threat.

Wolf advocates hope that these pictures will go viral, shaming a nation into facing the torture people inflict on animals and the moral and political failures that promote and legitimize it.

—————————————————————————————————

*** FURTHER ACTION / UPDATE – 03/04/2012 ***

ID Forest Service employee and trapper, Josh Bransford, had nothing better to do than to pose in front of a wolf caught in one of his leghold trap – the wolf had already been shot a couple of times while he was helplessly caught in Bransford’s trap! This brutal and callous behavior, particularly when displayed by an agency employee, whose salary we pay, is unacceptable. For more information, scroll down to read John Adams’ article in the Great Falls Tribune. Thank you for your help! Your friends at Footloose Montana
Please voice your opinion about this tragedy and call or send an e-mail today!

Here is some contact information. Please be respectful:

Nez Perce National Forest: Forest Supervisor Rick Brazell (208) 983-7000 / rbrazell@fs.fed.us

Deputy Forest Supervisor Ralph Rau (208) 983-7017 / rerau@fs.fed.us

Fire Management: Bob Lippincott (208) 983-4066 / blippincott@fs.fed.us

Public Affairs: Laura Smith (208) 983-5143 / lasmith@fs.fed.us

Idaho Fish and Game: Director Virgil Moore: virgil.moore@idfg.idaho.gov

Idaho Fish and Game Director Virgil Moore: (208) 334-3771.

Please sign this petition, which will be sent to:

USDA Office of Ethics Forestry Ethics Branch(Lorraine (Rainee) Luciano, Branch Chief Agency: U.S. Forest Service) and UDSA Forest Service Chief(Tom Tidwell)

http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-the-torture-of-wolves-in-our-forests

Photos of live, trapped wolf prompt threats to Missoula-based group

A photo downloaded from an online trapping forum shows an Idaho trapper posing in front of a wolf that was caught in a foot-hold trap and then allegedly shot at by bystanders. Missoula-based anti-trapping group members say they received death threats after posting the photo on their Facebook page. PHOTO COURTESY EARTH ISLAND JOURNAL.

HELENA — A Missoula-based anti-trapping organization said it received a threatening email this month after the group posted graphic photos on the Internet of a live Idaho wolf caught in a foot-hold trap.

Anja Heister, executive director of Footloose Montana, on March 22 posted a series of photos gleaned from an online trapping forum called Trapperman.com on her personal and Footloose Montana Facebook sites.

Heister said she opened Footloose Montana’s email inbox on Monday and found what she believed to be a death threat directed at family members of the organization:

“I would like to donate (sic) a gun to your childs (sic) head to make sure you can watch it die slowly so I can have my picture taken with it’s (sic) bleeding dying screaming for mercy body. YOU WILL BE THE TARGET NEXT BITCHES!” the message read.

Heister said the email was in response to the group posting photos of a northern Idaho trapper’s March 18 wolf kill, which was detailed on the online trapping forum.

The photos show trapper Josh Bransford, a fire management officer for the Nez Perce National Forest, kneeling and smiling for the camera as a wolf he caught in a foot-hold trap stands behind him in a ring of blood-soaked snow. Another photo shows a close-up of the wolf’s paw caught in the trap. A third photo shows the trapper posing with his catch.

Heister said Footloose Montana, which is actively campaigning to ban trapping in Montana, has received plenty of hostile emails and phone calls since 2007 but never anything that rose to this level.

“It has a cumulative effect on your psyche,” Heister said. “I’m not easily scared, but when I read this I got really concerned.”

Heister said she reported the threatening email to local and federal law enforcement officials. Missoula Police Sgt. Travis Welch confirmed the department received the report of the malicious email and that it was assigned to an investigator, but he declined to comment further.

In an online blog on Earth Island Journal’s website, writer James William Gibson recounted what Bransford — who goes by the handle “Pinching” — wrote about the photos. Bransford’s post has since been removed.

“I got a call on Sunday morning from a FS (Forest Service) cop that I know. You got one up here,” the post said, and then continued, “there was a crowd forming. Several guys had stopped and taken a shot at him already,” the post read, according to Gibson.

According to Bransford the wolf was a 100-pound male with “no rub spots” making an “good wall hanger.”

Bransford did not return calls or emails seeking comment Thursday.

As of late Thursday the photos posted on Footloose Montana’s Facebook page had received nearly 900 comments. Online commenters on both the Earth Island Journal and the Footloose Montana Facebook page expressed outrage over the photos. Many viewers were angry Bransford posed for a portrait with the wounded wolf before killing it.

Dave Linkhart, spokesman for the National Trappers Association, said there’s nothing wrong with a trapper posing with his catch before killing the animal.

“You pose with a successful catch just like you do with a successful hunt,” Linkhart said. “People make the problem of attributing human feelings and emotions to these animals.”

Linkhart claimed trapped animals don’t suffer, so taking the time to shoot a photograph does not cross ethical boundaries.

“If you look at the trap — across the pad of the foot like that — if you were to release the animal it would walk away like nothing happened,” Linkhart said.

Marc Bekoff is a former professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Colorado, Boulder and fellow of the Animal Behavior Society who has studied the social behavior of wolves and coyotes, among other animals.

“That wolf was suffering immeasurably. Not only physically by having his foot locked in a trap, but also being shot at,” said Bekoff, the author of several books on animal psychology and emotion. “This was not hunting. This was having an animal having its foot smashed in trap and then shooting at it with bullets. This wolf was tortured.”

Linkhart said if the wolf was shot at, that isn’t the trapper’s fault.

“Somebody else came up there and shot that animal first. That is illegal. What the trapper has done here is not,” Linkhart said. “The problem was not the trap. It was the illegal activity of the hunters who shot at that wolf.”

Reach Tribune Capital Bureau Chief John S. Adams at 442-9493, or jadams@greatfallstribune.com. Follow him on Twitter @TribLowdown.
http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20120330/NEWS01/203300316/Photos-live-trapped-wolf-prompt-threats-Missoula-based-group

 

 

 

 

Uk (England): Michael Tucker (Live Export) Campaign Photographs.

Further to our recent post relating to the sad death of Michael Tucker:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/uk-england-michael-tucker-a-dedicated-live-animal-export-protester-stalwart/

we have now obtained some more good photographs of Michael campaigning in London against live animal exports.  We would like to share them with you.

Photos are with thanks to Philip, Tina and the team at Compassion In World Farming (CIWF) – Godalming, Surrey, England, United Kingdom:

http://www.ciwf.org.uk/

http://www.ciwf.org.uk/about_us/default.aspx

EU: The Written Declaration on the Establishment of a Maximum 8-Hour Journey Limit Has Now Been Adopted Within the EU.

** News 16/03/2012 **

Written Declaration on the establishment of a maximum 8-hour journey limit

Past SAV posts on this issue:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/eu-very-urgent-action-for-eu-citizens-by-1503-2012-please-ask-your-national-regional-meps-to-support-written-declaration-wd-0049-2011-for-an-8-hour-maximum-journey-time-for-eu-animals-i/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/eu-europe-wide-a-new-written-declaration-wd-for-animals-in-transport-8-hours-maximum-journey-time-please-get-your-meps-to-add-their-signature-now/

The European Parliament during its plenary session in Strasbourg adopted Written Declaration 49/2011 on the establishment in the European Union of a maximum time limit of eight hours for the transportation live animals to slaughter.

“This is a key moment in a campaign that will end only when it has limited the transport of animals over long distances for slaughter. The Declaration and the collection of one million signatures are part of the 8 hours campaign which calls for a limitation on the transport of live animals for slaughter to a maximum of eight hours.

Travel today can last several days, causing extreme suffering to many animals, especially the old and young especially during the warmer seasons and this is completely unnecessary and unacceptable,” commented Dan Jørgensen MEP.

The Intergroup for Animal Welfare and Conservation welcomes this initiative and is extremely pleased that more than half of all MEPs supported this proposal, which was launched by the German organisation Animal’s Angels and Dan Jørgensen MEP, President of the Intergroup.

From left to right: MEPs Andrea Zanoni, Dan Jorgensen, Esther de Lange, Carl Schlyter, Pavel Poc.

SAV Comment:

Thank you to all our friends who worked so hard with their national MEPs to get this WD passed.

We can now move on with the support of both the WD and the 1 million + signature petition from the citizens of Europe.

Some political parties in the Uk (Conservative and UKIP) would not give any support to this declaration.  You have to ask why they are in the EU as MEPs when they do not support the requests of so many constituents.

This will be remembered and will form part of animal welfare campaigning at the next EU MEP elections.

Thailand: Horrifying Conditions at Thailand Animal Shelter Revealed – We Need to Close Down This Hell Hole for Animals NOW ! – Please Sign the Petition.

Care2 PETITION LINK – Please Sign and Crosspost:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/979/418/704/shut-down-abusive-animal-shelter-in-thailand/

http://blog.petaasiapacific.com/activism/shelter-skelter-horrifying-conditions-at-thailand-animal-shelter?utm_source=PAP%2BEnews&utm_medium=Enews&utm_campaign=02%2B12%2BTony

Shelter Skelter: Horrifying Conditions at ThailandAnimal Shelter Revealed

Tony’s Shelter, in Pattaya, Thailand, has been under fire for years from PETA and compassionate people all around the world for keeping animals in filthy conditions and failing to provide them with even basic veterinary care. Here are just a few of the animals who have suffered at the hands of Tony, a wealthy local businessperson:

A dog with at least two broken bones and who was unable to walk was left to die on the concrete floor of a pen with several other dogs. A kind-hearted visitor to the shelter tried to bring the dog to a local veterinarian, but the dog died before he could be moved from the shelter.

This dog—whose rear legs were both paralyzed—was forced to drag himself around a filthy, mud-bottomed cage.

Frequent complaints from shelter visitors have reported that puppies are sometimes eaten by starving adult dogs and that adult dogs eat the bodies of their dead companions.

This dog had a prolapsed uterus that was left untreated.

One dog had a maggot-infested wound on his or her paw.

Dogs are not separated by age, sex, size, or temperament, which leads to frequent fights and severe competition for food.

A dog with a gaping wound on his shoulder was confined to a cage with several other dogs and was apparently given no treatment for his injuries.

Even though Tony’s Shelter claims to be in desperate need of supplies, medicine that PETA took to the shelter to help alleviate the suffering of animals who were infected with mange was never used.

The vast majority of the dogs housed at Tony’s Shelter are underweight or emaciated.

Please help PETA keep the pressure on Tony’s Shelter to improve conditions immediately or close the shelter altogether by writing to your local Embassy of Thailand asking the ambassador to intervene on behalf of the animals at Tony’s immediately.

Posted by Ashley Fruno

Care2 PETITION LINK – Please Sign and Crosspost:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/979/418/704/shut-down-abusive-animal-shelter-in-thailand/