Germany: UPDATE 23/01/11 – ‘EU Hunting Court Rulings’, the German ‘Fox Week’ and More

Regarding our recent post on the ‘Fox Week’ in Germany:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/20/germany-mass-slaughter-of-fox-week-to-start-by-february-international-appeal-for-aw-groups-to-join-the-german-protest-and-say-no-details-below/

the message from our German animal campaigner friend finshed with the statement:

“On 20th of January we expect the decision on “forced hunting” (where hunters have the right to hunt animals on private ground) from the European Court of Justice. If that comes out in favour of our cause – which we hope – then that will be another coffin nail for the hunters and also work as a boost to our campaign”.

Well the decision has now been made by the European Court of Justice, and it has NOT found in favour of our cause.

The court’s decision for forced hunting was supplemented with a justification, and it said that the continuation of the practice is in the public interest and that hunting was necessary to protect the game stocks.

This is an Intersting twist on reality.

Going by that stated logic, and transferring it to us mere humans, any serial killer or masse murderer for that matter, would be the greatest friend of mankind we ever head. Because, in the end, by doing their killings of other humans, they, (the killer) protected the Human population.  Is it in the public interest to have the continuation of human masse killings  by serial killers to protect the human species ? – No.

 Simply one rule for the hunters and a different rule for everyone else.

Another more interesting point about the whole thing is that this very same court ruled against forced hunting in France and Luxemberg in 1999, saying that nobody could be forced to tolerate that on their private ground.

How the rules change in ten years by the very same court !

Well, the complainant (a guy from the Stuttgart area) will now go on to put his case again before the big chamber of the court; (the ruling from yesterday being by the small chamber), and we shall see with a great deal of interest what happens here.

Many people think the court decided the way it did because of pressure from the German sylviculture and the lobby behind it.  The economic value (timber prices) of German forests is high, and they are tightly managed.  Game they say, causes damage to the stock, and in many areas is seen as nothing more than ‘vermin’ that the hunters are more than, even incredibly happy, to get rid of.

Hunters are also aiming at having the (German) countys and local authorities establish bans for strollers and others wanting to use the forests for recreation. Clearly, they do not want witnesses to what they do and argue that ‘all these people disturb the game’. 

Really, is it not them who disturb the animals ? – destroying the natural reproduction cycles of animals which is based around the availability of food.  Do the hunters not put out food baits to lure their targets into the area so that they can then be shot by hunters standing high up on platforms ?

If this is not the hunting community ‘disturbing the game’, then what is ?

The hunters have currently achieved their will simply because of their connections to politics and local administrations – many hunters hold positions in these positions of power anyway.

Below is the link which provides the entire text of the court ruling on forced hunting from the 20th January.

You can read it and make your own decisions and opinions on the hunting issue:

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&documentId=880224&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649

Whatever the current situation, the campaign to stop the continued year round killing of foxes in Germany will continue.  Unfortunately, Fox Week during the next few weeks will see many, many more beautiful animals killed by hunters because of a ruling which declares that the ‘continuation of the practice is in the public interest’, that the wildlife ‘vermin’ destroy the now politically financially viable forests which the public must also be instructed to keep out of for recreational purposes !

Is the world and legislation going crazy in support of animal abusers and against the will of the majority of the public ?

–          Well yes !

Turkey: Terrible Animal Attrocities Commited by the Kadir Topbaş Hasdal Shelter, Istanbul; a Shelter Funded Via the EU – EU You Need to Investigate Your Spending; We Dont Accept Our Money Being Spent on Causing Animal Suffering !!!

 

CONGRATULATIONS EU…..You gave money to the administration of Istanbul to build a “standard” shelter….and LOOK AT THE HORROR INSIDE….

HOW ABOUT the EU investigating and requiring them to be held accountable for every EURO spent on this living hell hole for animals !

——————————————–

The following story is copied from:

http://blog.myletsadopt.com/2011/01/17/kadir-topbas-scandal-hasdal/

Please click on this link (above) and also watch the video footage.

With utmost respect and thanks from SAV to ‘Lets Adopt !’ for all their work in highlighting animal suffering in Turkey, and for saving lives !!

http://blog.myletsadopt.com/sahip-cikalim-hakkinda-about-lets-adopt/  

—————————————————————————–

It’s an early morning in Istanbul.

The Istanbul Municipality van drives through a lonely road in a village far away from Istanbul. In the back, shaken and terrified, 5 stray dogs violently hit the walls with each bump of the road. The barks and screams can be heard by every villager en route.

Upon arriving to an isolated location the Municipal drivers brutally unload the frightened animals onto the side of the road.

Two of the animals are in good condition but the other three barely have any strength to move. Mila is one of them. Too weak to move she lies on the grass, waiting to die.

We were there.

Mila – Dumped and Near Death on the Roadside

The entire event was caught on camera as part of an on-going investigation by Let’s Adopt! into the atrocities commited by Kadir Topbaş Hasdal shelter and the Municipality’s well documented practice of dumping dogs in the forests and deserted locations.

The events of that morning, together with undercover footage obtained by Let’s Adopt! proves, beyond any shade of doubt, the blatant disregard for the Law by Kadir Topbaş team and the constant and sustained lies of the Municipality to the Press and the general public.

It was barely weeks ago that the brutal killing of a cat made the entire turkish society get up in arms in rejection of animal cruelty.  The events and practices that have come to light show a different kind of cruelty, one no less brutal and affecting to a much larger number of animals, and cast serious doubts over the credibility and honesty of Kadir Topbas and his administration.

In recent months the European Union has granted the Istanbul Municipality large amounts of money in order to improve their sheltering practices, with a shelter currently being built in Istanbul with European Union funds.

European Union officials declare to be totally unaware and shocked by these practices. The scandal threatens to bring European Union funding to a halt.

Kadir Topbaş and the Istanbul Municipality deny any wrongdoing and claim the footage and the scandal to be fabrications. We let you be the judge of that.

Viktor

P.S. Mila died this morning after spending a week in intensive care.

———————————————————————

Sample letter Contact details

cevkom@tbmm.gov.tr; bulent.arinc@tbmm.gov.tr; agul@abdullahgul.gen.tr; kayhan.kavas@icisleri.gov.tr; bilgi@basbakanlik.gov.tr;

SAMPLE LETTER  SAMPLE LETTER  SAMPLE LETTER 

Dear Mayor,

It is without doubt that I assert that this e-mail is but one of many that your office has received in connection with the abject squalor that is Hasdal Rehabilitation Center. I am also certain that a number of these communications are coming your way from well beyond the reaches of Turkey.

The brotherhood and sisterhood of those who truly love animals and are steadfast in seeing conditions minimally suitable for them at the very least (if not exceeding this state) is an international one, and clearly, attention has been focused sharply on the blemish on the face of Istanbul that is Hasdal. Animals sleeping among others which are dead, injured, and / or very ill. Dogs with no alternative other than to wander among their own feces and vomit. These are the images that are emanating from the municipality over which you have been elected and given a degree of domain. It goes without saying that this does not reflect well at all on what is to be your legacy.

The video evidence clearly and unequivocally demonstrates flagrant violations of Animal Protection Law 5199 (June 24, 2004), In pertinent part: Part I, Chapter 1, Articles (a), (c), (d), (g), (h), and (j). I would respectfully suggest personal research into these matters.

Turkey prides itself on being a nation of animal lovers. It is truly my hope that the awareness currently being served upon you through various world locales prompts you to uphold the laws that are part and parcel to the government to which you were elected on the local level.

I submit this to you with the utmost respect and seriousness.

Yours,

Name:

Nationality:

———————————————————– 

Links:

Kadir Topbaş: Scandal at the Hasdal shelter « MyLetsAdopt !

HeraldNet.com – Life: Rick Steves’ top 3 European destinations for …

http://blog.myletsadopt.com/2011/01/17/kadir-topbas-scandal-hasdal/

Romania: New Video About Stray Animals – Please Watch and Then Send A Copy to the Romanian Embassy in YOUR Own Country. Full Links Provided in Post.

John Sakars has produced a Youtube video about the situation for strays in Romania.

There are so many similarities to Serbia – in every single way that he describes !

Please have a look at the video and then send a copy of it on to the Romanian Embassy in your own country. 

To find global Romanian embassies please go to: 

http://www.visasinfo.com/romania_embassy.html

or   http://embassy.goabroad.com/embassies-of/Romania

Johns video can been seen via the following:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wz3I55HKy_0

Stray animals are suffering the world over; please act for them – send a copy of the video link above to your Romanian embassy.

Thanks – SAV.

UPDATE 23/01/11.

Rosa has supplied the following letter (see ‘Sample Letter’ below) which can be copied and sent to embassies by e mail.

You may wish to include the following in your letter also – optional.

Distinguished officials from Romania and abroad

I am appalled by the daily news about about animal cruelty and crimes against animals which are committed in Romania. I am stunned to find out that in Slobozia, and in many other cities throughout Romania, the local authorities are UNWILLING to apply the Laws for the Protection of Animals from 2008 which BOTH prohibit the euthanasia of healthy animals and the International treaties and conventions which entered in force in your country after 2004….which also ban the killing of healthy animals…

Please read the following in Romanian :

“1. Conform art.7¹ din Legea 205/2004 privind protectia animalelor, cu modificarile si completarile ulterioare : „Este interzisă eutanasierea câinilor, a pisicilor şi a altor animale, cu excepţia animalelor cu boli incurabile, constatate de medicul veterinar”

Deci, nu se eutanasiază decat animalele cu boli incurabile, nu cele sanătoase, şi numai pe baza unor diagnostice precise (proba bolilor incurabile) şi incontestabile.

2. Conform :

Anexa 1

din OUG 155/2001 privind programul de gestionare a câinilor fără stăpân, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, sunt prevăzute

a) „CONDIŢII MINIME pentru funcţionarea unui adăpost pentru câini”

b) „Spaţiile pentru adăpostire şi pentru intervenţii medicale”

c) „Controlul bolilor”

d) „Hrănirea câinilor şi curăţenia adăposturilor”

e) „Vehiculele”

Anexa 2 sunt prevăzute „NORME privind capturarea şi transportul câinilor”

3. Anexa 3 „EUTANASIEREA CAINILOR”

1. Se recomanda pentru a fi eutanasiati cainii care nu au fost revendicati sau care nu au putut fi adoptati.

(acest punct este inoperabil prin aparitia prevederileo art.7¹ din legea 205/2004 (modificata prin Legea 9/2008)

Eutanasia se recomanda, de asemenea, in cazul cainilor care prezinta boli cronice incurabile.

2. Eutanasierea cainilor se efectueaza de catre un medic veterinar.

3. Eutanasierea cainilor se realizeaza numai prin utilizarea barbituricelor, injectate intravenos numai dupa pierderea cunostintei cainelui indusa prin anestezie. Cainii vor fi asistati pana la constatarea decesului.. Barbituricele nu trebuie sa fie injectate pe cale intramusculara sau subcutanata. Pentru cainii nou-nascuti calea de administrare care se utilizeaza este cea peritoneala. Produsele narcotice pot fi administrate si pe cale orala.

4. Medicul veterinar este singura persoana care poate avea acces la barbiturice si care poate decide in privinta utilizarii medicamentelor periculoase

SAMPLE LETTER   SAMPLE LETTER   SAMPLE LETTER 

Sir / Madam,

It is in the best interest of your country to STOP THE KILLING OF STRAYS IN THE SHELTER of the city of SLOBOZIA IMMEDIATELY….please ask ANSVSA for advice…

The international public opinion is outraged and I will inform all international authorities, family and friends about the daily massacres of animals (mostly strays) and the cruelty against animals which most of the time is not even investigated by the police, let alone punished by a judge…Romania has become known as the Hell of the EU for the animals….and I will refrain from visiting and I will ask all my acquaintances to do the same.

Please take all the necessary measures to stop the killings and to SEVERELY PUNISH ALL THOSE WHO HAVE BROKEN THE LAW…regardless of their social status.

Thank you

Name:

Nationality:

EU Citizen: Yes / No 

PS. This letter has been sent to the Romanian Parliament, European Commission for Animal Welfare, many Romanian Embassies and International animal welfare organizations, so, the entire world will know …..

Thanks for All Your Support – Enjoy !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a502RejLz8s&feature=list_related&playnext=1&list=MLGxdCwVVULXfWcZWXwHVrs2EVLdVkexgz

China: Has Banned Animal Circuses and Warned Zoos That They Must Stop Abusing Animals.

 

China has banned animal circuses and warned its zoos they must stop abusing animals or face closure.

9:00PM GMT 18 Jan 2011

 

Live animal shows and circuses are hugely popular in China, and draw around 150 million visitors a year at 700 zoos. However, animal rights campaigners have repeatedly complained that the shows should be stopped.

 

“A zoo in my city had a show where they forced an adult lion to stand on the back of a horse for a sort of animal acrobatic performance,” said Xiao Bing, the chairman of the local animal protection association in the southern city of Xiamen.

 

“I also saw one entertainment park where the monkeys seemed to have wounds all over their bodies. The manager told me the monkeys got hurt during live monkey-fighting shows,” he said.

 

Other cases of abuse include beating lions to make them jump through rings of fire and forcing bears to walk across tightropes, said Hua Ning, at the International Fund for Animal Welfare.

 

Chinese circuses have defended their shows, saying that the animals are well fed and that teaching them tricks can help them become “stars”.

 

However, the Chinese government has now issued a total ban, which came into force on Tuesday across the 300 state-owned zoos which are part of the China Zoo Association.

 

“We are hopeful it will have an effect,” said David Neale, the Animal Welfare Director at Animals Asia. “I visited Chongqing zoo before Christmas and their circus was clearing out, and Kunming zoo has also said its circus has been closed.”

 

Other zoos, however, said they had received no notice of the new rules. “We will help police the ban and report any cases we find to the government,” vowed Mr Neale.

 

The ban will also force zoos to stop selling animal parts in their shops and zoo restaurants will have to stop serving dishes made out of rare animals, another widespread practice.

 

Similarly, zoos will no longer be able to pull the teeth of baby tigers so that tourists can hold them and will have to stop attractions where live chickens, goats, cows and even horses are sold to visitors who can then watch them be torn apart by big cats.

 

A spokesman for China’s State Forestry Bureau said a three-month investigation last year had uncovered more than 50 zoos where animals were suffering severely because of abuse.

 

However, the closure of the shows could push some zoos towards bankruptcy and may leave many animals with an uncertain future. “In some cases, I am not sure where the animals will go,” said Mr Neale.

 

“In some cases I would recommend euthanasia, since there are animals in a very bad way after a few years of being in these performances.”

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/8266563/China-bans-animal-circuses.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

Germany: Mass Slaughter of ‘Fox Week’ To Start By February – INTERNATIONAL Appeal for AW Groups to Join the German Protest and Say ‘No’ – Details Below.

Regarding our recent post, the Fox Week’ in Germany at the beginning of February:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/germany-international-animal-welfare-organisations-only-please-support-the-call-for-a-closed-season-on-fox-murder-currently-foxes-can-be-killed-all-year/

We now have been provided with an update on the campaign by a great animal friend in Germany:

—————————— 

Dear Colleagues,

Lovis and Dag, the initiators of the Initiative „Schonzeit fuer Fuechse“, have asked me to keep you all updated on developments in English – as the mails going out here are only in German.

The initiative has now gained the support of 32 organisations in Germany and 13 from abroad. Several more will be added soon.

Two press releases have so far been sent out by Lovis – the latest for passing on to local media from January 20th – the subject being the myth of “(necessary) stock regulation”, which is an argument the hunters love to use when criticized for these massacres.

A letter is also being sent out to local (German) hunting societies warning them of legal action against them should they pursue the “fox weeks” – the paragraph being used against them is actually part of the German hunting law forbidding the disturbing/flushing/chasing game at times of need, like in harsh winters. The animals, it is argued, need their tight resources for survival, and every disturbance causes wasting of resources and energy that must be avoided.

Lovis says he has sent this out to several local hunting societies and the hunters react with uncertainty as to what they should do now/how they should react. Letters are passed around and to the governing hunting bodies of the resp. German counties – and it is obvious that they are worried about this full-frontal attack.

In all likelihood this will not prevent them from doing fox weeks this year again, but it definitely gives them something to ponder.

German media have taken up the issue, and many local papers print the press releases and a letter that Dag has written in defence of the demands of the initiative where hunters have come out with the own twisted version on fox hunts.

All in all it looks promising, although of course we cannot expect the hunters to relinquish what they perceive as their right without a fight. The backlash will come once they have organised themselves.

On 20th of January we expect the decision on “forced hunting” (where hunters have the right to hunt animals on private ground) from the European Court of Justice. If that comes out in favour of our cause – which we hope – then that will be another coffin nail for the hunters and also work as a boost to our campaign.

Best wishes to you all,

——————–

The original German link for this campaign on ‘Pro-Lure-Animalis’ can be viewed by accessing the following;

http://www.schonzeit-fuer-fuechse.de/

The current list of supporters can be found by accessing the following link:

http://www.schonzeit-fuer-fuechse.de/unterstuetzer.html

 

IMPORTANT **** We ask that as many INTERNATIONAL animal welfare organizations support this campaign as possible. ****

Only organisations which have a website or blog should apply, NOT individuals; but this application is not only open to fox and wildlife organizations – ANY animal welfare organisation from anywhere in the world can mail and ask to be added to the campaign supporters list.

To sign up your animal welfare organisation it is very simple.

Please send an e-mail of support to the following address and providing the name of the support organisation, the country in which the support organisation is based, and finally the link to your support organisations website:

info@schonzeit-fuer-fuechse.de

Please crosspost to any AW organisations that you consider will support this campaign.

Thanks.

NEWS JUST IN – 19/01/11.

The expected ruling on so called “forced hunting“ (on private ground, against the will of the proprietor) of the European Court for Human Rights today has, sadly, come out the wrong way. We lost.   The practice is to continue indefinitely.

All the more reason to add support to the above campaign !! – SAV.

 

EU: Eurogroup for Animals Calls for Better Animal Transport.

http://www.meatinfo.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/12198/Welfare_group_calls_for_better_animal_transport.html

News & Features » Breaking News 

Welfare group calls for better animal transport

 – Published:  18 January, 2011

A leading animal welfare group has called on the European Commission to enforce current legislation in the transport of animals.

The Eurogroup for Animals was commenting following the release of a new scientific report that suggested new techniques to alleviate animal suffering.

The European Food Safety  Authority (EFSA) has recommended that semen and embryos are transported rather than the animals, as well as calling for more carcase transport and for more animals to be slaughtered nearer production.

The EFSA published its recommendations in its Scientific Opinion – and it comes ahead of a report by the Commission into existing transport rules later this year.

Sonja Van Tichelen, director of Eurogroup for Animals, which represents animal welfare groups from all 25 member states, said: ““This opinion offers a number of improvements, including developing strategies to reduce the volume of animals transported and for reducing journey times, as well as the importance of correct vehicle temperature during transit, correct preparation of animals for transport, and monitoring and allowing sufficient space for each animal.

“With all the available science and with the evidence that the existing law is not strict enough to protect the welfare of animals, it is now time for the Commission to recognise these recommendations and to take action.”

Van Tichelen said she thought the Commission had not been strict enough in enforcing the current legislation, which requires member states to “carry out non-discriminatory
inspections of animals, means of transport and accompanying documents.”

She added: “The indifference to animal suffering during transport and the unwillingness to take responsibility by both Member States and the European Commission is unacceptable, and we call on the Commission to review the animal transportation regulation and to come forward with a clear action plan to improve enforcement.”

>> Concern over EU transport proposals

>> Newark Transport fined £1,000 after blood spillage

 

Photos: M. Johnson / PMAF.

Eurogroup for Animals website:   http://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/