BP burning rare sea turtles alive while blocking rescue efforts

 

Subject: BP burning rare sea turtles alive while blocking rescue efforts
From: “NaturalNews” <insider@naturalnews.com>
Date: Fri, June 25, 2010 1:46 am

http://www.naturalnews.com/029074_sea_turtles_Gulf_of_Mexico.html
—————————————————————

Seize BP Week of Action
Demonstrations across the country
Thursday, June 3 – Thursday, June 10
http://www.authorsden.com/ShortStoryUpload/3598.doc

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/02/bp-media-clampdown-no-pho_n_598119.html

—————————————————————–

(NaturalNews) By now, almost everyone is aware of the out-of-control oil spill down in the Gulf of Mexico that seems to be getting exponentially worse with each passing day. But what people may not know is that BP’s efforts to control the oil by burning it are actually burning alive a certain rare and endangered species of sea turtle.

For several weeks now, rescue crews have been feverishly trying to save Kemp’s Ridleys sea turtles, as well as four other endangered varieties, from being caught in the oil corral areas that are being intentionally burned by BP, but according to Mike Ellis, one of the boat captains involved in the project, BP has now blocked all such rescue efforts from taking place.

“They ran us out of there and then they shut us down, they would not let us get back in there,” he explained in an interview with Catherine Craig, a conservation biologist.

According to Dr. Brian Stacy, a veterinarian with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, there are five different endangered sea turtles living in the Gulf that are all at risk, but the type being found “dead or covered in oil” the most is the Kemp’s Ridleys variety, which is the rarest species of them all.

So why would BP intentionally block rescue efforts aimed at protecting and saving wildlife and other endangered species from being burned alive in controlled burning pits? For starters, the Kemp’s Ridleys sea turtle is listed in the Endangered Species Act, which means there are severe penalties for those who harm or kill them.

According to the law, harming or killing even one animal on the endangered species list can result in a fine of up to $50,000 and may include prison time. This means that the hundreds, or even thousands, of endangered sea turtles being burned alive by BP are going to cost the company a lot of money, not to mention the prison time its executives might have to serve.

At this point, it is difficult to determine exactly how many sea turtles are being, or have been, destroyed by BP because access to the pits has ceased, but crews are doing what they can to keep track of the animals they do know of to be sure that BP is held responsible in the end..___

———————————————–

When we last left Mother Jones’ reporter Mac McClelland, she was in the Gulf Coast region, caught up in the surreal tangle of media roadblocks that were being erected by British Petroleum to keep reporters at bay. How have things done since then? Not well, as it turns out!

Indeed, when I ran into some [cleanup workers] packing up on the Grand Isle beach twenty minutes later, I asked them only if they were done working for the day, and they refused to tell me. One woman said, “I can’t talk to you,” and then another worker ran up to her and grabbed her arm and said, “Just ignore her, ignore her,” and the whole interaction was unsettlingly rude and sort of sad. The workers who were staying next to me in my Grand Isle motel last week told me that when BP (not, in this case, and for the record, a subcontractor) had instructed them that they couldn’t talk to the press, it’d involved a warning that media organizations would go so far as to dub audio propaganda over their videotaped commentary, putting unflattering words in their mouths.

The New York Daily News‘ Matthew Lysiak is also in Grand Isle, where he was the fortunate beneficiary of a “surreptitious tour of the wildlife disaster unfolding in Louisiana.”

“There is a lot of coverup for BP. They specifically informed us that they don’t want these pictures of the dead animals. They know the ocean will wipe away most of the evidence. It’s important to me that people know the truth about what’s going on here,” the contractor said.

“The things I’ve seen: They just aren’t right. All the life out here is just full of oil. I’m going to show you what BP never showed the President.”

A dead dolphin, stuffed with oil, figures prominently in the account. It’s all very sad, and not a little bit enraging. As Allison KilKenny puts it: “In a sane world, a company guilty of gross negligence that resulted in the deaths of 11 workers would be under criminal investigation, and not be parading around the coast, telling the media where they can go and who they can talk to, while forbidding their clean-up crews from wearing protective gear.”

Meanwhile, remember BP CEO Tony Hayward, who this past Sunday said that he “wanted his life back?” Well, he’s very sorry about how that must have sounded, to humans:

“I made a hurtful and thoughtless comment on Sunday when I said that “I wanted my life back.” When I read that recently, I was appalled. I apologize, especially to the families of the 11 men who lost their lives in this tragic accident. Those words don’t represent how I feel about this tragedy, and certainly don’t represent the hearts of the people of BP – many of whom live and work in the Gulf – who are doing everything they can to make things right. My first priority is doing all we can to restore the lives of the people of the Gulf region and their families – to restore their lives, not mine.”

Naturally, that bit of flackery was emailed to reporters and posted on the BP America Facebook page, in keeping with BP’s tradition of keeping anything too troubling as far away from cameras as possible.

Link:  Ridley Sea Turtle –    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ridley_sea_turtle

EU Citizens – A Call for Immediate Action for Animals – Must be Done In the Next Week

We ask campaigners across EU nations to please act immediately and contact your MEP’s with regard the following.  This needs to be acted on within the next week as time is short.

It concerns the Written declaration on the welfare of pets 0026/2010, a document which will be used to try and convince the European Union to use their powers of influence concerning a clear written policy concerning the welfare of animals.

Only when 50% of ALL MEP’s from the entire EU put their name to this declaration does it have a chance of moving forward to the agenda stage.

The following link gives national information on all current MEP’s within any EU member state.  To find yours simply click on your country of residence and go from there.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/public/geoSearch.do?language=en

MEP’s for all regions of that (each) country are then listed – divided into the region of the country which they represent. Click on your region and you will then be provided with a listing of MEP’s for your region.  Then click on each MEP by name to find their direct e mail contact details.

English and German sample letters are provided below, as well as a copy of the declaration (in several languages – simply scroll down).

vertaling%20engels[1]

Bescherming pets

brief_europarlement[1].doc-duitse%20vertaling[1]

We ask anyone please who represents an animal welfare organization especially to please put their organizations name at the end of the letter.  Please ensure that you add your name to the sample letter and the region of (your) the country that you live in.

This is important for animals in Europe – please find time to take part.

370 MEP signatures are required by July, so time is short.

IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER:

Normally, MEP’s will only respond to requests by citizens from within the region of the country which they represent.  Therefore it is essential to attempt to get as many citizens from all regions across each country to contact their (regional) MEP’s. 

ie. Northern German MEP’s will not normally respond to requests from Southern german citizens; but Southern german MEP’s should !

This is the same for any EU state – please only contact your REGIONAL MEP’s.

Thanks – SAV.

Italy: A Terrible Tragedy – 2 Activists Killed Helping Animals

I am a member of LIPU http://www.lipu-uk.org/  which is a registered British charity helping birds in Italy.

Today I received their summer newsletter and read that Paola Quartini, LIPU activist from Genoa and Elvio Fichera, volunteer of the Association for Abandoned Animals, both animal welfare workers, went to the home of Renzo Castagnola accompanied by two police officers.  They went to serve a warrant on Castagnola for cruelty to animals.  He kept several dogs, belonging to others, in terrible conditions.  He had been visited before.  The dogs were to be confiscated.

After an inspection, Castagnola made an excuse to go into his house to find a pen and when he reappeared he was armed.  Castagnola fired several shots at Paola and then at Elvio, killing them outright.  He then injured his wife before turning the gun on himself taking his own life.  The victims had no chance to defend themselves, escape or for the police to intervene.

The two animal welfare volunteers had spent years dedicating their lives to helping animals and wildlife.  They had a wealth of experience in animal and environmental issues in the area. 

Paola was 54, was most active and was very knowledgeable on many matters, including the law.  She was very animal-focused.

The wildlife and animals have lost two caring and devoted people.  They lost their lives for an ideal they cherished.  They will be missed by many.

Sharon

Australia: Campaign follow up – Freemantle City Votes to END Live Sheep Exports

We now have a very positive follow up to our post of 31st May regarding our request  to support the city of Freemantle in their call / meeting for live animal exports to be stopped at the port.

The great news is that the city council has now voted to end live sheep exports !

Many thanks to everyone who joined the call and who sent mails of support to the city council – your voice has been heard !

Our previous post:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/05/31/australia-please-support-see-below-the-city-of-fremantle-has-called-for-live-animal-exports-to-be-phased-out-during-the-next-five-years/

News article from Perthnow:

http://www.perthnow.com.au/business/fremantle-council-votes-to-end-live-sheep-exports/story-e6frg2qc-1225871875456

Article reads:

Fremantle council votes to end live sheep exports

  • From: PerthNow
  • May 27, 2010 7:18AM

FREMANTLE has adopted a policy aimed at putting an end to live sheep exports from the port.

A historic decision was made last night by the City of Fremantle to support a phase out of live exports.

More than 80 per cent of the nearly 4 million Australian sheep exported in 2006 were loaded through the port of Fremantle.

Fremantle Council has now joined Greens Member for South East Metropolitan, Lynn MacLaren, and Federal Labour Member for Fremantle, Melissa Parke, in opposing live exports on the grounds of cruelty.

Fremantle Mayor Brad Pettitt said the time had come for the “cruel and unnecessary live sheep trade to be phased out and replaced with a trade that supports local jobs”.

“This motion is not designed to move the trade south from Fremantle to Kwinana. We want it stopped all together and replaced with the less cruel and better economic outcome of frozen meat,” Mr Pettitt said.

Stop Live Exports campaign manager Jodie Jankevics said: “We welcome Fremantle Council taking this strong stance against live exports. There are many animal welfare concerns with this trade, and despite industry claims, very little improvements to animal welfare have been made.

“Not only are live exports cruel, but they don’t make economic sense either.

“Recent reports released show that a sheep processed domestically is worth 20 per cent more to the Australian economy than one exported live, due to the capacity to value add in Australia.

“Added to that, many West Australians are losing their jobs in the processing sector. Live export are sending animals overseas that would normally be processed here.”

Serbia: New Animal Organisation ‘ORPAK’ Formed to ‘Advocate the Law and the Protection of Animals’

Dear all;

We have some great news.

A new animal welfare / rights organisation has been set up Serbia; they are called ‘ORPAK’ and are based in Krusevac city / municipality – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kru%C5%A1evac

ORPAK was founded on 30th April 2010, and so are a very new and vibrant organisation.  Already, it can be confirmed that Slavica at EPAR Subotica is already working with Lela at ORPAK to take further forward many animal issues that exist in Serbia.

You can visit the ORPAK web site now by clicking on this link: 

http://www.orpak.webs.com/ 

There is also an ORPAK video which displays a lot of their work and rescued animals, complete with donation information (at the end of the video) should you wish to support.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5QkMdhKiLQ 

SAV has been given the following information from our new friends at ORPAK:

————————————————–

ORganization for the Protection and rights of Animals Krusevac “ORPAK” is a humanitarian, non-governmental, non-profit organization which advocates the improvement of law and protection of animals, which was founded on 30th April 2010 in Krusevac.

In these troubled times, animals need our help now more than ever before. We work to protect dogs, cats, horses, birds, rabbits and ALL animals. We carry out hands-on programs to help animals and nature, mount rescue operations, expose cruelty through hard hitting undercover investigations, work to pass laws to protect animals, support animal shelters and wildlife rehabilitation centres and spread the word about how to help animals and nature through humane education.

We depend entirely on donations to support our programs to help animals and the environment. All donations are gratefully acknowledged with a receipt for income tax purposes.

If you would like to support our educational campaigns that protect animals and the environment please make a donation.

Because when it comes to fighting cruelty, we don’t give up. EVER!

Thank you for your time.
Lela Bucek
President “ORPAK”

———————————————————-

SAV welcomes our new friends at ORPAK into the ‘movement’ and look forward to further progress as an even stronger united animal force to continue putting pressure on the government and authorities to greatly improve the situation for strays and all other animals within Serbia.

Romania: Please Sign the Petition for the Braila Street Dogs – Video Included also

Please sign and share this really important petition calling for mandatory spay of street dogs in Braila, Romania.
 
To see how bad the situation is, there is a video showing puppies fending for themselves in any nook and cranny they can find. These two litters where found within 2 days of each other, the situation in Romania just gets worse and worse!
 
 
Petition link on the Romanian Animal Rescue website –
 
Please forward to all your friends.
Thank you
Maria xx

Uk (Wales): Shooting Badger Costs Former JP £3,000

Shooting badger costs former JP £3,000

Jun 16 2010 By Robin Turner  

Harold James

 

 

 

A FARMER and former magistrate has been fined for trapping and shooting a badger which dug up his garden.

The RSPCA yesterday warned people against killing the animals after dairy farmer and former High Sheriff of Dyfed Richard Harold James, 77, caught the badger in a snare near his Pembrokeshire home and blasted it to death at close range with a shotgun.

The ex-JP was given fines and costs totalling almost £3,000 by Swansea Magistrates yesterday (tue) for killing a protected animal and using a snare to trap it.

He shot the animal twice near his home at Home Farm on the Stackpole Estate in Pembrokeshire just before last Christmas.

James then threw the animal onto a slope leading on to National Trust land.

It was witnessed by National Trust worker David Jarman who works on land near Home Farm. He went back to his office and called in the RSPCA.

James, former chairman of the Clynderwen and Cardigan Farmers Co-Operative, later told an RSPCA inspector who questioned him about the killing: “What about the damage badgers cause us?”

John Tarrant, prosecuting, said the RSPCA brought the case because it felt not to have prosecuted would have diminished legislation protecting badgers irrespective of the Welsh Assembly Government’s planned cull of the creatures in West Wales in an attempt to eradicate bovine TB.

And after the case, RSPCA inspector Keith Hogben said: “We hope this case will send the message that killing badgers without a licence is illegal.

“The Welsh Assembly Government may be pursuing a cull under special measures in its bid to prevent bovine TB but the fact is badgers are still protected by law and unlicensed killing of them will lead to court.

“Do not take the law into your own hands.”

Tim Hayden, (corr) defending, said his client had no previous convictions, had co-operated fully with the RSPCA and had an impeccable record of distinguished public service in West Wales.

He produced photographs of the defendant’s garden and described the damaged caused by the badger as “extensive and messy”.

He added: “There had been a problem for some time which he had tried to address using an electric fence and sonic devices none of which worked.

“He felt if such damage was being caused to his property that he could, and he accepts now he was in error, take action in this way.”

He said James shot the badger twice because he wanted to make sure he was killing it humanely.

Mr Hayden told magistrates: “Whichever side you are on, the Welsh Assembly Government has decided to take action to eradicate a large proportion of badgers in the county where the defendant lives by first trapping then shooting them.

“I think that is something the court should bear in mind when coming to its sentence.”

Mr Hayden then asked the court to consider a conditional or absolute discharge.

But the magistrates imposed the full amount of costs £1,461.21 (including two vets’ post mortem examinations) and fined James £1,000 for killing a protected animal and £500 for using a snare to trap it.

Mr Hogben said afterwards the near £3,000 total was a clear signal to anyone tempted to unlawfully kill badgers that the courts would take the matter “very seriously”.

After hearing that James got £3,000 a month from his role as consultant in his family dairy farming concern, the magistrates gave him 28 days to pay the £2,961.21 fines and costs. Mr Hogben added: “Our advice to people who have trouble with badgers digging in their garden is first to consult with a local badger group.

“There are badger proof fences that can be used or various sonic devices and one method is to feed badgers so they will not bother digging in to a garden to get worms or other food.”

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/06/16/shooting-badger-in-cull-area-costs-former-jp-3-000-91466-26661783/North West Hunt Saboteurs Association
PO Box 239
Manchester
M14 7XB