MARS Inc. / ROYAL CANIN IS SUPPORTING BEAR BAITING IN THE UKRAINE – Through Them, Do You ?

USA

This *multi-billion dollar corporation, now owned by Mars

(Mars, Inc. is an American global manufacturer of confectionery, pet food, and other food products with US$30 billion in annual sales in 2010, and is ranked as the 3rd largest privately held company in the United States by Forbes. Headquartered in McLean, unincorporatedFairfax County, Virginia, US, the company is entirely owned by the secretive Mars family.

Mars operates in six business segments in the US: Chocolate (Hackettstown, New Jersey), Petcare (Franklin, Tennessee), Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (Chicago, Illinois), Food (Los Angeles, California), Drinks (West Chester, Pennsylvania), and Symbioscience (Germantown, Maryland)

and needs to know that people who care about what food their dogs/cats eat, also care about senseless suffering inflicted on other animal species.

They are also in bed with “breeders”(see below)…talk about a bad news company!

 

From: Anti-Fur Society

Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:34 AM

ROYAL CANIN IS SUPPORTING BEAR BAITING IN THE UKRAINE…are YOU supporting Royal Canin?

video & actual news link..

ROYAL CANIN (supposedly catering for animals) IS SUPPORTING THIS MOST BARBARIC ACT AGAINST BEARS. PLS PROTEST, BOYCOTT THEM & SPREAD THE WORD!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN6a8PR-jZg

http://dora-vp.m3plus.net/bulgaria/bg/news-press/news/page-7654/

Subject: ROYAL CANIN IS SUPPORTING IS SUPPORTING BEAR BAITING IN UKRAINE

ROYAL CANIN IS SUPPORTING THIS HORROR WITHOUT EVEN A DISGUISE. 

PLEASE EVERYONE, CONTACT R.C. MONSTERS DISGUISED AS ANIMAL LOVERS!  THIS IS UNBELIEVABLY DISGUSTING!!!!

**PETITION – Please Sign** – 

https://www.change.org/petitions/stop-bear-baiting-in-ukraine

You’ve probably heard of the pet food brand Royal Canin, but what you definitely won’t have heard of is that in recent months, Royal Canin has sponsored dog shows in Ukraine which have featured the barbaric practice of bear baiting.

We find it hypocritical that a pet food producer who claims to put “dogs and cats first” enables this cruel activity, where hunting dogs in training are let loose on a chained up bear, who is left almost defenceless to the onslaught.

Based on our information, around 15 to 20 bears are exposed to bear baiting in Ukraine. We have brought this information to the attention of the Ukrainian authorities and hope to be able to act quickly.

We have also asked Royal Canin for a meeting to constructively discuss this situation and provide sanctuary for these abused bears, but they chose to ignore our solution.

This is outrageous and unacceptable. We need you to call on Royal Canin to take responsibility!

Please send your protest mail now. Thank you.

Brief Company History: It was founded in 1967 in a village of Gard, France, by the French veterinary surgeon, Jean Cathary. Its headquarters are now located in Aimargues, France.

In March 1972, Royal Canin was acquired by Guyomarc’h.

In 1990, French bank, Paribas, bought out the Guyomarc’h Group.

In July 2001, Paribas sold Royal Canin to Mars for more than 1.5 billion euros. Approximately 93% of the purchase price consisted of goodwill paid. Mars paid 22.3 times its EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation).[2][3] In March 2004, Royal Canin acquired the veterinary grade manufacturers/service providers, in the U.S. and Canada, the IVD, Medi-Cal and Techni-Cal brands from Del Monte Foods for $82.5 million.[4]

Veterinary Expertise and Breeder Relationships: In each country veterinary delegate teams, which sometimes number over 70 people, are specifically dedicated to professionals. In Europe, Royal Canin sponsors or is active in 3,500 dog shows and 400 cat shows each year. In France, for instance, 35 cynotechnicians work with 4,000 dog breeders and 400 clubs. A “Feline Club” is open to more than 2,000 breeders.

Veterinary and Peer-Reviewed Journal Research

The company is most known for researching the clinical formulation, testing, manufacturing and marketing of a range of breed-specific and symptom-specific diets for dogs and cats. In addition to food production, Royal Canin also issues numerous books with the support of world-class academics from veterinary departments: comprehensive encyclopedias on pets (4 million copies and published in 15 languages), guidebooks on canine and feline breeding, nutrient guides, academic and professional publications for veterinarians and breeders, and deluxe technical brochures on each breed targeted by a specific diet. Publications also include FOCUS, a scientific quarterly that appears in 11 languages and reaches over 70,000 veterinarians around the world, and 1,450 Waltham-Royal Canin veterinary publications (compared with almost 400 publications from the company’s closest competitor).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN6a8PR-jZg

http://dora-vp.m3plus.net/bulgaria/bg/news-press/news/page-7654/

Factories

In 2008, Royal Canin had a revenue of over 1.5 billion euros – 80% outside of France – with approximately 4,500 employees worldwide.

Royal Canin has twelve production operations:

Aimargues, southern France

Cambrai, northern France

Johannesburg, South Africa

Rolla, Missouri, USA

Descalvado, Brasil

González Catán near Buenos Aires, Argentina

Dmitrov near Moscow, Russia

Castle Cary near Bristol, UK

Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Niepolomice, Poland

North Sioux City, South Dakota, USA

Shanghai, China

From May 1, 2007, many Mars products made in the UK became unsuitable for vegetarians. The company announced that it would be using whey made with animal rennet (material from a calf’s stomach lining, and a byproduct of veal), instead of using rennet made by microorganisms, in products including Mars, Twix, Snickers, Maltesers, Bounty, Minstrels and Milky Way.[37] The response from many thousands of consumers, particularly the Vegetarian Society‘s request for UK vegetarians to register their protests with Mars, generated a lot of press, and caused the company to abandon these plans shortly thereafter.[38] It has reportedly decided to switch to all-vegetarian sources in the near future in the UK.[39][40] On 18-Sep-2012, the 15-Jan-2010 press release could not be found in the “Press Releases” section of the Mars website; in Canada, the URL [1] redirected to the webpage, [2]. In January 2008, the Metro newspaper reported that Mars had allegedly begun to incorporate animal-derived rennet.[41]

Mars has come under criticism by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals for funding animal tests which the group alleges are inhumane.[42] One study was conducted in collaboration with the Salk Institute regarding angiogenesis and spatial memory in which mice were given an ad libitum diet that included epicatechin, plant-derived flavonoid. One of the experiments involved groups of control and experimental animals, the latter of which were housed in a cage that included a running wheel for optional exercise for two hours a day, the former did not have access to a running wheel. Another experiment was the classical spacial memory assay, the Morris water maze. The study showed that the inclusion of epicatechin in the diet improved memory and angiogenesis, and more so if coupled with exercise.[43][44]

Mars has been criticized for buying cocoa beans from West African farmers who reportedly use unpaid or poorly paid child laborers. In 2009, Mars announced that, as of 2010, the company would only purchase cocoa from suppliers who meet environmental, labour and production standards. TransFair USA, an organization which certifies products as Fair Trade, applauded the move and expressed hope that it would include a provision for fair wages for laborers and farmers.[45] In 2010, Mars Inc. received the U.S. Secretary of State’s Award for Corporate Excellence.[46] In April 2010, Mars launched the MyCocoaPaper initiative, which claims to provide economic opportunities to women and families in Indonesia by making paper products out of cocoa bark and recycled office paper.[47]

In 2011, Mars and Fairtrade International announced an agreement to introduce the first Fairtrade labeled Mars product and to work together to enable farmers to have sustainable livelihoods and substantially increased productivity. The first Mars product to carry the Fairtrade mark will be Maltesers, to appear in stores in 2012 in the UK and Ireland.[48]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN6a8PR-jZg

http://dora-vp.m3plus.net/bulgaria/bg/news-press/news/page-7654/

UK: Remembering Jill – Warrior of The Rainbow – Dover Is Still Exporting – But We Will Win !

England

No  Special Reason Today – Just Remembering a True Heroine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra1DgyTt1T

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFeKx_M-EJ0

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2012/02/08/england-uk-pictures-from-the-jill-phipps-memorail-day-ramsgate-4th-february-2012/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2012/01/29/uk-england-1st-february-in-memory-of-jill-phipps-15-january-1964-1-february-1995-warrior-of-the-rainbow/

 

Bricks For Bears – (19/7) TARGET REACHED! – Brilliant News – But Dont Stop Buying !

Our recent post to help the Animals Asia campaign:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2013/07/18/urgent-bricks-for-bears-can-you-help-with-the-purchase-of-1-brick-see-below-for-details/

Conrats everyone; you did it !!

Current total – 4,089 bricks purchased – 19/7 0930hrs GMT.


Sanctuary secured!

You made it happen – 4,000 ‘bricks’!

A bear-sized THANK YOU to all those who bought a ‘brick’ in our China flood appeal. Thanks to your urgent response, we’ve hit our target of 4,000 virtual bricks – and now we can start work on securing our sanctuary!

Soon we’ll be able to secure the damaged river bank. For now, the most urgent work involves keeping the swollen river water within its banks. This means placing sandbags kept in place by PVC tarpaulins at vulnerable and collapsed sections along the bank.

We’re happy to report our brown bears are out of their cages and back digging holes and climbing trees. Thank you for an amazing response.

Donations are tax-deductible in Australia, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, the UK and US.

Are You Finding All Our Posts ? – Checkout ‘Recent Posts’ To Make Sure.

Please note that all of our posts are not always published on the ‘Home’ page.

To see all of our latest posts, scroll down to ‘Recent Posts’ on the right hand side of the page, underneath ‘Categories’ and ‘Recent Comments’.

By going here you will find ALL of our recent posts, including those which have not been given priority location on the ‘Home’ page.

So there may be more posts and reading and actions than you imagined !! – Phew !!

Regards Mark – SAV.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

England: July ‘Elephant Family’ Latest News – Excellent Video To Watch – Then Take Action – All Links Provided In this Post.

England

ef_logo_0

Here is the latest news from the Elephant Family who are based in London, UK.

 

Please watch the excellent video and then send your message to the Indonesian government by clicking on the link given below under ‘Update on Sumatra’.

 

Sign up to get your free e news by clicking on this link –

http://www.elephantfamily.org/how-you-can-help/E-news

 

Website = http://www.elephantfamily.org/

 

Raja’s Fund – in memory of the baby elephant chained to a tree – http://www.elephantfamily.org/what-we-do/campaigns/raja/

 

The following is repeated directly from the Elephant family:

 

Update on Sumatra

 Last month Elephant Family and the Ecologist Film Unit set out to document the extreme threats to the critically endangered Sumatran elephant.

The short and powerful documentary can be viewed here.

Indonesia’s Ministry of Forestry is close to accepting a proposal that would open Aceh’s pristine forest for mining, logging, and palm oil production. Over 1,700 of you have signed a letter to urge them to drop this proposal that would destroy over a million acres of vitally important elephant habitat. Thank you!

If you have not already signed and shared the letter at this link, please do so now, it only takes 30 seconds.

Please TAKE ACTION NOW – tell the Indonesian government to STOP THIS PLAN.

Read more about the Sumatra appeal in this week’s Conservation News.


Quackers.

DD

Do you know the sordid history re L’Oreal ????

 loreal change.org

Normal
0

Photo and petition: Change.org

http://www.change.org/petitions/l-oreal-stop-animal-cruelty-stop-testing-on-innocent-animals

Subject: Do you know the sordid history re L’Oreal????

This article is from the site

http://www.yourwebsite.com/www.vegetarianbeautyproducts.com/

“Beauty product giant, L’Oreal, has made a lot of headlines lately, but not in the most positive way. From the presence of lead in their lipstick, to resuming animal testing to sell new products to the Chinese market, L’Oreal has found themselves in hot water with consumers who demand ethical practices and safer products.


L’Oreal is no stranger to controversy. Founder Eugene Schueller, who formulated the first hair dye product in 1907, was a well-known Nazi sympathizer and, to this day, the company is embroiled in a legal battle due to the fact that its German headquarters are situated on land that was confiscated from a Jewish family during World War II.

Holocaust survivor, Edith Rosenfelder, whose family was forced to sell their house and land to Nazi officials (and never saw the proceeds), has been in a legal battle to get her family’s land back from L’Oreal for several years.

Because legislation has been passed stating that all such transactions were illegal, and thus invalid, the land is technically owed back to the family. L’Oreal, however, has refused to relinquish the land, and the fight has been brought to the European Court of Human Rights.

http://www.forbes.com/2005/03/18/cz_sh_0318oreal_bill05.html


The controversies have persisted throughout the years. In 2005, the Supreme Court of California found that a former L’Oreal manager was wrongfully terminated after she refused to fire a valued employee due to the employee being dark-skinned. The manager was ordered by L’Oreal executive, Jack Wiswall, to hire a blonde employee in place of the dark-skinned employee.

In 2007 L’Oreal faced criticism by the British Advertising Standards Authority (BASA) for false advertising. L’Oreal’s ad claimed that their “Telescopic” mascara would make eyelashes 60% longer, when the mascara formula did nothing to physically lengthen eyelashes.

In 2011 L’Oreal once again fell under the microscope of BASA when they banned two ads by L’Oreal subsidiary, Lancome, for airbrushing actress Julia Roberts and model Christy Turlington in both of their ads. BASA again claimed “false advertising” due to the misleading touch-ups.

Then there is the continued animal testing.

L”Oreal is among the ranks of Mary Kay and Avon, the companies who have slyly claimed they are against unnecessary animal testing, while really meaning that they just did not have any need to do so at the time. Now that they are aiming to sell new products in China, they have resumed animal testing, but are lamenting that their hands are tied and they have no other options.

They’ve also been craftily stating that they haven’t tested “finished products” on animals since 1989, which really means that they still test ingredients on animals, just not the finished product.

It is this continued practice of animal testing that led to such a large backlash when L”Oreal purchased noted anti-cruelty beauty product company, The Body Shop.

Legions of devoted Body Shop fans were outraged to know that a company known for still testing on animals was the new parent company of a brand whose ethics they so appreciated.

To date, L’Oreal owns a range of well-known brand names, including:

Kerastase
Redken
Matrix
PureOlogy
Shu Uemura
Lancome
Yves Saint Laurent
Giorgio Armani
Diesel
Kiehl�s
Ralph Laruen
Stella McCartney
Clarisonic
Garnier
Maybelline
Essie
Skinceuticals

The latest PR disaster to hit L’Oreal is the revelation by the FDA that the cosmetic giant’s lipstick came out on top (in a bad way) of a list of over 400 different lipsticks that contain lead. L’Oreal, and its subsidiary Maybelline, were both found to have five of the 10 most lead-contaminated lipsticks tested.

L’Oreal, and the FDA itself, were quick to point out that the amount found in their lipstick was well below what is considered safe limits. The limits to which they are referring are global guidelines for cosmetics, but there are no limits established with the United States. The closest mandate that consumer advocate groups could find was the limitation on how much lead can be found in children’s candy, a measure that the FDA says is apples and oranges compared to lipstick, which is not intentionally consumed.

Still, consumer advocates are quick to point out that that lipstick is constantly consumed since it is applied topically to the mouth. Mark Mitchell, MD, MPH, is the policy advisor for the Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice and co-chair of the Environmental Health Task Force for the National Medical Assocation.

Mitchell contends that, even if the lead-levels in lipstick are low, “Lead builds up in the body over time and lead-containing lipstick applied several times a day, every day, can add up to significant exposure levels.”Those who are working on behalf of the cosmetic companies, such as the Personal Care Products Council, point out that the lead found in lipstick is naturally occurring lead that is found in the minerals used to pigment the makeup.

Consumer advocate groups maintain that this is not a sufficient explanation and have been steadily pushing for requirements, on both state and federal levels, that mandate the cap amount of lead allowed in a single cosmetic. All efforts have, so far, been successfully defeated by lobbyists on behalf of the cosmetic industry.

While the debate continues to rage as to how much lead, if any, is safe, two things are very clear:

1) L’Oreal has proven to be a company who is shrouded in too much controversy for comfort, and,

2) when it comes to piece of mind with purchasing beauty products, the smaller, organic and cruelty-free beauty product companies still reign supreme.”

__._,_.___