America’s hen slaves get bigger prisons

July 1, 2020, Animal Equality

The state becomes fifth in the U.S. to impose minimum space requirements for hens and ban the sale of cage-produced eggs.

DENVER, CO.Today, Colorado joined the growing ranks of U.S. states to enact legislation ending the cruel practice of caging hens raised for eggs.

In a bill-signing ceremony live-streamed on Facebook earlier today, Colorado Governor Jared Polis inked his name on H.B. 20-1343, making the Centennial State the seventh in the nation to enact such protections.

Five of those states’ laws—including Colorado’s—also ban the sale of eggs from caged hens.

WHAT THE LAW DOES: The new law’s primary feature is its minimum-space guarantees for hens raised in commercial egg operations, as well as banning the use of cages.

Currently, the industry standard is just 0.67 square feet per bird—roughly the size of a piece of notebook paper. At that density, chickens cannot even fully stretch their wings, let alone engage in natural behaviors essential to their welfare.

By contrast, Colorado’s new mandates that hens have a minimum of 1.0 to 1.5 square feet per bird, depending on the type of housing system used.

The law will also require egg producers to provide hens with enrichments that allow them to exhibit more natural behaviors, including, at a minimum, “scratch areas, perches, nest boxes, and dust bathing areas.”

These features are critical to hens’ psychological well-being, according to chicken welfare experts worldwide.

And chickens aren’t the only birds to benefit from Colorado’s new law.

Female turkeys, ducks, geese, and guinea fowl raised for the purpose of commercial egg production will receive the same legal protections, though their numbers are far lower than the state’s 5.5 million chickens in commercial egg production.

WHAT THE LAW DOES NOT DO: The law does not apply to small egg producers (those with flocks of 3,000 or fewer hens) or too small retailers (those who sell fewer than 750 dozen eggs per week).

It also does not apply to hens during transport, hens used in medical research or hens exhibited at state fairs or in 4-H programs.

The law also does not address painful mutilations, such as beak trimming or toe-clipping, though the “need” for such cruel practices diminishes when hens have more space.

For more…at


And I mean…“Livestock” is an arbitrary concept of art that we invented to justify the exploitation of non-human animals and “the right of the stronger”.
The exact biological terminology is human animals and non-human animals.

And wherever human animals do not have the same demands, we are simply not entitled to degrade them to “use” animals.

Improved factory farming … no! factory farming has nothing to do with an animal-friendly life.

If all of these, who improved the farm animals’ prisons by 0.40 cm, were to spend a month on fully slatted floors or cages as big as their bodies and on their own excrement, then they would surely change either the job or their laws.

What should be the decisive criterion for these laws?

Only one thing: do not reduce the profit, and that is what the “farmers” and their lobbyists are about.

Fattening chickens in their new environment, with 0.40 more freedom!! is that in line with our moral values?

Animals are conscious and have the same feelings as we humans, such as grief, pain, fear, want to stay alive, to live with their family.

Where there are no differences, there are no differences!

My best regards to all, Venus

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: