Germany: Merkel in China – Berlin’s Cozy New Relationship with Beijing. To Hell With Animal Welfare.

08/29/2012

Merkel in China Berlin’s Cozy New Relationship with Beijing

By Markus Deggerich, Ralf Neukirch and Wieland Wagner

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and much of her cabinet are headed to Beijing on Thursday for a two-day diplomatic offensive. China has quickly become one of Germany’s key partners, but several heated disagreements remained to be solved.

The quality of the relationship between two world leaders isn’t revealed in official appearances, military parades and festive dinners that have been planned down the very last detail. Instead, it is reflected in the small gestures and conversations that take place on the sidelines of the main events, especially when unexpected problems arise.

That was the case in February, when German Chancellor Angela Merkel was last in China. The Chinese authorities had prevented human rights attorney Mo Shaoping from attending Merkel’s reception at the German Embassy in Beijing. Merkel could have scored points with voters back home by issuing in sharp protest. But it would have also complicated her foreign-policy mission.

Instead, the chancellor took Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao aside during the dinner and suggested that he consider how much damage China was doing — especially to its reputation — by barring Mo from the event. In fact, she said, the incident was already dominating coverage of her trip in the German press.

Wen could have bridled at Merkel’s attempt to intervene in China’s internal affairs, as Chinese politicians tend to do in response to reproaches from the West. Instead, he listened quietly to what Merkel had to say, and she got the impression that he at least understood her argument.

Such quiet crisis diplomacy shows how far the German-Chinese relationship has come in recent years. Almost unnoticed by the general public, German foreign policy has undergone a remarkable transformation. China is no longer seen as merely a market for German goods and supplier of cheap products. For the German government, Beijing is now one of its most important political partners outside the Western alliance. Conversely, the Chinese leadership sees Merkel as its central point of contact in Europe.

Pivoting from Moscow to Beijing

Just how close the relationship between the two countries has become will be evident this Thursday, when Merkel travels to Beijing for two days of intergovernmental consultations accompanied by nine cabinet ministers and two parliamentary state secretaries. It’s an important political gesture seeing that the German cabinet only meets regularly with select partners. China does not have a similar arrangement with any other country.

Merkel’s shift toward China isn’t just a result of close economic integration between two of the world’s largest exporting nations. Germany does not buy more goods from any country. Germany ships 6 percent of its exports to China, or almost twice as much as it did only three years ago. China is one of the most important markets for machine-builders and automakers. The Chinese, for their part, need German know-how to continue modernizing their country.

China also has an interest in the survival of the euro. In the long term, Beijing wants to establish its own currency, the renminbi, as the global reserve currency, next to the US dollar. It needs the euro to break the dominant position of the American currency in the long run. Thus, for as long as the Germans support the euro, the Chinese will also do so. They recently promised, without further ado, to contribute an additional $40 billion (€32 billion) to the coffers of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

In fact, Merkel reportedly plans to directly ask China for aid in combating the ongoing euro debt crisis in Europe. Senior government officials say she will bring up the issue of whether the Chinese would like to directly purchase sovereign bonds of Spain and Italy, the two major ailing euro-zone countries, arguing that their high yields makes them an attractive investment.

Berlin’s interest in China, however, goes well beyond economic relations. Since China is one of the five veto powers on the United Nations Security Council, Beijing plays a decisive role in the central issues that, besides the euro crisis, are currently important for German foreign policy.

The Chinese are as important a factor in the negotiations over the Iranian nuclear program as in the discussions over Syria’s future. Only a few years ago, when voting in the Security Council, China took its cue from Russia on matters that did not directly affect its own interests. When the West wanted to assert important positions, it had to appeal to Moscow and not Beijing.

But now foreign policy experts in Berlin assess the situation differently. On the Syria question, for example, it appears that China is more open to taking a constructive approach. As a result, the discussion over how the world community should deal with the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad will play a central role during Merkel’s talks in Beijing.

Until now, the Chinese have blocked all attempts by the West to adopt a Security Council resolution against Assad. But the Germans now hope that Beijing’s position could change. It is encouraging that China has announced plans to provide aid for Syrian refugees, says a senior government official in Berlin.

The Chancellor’s newly strengthened emphasis on China also has to do with changes in Russia. The Russian approach to the West has become more rigid since Vladimir Putin returned to the Kremlin as president in May. Merkel has given up hope of being able to convince Putin to agree to compromises on important issues, such as the Syrian conflict. Officials in Berlin also fear that Moscow could veer away from the collective position in the Iran negotiations. Under these conditions, Germany’s pivot toward Beijing is also a turning away from Moscow.

Merkel’s Changed Stance on China

A few years ago, this sort of policy would have been inconceivable. At the beginning of her chancellorship, Merkel still used the German-Chinese relationship to bolster her own domestic profile. At the time, she sought to portray herself as a staunch advocate of human rights, much to the chagrin of then-Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, a member of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), Merkel’s coalition partner at the time.

But the strategy was popular with the general public. She met with the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of the Tibetans, at the Chancellery in September 2007. Opinion polls showed that it was a very popular decision. Beijing, however, perceived the chancellor’s behavior as a provocation, especially as Merkel had met with the Chinese prime minister a short time earlier, without telling him about her plans. The mood did not improve when she declined to attend the Beijing Olympics in 2008.

But that was yesterday. These days, Merkel addresses human rights issues much more quietly. Last spring, the Chancellery denied reports that Merkel had urged the Chinese leadership to release jailed artist Ai Wei Wei — even though the reports were true.

“Merkel is far more reserved on human rights issues than she used to be,” says Eberhard Sandschneider, director of the German Council on Foreign Relations. “She has a new, more pragmatic approach to Beijing. Now she is more likely to be motivated by classic power politics. The days of reprimands are over.”

Merkel’s view of China has also changed. She is fascinated by the Chinese leadership’s attempt to economically transform their enormous country while avoiding social unrest. Despite all criticism of political conditions, she is impressed by how quickly the Chinese have catapulted their country to global preeminence, both economically and politically.

The international political situation has also changed in a fundamental way. When Barack Obama was elected US president, it initially seemed like Chinese-American relations were on the mend. But that is no longer the case. The US’s traditional allies in the Pacific, most notably Japan, view China’s growing power with concern. The Americans now leave no doubt that they want to curb China’s regional ambitions.

Part 2: A Strengthening Partnership

Germany could end up running away with the bone as the third dog in this conflict. During her conversations with Chinese leaders, Merkel has often been told that they don’t want a bipolar world dominated by China and the United States. But the Chinese government does have an interest in seeing Europe retain its strength as an important international political player.

In this context, the Chinese see Merkel as their most important European partner. Beijing considers her to be a politician who keeps her promises, unlike former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, for example. As he did during her last visit, Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao will also accompany Merkel when she visits a second Chinese city. After Beijing, she will travel to the nearby city of Tianjin, Wen’s hometown. It is a rare diplomatic honor.

It was also Wen who pushed to have the intergovernmental consultations take place before the change in leadership this fall. He apparently wanted to ensure that the talks become established before Beijing’s new leaders assume office.

Many Chinese look to Germany as a role model for internal reforms. Despite the euro crisis, the country boasts historical record values in all key economic indicators, concludes the first “Germany Development Report” completed at Tongji University in Shanghai. The study, the results of which were reported throughout the country by the party newspaper People’s Daily, will reanalyze the situation in Germany every year from now on.

Remaining Problems

As good as relations between Berlin and Beijing may have become, the remaining problems are also considerable. In addition to the critical human rights situation, the biggest strain on the partnership is Chinese attempts to hijack German know-how.

During Merkel’s last visit to China, German business owners complained to her about the Chinese authorities’ notorious “certification process” for German goods and plants. They described it as an especially perfidious form of institutionalized industrial espionage.

German investors in China constantly complain about how brazenly their local partners siphon off Western knowledge. For instance, Volkswagen recently learned that the state-owned auto giant FAW, VW’s joint venture partner in China, is apparently copying transmissions and engines for its own models. But rather than jeopardize its position in China, its most important overseas market, the German automaker has declined to level public accusations against the Chinese.

Classic espionage also continues to be a strain on relations. Berlin is irritated by the audacity with which China spies on both German companies and the government.

Indeed, although Germany and China are economically dependent on each other, they remain bitter competitors. And as members of the German parliament, the Bundestag, experienced last week, they are also two partners with completely different systems. The German-Chinese Parliamentary Friendship Group had planned to fly to China two Saturdays ago for meetings with Chinese politicians, trade-union officials and business representatives.

On August 14, four days before the group’s scheduled departure, SPD parliamentarian Johannes Pflug sent an urgent email to his fellow Bundestag members. The Chinese parliament, the National People’s Congress, had informed him that it was “not in a position” to issue the invitation to the group of German lawmakers.

The Chinese offered no explanation, but the Germans believe they know why they were disinvited. The Chinese were apparently offended that Bundestag President Norbert Lammert had not met “officially” with the chairman of the National People’s Congress in Berlin but, rather, had merely invited him to an official dinner.

In addition, the Chinese authorities apparently wanted to prevent the German lawmakers from meeting with representatives of the Uyghur ethnic minority. The Germans now expect the government to address the issue in Beijing this week.

It isn’t the only problem Merkel is expected to solve. A group of some 30 China correspondents with German media organizations, including SPIEGEL, wrote a letter to Merkel asking her to address deteriorating working conditions for foreign journalists during her visit “at the highest level” and to request that China offer them the same working conditions to them that Chinese journalists enjoy in Germany.

“The police and state security officials continue to interfere with our work,” the letter reads. According to the journalists, the authorities openly threaten to refuse to extend visas when journalists report on “sensitive” issues and either prevent or strongly discourage sources from speaking with them.

Uncertain Futures

These problems suggest that it is still unclear whether Merkel’s China diplomatic offensive will be a success. No one can predict how reform-oriented the future Chinese government will be. The gap between rich and poor is widening, and the economy is no longer growing as strongly as it was a few years ago. In fact, it is quiet possible that a worsening economic situation will lead to more repressive domestic policies.

This would also affect foreign policy. At the moment, the Germans are betting that Beijing will become more open to Western arguments in the UN Security Council. But this is still little more than a hope, given that the Chinese leadership has not shown any evidence of a new posture.

“We talk about partners,” says one German official, “but exactly when the Chinese will become true partners is in the stars.”

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

 

SAV Comment:

And now, as for animal and human suffering in China; just like human rights issues; Merkel turns in the other direction.

Singapore: The last days of Ol Boy: Heartbreaking video captures animal rescue group giving a dying stray dog his first moments of love as his life slips away

For making a donation, go to:  http://www.saveourstreetdogs.com/  

For full story:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2192585/Video-captures-animal-rescue-group-giving-dying-stray-dog-moments-love-life-slips-away.html

The last days of Ol Boy: Heartbreaking video captures animal rescue group giving a dying stray dog his first moments of love as his life slips away

Singapore group cared for Ol Boy in his final days

When his rescuers found him, Ol Boy was in a state of pain, but they cared for him in his final days, showing him a love he had never known.

Weak from years of living on the streets, Ol Boy was covered in ticks and lesions, unable to walk or feed himself.

Web site link: 

Save Our Street Dogs , an animal rescue group in Singapore, took him home and showed him tenderness for the first time, letting him pass away knowing he was cherished during his short time on earth.

 

Scroll down on above link for video.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Germany: The Mink (Fur) Farm Which Considers It Is Above the Law – Owned by Alfons Grosser; President of the German Fur Animal Breeders Society.

Link:

http://www.tierschutzbuero.de/undercover-nerzfarm-bielefeld/

At this link above you see recent undercover footage and images of Germany’s most notorious mink farm at Bielefeld.

The owner, one Alfons Grosser (President of the German Fur animal breeder’s society), has repeatedly flouted the new regulations – for one, requiring more space for each animal (up to 10 times more than provided at this facility).

Authorities had also issued a ban on stabling animals in this way to this owner, which he also flouted.

The animals are caged much like plants in a hothouse, with rows upon rows in a closed storage building, with minimal temperature control/air conditioning – causing many animals to die of heat exhaustion.

Authorities are investigating.

SAV Comment – the authorities need to do more than just investigate; they need to close this whole operation down; prosecute and imprison Grosser – the major animal abuser !

We say:

 

 

On the other hand:

 

Israel Reconsidering Fur Ban

by Alicia Graef

August 9, 2012

A bill brought before the Knesset at the end of July may, if passed, make Israel the first country in the world to ban the sale of fur, reports the Jerusalem Post.

The bill, drafted by MK Ronit Tirosh (Kadima) in conjunction with the Israel-based International Anti-Fur Coalition, received the support of eight Knesset members from across the political spectrum – Tirosh, Eitan Cabel (Labor), Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz), Yoel Hasson (Kadima), Dov Henin (Hadash), Miri Regev (Likud), Nino Abesadze (Kadima) and Masud Ganaim (United Arab List).

An independent opinion poll conducted for the International Anti-Fur Coalition and Israeli animal rights group Let Animals Live found 86 percent of Israelis believe killing animals for their fur is morally wrong and 79 percent would support a nationwide ban.

However, previous efforts to ban fur sales in Israel received opposition from the fur industry, which doesn’t want anything cutting into its profits, or to see anyone pave the way towards an end to the fur trade, but also by the Orthodox Jewish community, whose cultural headdress, called a shtreimel, is made of fur.

This time around, the bill will allow for the sale of fur used in science or to express cultural identity.

The text of the bill explains that there is no longer any necessity for fur, as synthetic fabrics heat much more efficiently, and fur is now simply a fashion item and status symbol. A ban on the sale of fur within Israel would provide animals protection according to the Animal Welfare Law, and would be in accordance with the values of human compassion and Judaism, the bill text says.

“Fighting for people’s consciousness is a daily undertaking, and this legislation may yet save millions of animals. It’s time to do this at last and finally end the fur trade in Israel. Such legislation should gain immense respect for Israel and its citizens.

Another important point to note is that unlike the first bill, proposed by MK Ronit Tirosh, the new bill doesn’t suggest a ban on fur imports, hence the bill is an entirely internal matter and any intervention by foreign furriers will be neither ethical nor justified,” said Jane Halevy, chairperson of the International Anti-Fur Coalition.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Romania: Meet ‘Edd’ – Can You Help With A Donation For His Treatment ?

Dear friends,

we desperately need your help again… A week ago we found Edd, an old greyhound, sick and abandoned like garbage… Even if we did not have a place to keep him or the money for the medical treatment, we could not ignore him.

He was running among the cars, shivering with fear at any noise or any person that came near him.  He proved to be extraordinary gentle and patient, and after we saw how he behaved, we realized that he had lived in an apartment. He was somebody’s dog…

We took him to the vet and his age was estimated at 12 years. He walks slowly and has difficulties in standing up, probably the reason why he was abandoned. We took him blood tests (Wednesday we will have the results), treatment for external parasites (full of ticks), started the treatment for the back and he will be on medication for arthritis and age support. We will also need to take Xrays (probably 3 pcs because he is big) and echo.

The total cost for investigations, treatment (Alflutop, Milgamma, Omega, Bomazeal and natural supplements), and good quality food are estimated at 207 euro.

Donation can be made by paypal (donate@red-panda.ro), in the Asociatia Red Panda account RO72 PIRB 4237 7350 1300 1000, Piraeus Bank, or directly at Praxis Vetlife (str V. Stroescu nr 21, Bucharest) with the mention for Edd.

If he gets through all this alright, Edd has the chance to spend his last months or years in an experienced home, that deals with old greyhounds. He will be loved and appreciated, but we need first to help him and get him ready.

Look at him, a poor doggy abandoned in a big world, full of dangers. Think of your animals at home and imagine how would they feel if suddenly on the street. This is how Edd feels now, sad and disoriented, because he does not understand what is happening to him. Please help him, please be with him in this tough period.

If you are in Bucharest you can visit him anytime at the adoption center, Barbu Vacarescu 164 street. He would be happy too know that people care and love him!
Thank you!

Serbia: Part 2 – Palic Zoo Investigation: Can We Go and See the Animals Having Fun At the Zoo Daddy ? – The Real Side of Palic Zoo, Serbia.

Link to the Palic Zoo website:

As additional evidence to our recent fist post on the suffering of animals at Palic Zoo:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/serbia-can-we-go-and-see-the-animals-having-fun-at-the-zoo-daddy-the-real-side-of-palic-zoo-serbia-and-the-animals-that-exist-there/

We are now able to provide many more photographs regarding the August 2012 expose by campaigners who visited the zoo.

As said before, the beautiful flowers and gardens give the visitors to Palic Zoo the impression that everything here is wonderful for the animals.

We understand that the Brown Bear, the Chimps and two Canadian Wolves are the animals suffering the most.  Depression due to a lack of any stimulation to make their lives worthwhile.

Here are a selection of photographs taken during the August investigation.
THE BROWN BEAR

THE CHIMPANZEES

CANADIAN WOLVES

In a facility designed to replicate their natural environment !! ?

DEER

Provided with nothing – apart from a walkway to provide shade from the sun.

RABBITS

Don’t they eat grass and vegetation daddy ?

Below – Home is 50cm x 70cm

Dead and Dying Trees

Serbia: Can We Go and See the Animals Having Fun At the Zoo Daddy ? – The Real Side of Palic Zoo, Serbia and the Animals That ‘Exist’ There.

Link to the Palic Zoo website:

The beautiful flowers and gardens give the visitors to Palic Zoo the impression that everything here is wonderful for the animals.

The August 2012 expose by campaigners who visited the zoo shows a very different picture.

The Brown Bear is in massive depression – having simply existed in this shack of a cage facility for some 30 years.

This is the reality of Serbian zoos in 2012;  an attraction for human visitors to ‘enjoy’ the animals; but endless days of nothing to enjoy; just boredom in terrible conditions for the animals who exist there.

Here are a few pictures of the Brown Bear which has suffered boredom and confinement in its small enclosure for over 30 years.

In another post to be published very soon, we will be showing more photographs of other animals which are existing but not really ‘living’ at Palic Zoo, Serbia.

Visit us again soon to see more !

Please crosspost.

South Korea: If you lost your dog in Jeju, know this vehicle or the whereabouts of these dogs, please contact us with information.

Visit the following site for all the photographs:   http://koreandogs.org/?p=1887

S. Koreans: Do you know anyone of these dogs? Dog truck transported on a cruise ship from Jeju to Mokpo

[Urgent] S. Koreans: Do you know anyone of these dogs?

Given the circumstances, looks like a truck smuggling stolen pets out of Jeju Island but without a victim, investigation is unlikely.

This is a cruise ship traveling from Jeju Island to Mokpo last Saturday evening. A vacationer coming back from vacation in Jeju Island took these photos and provided to KARA. This is a horrific situation but please take a look and if you know someone who lost their pet dogs recently, please contact us immediately.

The fact that a cruise ship loaded a dog truck without any sanction can not be overlooked. But the urgent matter is to find an owner.

If you find your dog or if you know these dogs, please contact KARA Office at 02.3482.0999 or info@ekara.org

St.Bernard, Labrador Retriever, Golden Retriever, Jindo dog, Great Pyrenees, Husky and even the Yorkshire Terrier is seen.

The witness asked the driver if these dogs were stolen and the driver refused to talk. The witness obtained the vehicle license number and the driver s photo.
Please don t look away.

If you lost your dog in Jeju, know this vehicle or the whereabouts of these dogs, please contact us with information.


We want to save even one dog.

Call KARA office with information at 02.3482.0999.

Source: http://ekara.org/board/bbs/board.php?bo_table=community01&wr_id=384