Turkey: Stray Killings in Ankara After Alleged Human Attack – German AW Organisation Files a Motion With the Turkish Authorities to Verify the Real Facts. Sample Letter to Send.

A war against stray dogs has now erupted in Ankara,
with dogs being tortured, burned and killed all over the place.

Hi all,
 
had this in from a German/Turkish initiative yesterday:

http://www.animalprotectiongroup.de/tuerkei/apg-antraege-petitionen-tuerkei/403-ankara-sincan-verbrannte-gequaelte-strasenhunde.html

 
On March 29th a retired teacher of Iranian origin, who had lived for many years in Eryaman Ankara, has, according to news reports (to be treated with caution), been attacked and killed by strays during his morning sport (jogging).

Although the true cause of death has not yet been determined, a war against stray dogs has now erupted in Ankara, with dogs being tortured, burned and killed all over the place.
This must be stopped.

The initiative of my contact, http://www.animalprotectiongroup.de, has filed a motion with the Turkish authorities to verify the cause of death of this person and protect the stray dogs.
 
News reports:
http://haber.ihlassondakika.com/haber/Baskentte-katil-kopek-dehseti—4851_466155.html
http://www.haberturk.com/yasam/haber/729661-kopekler-yine-saldirdi

Turkish Facebook page and IMAGES:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/meral-filiz/tetik%C3%A7i-medya-g%C3%B6z%C3%BCn-aydineryamanda-k%C3%B6pekler-%C3%B6ld%C3%BCr%C3%BClmeye-devam-ediyorankara-bugun/3354450911347

Please write your own short letter in English oder Turkish (if you are able) or use the one provided below, thank you.
 
 
To be sent to:
‘bimer@basbakanlik.gov.tr’; ‘ankaracbs@adalet.gov.tr’; ‘sincancbs@adalet.gov.tr’
‘cevreorman@cob.gov.tr’; ‘bakan@cevreorman.gov.tr’; ‘mahalli.bilgiedinme@icisleri.gov.tr’; ‘mahalli@icisleri.gov.tr’; ‘islemlerilleridaresi@icisleri.gov.tr’; ‘illeridaresi@icisleri.gov.tr’; ‘cumhurbaskanligi@tccb.gov.tr’; ‘ozelkalem@cob.gov.tr’; ‘veyseleroglu@gmail.com’; ‘ozelkalem@cob.gov.tr’; ‘bilgiedinme@ormansu.gov.tr’; ‘etikkurul@basbakanlik.gov.tr’; ‘hksm@cob.gov.tr’; ‘cevrekom@tbmm.gov.tr’; ‘bhim@egm.gov.tr’; ‘bcoskun@cumhuriyet.com.tr’; ‘webadmin@milliyet.com.tr’; ‘editor@stargazete.com’; ‘posta@simge.com.tr’; ‘okur@milliyet.com.tr’; ‘okurhatti@zaman.com.tr’
 
SAMPLE LETTER (text of motion filed by APG)
 
Sincan Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı’na,
Ankara Eryaman’da, 26.03.2012 tarihinde, Etimesgut ilçesi
Eryaman Tunahan Mahallesi’nde,  sabah 08.00 sıralarında Tunahan
Mahallesi’nde spor yapmak için dışarı çıkan İran uyruklu emekli öğretmen Majid
Yahyakhani (60), bir anda karşısına çıkan 8-9 köpeğin saldırısına uğramıştır ve
hayatını kaybetmiştir.Akabinde, 30.03.2012 tarihinde Eryaman’da bir köpeğe önce
tecavüz edilmiş,makata yakın yerde delik açılmış,sonra dayakla boynu kırılmış
ve hala ölmedi diye yakılmıştır.Bugün yine olay yerinde bir başka köpek
zehirlenerek öldürülmüştür.
Tüm bunlar şüphe çekicidir.

1-Saat 08.00 sıraları çok erken bir saat değildir hatta
insanların işe ve okula gitmek için uyandığı, yola çıktığı en işlek saatlerden
biridir.Olay anının sadece bir tanığı olması ilginçtir.
2-Majid Yahyakhani saldırıya uğradığında, mutlaka yardım
istemiş olmalıdır.Köpekler saldırdığında kendisinin sesini duyan sadece bir
kişimi olmuştur?Ayrıca köpekler saldırdığında mutlaka havlamış ve hırlamış
olmalıdırlar bunuda duyan olmamış mıdır?
3-Aç köpeklerin saldırıldığı söylenmektedir.Köpekler Majid
Yahyakhani’yi öldürdükten sonra yemeye çalışmış mıdır?

4-Majid Yahyakhani ilk kezmi sabah sporuna çıkmıştır? Sabah
sporu yapma alışkanlığı varsa, bu köpeklerin varlığını biliyor olmalı ve önlem
alarak çıkmış olmalıdır ancak;yanında sopa vb.kendini koruyacak bir alet yada
acil durumlarda haber vereceği cep telefonu dahi yoktur.

5-Majid Yahyakhani ancak hemen hayatını kaybederse yardım
isteyemez.Köpeklerin Majid Yahyakhani’yi hemen öldürecek şekilde bir darbesi
yada ısırık izi var mıdır?
6-Majid Yahyakhani’yi öldüren köpekler tespit edilmiş midir?
Sahipsiz sokak hayvanları olduğu kesin midir?
7-Majid Yahyakhani’yi öldürme planı olan birilerinin özel
eğitilmiş saldırgan köpekleri o alana özel olarak getirip, Majid Yahyakhani’yi
öldürtüp, köpekleri geri toplama ihtimali yani cinayet ihtimali düşünülmüş
müdür?
8-Polisler olay yerine ulaştığında saldıran köpekleri görmüş
müdür?
9-Daha önce grup halinde dolaşan ve insanları ısıran köpek
vakaları duymuşken, hiç insanları öldüren bir grup sokak köpeği duymadık.Bu
durum ilginçtir.
10-Olay sonrasında bölgede gerçekleşen ve büyük olasılıkla
artarak devam edecek olan sahipsiz sokak hayvanları katliamı için önlem
alınacakmıdır?
11-Olay sonrası tecavüz edilerek işkenceyle öldürülen sokak
hayvanı ayrıca şüphe çekicidir.İnsanların sokak köpeklerini bu olaydan sonra
galeyana gelip öldürmesi öfkeli insan psikolojisine uysada bu tepkiden dolayı
normal bir insanın bir köpeğe tecavüz etmesi akıl dışıdır.Bu sebeple bu köpeğe
tecavüz eden kişinin olası komployla alakası olabileceği araştırılacakmıdır?
12-Bu olay toplumu ikiye ayırmıştır.Tüm sokak köpekleri
ölmeli diyenler, sokak köpeklerinin yaşam hakkını savunanlar.
TBMM ‘de bekleyen yeni hayvan hakları kanununa bu olayın
denk gelmesi ilginçtir.
 

Bu bağlamda, bu köpek saldırısı olayının daha dikkatli
incelenerek, Majid Yahyakhani’nin ölümüne cinayet şüphesinin eklenmesi,
sahipsiz sokak hayvanına tecavüz edip işkence eden kişinin acilen bulunması
gerekmektedir.Bu köpeğin cesedi şu anda Mehtap Aksoyoğlu’ ndadır.Kendisinden bu
köpeğin alınıp, adli mercilerce köpekte bulunan delillerin araştırılıp bu
köpeğin katilinin Majid Yahyakhani’nin ölümüyle alakası olup olmadığı
araştırılmasını ,ayrıca yukarıda madde madde yazdığımız şüphelerin biran önce
araştırılmasını talep ediyoruz.Bimer üzerinden de yaptığımız müracaatımıza
ilişkin 4982 ve 3071 sayiılı yasalar gereği kanuni süresi içinde tarafımıza
cevap ve bilgi verilmesini emir ve müsaadelerinize saygılarımızla arz ediyoruz.
 
Your name/Address

Serbia: DOGCATCHERS’ SAFARI IN NEW BELGRADE – ATTACK ON HUMAN AND DOGS’ LIFE.

SAV comment – The following report is being presented by SAV to the Legal Affairs department of the EU, Brussels, as proof that Serbia is NOT enforcing the rule of law; a requirement for all member states seeking EU accession.

If this is the way Serbia continues to abuse animals, then it is not wanted within the EU.  If it gains EU membership, then we will really start to have a good time with EU Legal Affairs in presenting all stories from within Serbia.

——————————————————————
Information provided through ‘SAWN’ – the Serbian Animal Welfare Network.

Wording directly as written, with no modifications.

DOGCATCHERS’ SAFARI IN NEW BELGRADE  – ATTACK ON HUMAN AND DOGS’ LIFE                 

On the 13th of March 2012 Veterinary Belgrade Zoo hygiene team started to „clear the ground“ of the street dogs in two New Belgrade locations: at large park between the Palace of Serbia (previously known as SIV) and Danube River and at the former building site of Energoprojekt at Španski borci Street.

The dogs by  the Palace of Serbia originate from dogs which have been living at the big building site in Proleterske solidarnosti Street. Upon completion of all works on the building site the dogs have moved into the uninhabited area by the Palace of Serbia. The dogs from Energoprojekt building siteoriginate from few dogs which survived the poisoning by strychnine in the vicinity of Belgrade Arena in September of 2005 shortly before the European championship in volleyball when Veterinary Station Belgrade ( the old name of Veterinary Belgrade) received an order of the Belgrade City Department of Environment and Ecology to “clear the ground“.

The lawsuit of the fosters of those dogs to the Prosecutor’s office despite all pathological and toxicological findings and autopsy reports as well as witness statements the findings did not go further than the County Prosecutor’s.                 

On the 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th of March 2012 at Palace of Serbia the dog catchers were chasing the dogs driving in five new cars of Veterinary Belgrade with rotating lights on. The dogcatchers were chasing the group of distrustful, peaceful, well fed and healthy dogs which do not approach people on the lawns around the woods and bushes where dogs were hiding. The frightened dogs fled in all directions.

As the dogs were running faster, the dogcatchers were driving faster with no care about the direction in which they were chasing the dogs and driving them out to boulevards of Mihajlo Pupin and Nikola Tesla. Two young dogs which were driven out in that way in full gallop on Nikola Tesla Boulevard were killed under the wheels of cars on the 13th of March 2012. So doing the dogcatchers directly caused the death of the dogs and directly endangered the safety of traffic participants, i.e. they endangered lives of people who were driving or were driven the boulevard at the time. Except the direct attack on the lives of humans and dogs, the dogcatchers traumatized the drivers and the passengers of the cars by which the dogs were killed, as well as the passengers of the buses who were disgusted by the whole scene watching the chase during a stop at traffic lights.

Their “booty“, young dogs about a year old packed in two large parked vans. The older dogs as faster, stronger, more experienced and more skilled at hiding resisted a few more days.  On the 16th of March 2012 the dog catchers came in only two cars at Palace of Serbia going on to chase traumatized and already tortured dogs on the lawns. They hit the oldest bitch named Big Mama by the car then and they killed her right at the spot by smashing her neck.

The witness Aleksandra Dokić ran to the dog and photographed the corpse of it before the dogcatchers returned to carry it away. The fosters Nada Prokić and Mileta Kusurović were also at the spot.     After completion of the chase at Palace of Serbia the dogcatchers went over to an “easier“ job at ex-building site of Energoprojekt.

A group of about ten dogs lives, i.e. lived on the site which is no longer in function. All dogs in the group except one female dog were neutered, vaccinated and micro chipped by Veterinary Belgrade during the fall of 2011 and earlier. 

The dogs are distrustful, non-aggressive, well fed and calm. They did not leave the fenced area of the former building site. The fosters called the dogcatcher and helped them to catch most of these dogs by using blowers in the fall of 2011 to be neutered in Neutering Center and Shelter Resnik and then returned to the dogs’ habitat at Energoprojekt. The dogs were returned from Resnik micro chipped on names of the fosters who helped the dogcatchers to catch the dogs.                 

As it was in 2006, 2007 and 2008  Zoo hygiene again forces the fosters to accept status and responsibilities of the owners in order to return neutered dogs to their habitats. But there is a difference compared to the previous decade: On the 21st of September 2011 the City Assembly adopted the latest Strategy of Solving Non Owned Dogs and Cats Problem on Territory of Belgrade City. Veterinary Belgrade as a direct perpetrator of the Strategy is required to operate in accordance with and on the guidelines of the Strategy.

One of the specific objectives of the Strategy is the introduction to the legal status of the street animal fosters. On the contrary Veterinary Belgrade has been turning the fosters into the owners of street dogs for months now, thereby reversing the stated objective of the Strategy, as well as one of two basic methods of  the Strategy: Catch – Neuter – Release.

On the other hand Veterinary Belgrade usually does not inform the “owners“ of street dogs when their dogs are caught despite the Regulation on Conditions which must be fulfilled by Shelters and Pensions for Animals (Pravilnik o uslovima koje moraju da ispunjavajuprihvatilišta i pansioni za životinje), and which obliges Veterinary Belgradeto (Article 36 point 2) and which has recently entered into force.

If the “owners“ are informed they are not allowed to take their dogs over. The whole problem has the economic aspect too: catching and transport of owned dog is charged 5.500,00 rsd and a day of dog’s stay in shelter is charged 400,00 rsd.                 

On the 13th of March 1012 the dogcatchers started to hunt the already neutered dogs at Energoprojekt which are registered as owned dogs of people who feed them and take care of them. One dog was caught by the blower on the first day  of hunt and another dog was caught the same way on the next day.

On the 15th of March the remaining, already traumatized, intelligent dogs hided under worker’s shack looking for security.    Finding out their hiding place the dogcatchers battered at the shack, moved concrete slabs on which the shack is placed so putting the dogs in danger of falling off the shack onto them. The dogcatchers used iron bars, wooden beams, iron hooks and wooden boards to blindly hit the dogs from one side of the shack while other dogcatchers  were waiting on the other side with wire ropes to put over the dogs’ necks.

They were caught by the wire rope and drew out  a terrified dog with bloody head then and they quickly gave him an injection of anesthetic to be able to towed the dog to the van. Witnesses who watched “bothered“ the dogcatcher by watching what they were doing, so  dogcatcher Marković cursed and insulted one of the fosters Emilija Barišić, an elder woman dressed in mourning clothes.

On the 16th of March 2012 the foster Nada Prokić came to the site to be witness of the way of catching the dogs previously gotten permission from the guard at the entrance to enter. The dogcatchers had just towed a long time ago neutered bitch named Ema.  Seeing Nada Prokić, they immediately stopped working and all of them were silent except the dogcatcher Marković. The dogcatcher Marković addressed rudely the  foster Prokić yelling at her “what she’s doing there“, and then he phoned a superior in Veterinary Belgrade.

The superior instructed dogcatcher Marković to call police, which dogcatcher Marković did several times in a row, i.e. until police patrol came on the spot. Dogcatcher Marković intercepted police officers at the entrance of the site and explained the officer that  Nada Prokić “hindered them in their work“.

Another witness, foster Veselinović joined Nada Prokić trying to talk to the officer. Having entered the site officer Trajković, badge number 10 56 92, asked identity documents of both fosters and  requested them to leave someone else’s property, because they “failed to indicate their arrival and they hindered the people who work“.

Nada Prokić told officer Trajkoviću that she had entered the site with the permission of the site guard, in order to be a witness – observer of the dogcatchers’ work, i.e. inhuman catching of animals that violate Animal Well-being Law, Veterinary Medicine Law, European Convention, as well as Veterinary Belgrade Regulation on Manner of Catching Animals.

For the above reasons, Nada Prokić refused to leave the site. The policeman grabbed her roughly by the arm, dragged her from the site and pushed her into a police car. Then the dogcatchers continued their action. Nada Prokić spent entire morning at the police station. A policeman who was standing right next to her; she neither could go to toilet nor to drink water.

To make the picture of what happened more complete it should be stated that Nada Prokić is a retired doctor and professor at Medicine Faculty of Belgrade University, a small and frail woman. Foster Veselinović is also Belgrade University professor at the Faculty of Mining and Geology.

On the 17th of March 2012 Deputy City Secretary for Utilities and Housing Services, Department Zoo hygiene, Vladimir Terzin answered by phone to a foster who complained of the cruelty with which the dogcatchers treat the dogs during catching them, hurting them with hooks, poles, rods…:

“If it is needed we will roll over even a shack!“

The dogcatchers stopped the hunt on the 21st and 22nd of March, and then they went on with pursuit of the dogs. Veterinary Inspection of Ministry of Agriculture, Trade, Water and Forestry responsible for supervising the implementation of the Animal Well-being Law as well as Veterinary Administration did not respond to any of many reports of violation of the Law by Veterinary Belgrade.

Bulgaria: The Killing Fields of the EU For Stray Animals – Now More Than Ever; Time for EU Legislation on Stray Animal Welfare. This IS BULGARIA – 2012 !

This is the real face of EU member state Bulgaria we can show the world now !

These are the results of the Bulgarian government running a “cruelty free” political strategy against stray dogs population!

This little girl visits the animal “shelter” Seslavtsi for walking the prisoners every week.

She looks devastated, she IS devastated, because today she understands what is going to happen to the new puppies in the last cell.

Maybe this will be the last piece of decent, non political / non mayoral, humanity they would have seen before they are put to sleep, labelled as ‘aggressive’.  As the following photo shows; she puts her hand into the cell to pat the animal the Bularian government and authorities label as ‘aggressive’.

The photographs below show the world the ‘aggressive’ dogs of Bulgaria; a nation which is now the shame of the EU because of what it is doing – where political ‘put the money in your pocket for your own interests’ take priority over the welfare of animals, animal welfare which is funded by the EU.

Bulgarian MEPs should bow their heads in shame that they represent such a politically bent and corrupt system.

All healthy, neutered and socialized dogs from the Malinova Dolina district in the country capital – Sofia are going to be euthanized as ‘aggressive’, as a reaction to an incident from two days ago, when in the same district an old man was ‘attacked’ by aggressive dogs and is in a hospital.

Since there is no certified test for ‘aggression’ in Bulgaria, and the aggressive dogs cannot be caught (because they hide from people, unlike the socialized ones), the Mayor of Sofia – Ms Fandakova has ordered all dogs that happen to inhabit the district, and can be caught by the hunters, to be killed.

This is Bulgaria’s “cruelty free” politics!

Please spread the word and let the world know about the way a European country and EU member state called Bulgaria handles their strays problem in the 21st Century!

In the album you can see all the “aggressive” dogs – http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.352728011430693.72688.167390933297736&type=1

SHAME ON BULGARIA ! – Shame on the Mayor of Sofia – Ms Fandakova – and where are the Bulgarian MEPs to allow this to happen in ‘their’ Europe ?

** WARNING ** – the following photos show many ‘aggressive’ dogs according to the Bulgarian authorities.  As our visitors to this site live in the real world, away from Bulgarian politics, we will leave you to decide on what the pictures show.

The little Bulgarian girl in the photos above will hopefully continue to grow up with the compassion that she obviously has – unlike the Mayor of Sofia and other EU member state Bulgarian politicians.  She is the future – and a hopeful future of sense and compassion; unlike what is being witnessed with Bulgarian politicians at the moment.

She is the future – and a hopeful future of sense and compassion; unlike what is being witnessed with Bulgarian politicians at the moment.

 

 

USA: Wolf Torture and Execution Continues in the Northern Rockies. Further Updated 03/04/2012.

http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/wolf_torture_and_execution_continues_in_the_northern_rockies/
 
Wolf Torture and Execution Continues in the Northern Rockies
by James William Gibson – March 28, 2012
Montana Anti-Trapping Group Gets Death Threat for Releasing Photos

On March 16, a Friday, a US Forest Service employee from Grangeville, Idaho, laid out his wolf traps. The following Monday, using the name “Pinching,” he posted his story and pictures on www.Trapperman.com . “I got a call on Sunday morning from a FS [Forest Service] cop that I know. You got one up here as there was a crowd forming. Several guys had stopped and taken a shot at him already,” wrote Pinching. The big, black male wolf stood in the trap, some 300-350 yards from the road, wounded—the shots left him surrounded by blood-stained snow. Pinching concluded his first post, “Male that went right at 100 pounds. No rub spots on the hide, and he will make me a good wall hanger.”

 
(The here depicted Josh Bransford is a federal employee and public servant out of the Red River Ranger District on the Nez Perce National Forest in north-central Idaho. As a taxpayer, you have a right to call the Front Desk and complain about his behavior. Call for his resignation and/or ask that he be suspended without pay for a period of time for his actions 208-842-2245.)

All photographs were taken from Trapperman.com website are being reproduced here under Fair Use“Pinching” with the wolf he trapped that he wrote would make him “a good wall hanger.”
The Trapperman website went wild with comments. “That’s a dandy!! Keep at it,” wrote Watarrat. Otterman asked, “All the gray on that muzzle make a guy wonder how old he is or if it is just part of his black coloring.” Pinching’s picture of the wolf’s paw caught in the trap got special attention. “Is that the MB750 stamped ‘wolf’ on the pan?” asked one man. “Looks to be a perfect pad catch. Congratulations! Pinching confirmed the trap model and commented, “Oh an [sic] by the way, a wolf is a heck of a lot of work to put on a stretcher! Man those things hold on to their hide like no other!”

By late March some 117 Idaho wolves had been killed in traps and snares, and another 251 shot. Montana saw 166 killed, for a total of 534 wolves out of an estimated 1150 in the two states. Although Montana’s season ended in February, Idaho is not quite done. Both states have announced plans for increased hunting in the 2012-2013, and discussions are underway among hunting groups and state officials to allow private donations to establish wolf bounties.

                                                                                              Wolf’s paw in trap.

As recently as the spring of 2011, gray wolves in the Northern Rockies received protection from he Endangered Species Act. But in April, 2011 Congress passed a rider on a federal appropriations bill removing them. Montana Democratic Senator Jon Tester, facing a 2012 challenge from Republican Congressman Danny Rehberg, wanted to show Democrats hated wolves just as much as Republicans. Conservation groups filed suit in Montana’s federal district court, claiming the delisting represented an unconstitutional infringement by Congress on the judicial branch while it deliberated an ongoing lawsuit over federal wolf protection.

Losing in district court, the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Friends of the Clearwater, WildEarth Guardians, the Center for Biological Diversity, and Cascadia Wildlands appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit. On March 14, the appeals court rejected their arguments, upholding the Congressional wolf delisting as a lawful amendment. This decision might well mark the endpoint for the conservation movement’s decades-long fundamental strategy of litigating in federal courts to promote wolf recovery in the Northern Rocky Mountains.

                                                                                      A hunter and his dead prey.

Thus wolves, demonized by the far-right in the Rockies as disease-ridden monsters and icons of the federal government (see my Summer 2011 Journal story, “Cry Wolf”), now face a brutal campaign to radically reduce their numbers so far that extermination can not be ruled out. Idaho’s Governor Butch Otter declared in a March 25 news conference that his state faced a “disaster emergency” from wolves. “We don’t want them here.”

Skirmishing on the web escalates. Footloose Montana, an anti-trapping group, posted the trapped wolf’s pictures on its website, drawing over a 1,000 comments within days. Word spread. Nabeki, founder of Howling for Justice, opined that “This wolf will be the face of the cruelty and ugliness that is the Idaho hunt…Our forests are hiding acts of unspeakable horrors that are being perpetuated on innocent animals.” Protesters called Idaho and Montana tourist bureaus, demanding the hunts end. By Monday, March 26, Trapperman learned that its photos now circulated offsite. The group’s administrator demanded that Footloose Montana remove the photographs.

Footloose staff and board members also received an anonymous death threat in their email: “I would like to donate [sic] a gun to your childs [sic] head to make sure you can watch it die slowly so I can have my picture taken with it’s [sic] bleeding dying screaming for mercy body. YOU WILL BE THE TARGET NEXT BITCHES!”

FBI agents and Missoula, Montana police received copies of the threat.

Wolf advocates hope that these pictures will go viral, shaming a nation into facing the torture people inflict on animals and the moral and political failures that promote and legitimize it.

—————————————————————————————————

*** FURTHER ACTION / UPDATE – 03/04/2012 ***

ID Forest Service employee and trapper, Josh Bransford, had nothing better to do than to pose in front of a wolf caught in one of his leghold trap – the wolf had already been shot a couple of times while he was helplessly caught in Bransford’s trap! This brutal and callous behavior, particularly when displayed by an agency employee, whose salary we pay, is unacceptable. For more information, scroll down to read John Adams’ article in the Great Falls Tribune. Thank you for your help! Your friends at Footloose Montana
Please voice your opinion about this tragedy and call or send an e-mail today!

Here is some contact information. Please be respectful:

Nez Perce National Forest: Forest Supervisor Rick Brazell (208) 983-7000 / rbrazell@fs.fed.us

Deputy Forest Supervisor Ralph Rau (208) 983-7017 / rerau@fs.fed.us

Fire Management: Bob Lippincott (208) 983-4066 / blippincott@fs.fed.us

Public Affairs: Laura Smith (208) 983-5143 / lasmith@fs.fed.us

Idaho Fish and Game: Director Virgil Moore: virgil.moore@idfg.idaho.gov

Idaho Fish and Game Director Virgil Moore: (208) 334-3771.

Please sign this petition, which will be sent to:

USDA Office of Ethics Forestry Ethics Branch(Lorraine (Rainee) Luciano, Branch Chief Agency: U.S. Forest Service) and UDSA Forest Service Chief(Tom Tidwell)

http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-the-torture-of-wolves-in-our-forests

Photos of live, trapped wolf prompt threats to Missoula-based group

A photo downloaded from an online trapping forum shows an Idaho trapper posing in front of a wolf that was caught in a foot-hold trap and then allegedly shot at by bystanders. Missoula-based anti-trapping group members say they received death threats after posting the photo on their Facebook page. PHOTO COURTESY EARTH ISLAND JOURNAL.

HELENA — A Missoula-based anti-trapping organization said it received a threatening email this month after the group posted graphic photos on the Internet of a live Idaho wolf caught in a foot-hold trap.

Anja Heister, executive director of Footloose Montana, on March 22 posted a series of photos gleaned from an online trapping forum called Trapperman.com on her personal and Footloose Montana Facebook sites.

Heister said she opened Footloose Montana’s email inbox on Monday and found what she believed to be a death threat directed at family members of the organization:

“I would like to donate (sic) a gun to your childs (sic) head to make sure you can watch it die slowly so I can have my picture taken with it’s (sic) bleeding dying screaming for mercy body. YOU WILL BE THE TARGET NEXT BITCHES!” the message read.

Heister said the email was in response to the group posting photos of a northern Idaho trapper’s March 18 wolf kill, which was detailed on the online trapping forum.

The photos show trapper Josh Bransford, a fire management officer for the Nez Perce National Forest, kneeling and smiling for the camera as a wolf he caught in a foot-hold trap stands behind him in a ring of blood-soaked snow. Another photo shows a close-up of the wolf’s paw caught in the trap. A third photo shows the trapper posing with his catch.

Heister said Footloose Montana, which is actively campaigning to ban trapping in Montana, has received plenty of hostile emails and phone calls since 2007 but never anything that rose to this level.

“It has a cumulative effect on your psyche,” Heister said. “I’m not easily scared, but when I read this I got really concerned.”

Heister said she reported the threatening email to local and federal law enforcement officials. Missoula Police Sgt. Travis Welch confirmed the department received the report of the malicious email and that it was assigned to an investigator, but he declined to comment further.

In an online blog on Earth Island Journal’s website, writer James William Gibson recounted what Bransford — who goes by the handle “Pinching” — wrote about the photos. Bransford’s post has since been removed.

“I got a call on Sunday morning from a FS (Forest Service) cop that I know. You got one up here,” the post said, and then continued, “there was a crowd forming. Several guys had stopped and taken a shot at him already,” the post read, according to Gibson.

According to Bransford the wolf was a 100-pound male with “no rub spots” making an “good wall hanger.”

Bransford did not return calls or emails seeking comment Thursday.

As of late Thursday the photos posted on Footloose Montana’s Facebook page had received nearly 900 comments. Online commenters on both the Earth Island Journal and the Footloose Montana Facebook page expressed outrage over the photos. Many viewers were angry Bransford posed for a portrait with the wounded wolf before killing it.

Dave Linkhart, spokesman for the National Trappers Association, said there’s nothing wrong with a trapper posing with his catch before killing the animal.

“You pose with a successful catch just like you do with a successful hunt,” Linkhart said. “People make the problem of attributing human feelings and emotions to these animals.”

Linkhart claimed trapped animals don’t suffer, so taking the time to shoot a photograph does not cross ethical boundaries.

“If you look at the trap — across the pad of the foot like that — if you were to release the animal it would walk away like nothing happened,” Linkhart said.

Marc Bekoff is a former professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Colorado, Boulder and fellow of the Animal Behavior Society who has studied the social behavior of wolves and coyotes, among other animals.

“That wolf was suffering immeasurably. Not only physically by having his foot locked in a trap, but also being shot at,” said Bekoff, the author of several books on animal psychology and emotion. “This was not hunting. This was having an animal having its foot smashed in trap and then shooting at it with bullets. This wolf was tortured.”

Linkhart said if the wolf was shot at, that isn’t the trapper’s fault.

“Somebody else came up there and shot that animal first. That is illegal. What the trapper has done here is not,” Linkhart said. “The problem was not the trap. It was the illegal activity of the hunters who shot at that wolf.”

Reach Tribune Capital Bureau Chief John S. Adams at 442-9493, or jadams@greatfallstribune.com. Follow him on Twitter @TribLowdown.
http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20120330/NEWS01/203300316/Photos-live-trapped-wolf-prompt-threats-Missoula-based-group

 

 

 

 

Bulgaria: 02/04/12 – Order for Euthanazia Cancelled – But the Fight is NOT Over – Please Sign Petition to Authorities – Links Provided In Post.

Source – http://legalaction4animalrights.net/2012/04/02/bulgaria-dont-kill-the-strays-of-sofia-update/
BULGARIA: don’t kill the strays of Sofia –UPDATE
 

UPDATE from Occupy Europe Animals

BULGARIA: don’t kill the strays of Sofia – UPDATE:
The order to kill the dogs who had been already caught, has been cancelled! … The dogs are alive
But we must keep the pressure on – the battle is not over yet!
For more information about the background of this action, please visit:
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/bulgaria-the-stray-dogs-of-sofia-are-in-eminent-danger.html

* * * Please SIGN & SHARE this important ONLINE PETITION * * *
By signing our petition at http://www.change.org/petitions/bulgaria-don-t-kill-the-strays-of-sofia the protest letter below will instantly be send to:

the President of Bulgaria
the Prime Minister of Bulgaria
the Minister of Agriculture and Food
the Mayor of Sofia, Ms J Fandakova
EU-Commissioner John Dalli
the Bulgarian Members of the European Parliament

PROTEST LETTER

Mr President,
Dear Government Officials of Bulgaria,
Dear Members of the European Parliament,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

we have learned of your intention to kill all stray dogs who happen to live in the Malinova Dolina district in the country capital Sofia, regardless if they are sick and/or aggressive or healthy, neutered and socialized. All dogs that happen to live in this district and who can be caught by hunters or dog catchers, shall be killed.

We are afraid that your intention is wrong on a number of levels including those moral and legal! They contradict European animal rights conventions and any adequate humans moral principles!
Your plans are not only contrary to the recommendations of the WHO (World Health Organisation) that states that TNR (trap-neuter-release) is the only proven method to control and reduce stray animal populations, but they violate also the following EU statutes, treaties and declarations:
– On September 22, 2010 a law was signed in the Strasbourg Protocol Room which dealt with the issue of animal protection within the European Union
– Although this law specifically targeted the humane treatment of animals used for experimental purposes, a previous European Union Treaty, namely the Amsterdam Treaty of 1997 dealt with “ensuring protection and respect for the welfare of animals as sentient beings”
The protocol of the Amsterdam Treaty introduced “a clear legal obligation for the EU Community Institutions (Commission, Parliament, and Council) to pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals
– In addition to these, the Treaty of Lisbon and the European Parliament Written Declaration 0026/2011, adopted October 13, 2011, were initiated to further consolidate a concrete and lasting protocol for the humane treatment of animals by Union Member States. Bulgaria, being a member state whose MEPs have signed Written Declaration 0026/2011 in promoting humane treatment of animals including their population control is therefore legally bound by its statutes
– Furthermore, is Bulgaria a signatory of the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals (signed; May 21, 2003 – ratified: July 20, 2004 – entry into force: February 1, 2005)
This said, we implore you to put a halt to these cruel plans to kill all homeless dogs in this district and to abide by the above mentioned EU statutes calling for spay and neuter as a humane means of controlling over-population.
Yours respectfully,
…………………………

Thank you very much in advance for speaking out for the homeless dogs of Sofia by signing our petition here:
http://www.change.org/petitions/bulgaria-don-t-kill-the-strays-of-sofia