Spain: WARNING – GRAPHIC VIDEO – SUFFERING BULL. Oh, and the Abuser Gets Injured – Karma !

** WARNING ** – GRAPHIC VIDEO – SUFFERING BULL.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kAlrG4jS9M

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/video/news/3861213/Bullfighter-gored-through-the-head.html

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20111008/world/bullfighter-gored-in-the-face.388256

A Spanish bullfighter is recovering from a five hour operation to repair his face after a terrifying goring in the north-eastern city of Zaragoza, according to a hospital official.

Television images showed the moment when the bull’s left horn ripped into Juan Jose Padilla’s lower jaw to emerge beside his protruding eyeball as spectators screamed in horror.

The hospital spokesman said Mr Padilla had suffered eye, bone, muscle and skin damage when the bull pinned him to the ground and gored him.

TV footage also showed Mr Padilla getting up from the ring, his face gushing blood, as the bull was distracted by bullring assistants.

 

Uk: (England) Only in London – Thousands of Gorillas Are on the Streets !!

Hundreds of gorillas on the streets of London !!

This is not your average fun run –  it’s the GREAT GORILLA RUN!

SATURDAY 24 SEPTEMBER 2011

London’s best all-costume charity fun run – 1,000 people, all dressed as gorillas and going ape for a day.

“This is the most fun event for conservation going on anywhere in the world”   Bill Oddie

Since the first Great Gorilla Run in 2003, thousands of people have donned their gorilla suits and run, jogged or walked the 7km City and Bankside fun run route that takes in sights such as Tower Bridge and The Tate Modern.

Video;  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD5wrag-N9M

The Gorilla Organisation:  http://www.greatgorillarun.org/about

http://www.greatgorillarun.org/

Photo gallery:  http://www.greatgorillarun.org/gallery

If you’re looking for something unique and if you like dressing up, this is the charity fun run for you.

By doing the Great Gorilla Run, you’ll be playing a crucial role in helping save the remaining 720 mountain gorillas left in the wild.

Here’s what a previous Great Gorilla runner had to say:

“First can I thank you for organising such a hilarious event. Sheer genius. I haven’t run and laughed so much – ever! You should all be rightly proud of what you’ve achieved.”

The gorilla run team will provide you with great support in the lead-up to the run to ensure you reach your fundraising target and are in shape for the race.

And on the day, you’ll feel like a star as the crowds cheer you on every step of the way

Register for 2012:

https://secure.gorillas.org/registrant/LoginRegister.aspx?EventID=27611&LangPref=en-CA&Referrer=http%3a%2f%2fwww.greatgorillarun.org%2f

USA: Ohio County, Indiana – Campshore Campground – Terrible Animal Suffering Approved by the ‘Honourables’ of the County. Watch the Video and Then Take Action – Contact Details of the ‘Honourables’ Below.

 

Warning – Animal Abuse by those with nothing better to do  !

http://blog.peta2.com/2011/08/urgent-turtle-torture-event-scheduled.html

Ohio County, Indiana, is home to an extraordinarily cruel event called “Snapperfest”—next scheduled for this Saturday, August 20!

Every year at the Campshore Campground, wild-caught snapping turtles endure terrible violence at the hands of participants.

The frightened animals are grabbed by their tails and repeatedly slammed to the ground. Their heads are yanked from their shells, and they are then swung around until “contestants” are able to wrap their fists around the animals’ necks.

STOP THIS EVENT!

Contact the so-called ‘Honourable’ people involved in supporting this:

The Honorable Connie J. Brown
Ohio County Commissioner
yvonnewalton@hotmail.com
812-438-4624

The Honorable Todd Walton
Ohio County Commissioner
twalton@cinergy.com

The Honorable Shane Koons
Ohio County Commissioner
812-584-0378

The Honorable Connie Smith
Ohio County Auditor
ohioctyauditor1@earthlink.net
812-438-2062

Campshore Campground
812-438-2135 (office)
812-290-5939 (cell)
info@campshorecampground.com

THERE IS NOTHING HONOURABLE  IN SUPPORTING ANIMAL ABUSE !!

Uk (England): HORRIFIC scenes of animal cruelty against pigs facing slaughter have been captured by animal rights activists. The Uk government fails to act.

HORRIFIC scenes of animal cruelty against pigs facing slaughter have been captured by animal rights activists.

The sickening abuse of the animals at a UK abattoir includes punching them and burning them on the face with cigarettes.

They also suffer because of incompetent use of stun equipment, they are hit in the face with bats and dragged to their deaths by their ears. see more ….

Disturbing video footage at:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3721871/Shocking-pig-abuse-at-abattoir.html

 

For immediate release: 29th July 2011

Revealed: cigarettes stubbed out on slaughter pigs’ faces
But Defra refuses to prosecute!

Cigarettes stubbed out on pigs’ faces; one animal punched in the head; another goaded in the face; regular blows and kicks; seriously injured pigs forced to drag themselves to slaughter… All these abuses in one UK slaughterhouse and Defra still won’t prosecute.

Today, Animal Aid has released footage shot secretly at Elmkirk Ltd (Cheale Meats), an Essex-based, family-run slaughterhouse that kills up to 6,000 pigs a week and whose website proclaims: ‘Be proud of higher welfare, buy British pork.’
 
The film – which was recorded on a number of secretly installed cameras over a period of four days – shows three different workers stubbing their cigarettes out on the faces of pigs, while one of the men landed a violent punch on the face of a pig who was walking by.
 
In addition, three seriously injured pigs were forced to crawl from the lairage, through the race and into the stun pen. Animal Aid’s cameras followed them as they were pushed, dragged by their ears and kicked along. Such treatment breaches the welfare laws multiple times.*
 
Animal Aid filmed many examples of incompetence. Pigs are stunned using electrified tongs, which should span their brains and render them immediately insensible. However, three of the four workers filmed stunning pigs showed a callous indifference to the suffering of the animals, many of whom were not stunned correctly. Some were subjected to painful electric shocks from the tongs, and fell to the ground screaming.
 
It is legal to use electric goads on the muscles of the hindquarters of pigs, but only for brief periods and only when there is space ahead of the animal in which to move. At Cheale Meats, the electric goad was used in the face of one pig and on the anus of another.
 
An additional worrying episode showed an apparently dead pig being dragged into the stun pen by a pole in her mouth. She was not stunned but she was shackled, hoisted and had her throat cut on the slaughter line. How this animal died, what she had been suffering from and where her meat ended up remain unknown.
 
Cheale Meats is the ninth UK slaughterhouse to be secretly filmed by Animal Aid in the past two-and-a-half years. The national campaign group has identified legal breaches in seven of the previous eight – some of them so serious that one slaughterhouse was forced to close down. Cases were built for the prosecution of nine men and four slaughterhouse operators before a change of government brought a change of heart, and all the cases were dropped. Defra, under the coalition government, said that, unlike its Labour predecessor, it could not proceed because the evidence was obtained without the permission of the slaughterhouses. Animal Aid believes that this is a politically motivated excuse and cites the recent Panorama programme, which secretly filmed care home workers without the permission of the owners, and whose film is being used to prosecute.
 
Animal Aid sent the Cheale Meats evidence to the Food Standards Agency (FSA). This is the body that supplies vets to slaughterhouses and investigates breaches of the welfare and hygiene law before passing the cases to Defra, which is the prosecuting body. The FSA replied on 14 June saying: ‘Defra is not prepared to commence prosecution proceedings where the initial allegation is based on CCTV footage gained without the consent of the relevant Food Business Operator.’
 
Kate Fowler, Head of Campaigns at Animal Aid says:
‘Since we first began investigating English slaughterhouses, we have been pressing everyone involved – regulators, industry bodies and the government – to act decisively to end the cruelty. At first, they appeared contrite and promised action but now their words ring hollow. If Defra won’t prosecute these flagrant breaches of the law; if the vets can’t or won’t act to stop the cruelties; and if the slaughterhouse owners look the other way, who is there to stop animals from being abused at the most vulnerable time of their lives? It seems that all involved are content to keep quiet and to allow these cruelties to continue. So much for the UK having the best welfare standards in the world!’
 

– Ends –

 

Cheale Meats Lts – Quality Pork – ‘RSPCA Freedom Food Approved’ – What a Joke !

– We suggest the RSPCA should investigate this further and PROSECUTE

Notes to Editors:

  • For further information or to arrange an interview, contact Kate Fowler or Andrew Tyler on 01732 364546. Out of hours 07918 083 774
  • A five-minute compilation film from Cheale Meats can be seen: http://vimeo.com/26056560
  • A35-minute film detailing the breaches can be seen:

http://vimeo.com/26861795

Notes to accompany the 35-minute film can be seen:

http://www.animalaid.org.uk/h/n/NEWS/news_slaughter//2527//

  • Screen grabs from the undercover film can be seen and downloaded:

http://www.animalaid.org.uk/h/n/NEWS/news_slaughter//2524//
 
Additional information:

  • Animal Aid has secretly filmed inside eight other slaughterhouses from January 2009 until the present. Previous investigations can be seen here:

http://www.animalaid.org.uk/h/n/CAMPAIGNS/slaughter//2419//
 

  • While the government has so far failed to take action to curb the cruelties, the supermarkets have responded to Animal Aid’s campaign for CCTV to be installed in the slaughterhouses that supply them. Ten major supermarkets Morrisons, Waitrose, the Co-op, Sainsbury’s, Aldi, Tesco, Lidl, Asda, Marks & Spencer and Iceland, along with wholesalers Booker, have now agreed to make CCTV mandatory.
  • * The treatment of the injured pigs at Cheale’s slaughterhouse breaches the Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations in a number of ways:

1. The occupier of a slaughterhouse or knacker’s yard and any person engaged in the movement or lairaging of animals shall ensure that pending the slaughter or killing of any sick or disabled animal in the slaughterhouse or knacker’s yard, it is kept apart from any animal which is not sick or disabled.
(Schedule 3, Part II 2 (e))

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made
 
 
2. The occupier of a slaughterhouse or knacker’s yard and any person engaged in the movement or lairaging of any animal shall ensure that any animal which has experienced pain or suffering during transport or following its arrival at the slaughterhouse or knacker’s yard is slaughtered or killed immediately.
(Schedule 3, Part II, paragraph 4 (a))

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made>
 
 
3. The occupier of a slaughterhouse or knacker’s yard and any person engaged in the movement or lairaging of any animal shall ensure that any animal which is unable to walk is not dragged to its place of slaughter or killing but is slaughtered or killed where it lies; or if it is possible and to do so would not cause any unnecessary pain or suffering, is transported on a trolley or movable platform to a place of emergency slaughter or killing where it is then immediately slaughtered or killed.
(Schedule 3, Part II, paragraph 5 (a,b))

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made>

 
4. The occupier of a slaughterhouse or knacker’s yard and any person engaged in the movement of any animals shall ensure that every animal is moved with care and, when necessary, that animals are led individually.
(Schedule 3, Part II, paragraph 9)

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made>

 
5. No person shall inflict any blow or kick to any animal.
(Schedule 3, Part II, paragraph 12)

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made

 
6. No person shall lift or drag, or cause or permit to be lifted or dragged, any animal by the head, horns, ears, feet, tail, fleece or any other part of its body in such a way as to cause it unnecessary pain or suffering.
(Schedule 3, Part II, paragraph 7)

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/schedule/3/made

UPDATE 5/8/11  **** ACTIONS: ****

 
PLEASE POLITELY COMPLAIN TO
 
The FSA (Food Standards Agency)- helpline@foodstandards.gsi.gov.uk
 
 
 
Those in the UK please write to your MP here– http://www.writetothem.com/about-contact 
– simply enter your postcode then write in your message. Ask them to take immediate action.
 

The Uk government (Defra) ministers who are REFUSING TO ACT on this footage:

Jim Paice – “The worst animal welfare minister ever”:

http://www.animalaid.org.uk/h/n/NEWS/news_wildlife//2492//

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-13490348

http://www.jamespaicemp.com/

Caroline Spelman

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Spelman

http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/about/who/ministers/spelman/

Both Ministers of the Uk Conservative government run by David Cameron –

Uk Prime Minister.

 

 

 

EU / Turkey: HORRIFIC CONDITIONS IN EXPORT OF EU FARM ANIMALS TO TURKEY

  

 

SAV Comment: Please ensure you add your name to the call for 8 hours maximum journey time for animals in transport within the EU

visit  http://www.8hours.eu/8hours

Please note that Turkey is NOT an EU member state.

————————————————–

HORRIFIC CONDITIONS IN EXPORT OF EU FARM ANIMALS TO TURKEY

Press Release by  COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING

Severe dehydration, blistering heat and death: horrific animal welfare conditions in export of EU animals to Turkey

An investigation has been carried out by Eyes on Animals, the Animal Welfare Foundation and Compassion in World Farming, looking into the export of bulls, pregnant heifers and sheep from a number of EU Member States to Turkey.

The findings were horrific. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qugtNI2Chcc

These animals have come from Austria, Hungary, Bulgaria, Greece and Latvia with the distances travelled as far as 2,200km in some cases. 44 animal transports were checked at the border between Bulgaria and Turkey and extreme welfare problems leading to severe animal suffering were discovered.

Peter Stevenson, Chief Policy Advisor of Compassion in World Farming says: “We are calling for the European Commission to suspend the export of animals to Turkey as a matter of urgency in order to prevent further suffering by EU animals.

“Indeed, we believe that this inhumane and unnecessary trade should be brought to an end altogether. The long distances and high temperatures are too extreme to guarantee even the most minimal animal welfare standards.”

Delays lasting hours, even days, regularly occur at the border while the trucks wait for veterinary and customs clearance. During the delays animals are left in blistering heat on stationary vehicles without sufficient water and food. We witnessed deeply disturbing welfare conditions:

the animals were exhausted and often had to lie down in a thick layer of their faeces

the animals were desperate with thirst,

the ammonia smell was unbearable

the temperatures inside the vehicles were measured at up to 48°C and in one case we measured 58°C in a Bulgarian sheep truck . EU cattle are not accustomed to the extreme summer heat of Turkey and become weak and even collapse

Many animals were unloaded at the border to check their weight or sex. They were not given any water or food while they were off the vehicle and even unfit animals that could not walk were forced back on to the trucks.

In one case a bull that collapsed on the ramp was reloaded even though he could not move at all. After shoving, kicking and hitting failed to make him move, the ramp was lifted and the animal slid back into the truck. During the journey to Ankara a second bull was found lying on the vehicle floor in agony with a broken front leg.

The suffering engendered by this trade is made worse by the fact that approximately 90% of the transports that we inspected were in breach of EU Regulation 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport. Often the animals are crammed in with insufficient floor space and have too little headroom which impairs ventilation. In many cases the water taps are not working or are not turned on or the water tank is empty. Even when the water system is working, the overcrowding means that many animals cannot reach the water devices.

The Commission was alerted to these problems by us on 5 April 2011 and again on 27 May. We urged the Commission to take action as a matter of urgency as extreme levels of suffering were likely to occur if the long delays at the border between Bulgaria and Turkey continued during the hot summer months. We were dismayed to find, when we were at the border earlier this month that the Commission and the Member States concerned have failed to take any effective action to address these problems. As a result of this failure, EU animals continue to experience immense suffering.

-Ends

Please give your support  to  http://legalaction4animalrights.net/about/

Serbia: Novi Pazar Zoo Now Produced As Youtube Video – Please Crosspost Link.

Further to all of our zoo campaigning recently, we have produced a quick video relating to the situation at Novi Pazar zoo.

Please feel free to use the following link when you send out any correspondence, as it will hopefully make the unaware aware of the terrible suffering of some Serbian zoo animals and the conditions in which they exist.

Youtube video link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tTtV7AYWBM&feature=channel_video_title

 

Uk: Despite Attempts By David Cameron To Kill The Introduction of Legislation, It Is Now The ‘Start of the End’ For Wild Animals In English and Uk Circuses.

SAV Comment.

Thursday 23rd June 2011 has been a monumental day fo circus animals in England and the rest of the Uk.  Despite overwhelming attempts by a government led by David Cameron (Prime Minister) to block the legislation calling for a ban, which included putting personal pressure on MPs involved in the issue, a vote in the House of Commons on the afternoon of 23/06/11 has now started the official wheels turning to enforce a ban on the use of all wild animals in circuses.

SAV wishes to especially congratulate Mark Pritchard MP for having the resolve to continue with his fight to introduce this legislation, despite major threats and opposition from David Cameron; who all of us in the Uk animal welfare lobby know is NO real friend of the animals or of legislation aimed at improving animal welfare.

Yesterday was a major defeat for those who wished to take no real, positive action in defence of animal welfare.  95% of the British public wanted a ban on the use of wild animals in circuses.  The government led by David Cameron even established an on line consultation to ask the public what they felt.  When the British public overwhelmingly showed they wanted a ban; the government ignored the wishes of the public and instead attempted to use EU and human rights laws as a feeble attempt to refuse the introduction of a ban.

The brilliant campaign group ‘Animal Defenders’ http://www.ad-international.org/about_us/  instructed Bircham Dyson Bell, leading Solicitors and Parliamentary Agents, to research the conformity of a ban on wild animals in circuses with the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Union Services Directive.

All the findings of the research showed one thing –

there are No obstacles left in the way for Government to implement outright ban”.

The parliamentary vote on 23/06/11 dealt a massive blow; another blow to the current government; a government now known as the “U turn government” because of the amount of reversing and back tracking and changes it is doing with regard its fledgling policies.

The use of wild animals in circuses is yet another issue where the government has been blown apart.

Thursday 23rd June 2011 was a great day for Uk circus animals.  It is the start of the end for beautiful animals performing cheap and degrading tricks for an uneducated audience.

The following links provide more information on this historic event.

SAV.

————————————————-

Watch the great speech by Mark Pritchard MP in the (London) House of Commons debate on 23/06/11 via the following BBC link:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13884165

Congratulations Mark !!

Latest (24/06/11) from Animal Defenders:

http://www.ad-international.org/animals_in_entertainment/go.php?id=2179&ssi=10

Anne the elephant beaten at Bobby Roberts Circus:

http://www.ad-international.org/animals_in_entertainment/go.php?id=2075&ssi=10

Anne the elephant safe at last

Anne the elephant has made a safe journey to Longleat Safari Park this morning after being handed over by Bobby Roberts Super Circus.
Read more…

http://www.ad-international.org/media_centre/gallery.php?g=94

Link:  http://www.haringeyindependent.co.uk/uk_national_news/9103884.No_10_climbdown_on_circus_ban_calls/

—————————————————————————————

No. 10 climbdown on circus ban calls

12:30am Friday 24th June 2011

Downing Street has signalled it will bow to pressure over MPs’ demands for a ban on the use of wild animals in circuses.

But there are still “unavoidable legal difficulties” that must be overcome before the practice can be outlawed, officials have insisted.

Ministers have steadfastly opposed the move fearing the Government will be left open to lawsuits from circus owners and workers. MPs agreed, however, to direct the coalition to introduce a ban from July next year after a debate in the Commons.

Although the decision is not binding, it is highly embarrassing for the Government and has heaped pressure on ministers to act. A Downing Street source said: “The Government will recognise the will of the House.”

Tory Mark Pritchard, who led the backbench call for a ban, claimed he had been threatened by the Prime Minister’s office unless he backed down.

In an open show of defiance, Wrekin MP Mr Pritchard told MPs he was first offered “incentive and reward” if he complied with the wishes of the party hierarchy but as he stood firm pressure was “ratcheted up” on him.

He said: “I had a call from the Prime Minister’s office directly and I was told that, unless I withdraw this motion, the Prime Minister himself said he would look upon it very dimly indeed.”

Mr Pritchard said: “I will not be bullied by any other whips. This is an issue I have campaigned on for many years.”

There are currently three travelling circuses in the UK, with a total of 39 wild animals, including zebras, lions, tigers and camels. Agriculture minister Jim Paice said Government lawyers advised that it was “highly likely” ministers would be challenged on the basis that an outright ban was “disproportionate in terms of improving welfare in circuses”.

A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs spokeswoman said: “The Government will listen to the view of the House and is sympathetic to the motion for a ban. We will continue to look carefully at how this could be introduced, but there are unavoidable legal difficulties that we cannot ignore.”

Link:  http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/27000-sign-wild-animal-circus-ban-petition-2299007.html

27,000 sign wild animal circus ban petition

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent

Friday, 17 June 2011

Almost 27,000 have signed The Independent’s online petition calling for the Government to ban wild animals in circuses, pushing it within a few thousand of its target.

The Independent is hoping that 30,000 people will put their name to the petition by Thursday when MPs vote on whether to direct the Coalition to introduce a ban.

Related articles

28,000 sign circuses petition ahead of crucial vote

Animal welfare groups are concerned that some MPs who have signed Commons motions backing a ban will not turn up because the three-hour backbench debate takes place on a Thursday afternoon when many would normally return to their constituencies.

In the run up to the vote, the RSPCA and other organisations are encouraging supporters to contact their MP urging them to vote.

Meanwhile The Independent is making a final appeal for people to sign its petition.

Signing it, Jenny Parker, of Sherborne, Dortset, wrote: “I find it hard to believe that in the so-called enlightened 21st century that we still have to petition the Government to ban such cruel and unnatural acts as performing animals in circuses.” Annik Piriou, from Oxford, remarked: “I would prefer to see animals in their natural environment, even if it is only on TV.”

The Captive Animals Protection Society, which is backing The Independent’s campaign, appealed for the public’s help.

Its director Liz Tyson said: “The numbers showing their support for a ban is growing daily – demonstrated by the almost 27,000 people that have signed the Independent petition. Interestingly, a petition set up just six days after this one, showing the level of support for keeping animals in circuses currently boasts only 594 signatures.”

She added: “We know that there are almost 200 MPs that have formally pledged their support for a ban by signing the EDM and many more who have told us they are behind us on this one but without this support being translated into votes, the animals will continue to suffer. We implore MP’s to attend the debate and make their opinion heard next Thursday.”

Ricky Gervais: “I am appalled

Multi award winning writer and comedian Ricky Gervais said: “Animal Defenders International’s recent footage of Anne the elephant being beaten graphically displays why the government should ban wild animals in circuses. I am appalled that wild animals are still kept in circuses and fully support the call for a ban. It is high time that Government got on and implemented one.”

Celebrity Designer Meg Mathews said: “As an advocate of animal welfare, the footage released by ADI of poor Annie the elephant being so cruelly treated made me sick to my stomach. It’s time for this government to stop dragging its heels and finally take action to end the suffering that animals like Anne endure every day in UK circuses.”

Brian May, legendary guitarist, song writer and founding member of Queen said: “The use of wild animals in circuses is cruel, distasteful and unacceptable in the 21st century. Our present government is currently backing away from ending this abhorrent practice. We at ‘Save-Me’ call on David Cameron personally to act now, and take a step towards making Britain worthy of its desired status as a nation of animal-lovers. While wild animals still exist in circuses, we remain very far away from that title.”

Star of Miss Marple and theatre director Julia McKenzie said: “The Government needs to listen to the will of the Great British public and implement a wild animal circuses ban without further delay. Their decision is flawed and needs rapid review. I urge the Minister to reconsider.”

Actor, historian and writer John Nettles said: “I am absolutely amazed that wild animals in circuses still exist in the UK. I was appalled when ADI informed me of Government’s recent decision and I would urge all animal lovers to get behind their campaign in the interests of animal protection and welfare.”

Radio personality, DJ, presenter and broadcaster Mark Radcliffe said: “I am amazed that wild animal circuses still exist in the UK, and like the vast majority of the public and politicians I want to see a ban on their use once and for all – and I want this to happen now. Successive governments have been mulling this issue over now for far too long, and it is high time that the Coalition Government acted decisively to bring an end to this animal suffering – once and for all. They have been provided with all the evidence and information that they need and it is time to now listen to the will of the UK public.”

Comedian, actor and author Alexei Sayle said: “There are many grey areas in matters of morality – using wild animals in circuses is not one of these grey areas. It is simply and obviously wrong and indefensible. The sooner this blot on a civilised country is eradicated the better it will be for all of us – animals and humans.”

And the poet, novelist and playwright Benjamin Zephaniah said: “There are so many ways that intelligent human beings can have fun, and exploiting animals should not be one of them. Beautiful animals are not for our entertainment, in fact it’s our duty to respect and protect them. I am a real animal lover and I would never go to a circus that had wild animals, so I’m appealing to the Government to heed ADI’s advice. The Great British public have made it clear, they demand better, so the Government should do the right thing for animal welfare by implementing a ban.”

Mark Pritchard MP, Jim Fitzpatrick MP and Bob Russell MP have secured a three hour backbench cross party debate to discuss the issue in the Chamber on Thursday 23 June commencing at 3pm and running to 6pm.

Immediately afterwards a vote is expected to be taken urging that the Coalition Government uses its powers to introduce a regulation banning the use of all wild animals in circuses.

A copy of the joint letter to the Prime Minister can be viewed here.

**Recent HistoryAnimal Defenders Show that there would be NO breaches of Acts, despite what the government says.

Link:  http://www.ad-international.org/animals_in_entertainment/go.php?id=2157&ssi=10

ADI’s legal advice: circus ban would not breach Human Rights Act or European Services Directive

Posted: 2 June 2011. Updated: 2 June 2011

No obstacles left in way for Government to implement outright ban.

Animal Defenders International (ADI) has received expert legal advice stating that an outright ban on the use of wild animals in circuses would not breach the Human Rights Act or the EU Services Directive, once again paving the way for the Coalition Government to implement a ban on the use of wild animals in circuses without further delay.

ADI’s latest announcement follows their statement last week that Defra officials had indicated in 2009 that it was possible to introduce a ban on the use of wild animals in circuses under the auspices of the Animal Welfare Act 2006. The week previously ADI had exposed the Government as being incorrect by uncovering that there was no Austrian legal challenge in the courts, cited by the Government as a primary reason not to ban.

Jan Creamer, Chief Executive of ADI said: We have proved conclusively that there is no Austrian legal challenge, no need for new legislation and that a ban would not breach the Human Rights Act nor the EU Services Directive.

“Once again, ministers have been found wanting and we have proved the Coalition Government to be incorrect, legally and factually. Every obstacle they have put in the way to prevent an outright ban has now been knocked down. The government needs to stop looking for excuses and bring in a ban. 95% of the public wants a ban, parliament wants a ban, it is therefore in the public interest to bring in a ban.”

Knocked out: Human Rights Act

Last week, lawyers instructed by ADI analysed if a ban could potentially affect a person’s right to respect for private and family life under the UK’s Human Rights Act (HRA) (article 8) and the protection for property (article 1 of protocol 1 HRA). The advice concluded that a ban would be within the ‘margin of appreciation’ afforded to the UK.

Furthermore, the legal advice is that if a ban is proposed because it is considered ethically wrong in itself to use wild animals in circuses, a ban would be the only measure which would achieve this public interest aim and would be automatically proportionate. Therefore, the ban would not be in breach of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

Knocked out: EU Services Directive

In addition, it was concluded that the UK would not be in contravention of the EU Services Directive by implementing national legislation which banned the use of wild animals in circuses and it would not be unlawful under EU law generally.

The European Court of Justice would accord a Member State a wide degree of discretion in this matter and since 2002 the European Commission has reiterated that the decision would be at the discretion of the individual Member State, and they would not wish to become involved.

Tim Phillips, ADI’s Campaigns Director said: “ADI’s recent exposé at the winter quarters of Bobby Roberts’ Super Circus, which showed the appalling abuse of Anne the elephant and Monty the camel and led to a worldwide public outcry, has provided the Government with the perfect opportunity to ban the use of wild animals in circuses.

“However, the Coalition Government seems to be going to great lengths to place obstacles in the way and create smoke screens. What is becoming clear to us is their decision not to ban and subsequent actions continues to undermine their position, which is becoming increasingly untenable and the pressure is not subsiding. The Government ignores the will of the UK public at its peril, and may soon discover this to their detriment.”

Earlier this week ADI and other animal protection groups including Animal Aid, BVA, PETA, WSPA and RSPCA sent a joint open letter to the Prime Minister, requesting that he rethinks his Government’s current position.

ADI is in the process of drafting a series of legal briefings for politicians to keep the pressure up on the Government to do the right thing morally and ethically – wild animals do not belong in travelling circuses.

ADI instructed Bircham Dyson Bell, leading Solicitors and Parliamentary Agents, to research the conformity of a ban on wild animals in circuses with the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Union Services Directive.

—————————————-

SAY THANKS TO MP’s WHO VOTED FOR THE BAN:

Dear friends,

Please have a look at this:
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/end-circus-cruelty-say-thankyou

This week MPs voted to ban the cruel use of wild animals by circuses. The ban isn’t law yet, but it could be if MPs keep pushing the government to end this cruel and outdated practice.

I’ve just added my name to a letter to MPs thanking them for what they’ve done so far and urging them to keep pushing for a circus ban.

I thought you might want to sign the letter too.

Click here to find out more and sign the letter now:
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/end-circus-cruelty-say-thankyou

Thanks,
Mark