Europe: All EU Citizens – YOUR MEP’s in Europe – Do THEY Support The 8 Hour Limit ?

EUUN0001

EU AW LOGO

0ValCameron4391_080812

 

YOUR MEP’s in Europe – do THEY support the 8 hour limit ?

 Researched and compiled by Mark Johnson – Founder ‘Serbian Animals Voice’ and EU Correspondent – KAALEwww.kaale.org.uk

ALL Photographs by Valerie Cameron and Bill F. of KAALE (England, UK) and show live animals exported from England to mainland Europe for slaughter.

A personal message from Mark.

As you will see by clicking on the ‘About Us’ tab on this site, I have investigated and campaigned against the global live animal export trade for many, many years.   It is ‘the’ issue which is most in my heart; and over those years I have, unfortunately, seen a lot of animal suffering packed into trailers on the roads of Europe.  It has been time for change for many years as things are not good enough at present; it still is time for change for the future, and you (if an EU citizen) can help before May 2014 by writing to all your MEPs that represent your nation / region and ask them to support the maximum journey time of 8 hours for animals in transport throughout the EU.

There is no excuse for animal abuse, and believe me when I say that there is a lot of animal abuse going on with animals being hauled by road across Europe.

Please support this by taking on what I ask below – the animals deserve better; ad we can make that difference.

Regards Mark. 

With thanks to my good English campaigner friends Val and Bill, who’s photos are used here.

vc1

—————————————————————————————————————————-

If you are a European citizen AND SOMEONE WHO VOTES ?, then please take a look via the following link to see who your national / regional MEPs (Member of the European Parliament) are. Select ‘your’ country from the euro map from the link to then be provided with a full listing of your national MEP’s.  Then, use the ‘Constituency’ drop down at the top of the page to find which MEP’s represent your specific region / area of the country.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/map.html

You can click on any MEP name and should then be taken immediately to their individual page which provides a contact e mail address and phone numbers for them – this is usually on the right hand side of the page.  These are the e mail addresses which should be used for direct contact, in conjunction with the sample letter given below.

Important Noteyou should ONLY make contact with MEP’s who represent your region.  Please DO NOT contact all MEP’s from all regions; just your own.  Use the ‘Constituency’ drop down at the top of the above link to find which MEP’s represent your area of the country.

vc7

B10(1)

Lesley.last.3

8 hours logo

VITA Photo

The 8 Hour Campaign

Web link:  http://www.8hours.eu/

Today, too many animals are transported under unacceptable conditions on European highways.  The most important issue is the duration of many of the transports. Current EU legislation allows for animals to be transported for up to several days. This has to be changed. Live animals for slaughter should never be transported for more than eight hours

This is the aim of the 8 hours campaign – to make any journey for animals last no more than a maximum of 8 hours.

B1

J2(1)

J4(1)

8 hours logo

Why 8hours?

Every year millions of animals are transported along European highways, and too often under unacceptable conditions.  In 2002, the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare published the report “The Welfare of Animals during Transport” concluding that animal transports, as a ground rule, should be as short as possible.

This recommendation is, however, NOT reflected in the current EU legislation.

According to current legislation, animal transports which can last up to several days are acceptable as long as the haulier fulfils simple demands concerning rest, feeding and watering of the animals etc. These demands are detailed in the current Council Regulation (EC) 1/2005 of 22nd December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations.  A copy of this regulation can be viewed at:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32005R0001:en:NOT

Select your language of choice from any of the yellow colored boxes.

The 8 hour campaign does not think this (up to several days journey) is acceptable.

It is now time for a major change in animal transport regulations throughout Europe.  And this is importantly where YOU can help to change the legislation.

For a long time, European-wide societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, concerned EU citizens and politicians have argued that something has to be done. Animals for slaughter should never be transported for more than eight hours.

The following link provides a full listing of all current MEP supporters for the 8 Hour campaign across the EU.

http://8hours.eu/mep_supporters/

 This needs to be vastly increased – and can be done with your help and support by you making contact with your national / regional MEP’s and asking them to support.

 The following is the 8 hours campaign web site statement:

Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) for 8hours

This is a list of Members of the European Parliament (MEP’s) who HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR SUPPORT FOR THE 8 HOURS CAMPAIGN  as a whole.

This is NOT a list of MEPs who have signed Written Declaration 49/2011 – there are over 300 of these, but we are not allowed to make their names public – but of supporters of the campaign and of its aims as a whole. In fact, some of the MEPs listed on this page have not signed Written Declaration 49/2011 because they don’t sign Written Declarations in general, but they are supporting the review of Regulation 1/2005 to include a maximum journey limit of 8 hours, whenever possible in the relevant parliamentary bodies. – See more at:

http://8hours.eu/mep_supporters/

 

 ValCameron0005_080812

2014 Euro Elections

– Things could be on our side in the coming months.

This is why we have to act now !

 Between 22nd and 25th May 2014, the next European Elections will arrive, this is where all of the MEP’s representing your country and region, throughout the EU,  are elected.  So if current MEP’s in your region have not supported the campaign and will be standing for re-election next May, then you, as a European citizen, and as a voter, can mail or write to them ask they either support the 8 Hour campaign (by adding their name to the listing), or you (as a voter) may decide to take your vote elsewhere at election time.

This is your opportunity to request of MEP’s what you wish to see – after all, they are there supposedly in the European Parliament to represent you, their regional electorate.

 You could copy and send the following sample mail to all your currently non supportive regional MEP’s asking them to give their support for 8 hours.

ValCameron0006_080812

SAMPLE MAIL

Dear ??  MEP;

As one of your Euro constituents, I notice from information that I have access to that you are currently NOT a supporter of the 8 Hours campaign as a whole.  Supporting 8 Hours as an official MEP supporter on the web site is different to the signing of Written Declaration 49/2011 which you may or may not have given your support to.

 Today, too many animals are transported under unacceptable conditions on European highways.  The most important issue is the duration of the transports. Current EU legislation allows for animals to be transported for several days. This has to be changed. Live animals for slaughter should never be transported for more than eight hours.  This is why the 8 Hour campaign was founded.

 May 2014 sees the next European Elections at which ALL MEP’s are elected.

I, as an animal welfare campaigner who fully supports the need for a maximum journey time across the entire EU of 8 hours maximum, write to ask if you will add your name to the list of MEP supporters for 8 hours.

I have heard concerns from some quarters that it would not for example, be possible to move animals under these time regulations.  I ask you to not accept this argument, as special derogations would be structured by the EU for any such special circumstances.  This 8 hour limit is one which would apply to the long distance live transport of live animals within / across the main EU.

If you are unable to support this campaign with the addition of your signature, then I am afraid I will have to consider giving my vote at the Euro Elections to an MEP / Political Party which ARE much more supportive of this specific issue.

Thank you for your consideration of my request. I am keen to hear your response.

To become a full signed up MEP supporter of the 8 hour campaign, please go to http://8hours.eu/mep_supporters/ for further details.  You can contact the 8 hour team and add your name via http://www.8hours.eu/contact .

I very much hope that you will consider becoming a signed up member of the 8 hour campaign which will lead to my support and vote for you in may 2014.

Yours Sincerely

VERY IMPORTANT – Add your name and importantly, your address to show that you are from the country and national region represent

 

PLEASE CHANGE THE LEGISLATION THROUGHOUT EUROPE,

CALL ON YOUR MEP’S TO GO 8 HOURS MAXIMUM

TAKE ACTION IN YOUR COUNTRY / REGION NOW !!

 

ValCameron43910-_080812 (1)

Jane 3

Joline Dover 19 March 2013 

VC 005 rs

8 hours logo

B1(3)

All Photos – Valerie Cameron and Bill F.

USA: America – Please Mail to Support the SAFE Act Now !

USA1

Horse slaughter for human consumption has been outlawed in the United States for many years, but a recent push by the animal agriculture lobby aims to open the slaughterhouse doors to horses once again.

Fortunately, the Safeguard American Food Exports (SAFE) Act (H.R. 1094/S. 541) was recently introduced in Congress. The SAFE Act aims to protect the food supply in the United States from the dangers that consumption of horse meat poses–since horses aren’t raised to be food in the United States, there are no meaningful safeguards to ensure that the consumption of horse meat is safe. Many horses, such as racehorses, are treated with drugs that would harm a human if eaten, according to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

If passed, the SAFE Act would prohibit people from selling or transporting equines and equine parts in interstate or foreign commerce for human consumption. Aside from the fact that eating horse meat likely poses a serious threat to human health, ALDF takes the position that caring for horses is important in its own right–regardless of what purpose a horse may be used for. Horses should be cared for and respected–not eaten. This bill presents a good opportunity to prevent the horse slaughter industry from being revived in our country.

Take Action!

The SAFE Act is currently being considered by the Energy & Commerce and Agriculture Committees.

We urge you to take five minutes and use our one-click action form to contact the members of these committees.

http://aldf.org/cases-campaigns/action-alerts/stop-the-horse-meat-industry/

 

Serbia: Zahtev,18.6.13.Brojno stanje i dr.

Serbian  Flag

Zahtev,18.6.13.Gde su zivotinje2251

 

EPAR – OIPA SRBIJA
Alijansa za zaštitu prirode,prava životinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica Matka Vukovića 9

epar@open.telekom.rs

epar@yunord.net

epar-oipaserbia@hotmail.com

JKP`Cistoca I zelenilo`,Subotica
18.6.2013.
Zahtev za informacijama od javnog znacaja

1. Brojno stanje pasa I macaka na dan 18.6.2013. u prihvatilistu na adresi Ganjo sor 134,Subotica;

2. Dostavite kopiju dokumentacije iz koje se vidi na koji nacin je nastalo brojno stanje pasa I
macaka koje postoji na dan 18.6.2013. u odnosu na brojno stanje 31.12.2012. u prihvatilistu na
adresi Ganjo sor 134, Subotica.

3. Dostavite kopiju dokumentacije iz koje se vidi da je ova firma postupila po Resenju RVI Subotica
br.273-323-0843/2012-05 od 23.1.2012.

4. S obzirom na broj uhvacenih pasa i macaka u poslednje 3 godine za koje ste duzni imati
dokumentaciju , a koji je : 2187 pasa i 234 macke ( po vasim mesecnim izvestajima), zahtevamo da
nam dostavite kopiju dokumentacije iz koje se vidi sta se dogodilo svakoj od ovih zivotinja , narocito s
obzirom da ste nas 2013. izvestili da nakon svih tih 2421 hvatanja pasa I macaka vi raspolazete
brojnim stanjem 170 pasa i 0 macaka I, takodje ste nas obavestili i o smestajnom kapacitetu : 234
psa , i da -ako vi nemate dokumente dokaze nenasilne smrti nedostajucih zivotinja ( 234 macke i
2017 pasa , vi ste time priznali da ste pocinili krivicno delo zlostavljanje velikog broja pasa I macaka ,
a nepostojanje dokumentacije je upravo dokaz vase krivicne odgovornosti I krivicne odgovornosti
veterinarske sluzbe koja je za vasu firmu radila u te poslednje 3 godine :zataskavanja tog krivicnog
dela , jer ta dokumentacija je jedini moguci dokaz s kojim mozete vi dokazati nepostojanje ovog
krivicnog dela.

S poštovanjem,

EPAR – OIPA SRBIJA/Alijansa za zaštitu prirode,prava životinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica Matka Vukovića 9
Zastupnik: Prim.mr.sci.dr.med.Slavica Mazak Bešlić

epar@open.telekom.rs
epar-oipaserbia@hotmail.com
p.s. Čuvajmo šume! Štedite papir i javni novac, pošaljite odgovor u elektronskoj formi

For ENGLISH SUPPORTERS ONLY – Do Your MEP’s Support The Campaign for 8 Hours Maximum Journey Time Across Europe ?

England

Your MEP’s in England – do they support the 8 hour limit ?

8 hours logo 

Researched and compiled by Mark Johnson

 If you are a English (UK) citizen AND SOMEONE WHO VOTES, then please take a look via the following link to see who your regional MEPs (Member of the European Parliament) are.. These are also detailed in the regional tables which form part of this document and are given at the end:

http://www.europarl.org.uk/view/en/your_MEPs.html

 I live in Kent.  As such, I am ‘represented’ at the European Parliament by ‘South East’ MEP’s; as Kent is part of the South East region.  If you live elsewhere in the country, then by using the above link or the regional table information provided in this document, a listing of MEPs who represent ‘you and your region’ are shown.

You can click on any MEP name given in the following tables, and should be taken immediately to their page which provides a contact e mail address and phone numbers.  These are the e mail addresses which should be used for contact, in conjunction with the sample letter given later in this document.  Note – you should ONLY make contact with MEP’s who represent your region.  Please DO NOT contact all MEP’s from all regions; just your own.

As well as providing a listing of MEP’s for each region, I have also provided against each members name, either an ‘x’ or the word ‘SUPPORTER’.  These represent the following:

SUPPORTER’ = Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who HAVE expressed their support for the 8hours campaign as a whole.

Note – This is NOT a list of MEPs who have signed Written Declaration 49/2011 – there are over 300 of these, but we are not allowed to make their names public.

x’ = Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who have NOT CURRENTLY expressed their support for the 8hours campaign.

The 8 Hour Campaign

Web link:  http://www.8hours.eu/

Today, too many animals are transported under unacceptable conditions on European highways.  The most important issue is the duration of the transports. Current EU legislation allows for animals to be transported for several days. This has to be changed. Live animals for slaughter should never be transported for more than eight hours.

8 hours logo

Why 8hours?

Every year millions of animals are transported along European highways, and too often under unacceptable conditions.  In 2002, the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare published the report “The Welfare of Animals during Transport” concluding that animal transports, as a ground rule, should be as short as possible. This recommendation is, however, not reflected in the current EU legislation.

According to current legislation, animal transports which can last up to several days are acceptable as long as the haulier fulfills simple demands concerning rest, feeding and watering of the animals etc. These demands are detailed in the current Council Regulation (EC) 1/2005 of 22nd December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations.  A copy of this regulation can be viewed at:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32005R0001:en:NOT

Select ‘EN’ for English.

The 8 hour campaign does not think this is acceptable.  As the EU Correspondent for ‘Kent Action Against Live Exports’ (KAALE), and with 23 years personal experience in all aspects of live animal transport, I do not feel that the current EU legislation is acceptable either.  It is time for a major change in animal transport regulations throughout Europe.

For a long time, societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, concerned EU citizens and politicians have argued that something has to be done. Animals for slaughter should never be transported for more than eight hours.

The following link provides a full listing of all MEP supporters for the 8 Hour campaign across the EU.  http://8hours.eu/mep_supporters/

8 hours logo

The following is the 8 hours campaign web site statement:

Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) for 8hours

This is a list of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who have expressed their support for the 8hours campaign as a whole.

This is NOT a list of MEPs who have signed Written Declaration 49/2011 – there are over 300 of these, but we are not allowed to make their names public – but of supporters of the campaign and of its aims as a whole. In fact, some of the MEPs listed on this page have not signed Written Declaration 49/2011 because they don’t sign Written Declarations in general, but they are supporting the review of Regulation 1/2005 to include a maximum journey limit of 8 hours, whenever possible in the relevant parliamentary bodies. – See more at:

http://8hours.eu/mep_supporters/

The above supporters listing, which includes English MEP’,s is a pathetic one (regarding English MEP support) to say the very least; when you consider the term that we in the UK are supposed to be an ‘animal welfare supporting nation’; a nation which hates cruelty to animals.

Current situation – Only 8 English MEP’s have currently given their name to the 8 hours campaign out of a total of 60.  This needs to be changed.

Please use the regional tables following to select your area and then view how many of ‘your’ MEP’s have either added their name as a ‘SUPPORTER’ to the 8 Hours campaign, or are currently given a ‘x’ to represent them as a non supporter of the campaign.

But things could be on our side

Between 22 and 25 May 2014, the next European Elections will arrive, this is where all of the MEP’s representing your country and region are elected.  So if current MEP’s have not supported the campaign and will be standing for re-election next May, then you, as a European, and as a voter, can mail or write to them ask they either support the 8 Hour campaign (by adding their name to the listing), or you may decide to take your vote elsewhere at election time.

This is your opportunity to demand of MEP’s what you wish to see – after all, they are there supposedly in Europe to represent you, their regional electorate.

English Political Party Contributions To 8 Hours – Current Situation

The following table is a summary of support to the 8 Hour campaign by MEP’s from all the (English MEP) represented political parties.  The order is not given with any preference.

Political Party

No. of  SUPPORTERS

For 8 Hours

MEP’s Who Have NOT Supported

Conservatives

1

23 of 24

Not supported

UKIP

0

10 of 10

Not supported

Liberal Democrats

2

9 of 11

Not supported

Greens

2

Fully Supported

Labour

3

6 of 9

Not supported

Independent

0

1 of 1

Not supported

British National Party

0

1 of 1

Not supported

Whilst past experience has shown us that we never expect much in the way of animal welfare support from UKIP MEP’s and very little from the Conservatives; despite their documented continual talk of supporting animal welfare issues – (we all know how Defra always start their letter – ‘animal welfare is so important to us blah blah ….. ), the elections next May are now providing us with a very good opportunity to request to our regional MEP’s that they either join the ‘8 hour SUPPORTER club’ and as a result, possibly get  a vote from you next May, or they stay as non supporters and definitely do NOT get your vote at Euro Election time.  The choice is theirs !

In the following tables as stated earlier I have outlined each of the English regions and the full listing of MEP’s which represent them.  I have identified supporters of the 8 hour campaign, or current non supporters.  For those non supporters (MEP’s) who have not yet signed up; it is suggested that the following sample mail could be copied (and if you feel, modified) and sent to them; asking them to consider giving their support AND signature to the campaign.

SAMPLE MAIL  SAMPLE MAIL  SAMPLE MAIL

Dear ??  MEP;

As one of your Euro constituents, I notice that you are currently NOT a supporter of the 8 Hours campaign as a whole.  Supporting 8 Hours as an official MEP supporter on the web site is different to the signing of Written Declaration 49/2011 which you may or may not have given your support to.

Today, too many animals are transported under unacceptable conditions on European highways.  The most important issue is the duration of the transports. Current EU legislation allows for animals to be transported for several days. This has to be changed. Live animals for slaughter should never be transported for more than eight hours.  This is why the 8 Hour campaign was founded.

May 2014 sees the next European Elections at which ALL MEP’s are elected.

I, as an animal welfare campaigner who fully supports the need for a maximum journey time across the entire EU of 8 hours maximum, write to ask if you will add your name to the list of MEP supporters for 8 hours.

I have heard concerns from some quarters that it would not for example, be possible to move animals from the islands of Scotland to the mainland under these time regulations.  I ask you to not accept this argument, as special derogations would be structured by the EU for any such special circumstances.  This 8 hour limit is one which would apply to the long distance live transport of live animals within / across the main EU.

If you are unable to support this campaign with the addition of your signature, then I am afraid I will have to consider giving my vote at the Euro Elections to an MEP / Political Party which ARE much more supportive of this specific issue.

Thank you for your consideration of my request. I am keen to hear your response.

To become a full signed up MEP supporter of the 8 hour campaign, please go to http://8hours.eu/mep_supporters/ for further details.  You can contact the 8 hour team and add your name via http://www.8hours.eu/contact .

I very much hope that you will consider becoming a signed up member of the 8 hour campaign which will lead to my support and vote for you in may 2014.

Yours Sincerely

Add your name and importantly, your address to show that you are from the region represented.

South East – 10 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Daniel Hannan Conservative

x

Nigel Farage UKIP

x

Richard Ashworth Conservative

x

Sharon Bowles Liberal Democrats

x

Keith Taylor  Green Party  SUPPORTER
Njri Deva Conservative

x

Marta Andreasen Conservative

x

James Elles Conservative

x

Peter Skinner Labour SUPPORTER
Catherine Bearder Liberal Democrats

x


South West – 6 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Giles Chichester Conservative

x

Trevor Colman UKIP

x

Sir Graham Watson Liberal Democrats

x

Julie Girling Conservative SUPPORTER
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth UKIP

x

Ashley Fox Conservative

x


North West – 8 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Rt. Hon. Sir Robert Atkins Conservative

x

Arlene McCarthy Labour

x

Paul Nuttall UKIP

x

Chris Davies Liberal Democrats SUPPORTER
Sajjad Karim Conservative

x

Brian Simpson Labour SUPPORTER
Jacqueline Foster Conservative

x

Nick Griffin British National Party

x

North East – 3 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Stephen Hughes Labour

x

Martin Callanan Conservative

x

Fiona Hall Liberal Democrats

x


Eastern – 7 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Geoffrey Van Orden Conservative

x

David Campbell Bannerman Conservative

x

Robert Sturdy

x

Andrew Duff Liberal Democrats

x

Richard Howitt Labour

x

Vicky Ford Conservative

x

Stuart Agnew UKIP

x

East Midlands – 5 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Roger Helmer UKIP

x

Glenis Willmott Labour

x

Derek Clark UKIP

x

Emma McClarkin Conservative

x

Bill Newton Dunn Liberal Democrats SUPPORTER

London – 8 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Charles Tannock Conservative

x

Claude Moraes Labour

x

Baroness Sarah Ludford Liberal Democrats

x

Dr Syed Kamall Conservative

x

Jean Lambert Green Party SUPPORTER
Gerard Batten UKIP

x

Mary Honeyball Labour

x

Marina Yannakoudakis Conservative

x


West Midlands – 7 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Philip Bradbourn OBE Conservative

x

Mike Nattrass UKIP

x

Michael Cashman Labour

x

Malcolm Harbour Conservative

x

Phil Bennion Liberal Democrats

x

Nicole Sinclaire Independent

x

Anthea McIntyre Conservative

x

Yorkshire & the Humber – 6 MEP’s

MEP Name Political Party HAVE Expressed 8 hours support NOT Expressed 8 hours support
Edward McMillan-Scott Liberal Democrats

x

Linda McAvan Labour SUPPORTER
Godfrey Bloom UKIP

x

Rebecca Taylor Liberal Democrats

x

Timothy Kirkhope Conservative

x

Andrew Brons British National Party

x

—————————————————————————

Mark is the founder of ‘Serbian Animals Voice’ which provides support for stray and street animals in the Balkans:

Site – https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/

Facebook –

https://www.facebook.com/groups/SerbianAnimalsVoice/?ref=ts&fref=ts

and is also the EU Correspondent for ‘Kent Action Against Live Exports (KAALE);

http://www.kaale.org.uk/

 

PLEASE CHANGE THE LEGISLATION, GO 8 HOURS MAXIMUM

 

8 hours logo

VC 005 rs

 VITA Photo

Photos – Valerie Cameron.

Serbia: Do The Republic Veterinary Inspectors Know the Law ? – It Appears That They Still Live In and Use Legislation From A Serbian A World PRE 2005 !! – and That Is Very Dangerous for Serbian Animal Welfare (and Serbian EU Membership In the Future !).

Serbian  Flag

cropped-azil-alex-logo-3.jpg

I never show something so stupid like the demand of republic veterinary inspector of Serbia, Subotica, because she, republic veterinary inspector :Mrs Matilda Sobloher knows and republic veterinary inspector :Mrs Sanja Celebicanin knows too : there is no free place for 600 dogs , because 170 Serbian cities have NOT adequate shelters .

government_approved 2226ASP6179944780

These inspectors also know the fact that nobody may replace these 600 – they still have own place, Subotica city has NOT any legal city shelter , and nobody may touch these 600 , they are protected BY LAW ! If somebody touch dogs at Titogradska 53 , EPAR would immediately bring a criminal charge against everybody who maybe could be involved by any way.

It is veterinary inspector obligation and duty ( still long time ago, FROM 2.11.2005.) : and they must write urgent demand to city authorities : immediately start with care about these 600 city-dogs and also about all street dogs and cats in Subotica.

The same , equal situation is in the whole of Serbia – because of the authorities non implementation of up to date existing laws for 8 years . Those responsible for the non implementation are veterinary inspectors.

226ASP6179944780

Dr. Slavica Mazak Beslic – Subotica.

Additional SAV comment:

We at SAV would support Dr. Beslic by immediately writing once again to the EU and informing them that Serbia is NOT implementing its own ‘rule of law’ – a fundamental requirement which must be shown to be happening within any member state seeking EU accession (membership).

cropped-azil-alex-logo-3.jpg

Send e mails of complaint to:

kabinetpremijera@gov.rs    eu.integracije@gov.rs     press@gov.rs   www.mrrls.gov.rs  kabinet@mpravde.gov.rs      kabinet.min@merz.gov.rs    kancelarija@kornrp.gov.rs
budimir.plavsic@minpolj.gov.rs   zoran.ivanovic@minpolj.gov.rs
maja.andrijasevic@minpolj.gov.rs
s.celebicanin@minpolj.gov.rs  zoran.marinkovic@minpolj.gov.rs     ombudsman@subotica.rs   office@ombudsmanapv.org    zastitnik@zastitnik.rs    info@mup.gov.rs    zivotnasredinasu@gmail.com     office@rtvcity.com    gukomunalno@subotica.rs

The following text relates to the following link, but also  gives an overview  of current legislation

Reference:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2010/05/04/serbia-temerin-city-their-animal-shelter-death-after-3-days-and-a-national-public-attorney-who-says-all-is-ok/

Serbian LAW – Some very Important points to be considered especially relating to Shelter Alex: 

After three days at the ‘shelter’, dogs are taken to Novi Sad city where they are killed by ‘euthanasia’, using Pravilnik 29/94 legislation.

Prior to the new Serbian Veterinary Law of 02/10/2005, there was an old law dating from 1991 for the health protection of animals. In agreement with the old law of 1991, the authorities produced their own other ‘underlaw’ (extra law) regulationnamed ‘Pravilnik 29/94’, which was intorduced to allow the killing of animals after they were held in pounds for 3 to 7 days.

** From 02/10/2005, the new Veterinary Law Article 168 effectively destroyed everything that was written in Pravilnik 29/94, ** because the 2005 law demanded the care of animals.

Pravilnik 29/94 was overwritten by Article 168, the result being that all killing of animals was forbidden apart only from cases for Rabies infected areas, which were covered by application of Articles 64 and 65 of the Veterinary Law.

By continuing to undertake the killing of animals after 3 to 7 days in accordance with regulation Pravilnik 29/94, the authorities were then in a situation where they were working in opposition to the actual existing law.

But it is very much the case, even up to the present day, where authorities are still using Pravilnik 29/94 as a reason for the killing of animals.  But in reality, Pravilnik 29/94 became nonexistent on 02/10/2005 with the introduction of the new Veterinary Law (Article 168).

Hence there should be no killing, but animal care instead.

Pravilnik 29/94 is only an ‘underlaw’ (extra law) regulation, has very less power than the actual law, and most importantly, must be in agreement with the existing law.  Pravilnik 29/94 was valid originally (1991 on) to protect animal health but is now in opposition to the new and current animal law – the new Veterinary Law Article 168 of 02/10/2005.

Serbian campaigners have written to the Constitutional Court saying that it is unlawful for Shinters (Dogcatchers) and also veterinarians to kill stray dogs and cats only after they have been held for three (3) days, as this is now old and outdated legislation.  Killing is forbidden under the new Veterinary law.

Campaigners have now heard from the court in writing, and they say that no analysis of the case is necessary for Pravilnik 29/94 as it has been replaced by the new Veterinary Law Article 168 (02/10/2005).

This is exactly what the campaigners had said, ie. that the old ‘underlaw’ (extra law) of Pravilnik 29/94 was still being used when it fact it has been overwritten by the new Veterinary Law Article 168 of 02/10/2005.

In addition, Article 46 of the new Veterinary Law (02/10/2005) states that the killing of stray cats and dogs is forbidden and that instead they should be provided with care.

The word from the Serbian Constitutional (law) Court is that from 2005, animals should be provided with care and not be killed.

It would appear that all of the public firms responsible for garbage collection in Serbian cities are still working to, and effectively using Pravilnik 29/94 rather than Article 46 (168) of the new Veterinary Law.

In effect, by still working to this now non existent law, these public firms who collect and kill strays are UNDERTAKING ILLEGAL WORK– they should be working in accordance with the new Veterinary Law Article 46 (168) of 02/10/2005 which demands care for the animals.

Unlike the Temerin ‘shelter’ dogs which are illegally killed after only 3 days, Cats which are taken to the ‘shelter’ do not even live three days – they are killed immediately.

A detailed explanation of the legislation is given in our past SAV Link:

Constitutional Court ruling link:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/01/25/serbia-constitutional-court-of-serbia-says-that-the-killing-of-stray-dogs-and-cats-in-serbia-is-forbidden-from-02102005/

You have to ask if the Subotica republic veterinary inspector :Mrs Matilda Sobloher and republic veterinary inspector Mrs Sanja Celebicanin actually know what the law IS in Serbia ? – It would appear that they do NOT know the laws of Serbian animal welfare, despite their positions !!!

Serbian campaigners have now taken this case to the court of human rights in Strasbourg – an EU court.  The caseGarbage collectors in Serbian cities are still working using the (now) non existent Pravilnik 29/94 rather than Article 46 (168) of the new and current Veterinary Law of 02/10/2005 which demands care.  In addition, campaigners have requested justification be presented for all the animal killings by the authorities from 02/10/2005 right up to the present day.

Serbian authorities  and officials are responsible for ensuring the correct laws are implemented are:

Mrs. Sanja Čelebićanin  -Chief of  Veterinary Inspection

Mr. Zoran Mićović – Director of Veterinary Department

Mr. Radivoje Kaurin – Chief of  Hunting – Forests Inspection.

So the situation is that many Serbian authorities are not implementing the most recent and current legislation which would give protection to animals in shelters, but are instead using old and outdated, non existing legislation (Pravilnik 29/94) as justification for the continued killing of animals held in shelters.

Another very important factor here is that what has been happening since 02/10/2005 is that existing Serbian law (legislation) has not been implemented throughout the country in relation to animal welfare.

Probably the most important point:

And the proof of the implementation of the ‘Rule of Law’ is a paramount requirement for any nation wishing to become a future member of the EU !

And so what about the ‘Shelter’ for animals at Temerin or any other location in Serbia – such as Shelter Alex in Subotica ?

We declare that the alleged ‘shelter’ at Temerin is NOT shelter but a terrible, unlawful place being funded by Serbian taxpayers to the tune of many millions of Dinars.

Is this facility simply a place that takes in public money allegedly caring for animals, whilst at the same time killing them immediately (cats) or after just three days (dogs) using outdated legislation which was replaced in 2005 ?

Animals such as these dogs and cats which are taken from the streets by shinter teams, are not marked or identified in any way.  There is no way that the authorities can provide details of the animals taken by the shinters, be it 10 dogs or 100 dogs captured.  In effect, with no accountability of their work, these public firms can ask for as much public money as they wish – and very often / always they are provided with it !!

Can this be called ‘organised crime’ ?

If a full sterilisation, vaccination, identification and care system was established for all stray animals taken by the shinters, then the facilities such as the Temerin ‘shelter’ would be very much more accountable (ie. Record keeping) of all animals which enter the facility.

As it is, by using old, outdated, self created (mass killing) legislation such as Pravilnik 29/94 rather than working to what should be current animal protection legislation, (ie. Article 46 (168) of the new and current Veterinary Law of 02/10/2005), the authorities and those involved with it appear to in a situation where they can request, and are provided with an endless supply of public money public money for killing animalsWHICH IS ILLEGAL (since 2005).

Serbia / UK: New Facebook Site – ‘Help The Pozega Dogs’.

Serbian  Flag

DIRECT DONATIONS LINKS:

http://www.youcaring.com/other/help-us-pay-to-save-20-new-dogs-from-pozega-torture-pound-costs-for-57-saved-so-far/60205

 http://www.youcaring.com/medical-fundraiser/help-get-10-more-dogs-out-of-serbian-torture-shelter-15-saved-so-far-/55845

 

VIDEO OF POZEGA:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afWUo5GMB-c

Poz6

Our (SAV) past posts on this particular issue:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2013/05/12/serbia-pozega-pound-please-sign-the-petition-and-tell-the-ministry-of-agriculture-forestry-and-water-management-to-close-the-facility-down-immediately-and-undertake-the-13-existing-prosecutions/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2013/05/10/serbia-activists-trying-to-save-dogs-from-the-cruel-and-painful-death-in-nas-dom-pound-in-pozega/

Poz1

The latest news from Slavica today (23/05) is that there is very little in the way of positive change.

Poz10

We made contact with Lucy here in London yesterday; and Lucy has sent us some great information about the work she is doing for the Pozega dogs. 

Lucy has established a Facebook page called ‘Help the Pozega Dogs’ and the following are all links which we encourage you to view and help with.

Poz2

Poz3

Help Pozega Dogs

Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/groups/134641413389079/

Recent photos from the shelter:

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10201145559942005.1073741826.1259885246&type=3

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10200937651941292.1073741827.1165592061&type=1

About This group is created to help volunteers from Belgrade HumAnimal who rescue dogs from the Pozega horror shelter in Serbia. It is estimated over 7000 dogs have already been killed there and it is well known the animals are tortured and literally starved – we are trying to save as many as possible by reserving them vetting them/placing them in private kennels and finding them fosters or adopters.

We will raise funds, build awareness and assist with lobbying the government.

This infamous torture dog pound ironically called “Our Home”:

– is catching dogs from 7 cities in Serbia
– after a few weeks dogs are killed with t61 injenction and no preparation
– or they are strangled or beaten!!!
– dogs are literally starved before they die
– most dogs can no longer walk
– and can barely lift their heads

Pups only couple of months old are curled up on the ground and do not react any more to the human voice.

Poz4

VIDEO OF POZEGA:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afWUo5GMB-c

Poz5

It is well known that the shelter supervisor and the veterinarian torture the dogs. There are 20 criminal charges against the management of the pound, but they continue to catch and kill these poor animals.

– it is thought around 300-400 dogs are killed per month.
– Local Authorities pay 100 euros per dog to the pound!
– it means they earn around 400.000 euros for year

**  In the last 2 weeks 57 dogs have been saved by Belgrade group HumAnimal and we are now raising funds for 20 more!!!! (10 more this week/10 next) **

– many of those saved have a serious health problems, due to being saves and sterilisations performed by incompetent veterinarians.
– some are fighting for their lives
– 4 have very sadly died due to having been starved or distemper

PLEASE HELP IN WHATEVER WAY YOU CAN TO STOP THE HORROR!

DONATE to paypal – humanimal.org@gmail.com
or:


http://www.youcaring.com/other/help-us-pay-to-save-20-new-dogs-from-pozega-torture-pound-costs-for-57-saved-so-far/60205

RECENT PHOTOS OF THE ‘SHELTER’:

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10201145559942005.1073741826.1259885246&type=3
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10200937651941292.1073741827.1165592061&type=1

LIST OF ACTIONS TO TAKE:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151600811030399&set=o.134641413389079&type=1&theater

RECENT ARTICLES:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/139324816/Dog-concentration-camp-in-Pozega
http://inserbia.info/news/2013/05/serbia-activists-trying-to-save-dogs-from-the-cruel-and-painful-death-in-nas-dom-pound-in-pozega/

HumAnimal has saved over 250 dogs from Pozega so far and also from other kill shelters and or where dogs are being killed but live in horrible conditions as Stara Pazova, Rakovica in Belgrade etc – approx 400 dogs rescued in total.

Over 250 dogs have been adopted in Italy, some in Germany and some in Serbia.

We will not tolerate any profanities or arguing on this site. We are all here to help these poor dogs and will use all our energy and resources solely for that goal.

Poz7

Poz8

DIRECT DONATIONS LINKS:

http://www.youcaring.com/other/help-us-pay-to-save-20-new-dogs-from-pozega-torture-pound-costs-for-57-saved-so-far/60205

 http://www.youcaring.com/medical-fundraiser/help-get-10-more-dogs-out-of-serbian-torture-shelter-15-saved-so-far-/55845

THANK YOU !

 

 

 

 

Serbia: Pozega Pound – Please Sign the Petition and Tell the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management To Close the Facility Down – Immediately and Undertake the 13 Existing Prosecutions Against Workers of the Pound.

Serbian  Flag

Pozega petition

Re our very recent post on the dog pound at Pozega:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2013/05/10/serbia-activists-trying-to-save-dogs-from-the-cruel-and-painful-death-in-nas-dom-pound-in-pozega/

There is now a petition which can be viewed and signed via the following link:

http://www.change.org/petitions/local-and-state-authorities-in-serbia-as-well-as-the-european-union-shut-down-the-horror-dog-shelter-in-pozega-serbia

Petition wording:

The infamous dog pound, ironically called “Our Home” in city Pozega in Serbia is catching dogs from 7 cities in Serbia. After a few weeks in the shelter dogs are being killed with t61 injection with no proper sedatives or preparation.
Dogs in this shelter are beaten and literally starved before they die. Most dogs can no longer walk and can barely lift their heads. Pups only couple of months old are curled up on the ground and do not react any more to the human voice.

Due to a sterilisation performed by incompetent veterinarians dogs die infection. Instead of surgical thread, rope is used to saw sterilisation wounds.

It is well known that the shelter supervisor and the veterinarian torture the dogs. There are currently 13 charges against the management of the pound, but they continue to catch and kill these poor animals.

– It is thought that around 70-90 dogs are killed every week!!!
– Local Authorities pay 100 euros for each dog to the pound!

This means the shelter earns around 400.000 euros per year.
– The pound charges volunteers 28 Euros per dog to get them out of the horror shelter

PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION TO HELP US SHUT DOWN THIS CORRUPT SHELTER FOREVER AND TO CHARGE THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS HORROR.

———————————————————-

EUUN0001

Please crosspost this petition and get as many people to sign as you can.

If you are an EU citizen then please go to out ‘EU Links’ tab at the top of the page and use the links provided to provide this information to your national MEPs.

Explain that you are very concerned about the killing of dogs at this (Pozega) pound and that you wish all EU funding to be stopped that supports the abuses at this shelter.

At a meeting on 17th April in Belgrade we were unofficially informed via Milos Skalicki of the Serbian Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, that the Serbian authorities were going to call for ‘better implementation of animal welfare laws’.

If the pound at Pozega is not somewhere where the Ministry should be acting immediately, then we don’t know what is !

You can see the Ministry response to the meeting below:

Response from the Ministry of Agriculture to letter DO NOT CHANGE ANIMAL WELFARE LAW IN SERBIA

TRANSLATION

On 04/09/2013 you sent an e-mail to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management in which you expressed the view that the Conference about the welfare of abandoned animals, organized by TAIEX and Veterinary management on 17.04.2013, should not be held because it is an attempt to make changes to the Animal Welfare Law, relating to the ban of killing animals.

We inform you that the Conference on this issue is of great importance and it is opportunity to meet Directors of Veterinary management from this region, representatives of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), representatives of the European Commission and the RSPCA – all to talk about the problem of abandoned animals. The aim of this Conference was to share experiences of countries in the region related to the problem of stray animals, control of their population, the role and responsibilities of government agencies and non-governmental organizations.

The allegations from some animal welfare organizations are incorrect – who are calling for protest rallies and petitions against the Serbian authorities, NGO organizations and speakers at this Conference – because, as stated above, this Conference hasn’t been organized as “attempt” to make changes in the existing Animal Welfare Law, but rather for better implementation of same.

Veterinary management has good cooperation with many well-meaning animal welfare associations and non-governmental organizations, of which some actively participate and provide help to us in achieving our mutual goal of animal welfare.

Sincerely
Milos Skalicki
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management
Belgrade, Nemanjina Street 22-26
Phone +381 11 3622-101
www.minpolj.gov.rs

——————————————————————————————-

Letters from supporters asking that Pozega pound be immediately closed down can be sent to the following:

zoran.micovic@minpolj.gov.rs; s.celebicanin@minpolj.gov.rs; mfa@mfa.rs; kancelarijan@narodnakancelarija.rs; predsednikvladesrbije@srbija.gov.rs; kabinet.zpv@srbija.gov.rs; office@poverenik.org.rs; predsednikvladesrbije@gov.rs; kabinet.zpv@gov.rs; potpredsednik.prr@gov.rs; kabinet.zpv@gov.rs; potpredsednik.prr@gov.rs; predsednik@pozega.org.rs

Thank you – SAV.

Pozega petition