Spain: Further Update 04/11/09 – Donkey Charity (Uk / Spain) Now Plans Full Legal Action Against Donkey Abusing Sick in the Head Thugs

SPAN0001

 

  uk

 

 

 

DONKEY BRUTALLY MURDERED IN SPAIN SHOCKS DONKEY CHARITY 

04 November 2009, 2.30pm  News release issued by El Refugio Del Burrito’s Press Office

donkey tortured

A donkey has been brutally murdered by teenagers in the village of Torreorgaz in the Spanish region of Extremadura.  The news has shocked the Sidmouth-based Donkey Sanctuary and its Spanish counterpart now plans to take full legal action against the culprits.

El Refugio del Burrito, based in Fuente de Piedra is a Spanish registered charity, and part of the UK-based Donkey Sanctuary, dedicated to the care and protection of donkeys and mules.  

Staff at the refuge were devastated to hear how a 20-year old female donkey died in the early hours of Saturday 31st October after being repeatedly kicked, and more disturbingly for having objects inserted into its bodily orifices causing great internal damage, which then led to a fatal heart attack.

Ivan Salvia, General Manager at El Refugio Del Burrito says: “This cruel act is incomprehensible and we hope to find justice for the poor donkey concerned.  The owner is just as devastated as we are.”

El Refugio del Burrito now plans to lodge an official condemnation to the local government of Extremadura to start the legal proceedings.  The charity also hopes to gather support from the general public to campaign for animal protection laws to be fully enforced in future.

To support El Refugio del Burrito in their campaign, please visit www.elrefugiodelburrito.com

 [ends]

NOTES

·      The Donkey Sanctuary aims to protect donkeys and mules and promote their welfare worldwide.  The charity was founded by Dr Elisabeth Svendsen, MBE in 1969 and has taken into its care over 13,600 donkeys in the UK, Ireland and other parts of Europe.  It currently works in 18 countries around the world, including the Sanctuary’s core overseas projects in Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Kenya and Mexico – bringing veterinary assistance to thousands of working donkeys.   The charity relies entirely on donations to continue its vital work worldwide.  For further information telephone: 01395 578222 or visit: www.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk

·       The Donkey Sanctuary has a connected charity, The Elisabeth Svendsen Trust for Children and Donkeys, where fit and healthy donkeys provide riding therapy to children with special needs at purpose built centres located throughout the country.  For further information visit: www.elisabethsvendsentrust.org.uk

Spain: 03/11/09 Update and Further Action Re Donkey Killing by Sick In The Head Thugs

spain

 

 

 

 

Subject: LATEST NEWS tortured donkey in Spain

Previous SAV Post:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/spain-sadistic-sick-in-the-head-spanish-teenage-thugs-torture-and-kill-donkey-during-celebrations/

donkey tortured

PLEASE WRITE TO THE MAYORESS DEMANDING THESE MONSTERS BE TRIED FOR CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (SEE TEXT AND SAMPLE LETTER BELOW). 

PLEASE CIRCULATE THIS WIDELY.

http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/556119/0/burra/muerta/torreorgaz/

The Mayoress of Torreorgaz, Concepción Polo, has read a statement condemning what was done to the donkey on Friday and also a letter from the parents of the teenage sadists apologizing for them and taking full responsibility, but get this: the Court for Minors only wants to prosecute based on “damages” because the animal died of a “heart attack” and not of the wounds  !!!!!!!!!!

Please write again  to the Mayoress’s office aytotorreorgaz@yahoo.es and tell her you are NOT buying this absurd excuse and that you demand that the criminals be tried for cruelty to animals under the 5/2002 legislation.

Ayuntamiento de Torreorgaz – Calle Del Moral, 1 – Teléfono: 927 20 50 01 / 927 20 52 03
Fax: 927 20 53 74 – E-Mail: aytotorreorgaz@yahoo.es

Sample letter:

Acabo de leer con total incredulidad que el fiscal de menores acusa a los menores torturadores del burrito en su pueblo de un mero delito de “daños” porque el animal murió de un “ataque al corazón” y no de sus heridas. Por favor, no nos traten de imbéciles, el animal murió de la gran paliza recibida y de la brutal violación a la que fue sometido y no nos importa cual de sus órganos cedió primero, aquí se debe aplicar  la ley 5/2002 además de poner denuncia por lo administrativo. Cualquier acción para evitar un verdadero castigo a esos individuos sería un gran error de su parte ya que Vds. tienen a una pandilla de sicópatas en el seno de su sociedad, y está bien estudiado que los asesinos en serie y los asesinos de niños empiezan cometiendo barbaridades como la que nos ocupa.

Name and country

———————————————

Translation of sample letter

I have just read with total disbelief that the teenage torturers of the donkey are being accused by the authorities merely of “damages” because the animal died of a “heart attack” and not of his wounds. Please do not treat us like idiots, the animal died of the terrible beating he received and of the brutal rape he suffered and we don’t care which one of his organs failed first, the law 5/2002 (*penal code) must be applied plus a civil suit. Any excuse to avoid a real punishment for these individuals would be a grave mistake on your part as you have a group of psychopaths in your midst  and it is a fact that serial and child killers start by torturing animals to death as in this case.

Spain: Sadistic, Sick in the Head Spanish Teenage Thugs Torture and Kill Donkey During ‘Celebrations’

spain

 

 

 

 

donkey tortured

A dozen 17-year-olds sadistically tortured a hapless donkey by beating her up and raping her with a broomstick destroying her insides yesterday in Torreorgaz, Extremadura,

http://www.elperiodicoextremadura.com/noticias/noticia.asp?pkid=473826 

during the “celebrations” of the Quintos, a tradition where animals are often abused.

There is pressure on the owners of the donkey to withdraw their complaint to the police.

Please write asking for justice for the innocent animal and her owners so the monsters will not get away:   

Ayuntamiento de Torreorgaz – Calle Del Moral, 1 – Teléfono: 927 20 50 01 / 927 20 52 03
Fax: 927 20 53 74 – E-Mail: aytotorreorgaz@yahoo.es

Sample letter  Sample letter  Sample letter  Sample letter 

Con horror hemos leído la noticia de la tortura a muerte de una burra por parte de unos salvajes de 17 años en su municipio. Por medio de este mensaje solicitamos que se castigue ejemplarmente a los culpables y que se prohíban “los quintos” de ahora en adelante. Su ayuntamiento queda en mi lista de lugares de España que no visitaré a menos que se civilizen.

Atte.

YOUR Name and country    

 —————————————————————–

Traslation of sample letter:

We have read with horror about the torture to death of a donkey by a group of 17 year old savages in your municipality. We urge you to punish the criminals making an example of them and to forbid this celebration from now on. Your part of the world is now on my list of places I will not visit in Spain until it becomes civilized.  

*** SAV Comment ***

As we have declared in recent posts on this site, the EU is doing nothing to prevent animal abuses and suffering; this is a typical example.  The EU is only interested inn money.

The EU would appear to be keen for other animal abusing nations to become members of its ‘club’, much to the detriment of member states which DO show compassion towards animals.

 

Serbia: And What For Stray Dogs and Cats ? – More EU Veiled Promises As We See in Romania, Greece, Spain – EXISTING EU MEMBER STATES

EU-Serbia Relations

Source: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/serbia/eu_serbia_and_montenegro_relations_en.htm

Main steps towards the EU

Following the referendum on independence organised on 21 May 2006 in Montenegro (in which 55.5% of voters expressed their support for independence whereas the turnout reached 86.5% of those eligible to vote), on 5 June Serbian Parliament, acting in accordance with Article 60 of the Constitutional Charter of Serbia and Montenegro confirmed the continuity of Serbia as a legal successor of the State Union and informed thereof the EU and other representatives of the international community.

On 12 June 2006 the EU Council adopted Conclusions, in which taking note of the Serbian Parliament’s Decision it recognised Republic of Serbia as a legal successor of the State Union. The Council called also on Montenegro and on Serbia to pursue a direct and constructive dialogue on their future relations.

The Government of Serbia declared the European integration to be one of the strategic priorities for the Republic.

Since 2001 Serbia has benefited from the EU policy advice provided through the EU-FRY Consultative Task Force (CTF), later replaced by the Enhanced Permanent Dialogue (EPD). The task of EPD is to encourage and monitor reforms on the basis of the European Partnership adopted by the EU Council in June 2004 and updated in January 2006. The current text takes due account of the respective competences and different priorities of Serbia and of Montenegro, will require however an adaptation following the change in the status of the Republics. The EPD structures will remain in place and continue providing support for the reforms in Serbia until formal contractual relations between the EU and Serbia are established through the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) in the context of the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP). On the basis of decisions taken at the Thessaloniki Summit in June 2003 and confirmed on several occasions by the EU, Serbia is a potential candidate country for the EU accession.

Contractual relations

In its Feasibility Report of 12 April 2005, the Commission concluded that Serbia and Montenegro is sufficiently prepared to negotiate an SAA with the EU. On 25 April 2005, the EU Council endorsed the Feasibility Report and invited the Commission to submit the negotiating directives for the SAA. In line with the “twin-track” approach the negotiations with the State Union and the two constituent Republics were launched in October 2005, whereas the Commission made clear that the continuation and pace of talks would depend on the progress in addressing by Serbia and Montenegro of issues highlighted by the Commission and the EU Council, including achievement of full co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) without delay.

Since then two official and two technical rounds of talks were conducted and a progress was made in discussion on the text of the future agreement.

Following a negative assessment on the state of co-operation of Serbia and Montenegro and the failure of Serbia to locate, arrest and transfer Ratko Mladić to The Hague, submitted by ICTY, the Commission decided on 3 May 2006 to call off the negotiations.

In the light of the outcome of the referendum in Montenegro the Commission announced its intension to submit to the Council a proposal for an amended negotiating mandate for an SAA with Serbia. It recalled that even pending the adoption of the amended negotiating mandate it was prepared to resume negotiations as soon as the condition of co-operation with ICTY has been fulfilled.

The SAA will be a comprehensive agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part. Similar to the “Europe Agreements” with countries of the Central and Eastern Europe, the SAA will provide a legal framework for the relations between the EU and Serbia for the entire period prior to the possible future accession.

Trade

Since 2000 the EU has granted, on an autonomous basis, generous trade conditions for Serbian products as part of the support package in the framework of the SAP. In order to take the full advantage of these preferences Serbia will need to continue the necessary reforms and to develop its export capacity.

Bilateral trade relations with the EU also include the trade in textile and textile products, which is governed by the Textile Agreement signed between the Republic of Serbia and the EU on 31 March 2005. This agreement brings the immediate opening of the EU market for textile and textile products originating from Serbia and Serbia’s commitment to phase out its tariffs for the EU textile imports over a period of three years and to apply a zero tariff rate on EU textiles from January 2008 onwards.

In 2004, the imports to the EU from Serbia reached the level of 1.5 billion EUR.

In the same period, the major exports to Serbia from the EU were at the level of 4.769 billion EUR.

EU assistance

In total, combining CARDS, macro-financial and humanitarian assistance, EU assistance to the whole Serbia and Montenegro has amounted to more than €2.9 billion since 1991 to 2002, of which more than €2 billion since the fall of Milosevic regime in October 2000. The focus and main objectives of EU assistance have evolved since the 1990s, covering conflict management, post-conflict reconstruction and stabilisation and paving the way for a closer association with the EU. The support provided through CARDS in 2005 (154.5 million EUR for Serbia) focused mainly on the European Partnership priorities, taking into account political and economic situation in Serbia and the requirements the Republic will have to meet in order to be able to conclude the SAA negotiations and implement the agreement. Serbia benefits also from the regional CARDS programme which in 2005 had an overall budget of 40.0 million EUR to support actions of interest for the whole Western Balkans region in the field of infrastructure, institution building and cross-border co-operation. The annual CARDS programme for 2006 is in the process of being adopted.

Programming has also been launched for the preparation of the future IPA (Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance) of which Serbia will be a beneficiary together with all other countries in the Western Balkans in the period of 2007-2013. It will have two components (Institution Building and transition facility, and Cross-border cooperation). The financial framework for support to Serbia has not yet been decided.

——————————————————————————

Serbia – EU-Serbia Relations

Serbia is a potential candidate country for EU accession following the Thessaloniki European Council of June 2003. On 29 April 2008, the EU and Serbia signed the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) and the Interim Agreement on Trade and Trade-related issues . The SAA will be submitted to parliaments for ratification and the implementation of the Interim Agreement will start as soon as the Council decides that Serbia fully co-operates with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). On 1 January 2008, a visa facilitation and a readmission agreement between Serbia and the EU came into force. On 15 July the European Commission proposed to grant visa liberalisation to Serbia.

On 18 February 2008 the Council adopted the new European partnership for Serbia. Consultations with the Serbian authorities across the range of reform issues are conducted through the Enhanced Permanent Dialogue process (EPD).

Serbia has benefited from EU autonomous trade measures since 2000. As a result of Serbia’s decision to start implementing the provisions of the Interim Agreement, the access of EU exporters to the Serbian market is expected to improve substantially as of 1 January 2009. The EU is the main trading partner of Serbia and EU-Serbia trade has been rapidly growing since 2000. Trade integration with the EU is high. During 2007, exports and imports of goods and services to and from the EU increased to 56% of the country’s total exports and 54% of its total imports, compared with 53% and 49% in 2006. Serbia has a large trade deficit with the EU: in 2007, its exports to the EU amounted to €3.6 billion and its imports from the EU to €7.4 billion. Serbia mainly sold agricultural products (sugar, raspberries), tires, iron, steel and machinery to the EU while the main goods bought from EU were vehicles, diesel fuels and medicaments.

Net foreign direct investment from EU countries in Serbia in 2007 was around € 2.3 billion.

Key dates in Serbia’s path towards the EU

15 July 2009 – European Commission proposes to grant Serbia visa liberalisation.

7 July 2008 – Following 11 May parliamentary elections, formation of a new government; European integration set as a key priority.

7 May 2008 – Commission hands over to the Serbian government the Road map on Visa liberalisation, set up with the aim of achieving a visa free regime for Serbian citizens wishing to travel to Schengen countries.

29 April 2008 – The Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) and the Interim Agreement on Trade and Trade-related issues between Serbia and the EU is signed in Luxembourg.

18 February 2008 – Council adopts the revised European partnership for Serbia.

1 January 2008 – Entry into force of the Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreement between Serbia and the EU.

7 November 2007 – The SAA with Serbia is initialled.

13 June 2007 – SAA negotiations with Serbia resumed, following a clear commitment by the country to achieve full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), and concrete actions undertaken by the country that have matched this commitment.

3 May 2006 – SAA negotiations called off due to lack of progress on Serbia’s co-operation with the ICTY.

October 2005 – Launch of the negotiations for a Stabilisation and Association Agreement.

October 2004 – Council conclusions open up a process for a Stabilisation and Association Agreement.

June 2003 – at Thessaloniki European Council, the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP) is confirmed as the EU policy for the Western Balkans. The EU perspective for these countries is confirmed.

2001 – First year of the new Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation (CARDS) programme specifically designed for the SAP countries.

November 2000 – Zagreb Summit launches the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP) for five countries of South-Eastern Europe.

November 2000 – “Framework Agreement Federal Republic of Yugoslavia-EU for the provision of Assistance and Support by the EU to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia”. Serbia benefits from Autonomous Trade Preferences from the EU.

June 2000 – Feira European Council states that all the SAP countries are “potential candidates” for EU membership.

1999 – The EU proposes the new Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP) for five countries of South-Eastern Europe, including Serbia.

1997 – Regional Approach. The EU Council of Ministers establishes political and economic conditionality for the development of bilateral relations.

——————————————————————————

Progress Report on Serbia

Source:  http://www.delscg.ec.europa.eu/code/navigate.php?Id=1044

Over the last year there has been progress in Serbia’s European integration process. The European Commission noted in its Annual Progress Report for Serbia that in light of sustained cooperation with ICTY. In this context the Commission considers that the Interim Agreement should now be implemented by the EU, followed by the full implementation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA). The Commission expects Serbia to continue its co-operation with ICTY which should eventually lead to the arrest of the two remaining fugitives, General Ratko Mladic and Goran Hadzic.

Presenting the progress report for Serbia, Ambassador Vincent Degert said: “Serbia has demonstrated its commitment to bringing the country closer to the EU by building a track record in implementing the provisions of the Interim Agreement with the EU and by undertaking key reforms in a wide number of areas in line with European standards.”

The Annual Report notes that Serbia needs to continue its efforts to carry out and implement EU related reforms and to fully commit itself to the path of European Integration.

The EU has for its part shown clear support for these efforts by earmarking substantial financial assistance – €1 billion for the period of 2007-2011 and additional €200 million of micro financial assistance.

The EU is also supporting efforts to bring Serbian people closer to the EU by finalising the visa liberalisation process. The European Commission encourages Serbia to meet the outstanding benchmarks to ensure the endorsement of the Commission’s proposal by the member states and thus make visa free travel a reality by 1 January 2010.

The country faces, at the same time, the difficult requirements of accelerating economic reforms and ensuring sustainability in the public finances. Concerning other challenges, the Progress Report states that the country needs to make further progress in a number of areas, including the effective implementation of existing laws; the improvement of public consultation prior to the adoption of laws; the reform of the judicial system and in reinforcing its capacity to fight against corruption. Furthermore there continue to be concerns about incidents of intimidation of civil society activists, human rights defenders and journalists that are not fully investigated and where the perpetrators are not brought to justice. Serbia needs to demonstrate a more constructive attitude on regional co-operation and issues related to Kosovo.

Together with Serbia the European Commission adopted its annual strategy on EU enlargement and the progress reports for the candidate and potential candidate countries. The strategy highlights the progress the Western Balkans and Turkey made towards European integration during a difficult year of global economic crisis, and spells out the main challenges ahead.

2009 marks the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall and 5 years since the enlargement of the EU to central and Eastern Europe. The prospect of EU accession continues to provide strong encouragement for political and economic reform and reinforces peace and stability. It is in the EU’s strategic interest to keep up this momentum, on the basis of agreed principles and conditions.

The EU enlargement process currently takes place against the background of a deep and widespread recession, which has affected both the EU and the enlargement countries.

Documents:

Progress Report
Brussels, 14.October (PDF, 386 KB,na Engleskom)

European Partnership
Brussels, 08.February(na Engleskom)

Key findings
of the progress reports on Kosovo 1 and the potential candidates: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia
Brussels, 14.October (PDF, 94 KB,na Engleskom)

——————————————————————————–

HOW TO ACCESS EUROPEAN UNION FUNDING
http://www.europa.rs/code/navigate.php?Id=920

———————————————————————————-

SAV Comment:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/eu-balkans-sav-launch-new-petition-asking-eu-to-act-in-advance-of-balkans-states-eu-membership-accession-please-read-and-sign-petition-link-in-text-below/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/eu-sav-writes-to-eu-enlargement-commissioner-olli-rehn-regarding-concerns-about-balkans-animal-welfare-legislation-enforcement-or-lack-of/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZSXlSH4pEA&feature=channel 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sewZvVbQro0 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAEfxbysd_Y&feature=channel 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/serbia-evidence-what-evidence/

5 Eutanazija

4eutanazijazivipsiposmaxb2

Orca Belgrade 6

Photo 2

The EU cannot even control animal welfare in EXISTING EU MEMBER STATES, let alone potential future states ! – Romania, Greece, Spain – all current EU members; all have massive stray animal welfare problems; and the EU DOES NOT ACT.

The EU worries about only one thing – MONEY.

Animal Welfare comes way down low.

 

 

 

EU / Balkans: SAV Launch New Petition Asking EU (Enlargement Commissioner Mr. Olli Rehn) To Act In Advance of Balkans States EU Membership (Accession) – Please Read and Sign – Petition Link In Text below

EUUN0001

EU AW LOGO

loz1

Video Link – Dogcatchers (Shinters) in Nis City, Serbia:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rV5hu-uVJI&feature=player_embedded

24/10/09 – Update.

Further to our correspondence with Commissioner Rehn of 19/10/09,

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/eu-sav-writes-to-eu-enlargement-commissioner-olli-rehn-regarding-concerns-about-balkans-animal-welfare-legislation-enforcement-or-lack-of/

we have now decided to support this with a petition, the full wording of which follows at the end of this post.

The petition finsihes by declaring:

Signators of this petion request that Commissioner Rehn now fully investigates if there is actually any animal welfare legislation enforcement by Balkans states requiring EU membership prior to them being granted official EU membership.  Or is animal welfare legislation implementation simply being ignored.

We request the implementation of ‘democracy’ and the ‘rule of law’ for all animal welfare issues within Balkans states at all times prior to their EU Accession.  Where this is not happening, we rquest the EU demands it prior to accession”.

**  To sign the petition, simply click on the following link   **  :

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/EU-Investigate-Balkans-Animal-Welfare 

The petition is global, international and open to everyone – please support it.

We would especially though love to see lots of support from existing EU citizens; Commissioner Rehn is supposed to be a representative of the EU citizen, so let him know how EU citizens feel about this issue.

Please finish and comment you leave on the petition with wording like:

“I am an existing EU citizen, and I request that the EU Enlargement Commissioner acts on behalf of EU citizens and Balkans Animals”.

Add Your Voice for Serbian Animals Voice !!! – Sign today.

 Balkans dogs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please feel free to crosspost.

Many Thanks – SAV.

 —————————————————————————————–

PETITION WORDING:

Target:  European Union Enlargement Commissioner: Olli Rehn

Sponsored by:  Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)  https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/

Petition overview:

Several Balkans states are now seeking either full membership (Accession) to the European Union (EU), or are attempting stronger links with the EU.

These include:  Republic of Macedonia,  Montenegro,  Serbia,  Bosnia
and Herzegovina,  Croatia and Kosovo.

Serbian Animals Voice (SAV) has been campaigning for the improved welfare of Balkans animals for several years.  We have extensive experience and data relating to the terrible daily suffering inflicted on animals, despite existing Balkan states national legislation which should legally prevent much of this.  There is very little evidence to show political and municipal authority enforcement of animal welfare legislation. – details of this on a ‘nation by nation’ basis can be seen via our site at https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/

In October 2009, SAV wrote to Commissioner Olli Rehn; EU Commissioner for Enlargement, expressing our deep concerns regarding an apparent lack of existing national animal welfare legislation implementation and enforcement by governments throughout the Balkan states.

Over 25 ‘prime’ evidence links from the SAV site were provided to Commissioner Rehn, each of these containing many ‘sub’ links, showing extreme Balkans animal suffering video footage which relate to our concerns.  A few examples are shown in the following links –

**WARNING – Graphic Animal Suffering**:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZSXlSH4pEA&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sewZvVbQro0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAEfxbysd_Y&feature=channel

We have expressed our concerns to the Commissioner, that even when provided with such evidence, clearly showing extreme animal abuses, nothing with regard investigation and prosecution is being followed up by the Balkans authorities to press charges; to enforce (the) often existing national animal welfare legislation.  In Serbia for example, the Public Attorney appears to be dismissing all evidence provided by animal welfare campaigners; instead, they themselves are themselves being accused of “obstructing them (the Public Attorney) from getting on with their legal work”.

In our letter, we have reminded Commissioner Rehn that (on his website) his very own words declare:

“The European Union currently has 27 Member States. The Western Balkan countries, Turkey and Iceland may also join once they meet the conditions for membership. The aim of enlargement is simple: to extend the area of peace, stability, democracy and the rule of law, and prosperity and well-being throughout Europe”. 

We draw particular attention to the statement by Commissioner Rehn of – “democracy and the rule of law”, as it is felt that despite Serbian animal welfare campaigners providing large amounts of evidence to Serbian legislators, no action appears to ever be taken by Serbian authorities to apply ‘the rule of law’ – a fundamental condition necessary for EU membership.

If no action (in the form of prosecutions against animal cruelty) is being shown to be taken by Serbian legislators following the production of evidence and documented requests by animal welfare campaigners, then we declare that Serbia is not meeting some of the necessary and fundamental aims of EU enlargement – with regard showing the implementation of both ‘democracy’ (ie. requests by animal welfare campaigners) and the ‘rule of law’ (ie. by not prosecuting perpetrators of causing animal suffering), even when evidence is provided. 

As a consequence, Signators of this petion request that Commissioner Rehn now fully investigates if there is actually any animal welfare legislation enforcement by Balkans states requiring EU membership prior to them being granted official EU membership.  Or is animal welfare legislation implementation simply being ignored.

We request the implementation of ‘democracy’ and the ‘rule of law’ for all animal welfare issues within Balkans states at all times prior to their EU Accession.  Where this is not happening, we rquest the EU demands it prior to accession.

Ends

 —————————————————————-

**  To sign the petition, simply click on the following link   **  :

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/EU-Investigate-Balkans-Animal-Welfare

The petition is global, international and open to everyone – please support it.

vardariste6

EU: SAV Writes to EU ‘Enlargement’ Commissioner Olli Rehn Regarding Concerns About Balkans Animal Welfare Legislation Enforcement; or Lack Of !

EUUN0001

 

19/10/09

SAV has now written to Commissioner Olli Rehn; EU Commissioner for Enlargement, expressing our concerns regarding animal welfare legislation enforcement throughout the Balkans.

Commissioner Rehn Website:   http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/rehn/index_en.htm

Our four (4) page letter has covered animal welfare issues in the following states:

Serbia,  Macedonia,  Bosnia and Hertzegovina,  Croatia,  Montenegro.

Over 25 ‘prime’ links have been provided to Commissioner Rehn, each of these with many ‘sub’ links, showing Balkans animal suffering video footage which details our concerns.  A few examples are shown here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZSXlSH4pEA&feature=channel 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sewZvVbQro0 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAEfxbysd_Y&feature=channel 

We have expressed our concerns that even when provided with such video evidence as this, clearly showing those involved in animal abuses, nothing is being done by the authorities to press charges; to enforce the law.  With regard Serbia, the Public Attorney would appear to be dismissing all evidence provided.  More details are provided in our post:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/serbia-evidence-what-evidence/

We have reminded Commissioner Rehn that (on his website) his very own words declare:

“The European Union currently has 27 Member States. The Western Balkan countries, Turkey and Iceland may also join once they meet the conditions for membership. The aim of enlargement is simple: to extend the area of peace, stability, democracy and the rule of law, and prosperity and well-being throughout Europe”. 

We pay particular attention to “democracy and the rule of law”, as it is felt that despite Serbian animal welfare campaigners through their right of ‘democracy’, providing large amounts of evidence to Serbian legislators, no action appears to ever be taken by Serbian authorities to apply ‘the rule of law’.

If no action (prosecutions) is being shown to be taken by Serbian legislators, then possibly Serbia is not meeting one of the aims of EU enlargement with regard both democracy and the rule of law

Applying ‘the rule of law’ would mean identifying (from the videos) and prosecuting those involved with animal abuses.

We are not publishing a copy of the information provided to Commissioner Rehn, as we feel that this is private between him and European citizens representing Serbian Animals Voice with this evidence. 

We have requested that Commissioner Rehn now investigates animal welfare legislation enforcement by Balkans states requiring EU membership, and have asked why (from what we are informed by the Serbian Public Attorney and the police), they as nations are allegedly NOT enforcing their own national legislation when it comes to issues of animal welfare.

Ie. not applying the ‘rule of law’, a fundamental condition which needs to be shown to be applied nationally by nations wishing to become future members of the EU.

We now await Commissioner Rehns responses on this important point of animal welfare legislation within the Balkans.

Once we have been provided with a response from Commissioner Rehn, will we then decide our future route of action.

 EU AW LOGO

 

 loz18

 Above – SERBIA

vardariste5

Above – MACEDONIA

CROATIA –

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/animal-friends-croatia-prepare-reports-about-the-benkovac-situation/

BOSNIA and HERTZEGOVINA

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/2319/

Serbia: Evidence; What Evidence ? ! ?

Serbian  Flag

 

 

 

 

 

WARNING – Graphic footage of animal suffering in organised fights etc is shown in sub links on each of the following primary links – that is those which have not already been removed by the users ! – please read on for details. 

Serbian Public Attorney; try these as evidence for a start and then tell us it is not possible to identify who is involved ! :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZSXlSH4pEA&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UQdd7OGZ4Y&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sewZvVbQro0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAEfxbysd_Y&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oe56SxOQVKA&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUnu8yKOt5s&feature=channel

We still have copies of them all regardless.

Past Links and Evidence:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/serbia-criminal-charge-made-to-serbian-authorities-and-pictures-of-may-9th-public-awareness-day-belgrade/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/03/06/serbia-time-for-the-public-attorney-general-mrs-gordana-miloshevic-stojanovic-to-act/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/serbia-now-video-proof-of-organised-animal-fighting-obtained-calls-to-government-to-now-prosecute-those-shown-on-film/

Note that on many of the above links that we gave on the original SAV posts showing animals fighting with each other, including foxes and badgers being baited, and dogs attacking wild boar, MUCH OF THE FOOTAGE HAS NOW ‘BEEN REMOVED BY THE USER.

If the ‘user’ (who almost certainly made the footage) has nothing to hide and all their activities are valid as far as they are concerned, then why now have they removed the footage ? – something to hide ?; could it be in relation to Criminal Charge evidence submitted to the Serbian Public Attorney by animal welfare organisations ?

Fortunately, and assuming that the creators of these sadistic scenes of animal abuse would eventually remove them from public view, welfare campaigners ensured that  full copies of all the footage were taken in advance at the time that it was still being publicised.  So regardless of the current situation where the ‘user’ has now removed the footage, we still have copies of everything should future legal actions be necessary.

Names, surnames, video evidence and photographic evidence of those involved with these clear abuses of animals were provided to the Serbian Public Attorney; the video footage clearly showing the faces of parties involved.  Video footage we still have which still shows the faces.

Now welfare campaigners have been informed that both the police and the inspectors of the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of the Environment have found NO EVIDENCE of any wild animals having been caused any sufferingWe have been informed that ‘some people keep wild pigs as pets’:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWupK-gWSHA&feature=channel

– Obviously this shows footage of daily ‘play’ between pet animals no doubt !!

The Ministries ask for ‘proof’ , even though we consider that the above video footage for example is enough ‘proof’.

The police have oddly enough ‘LOST’ the first documented Criminal Charge presented by the campaigners some THREE (3) TIMES now ! – requiring a 4th copy to be sent to them on 23/02/09.

Further charges have now been persented / submitted by welfare campaigners since this time; building on the stack of evidence and video footage now held; remember, this is oddly enough some of the footage which has now been removed by the user.

It would appear that the police have not been able to find the Criminal Charge, and as a result they have not been able to find those who have been involved in these actions.

Campaigners feel that both the police and the Public Attorneys in Serbia have been obstructing any criminal charges brought by welfare campaigners regarding animal fighting.  Below are some copies of the large amount of documentation now held by welfare campaigners relating to this.

S3

S4

S1

S2

Fighting between dogs, dogs and foxes, and dogs and badgers has often been taking place underground; literally – see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcjjss3csAs&feature=channel

Ministries are claiming to campaigners that bodies of foxes and badgers which have been involved in fighting have never been found, so it would appear that nothing can be done as there is no ‘evidence’ !.

One person (fighter) who lives in Chachak and who has made in the past extremely brutal animal fighting videos in which foxes were kept and continually attacked by dogs until their (foxes) deaths, has never had any action taken against them.  Neither have Dejan Molnar who does fights in Subotica, Obrad Panic who does fights in Subotica, and Aleksandar who does fights in Sefkerin. 

Despite all the video evidence and criminal charges presented by welfare organisations, both the police and the Ministries who should be involved with prosecutions, as well as the Public Attorney, all appear to be unable to keep footage in their holding, requesting copies of criminal charges (with the video links) be provided some 4 times ! – and they also seem to be unable to visually identify persons who are involved in these fights, despite clear facial evidence being shown on several parts of different video footage.

Even the Deputy Public Attorney General, Mrs Gorgdana Milosevic Stojanovic, has written a very stern and angry letter to welfare campaigners making statements and declarations such as they (the welfare campaigners) are obstructing the legal work of the Public Attorney General by sending in these charges !!

What does the public of Serbia have a  Public Attorney General for ?

Welfare campaigners ask what exactly the Serbian Public Attorney General does require in the way of evidence before they can bring charges

They have been supplied with:

  • Photographs
  • Video Footage – samples of which are given above as examples
  • Names of persons involved
  • Towns or villages where these persons live
  • Written Criminal charges by welfare organisations – which have been lost by the police up to four (4) times
  • A Deputy Public Attorney General who finds that a public legal issue, including such evidence as detailed, is ‘obstructing them from getting on with their legal work’ !!! – WOW !

We finish by saying that despite all this evidence being presented to Serbian Ministries and legal authorities, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON who is clearly shown on some of this video evidence has to date ever been investigated or punished for this animal fighting.

Now these institutions have been sent another official request by the welfare campaigners asking what is happening / what has happened regarding these criminal charges originated by the welfare campaigners.

This type of action by people and organisations who should be upholding Serbian law / legislation does not seem very appropriate for a nation which is hoping to achieve accession into the EU in the near future.

The information in this post will immediately be forwarded to the European Union asking them to contact the Serbian authorities regarding the obvious lack of legal  and investigative action in relation to clear animal abuses which are identified many times on different video footage.

We would say that if the Serbian authorities and legislators cannot undertake an investigation such as this, when they have been provided with most of the evidence already, then we question if they are worthy of EU membership; who has membership Accesiion Criteria declaring:

COPENHAGEN EUROPEAN COUNCIL

Membership criteria require that the candidate country must have achieved

stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities;

the existence of a functioning market economy as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union;

the ability to take on the obligations of membership including adherence to the aims of political, economic & monetary union.

MADRID EUROPEAN COUNCIL

Membership criteria also require that the candidate country must have created the conditions for its integration through the adjustment of its administrative structures, as underlined by the Madrid European Council in December 1995. While it is important that European Community legislation is transposed into national legislation, it is even more important that the legislation is implemented effectively through appropriate administrative and judicial structures.

This is a prerequisite of the mutual trust required by EU membership.

 

Additional action – Copies of this post are also being provided to the OIE – the World Organisation for Animal Health.

http://www.oie.int/eng/en_index.htm