USA: Wolf Torture and Execution Continues in the Northern Rockies. Further Updated 03/04/2012.

http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/wolf_torture_and_execution_continues_in_the_northern_rockies/
 
Wolf Torture and Execution Continues in the Northern Rockies
by James William Gibson – March 28, 2012
Montana Anti-Trapping Group Gets Death Threat for Releasing Photos

On March 16, a Friday, a US Forest Service employee from Grangeville, Idaho, laid out his wolf traps. The following Monday, using the name “Pinching,” he posted his story and pictures on www.Trapperman.com . “I got a call on Sunday morning from a FS [Forest Service] cop that I know. You got one up here as there was a crowd forming. Several guys had stopped and taken a shot at him already,” wrote Pinching. The big, black male wolf stood in the trap, some 300-350 yards from the road, wounded—the shots left him surrounded by blood-stained snow. Pinching concluded his first post, “Male that went right at 100 pounds. No rub spots on the hide, and he will make me a good wall hanger.”

 
(The here depicted Josh Bransford is a federal employee and public servant out of the Red River Ranger District on the Nez Perce National Forest in north-central Idaho. As a taxpayer, you have a right to call the Front Desk and complain about his behavior. Call for his resignation and/or ask that he be suspended without pay for a period of time for his actions 208-842-2245.)

All photographs were taken from Trapperman.com website are being reproduced here under Fair Use“Pinching” with the wolf he trapped that he wrote would make him “a good wall hanger.”
The Trapperman website went wild with comments. “That’s a dandy!! Keep at it,” wrote Watarrat. Otterman asked, “All the gray on that muzzle make a guy wonder how old he is or if it is just part of his black coloring.” Pinching’s picture of the wolf’s paw caught in the trap got special attention. “Is that the MB750 stamped ‘wolf’ on the pan?” asked one man. “Looks to be a perfect pad catch. Congratulations! Pinching confirmed the trap model and commented, “Oh an [sic] by the way, a wolf is a heck of a lot of work to put on a stretcher! Man those things hold on to their hide like no other!”

By late March some 117 Idaho wolves had been killed in traps and snares, and another 251 shot. Montana saw 166 killed, for a total of 534 wolves out of an estimated 1150 in the two states. Although Montana’s season ended in February, Idaho is not quite done. Both states have announced plans for increased hunting in the 2012-2013, and discussions are underway among hunting groups and state officials to allow private donations to establish wolf bounties.

                                                                                              Wolf’s paw in trap.

As recently as the spring of 2011, gray wolves in the Northern Rockies received protection from he Endangered Species Act. But in April, 2011 Congress passed a rider on a federal appropriations bill removing them. Montana Democratic Senator Jon Tester, facing a 2012 challenge from Republican Congressman Danny Rehberg, wanted to show Democrats hated wolves just as much as Republicans. Conservation groups filed suit in Montana’s federal district court, claiming the delisting represented an unconstitutional infringement by Congress on the judicial branch while it deliberated an ongoing lawsuit over federal wolf protection.

Losing in district court, the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Friends of the Clearwater, WildEarth Guardians, the Center for Biological Diversity, and Cascadia Wildlands appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit. On March 14, the appeals court rejected their arguments, upholding the Congressional wolf delisting as a lawful amendment. This decision might well mark the endpoint for the conservation movement’s decades-long fundamental strategy of litigating in federal courts to promote wolf recovery in the Northern Rocky Mountains.

                                                                                      A hunter and his dead prey.

Thus wolves, demonized by the far-right in the Rockies as disease-ridden monsters and icons of the federal government (see my Summer 2011 Journal story, “Cry Wolf”), now face a brutal campaign to radically reduce their numbers so far that extermination can not be ruled out. Idaho’s Governor Butch Otter declared in a March 25 news conference that his state faced a “disaster emergency” from wolves. “We don’t want them here.”

Skirmishing on the web escalates. Footloose Montana, an anti-trapping group, posted the trapped wolf’s pictures on its website, drawing over a 1,000 comments within days. Word spread. Nabeki, founder of Howling for Justice, opined that “This wolf will be the face of the cruelty and ugliness that is the Idaho hunt…Our forests are hiding acts of unspeakable horrors that are being perpetuated on innocent animals.” Protesters called Idaho and Montana tourist bureaus, demanding the hunts end. By Monday, March 26, Trapperman learned that its photos now circulated offsite. The group’s administrator demanded that Footloose Montana remove the photographs.

Footloose staff and board members also received an anonymous death threat in their email: “I would like to donate [sic] a gun to your childs [sic] head to make sure you can watch it die slowly so I can have my picture taken with it’s [sic] bleeding dying screaming for mercy body. YOU WILL BE THE TARGET NEXT BITCHES!”

FBI agents and Missoula, Montana police received copies of the threat.

Wolf advocates hope that these pictures will go viral, shaming a nation into facing the torture people inflict on animals and the moral and political failures that promote and legitimize it.

—————————————————————————————————

*** FURTHER ACTION / UPDATE – 03/04/2012 ***

ID Forest Service employee and trapper, Josh Bransford, had nothing better to do than to pose in front of a wolf caught in one of his leghold trap – the wolf had already been shot a couple of times while he was helplessly caught in Bransford’s trap! This brutal and callous behavior, particularly when displayed by an agency employee, whose salary we pay, is unacceptable. For more information, scroll down to read John Adams’ article in the Great Falls Tribune. Thank you for your help! Your friends at Footloose Montana
Please voice your opinion about this tragedy and call or send an e-mail today!

Here is some contact information. Please be respectful:

Nez Perce National Forest: Forest Supervisor Rick Brazell (208) 983-7000 / rbrazell@fs.fed.us

Deputy Forest Supervisor Ralph Rau (208) 983-7017 / rerau@fs.fed.us

Fire Management: Bob Lippincott (208) 983-4066 / blippincott@fs.fed.us

Public Affairs: Laura Smith (208) 983-5143 / lasmith@fs.fed.us

Idaho Fish and Game: Director Virgil Moore: virgil.moore@idfg.idaho.gov

Idaho Fish and Game Director Virgil Moore: (208) 334-3771.

Please sign this petition, which will be sent to:

USDA Office of Ethics Forestry Ethics Branch(Lorraine (Rainee) Luciano, Branch Chief Agency: U.S. Forest Service) and UDSA Forest Service Chief(Tom Tidwell)

http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-the-torture-of-wolves-in-our-forests

Photos of live, trapped wolf prompt threats to Missoula-based group

A photo downloaded from an online trapping forum shows an Idaho trapper posing in front of a wolf that was caught in a foot-hold trap and then allegedly shot at by bystanders. Missoula-based anti-trapping group members say they received death threats after posting the photo on their Facebook page. PHOTO COURTESY EARTH ISLAND JOURNAL.

HELENA — A Missoula-based anti-trapping organization said it received a threatening email this month after the group posted graphic photos on the Internet of a live Idaho wolf caught in a foot-hold trap.

Anja Heister, executive director of Footloose Montana, on March 22 posted a series of photos gleaned from an online trapping forum called Trapperman.com on her personal and Footloose Montana Facebook sites.

Heister said she opened Footloose Montana’s email inbox on Monday and found what she believed to be a death threat directed at family members of the organization:

“I would like to donate (sic) a gun to your childs (sic) head to make sure you can watch it die slowly so I can have my picture taken with it’s (sic) bleeding dying screaming for mercy body. YOU WILL BE THE TARGET NEXT BITCHES!” the message read.

Heister said the email was in response to the group posting photos of a northern Idaho trapper’s March 18 wolf kill, which was detailed on the online trapping forum.

The photos show trapper Josh Bransford, a fire management officer for the Nez Perce National Forest, kneeling and smiling for the camera as a wolf he caught in a foot-hold trap stands behind him in a ring of blood-soaked snow. Another photo shows a close-up of the wolf’s paw caught in the trap. A third photo shows the trapper posing with his catch.

Heister said Footloose Montana, which is actively campaigning to ban trapping in Montana, has received plenty of hostile emails and phone calls since 2007 but never anything that rose to this level.

“It has a cumulative effect on your psyche,” Heister said. “I’m not easily scared, but when I read this I got really concerned.”

Heister said she reported the threatening email to local and federal law enforcement officials. Missoula Police Sgt. Travis Welch confirmed the department received the report of the malicious email and that it was assigned to an investigator, but he declined to comment further.

In an online blog on Earth Island Journal’s website, writer James William Gibson recounted what Bransford — who goes by the handle “Pinching” — wrote about the photos. Bransford’s post has since been removed.

“I got a call on Sunday morning from a FS (Forest Service) cop that I know. You got one up here,” the post said, and then continued, “there was a crowd forming. Several guys had stopped and taken a shot at him already,” the post read, according to Gibson.

According to Bransford the wolf was a 100-pound male with “no rub spots” making an “good wall hanger.”

Bransford did not return calls or emails seeking comment Thursday.

As of late Thursday the photos posted on Footloose Montana’s Facebook page had received nearly 900 comments. Online commenters on both the Earth Island Journal and the Footloose Montana Facebook page expressed outrage over the photos. Many viewers were angry Bransford posed for a portrait with the wounded wolf before killing it.

Dave Linkhart, spokesman for the National Trappers Association, said there’s nothing wrong with a trapper posing with his catch before killing the animal.

“You pose with a successful catch just like you do with a successful hunt,” Linkhart said. “People make the problem of attributing human feelings and emotions to these animals.”

Linkhart claimed trapped animals don’t suffer, so taking the time to shoot a photograph does not cross ethical boundaries.

“If you look at the trap — across the pad of the foot like that — if you were to release the animal it would walk away like nothing happened,” Linkhart said.

Marc Bekoff is a former professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Colorado, Boulder and fellow of the Animal Behavior Society who has studied the social behavior of wolves and coyotes, among other animals.

“That wolf was suffering immeasurably. Not only physically by having his foot locked in a trap, but also being shot at,” said Bekoff, the author of several books on animal psychology and emotion. “This was not hunting. This was having an animal having its foot smashed in trap and then shooting at it with bullets. This wolf was tortured.”

Linkhart said if the wolf was shot at, that isn’t the trapper’s fault.

“Somebody else came up there and shot that animal first. That is illegal. What the trapper has done here is not,” Linkhart said. “The problem was not the trap. It was the illegal activity of the hunters who shot at that wolf.”

Reach Tribune Capital Bureau Chief John S. Adams at 442-9493, or jadams@greatfallstribune.com. Follow him on Twitter @TribLowdown.
http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20120330/NEWS01/203300316/Photos-live-trapped-wolf-prompt-threats-Missoula-based-group

 

 

 

 

Bulgaria: 02/04/12 – Order for Euthanazia Cancelled – But the Fight is NOT Over – Please Sign Petition to Authorities – Links Provided In Post.

Source – http://legalaction4animalrights.net/2012/04/02/bulgaria-dont-kill-the-strays-of-sofia-update/
BULGARIA: don’t kill the strays of Sofia –UPDATE
 

UPDATE from Occupy Europe Animals

BULGARIA: don’t kill the strays of Sofia – UPDATE:
The order to kill the dogs who had been already caught, has been cancelled! … The dogs are alive
But we must keep the pressure on – the battle is not over yet!
For more information about the background of this action, please visit:
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/bulgaria-the-stray-dogs-of-sofia-are-in-eminent-danger.html

* * * Please SIGN & SHARE this important ONLINE PETITION * * *
By signing our petition at http://www.change.org/petitions/bulgaria-don-t-kill-the-strays-of-sofia the protest letter below will instantly be send to:

the President of Bulgaria
the Prime Minister of Bulgaria
the Minister of Agriculture and Food
the Mayor of Sofia, Ms J Fandakova
EU-Commissioner John Dalli
the Bulgarian Members of the European Parliament

PROTEST LETTER

Mr President,
Dear Government Officials of Bulgaria,
Dear Members of the European Parliament,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

we have learned of your intention to kill all stray dogs who happen to live in the Malinova Dolina district in the country capital Sofia, regardless if they are sick and/or aggressive or healthy, neutered and socialized. All dogs that happen to live in this district and who can be caught by hunters or dog catchers, shall be killed.

We are afraid that your intention is wrong on a number of levels including those moral and legal! They contradict European animal rights conventions and any adequate humans moral principles!
Your plans are not only contrary to the recommendations of the WHO (World Health Organisation) that states that TNR (trap-neuter-release) is the only proven method to control and reduce stray animal populations, but they violate also the following EU statutes, treaties and declarations:
– On September 22, 2010 a law was signed in the Strasbourg Protocol Room which dealt with the issue of animal protection within the European Union
– Although this law specifically targeted the humane treatment of animals used for experimental purposes, a previous European Union Treaty, namely the Amsterdam Treaty of 1997 dealt with “ensuring protection and respect for the welfare of animals as sentient beings”
The protocol of the Amsterdam Treaty introduced “a clear legal obligation for the EU Community Institutions (Commission, Parliament, and Council) to pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals
– In addition to these, the Treaty of Lisbon and the European Parliament Written Declaration 0026/2011, adopted October 13, 2011, were initiated to further consolidate a concrete and lasting protocol for the humane treatment of animals by Union Member States. Bulgaria, being a member state whose MEPs have signed Written Declaration 0026/2011 in promoting humane treatment of animals including their population control is therefore legally bound by its statutes
– Furthermore, is Bulgaria a signatory of the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals (signed; May 21, 2003 – ratified: July 20, 2004 – entry into force: February 1, 2005)
This said, we implore you to put a halt to these cruel plans to kill all homeless dogs in this district and to abide by the above mentioned EU statutes calling for spay and neuter as a humane means of controlling over-population.
Yours respectfully,
…………………………

Thank you very much in advance for speaking out for the homeless dogs of Sofia by signing our petition here:
http://www.change.org/petitions/bulgaria-don-t-kill-the-strays-of-sofia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bulgaria: 30/03/12 – Mass Killing of Stray Dogs to Start Immediately. EU Money for Stray Dogs Programm Is Going Elsewhere ! – Please Send E Mails Now.

SAV Comment – There are many great people in Bulgaria doing wonderful work for animals – including the feeding of strays.  Please remember that it is not the Bulgarian people who are at fault; it is the Bulgarian political system and its politicians, as it is with political systems in so many nations.  When the day comes that Bulgarian politicians implement legislation for the protection of animals, rather than ‘simply’ killing them; only then will Bulgaria be accepted by the world as a progressive nation.

As one German supporter states:

I am sorry I have to be blunt here, but I feel simply pleading for these innocent lives will get us nowhere, and will only be laughed at as sentimental (which I assure you it is not).

 

Money is the only language that is understood any more these days, and money it is you receive for dealing with these animals humanely.

 

Do it.

 

Or do not – and face the consequences.

Times are changing, and cruelty to animals is no longer tolerated.

You wanted to be a member of the EU – now make sure you conduct yourselves according to the rules of the game.

 

 ————————————————————

 

 *** URGENT ACTION REQUIRED ***.  30/03/2012.

Bulgaria, Please STOP Mass killing of stray dogs!
You are stealing our money from EU for stray dogs program in your country but you are KILLING THEM on your streets!!!

Our money is going into your pockets!!!

What a shame for you, Bulgarian government!

You are hurting your own people, their hearts ache for all these dogs which they use to feed on street!!!
You’re a shame for EU!!! Please STOP!
Don’t steal Our money for Your ILLEGAL Evil work!!!

Laila Afsoon
Composer and Vocalist

Please send your protest letters to Bulgarian government!!!

Bulgaria is stealing money from EU for stray dogs program and they are KILLING THEM! – the EU money is going into their pockets !!!

THESE ARE THE MAIN CONTACT ADDRESSES OF THE GOVERNMENT.

ceo@bfsa.bg
 
damyan.iliev@nvms.government.bg
 
jfandakova@sofia.bg
(this is the email of the mayor)
 
primeminister@government.bg
 
PLEASE WRITE AND PROTEST.

contact: prime minister Boyko Borissov

http://www.government.bg/cgi-bin/e-cms/vis/vis.pl?s=001&p=0230&g=

Council of Ministers of the Republic of Bulgaria
1594 Sofia, 1 Dondukov Blvd
central switchboard: (+359 2) 940 29 99
Government Information Service
tel. (+359 2) 940 27 70  fax. (+359 2) 980 20 56
e-mail: GIS@government.bg 

contact Sofia municipality     http://www.sofia.bg/en/display.asp?ime=contact

http://www.sofia.bg/en/display.asp?ime=council

*** SAMPLE LETTER *** by Ruth Eisenbud – USA

Dear Government officials of Bulgaria,
 
Word of your intention to conduct a mass slaughter of dogs has spread throughout the world. If you go through with this massacre Bulgaria will be known as a nation that does not understand compassion. Many will be reluctant to visit such a nation, as they would think of the loving dogs in their families and choose instead to visit a nation which is more dog friendly.
 
One such nation is India…where it is illegal to kill a healthy or curable dog for any reason. In large part this is due to the compassion of the Indian religions of jainism and hinduism, which recognize that both animals and humans cherish their lives. ALL who live are entitled to respect and the right to live.
 
The ignorance of your decision is rooted in a religious tradition that grants man dominion over the animals and with it the right to slaughter them for human need and convenience. All three of these cruel religions are represented in Bulgaria:  St Nedelya Church, Banya Bashi Mosque and Sofia Synagogue  Therefore rather that finding a way to help the homeless dogs of Bulgaria, you have instead chosen to dispose of them according to the dictates of heartless religious doctrine.
 
Remember, many outside of bulgaria understand your cruel intentions. to kill homeless dogs. Do you want Bulgaria to be viewed as a modern compassionate nation or one that is backward and cruel. I hope you will have the wisdom to deflect the animosity you have created. Please allow the dedicated animal activists in your country to save the precious lies you so callously dismiss.
 

Your Name and Nationality

——————————————-

Contact all Bulgarian MEPs to express your disgust at what is happening within their nation.

– please copy your mail / letters to them.

slavi.binev@europarl.europa.eufilizhakaeva.hyusmenova@europarl.europa.eustanimir.ilchev@europarl.europa.euilianamalinova.iotova@europarl.europa.euiliana.ivanova@europarl.europa.euivailo.kalfin@europarl.europa.eumetin.kazak@europarl.europa.euevgeni.kirilov@europarl.europa.euandrey.kovatchev@europarl.europa.eusvetoslavristov.malinov@europarl.europa.eumariya.nedelcheva@europarl.europa.euNadezhda.Neynsky@europarl.europa.euvladkotodorov.panayotov@europarl.europa.euantonyia.parvanova@europarl.europa.eudimitar.stoyanov@europarl.europa.euemilstefanov.stoyanov@europarl.europa.euvladimir.urutchev@europarl.europa.eukristian.vigenin@europarl.europa.eu

** Visit our Bulgaria (EU member) wall of shame post at: **

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/02/09/bulgaria-existing-eu-member-state-wall-of-shame/

 Access to Bulgarian MEPs by clicking on the following link:

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/performsearch.html?action=0&webCountry=BG&webTermId=7&name=&politicalGroup=&bodyType=&bodyValue=&type=&filter=

It is time to let all other EU MEPs know about the abuses and the situation currently in Bulgaria – an EU member state.

Please use the following link to find your national MEPs just click on any country (EU member state) on the map shown, where you will then be provided with access to (the nation ‘clicked on’) national regions and / or directly to national MEPs.  Click on each persons (MEP) name and on the right hand side you will then be provided with their individual e mail contact address. 

Use this method to send e mail messages to your individual, national MEPs.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/public/geoSearch.do;jsessionid=A430C75370DD272C5663047E6A5504CC.node2?language=en 

We are providing below the following listing for MEPs for each individual member state, but cannot guarantee that they are all currently up to date.
Country names are given under ‘F’.
‘A’ and ‘B’ provide MEP names; and ‘D’ is the individual contact address.
Note that ‘C’ is their website; NOT their individual e mail contact address.

Click here for access to the information.  Note that this can be used in conjunction with the link map method given above should you wish to contact specific MEPs.

MEP_email_addresses

 

 

 

 

Australia: New Australian Group: Vets Against Live Export (VALE).

New Australian Group: Vets Against Live Export

http://www.vale.org.au/index.html

PRESS RELEASE

1 March 2012

http://www.vale.org.au/uploads/1/0/4/3/10438895/vale_press_release_120301.pdf

Veterinarians form new group opposing live export

A group of prominent veterinarians have founded a new organisation focusing on the need to phase out export of live animals for slaughter.

Spokesperson Dr Sue Foster says Vets Against Live Export (VALE) counts among its members and advisors two professors of animal welfare in Australian veterinary schools and an on-ship veterinarian who has first-hand experience of the live trade.

Dr Foster said “The national professional body, the Australian Veterinary Association (AVA), continues to condone live export despite overwhelming evidence that regulatory enforcement of animal welfare standards is non-existent, and attempts to improve animal welfare in importing countries have consistently failed.

“We believe that the live export trade for slaughter exposes millions of animals to significant and unnecessary pain, suffering and abuse. It is therefore crucial to correct the public’s impression that all vets – or indeed all AVA members – support live export.

“VALE’s aim is to lead the transition away from live export by giving the public and government a balanced and objective scientific view of animal welfare and regulation of the industry. Our members have direct experience of the willingness of exporters to hide the truth about poor animal welfare and will be seeking to expose this to the public.”

Dr Foster hopes that the Australian Veterinary Association will support VALE’s goal of phasing out the live export trade and assisting with the transition back to a localised slaughter industry with export of refrigerated meat, which would benefit many more Australians through the creation of regional jobs.

“It has repeatedly been demonstrated that the trade is very risky and unreliable. More needs to be done to ensure the long term viability of Australia’s livestock industries, and the AVA should support that notion,” she said.

In addition to the tremendous response to VALE from veterinarians in Australia there has been strong interest in VALE from overseas.

“This is a global issue which has attracted international attention and will continue to do so,” said Dr Foster.

For more information contact Dr Sue Foster on 0423 783 689, info@vale.org.au <mailto:info%40vale.org.au>

England (Uk): “Wild Animal Ban Will Help Circus Industry But Government Must Act”

 

Source: http://legalaction4animalrights.net/2012/03/24/wild-animal-ban-will-help-circus-industry-but-government-must-act/

“Wild animal ban will help circus industry but Government must act”

Circus master Gerry Cottle: “I believe a ban will, in the end, improve the image of circuses in Britain.

The animal issue has given circuses a bad name.”

Animal Defenders International (ADI) have found an unexpected ally in the campaign to end the use of wild animals in circuses – famous circus impresario Gerry Cottle. Years ago, they were locked in battle as Gerry Cottle’s Circus toured with elephants, lions, monkeys, and llamas. But today ADI applauded Mr Cottle for saying that the time has come to end the use of wild animals in circuses.

Gerry Cottle, once a leading advocate of wild animal acts in the big top, is backing the Government’s promise to ban the practice, saying he has “reluctantly decided to move on”, conceding “The animal issue has given circuses a bad name.”

“Sad as it is for me to say, I now support the ban,” said Mr Cottle. “Times have changed and this issue has to be decided one way or the other. I believe a ban will, in the end, improve the image of circuses in Britain.”

Gerry Cottle’s Circus will start touring again next month completely animal free with human only acts.

Tim Phillips, Campaigns Director of ADI says: “We have said for a long time that the tarnished image of the animal circus is holding back the circus industry as a whole. We have always advocated human only circuses, and are in fact involved in promoting a human only circus festival in Colombia in the near future.”

“However, every time our undercover investigations catch on film savage brutality in the circus, like that meted out to Anne the elephant, or the Great British Circus elephants, then people come to associate that with the big top generally. The longer the Government delays implementing the ban the more harm they are doing to animal welfare and the wider circus industry.”

Data collected by ADI in the past has shown that when animal circuses close they tend to be replaced by animal free circuses. ADI’s huge undercover investigation of the British circus industry in 1998, which led to the convictions of Mary Chipperfield and others, saw more than 50% of the UK’s animal circuses close within six months. Every one was replaced by an animal free circus. Since then animal circuses in the UK have continued to disappear leaving just four with wild animals. But the exposes by ADI have continued with the abuse of Anne with Bobby Roberts Circus particularly shocking the public last year.

In 2011 the Chipperfield Circus, which had previously been exposed by an ADI undercover investigation, finally went animal free.
Tim Phillips says: “We applaud Gerry Cottle for taking this stand. The future of circuses has to be animal free, the traditions and skills can be retained without animal suffering. A ban on wild animal acts can be the best thing to happen to the industry. It’s the best way to escape the taint of all the video footage of lions, tigers, elephants and camels living in small cages and chains being punched, kicked and beaten.”

ADI however remain sceptical about the Government’s proposals for a ban and met with Defra Minister Lord Taylor last week to press for a timetable for a ban.

ADI believe that a licensing regime and inspection system is unworkable and will merely give an undeserved veneer of respectability to circuses with wild animals whilst perpetuating suffering and abuse. The ADI report Out of Control submitted to Defra shows how inspectors have repeatedly been misled by animal circuses concealing sick animals, chains used to restrain animals and physically abusing animals between inspections.

Tim Phillips says: “The only people who want regulation are the circuses with wild animals because for them it is business as usual with a stamp of Government approval. The public, Parliamentarians and now even Gerry Cottle all want a ban, but instead we have a handful of circuses making Defra and the Prime Minister jump through hoops rather than actually deal with the problem. It’s simple, if Defra and the Prime Minister really want a ban, then do it, not just talk about it.”

Earlier this year Greece banned all animals in circuses, and a few months before that Peru banned wild animal acts. National measures to prohibit or limit the use of animals in circuses have already been adopted in Bolivia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovenia, Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Poland, Peru, Portugal, Sweden, Singapore, Costa Rica, India and Israel and similar laws are being discussed in the USA, Brazil, Chile, and Colombia.

In 2011, ADI undertook an enforcement operation with the Bolivian authorities closing down eight animal circuses that defied the ban there. Every animal was rescued by ADI and relocated including 29 lions to the USA and a baboon to the UK. ADI continues to care for the animals and has offered the UK Government every assistance in enforcing a ban here.

Additional Information:

ADI (London) International and Uk  websites

http://www.ad-international.org/adi_uk/

http://www.ad-international.org/adi_world/

http://www.ad-international.org/about_us/

Boycott All Animal Circuses !

Ukraine: The Current Situation For Ukraine Strays As Told to SAV During Discussion With ‘Naturewatch’ (Uk Animal Welfare Charity).

Thursday 22 March 2012.

Today, SAV has been in contact with Naturewatch, another Uk animal welfare organisation, dedicated to helping animals worldwide.

Mark at SAV was informed by Debbie at Naturewatch that at this current time, the situation relating to stray animal control schemes in the Ukraine has improved greatly.

The mobile crematorium; of which there was one in operation; not several, has now been completely scrapped and is no longer in use.

We are providing links to the following Naturewatch web information relating to the Ukraine; but we are also copying and repeating a few of the key points below as detailed on the Naturewatch website.

After SAV / Naturewatch conversation today, we are confident that the situation for stray dogs in the Ukraine has changed dramatically in the past few months.  Please check on the following links (and others via these same links) to obtain much more information on the work for strays in the Ukraine.

· Ukraine’s Prime Minister, Mr Mykola Azarov, has instructed humane stray animal control schemes to be implemented across Ukraine and for laws to be more rigorously enforced to prevent the mistreatment of animals. 

Link – http://www.naturewatch.eu/pm-helps-animals

· November 2011
With just six months remaining before EURO 2012, Naturewatch has secured agreements with top Ukrainian government officials to immediately address issues of cruelty to stray animals.

Link – http://www.naturewatch.eu/humane-stray-animal-control

· February 2012

Naturewatch has teamed with two of the largest animal welfare groups in the world in order to tackle Ukraine’s stray animal problem in a humane manner.

Link – http://www.naturewatch.eu/naturewatch,-rspca-and-hsi-team-up

· November 2011
On 10 November 2011, Naturewatch Director, Mr John Ruane, was offered the position of Personal Advisor on Animal Weflare to the First Deputy Mayor of Kyiv City Municipality.

Link – http://www.naturewatch.eu/naturewatch-as-personal-advisor

· Naturewatch is sincerely grateful to Mr Platini for all he has done to address the issues of stray animal cruelty in Ukraine.
Following months of intense international lobbying, UEFA repeatedly contacted the Ukrainian authorities asking for appropriate measures to be implemented to humanely control stray animals. UEFA also made a donation to the Kyiv Society for the Protection of Animals ‘SOS’ to help finance its shelter activities.
Link – http://www.naturewatch.eu/uefa-and-naturewatch

Naturewatch website home link – http://www.naturewatch.eu/

Croatia: Sibenik is a Town in South. Croatia – The Communal Dog Kill Shelter Is Now Full – Animals are At Risk of Death.

Dear All,

I’ve had this from Colleagues in Austria today.

Sibenik is a town in Sth. Croatiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%A0ibenik

And it has a communal kill shelter, which is full now.

The dogs presented below are in acute danger of being killed, very soon.

The German page to this call for help is this

http://notfallhunde.blogspot.de/2012/02/niemand-hort-ihr-bellen-sibenik-die.html

Please, if you can assist, do – with a new home, with a foster home, even financial help (details below). These are wonderful animals who do not deserve to die.

I know – we see this every day, and no animal like this ever deserves to die. They are all priceless creatures. Unique and precious, every one of them …

I beg you, if you can help them, or at least a few of them, it would mean the world.

Please contact either perugia09@gmx.de  or me – I will translate, of course.

Please also pass on to anyone who might be able to assist.

Thank you so much!

Diana

————————————————————–

Slavica Mazak Beslic commented on Croatia: Sibenik is a Town in South. Croatia – The Communal Dog Kill Shelter Is Now Full – Animals are At Risk of Death.

Hi all

Diference – distinction between euthanasia and “euthanasia“ is in these 3 :
– a way
– a present/absent indication
– a present/absent Wish to die by person whose life is on the table ,
by a person who be euthanized or killed .
All 3 must be `pozitive` or there is not euthanasia, but killing by any way.
Please help these poor dogs, and push authorities of Croatia for doing a new regulation in agreement to The Written Declaration on dog population management in EU-13.10.2011., by putting down 60 days dead rows ( or any other limitation), and by doing that : responsible ownership be a way of control of dog/cat population .Thanks.