Germany: 28/01/11 – German ‘Fox Week’ – Latest Pics, Links and Even A Message From Jesus.

We have a saying about fur here in England:

“It may take the skins of many dumb animals to make one fur coat;

BUT  IT  TAKES ONLY ONE DUMB BITCH TO WEAR IT !”

The following is from the most nortorious of the German hunters’ forums

http://www.landlive.de/communities/3/

This is the same forum where the photos of the shot cubs and vixens are posted – see pictures directly below:

Some current pictures from the same forum are shown below – for fox week 2011 and winter 2010 / 2011.

Here is a translated write up from one of the articles which was posted on the forum:

“Right, yesterday afternoon we arrested fox No. 20 and 21, two dogs.

Despite drizzle and “den weather“ the two artificial dens were empty, and the two of them lay in the brambles with the vixen.

Basko chased all three out within 3 minutes. Sadly the vixen (of all things!!) escaped, because our mate gloriously missed. Oh well, shit happens.

At least we managed to slay the other two.

The second one made it back to the hedge, but could go no further from there (ass shot apart) and turned to face the dog.

I go into the brambles and see the fox dead (eyes rolled back in the head, motionless) lying under the brambles – Basko grabs him by the throat and shakes him (I praise him). I leave to get the rose shears to cut fox and dog out. And all of a sudden the commotion starts afresh, and my dog wails terribly; my mate has a look and what does he see ?

This fucking beast only pretended to be dead when I came to look at it, and when I left he went for the jugular of the unsuspecting dog and had his fangs sunk into Basko’s.

My mate then stood on his throat and he let go, and we slew him. But imagine: he really lay there for a good minute or longer like dead !

What a terrific feat !” 


Other links which may be of interest:

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2009/01/13/nwt-moose.html

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,2335758,00.html

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-46444093/stock-photo-hunter-s-highchairs-among-snow-covered-fields-in-german-forest.html

http://www.huntservice.com/?cid=39

 

Fancy being able to shoot so well with a balaclava right over your head

– Now thats what you call ‘A Real Man’ !

And Finally; we have just had a text message in from the almighty; it reads:

Serbia: Urgencija 23.1.2011. na Prijavu od 10.9.2009. / vlast u 170 jedinica lok samouprave KRSi LJUDSKA PRAVA / MINISTRE DRAGIN , Vi KRSITE LJUDSKA PRAVA , zakone i Ustav !

 
 
 
URGENCIJA  23.1.2011.  na postupanje po Prijavi  od 10.9.2009.  –  na radnim mestima  su  jos uvek  svi koji su  imali obavezu postupati, ali nisu  to cinili, plate su dobijali .
  
Gospodine Ministre  , Vi i Uprava za veterinu  KRSITE LJUDSKA PRAVA  , KRIVI ste  za   nezakonito masovno ubijanje pasa i macaka  – kucnih ljubimaca u Srbiji , za nezakonito trosenje  javnog novca u te svrhe  i za krsenje ljudskih prava ljudi koji postuju zivotinje  i ciji novac  je zloupotrebljen  protivno njihovim  zakonitim  uverenjima ,za  finansiranje  masovnog ubijanja pasa i macaka  u Srbiji.
  
Pogledajte u atachmentu  sta ste Vi  pisali ili potpisali ili ovlastili nekoga da  za Vas potpise  i dostavi javnosti , svejedno , na tom dokumentu stoji da ste Vi  autor  i Vi ga niste demantovali   od  1.10.2009. do danas 23.1.2011 :   o lisavanju zivota – sramota nam je  koliko Vi ne cenite tudji zivot ,  ni  zivot  zivot ljudi koji postuju zivotinje , ni  zivotinja , stidimo se  sto Vi   zloupotrebljavate  znacenje   termina i pojma   `eutanazije` ,  i  pojma `kucni ljubimac` koje  mesate sa `divljim zivotinjama`.
  
NETACNO  je sto ste 1.10.2009.  Vi g.Ministre  napisali o  `lisavanju zivota ` – vidi atachment  ,  jer u  Srbiji je   od 2.11.2005.  Zakonom o vet ZABRANJENO  ubijanje  pasa i macaka  ,kako napustenih, tako i nezeljenih  –   Zakljucak Ustavnog suda  IU 27/2007   ,  takodje  u Zakonu  o dobrobiti zivotinja je  precizno definisano : KADA, KO,  KAKO I  POD KOJIM USLOVIMA SME  PSA ILI MACKU LISITI ZIVOTA   cl.15. tacka: 1, 2, 5, 9  –  i to je onda eutanazija  , dok SVE  ostalo jeste KRIVICNO DELO  kaznjivo stavom 2 clana 269. KZ RS  ,  tako da  Vase tumacenje  NIJE TACNO  , jer  kucni ljubimci se NE PUSTAJU NA SLOBODU ( kucne ljubimce je zabranjeno napustati   izbacivanjem  na  slobodu, i zabranjeno ih je ubijati  – cl 7. tacka 2  i 3  –   dok  tacka 6 , clana 15 . Zakona o dobrobiti odnosi se na  DIVLJE ZIVOTINJE U ZAROBLJENISTVU   ,  dok  kucni ljubimci   ne zive na slobodi i   njih je zabranjerno pustati  na slobodu  bez pratnje  coveka  na odredjeni nacin , zabranjeno ih je pustati na javne povrsine  i  zabranjeno ih  je ubijati   koriscenjem tacke 6. cl.15.  Svojim tumacenjem Vi  indukujete  krivicno delo  kaznjivo  stavom 2, clana 269. KZ RS –   sto je  nedozvoljeno za  jednog Ministra , te smatramo da  niste pokazali potreban kvalitet  radeci   posao  ministra  , naprotiv  naneli ste  stetu  rep budzetu, gradskim budzetima i licnim  budzetima mnogih gradjana promovisanjem nezakonitih  postupaka i odgovorni ste za  nezakonito  masovna ubijanja pasa i macaka  koriscenjem  tacke 6 , clana 15. Zakona o dobrobiti zivotinja . 
  
Zakon  o vet cl.46. nalaze  jedinicama  lokalne samouprave  ZBRINJAVANJE    svih napustenih pasa i macaka  , zbrinjavanje  nije ograniceno na 30 dana  , nastavlja se  i nakon isteka  30 dana –  ali tada po  cl.54. :Programu kontrole i smanjenja  brojnosti – sterilizacijom vlasnickih i nevlasnickih  pasa i macaka  kojim  se ne menaju zakonske direktive , i ne moze se podzakonskim aktom dozvoliti ono sto je zakonom zabranjeno , stoga   postupanje po Programu  kontrole i smanjenja brojnosti populacije pasa i macaka  ne znaci  ubijanje UBIJANJE  JE ZAKONOM ZABRANJENO . Opstina/grad   mora imati objekat/objekte  za zbrinjavanje – ako  ima  samo objekat za privremeni smestaj  ,onda mora imati   zakonit nacin- Ugovor  itd ,  da omoguci  zbrinjavanje   u  legalne  objekte za zbrinjavanje ,  ali   NIKO NEMA   pravo  ubijanjem   smanjivati brojnost populacije   , jer   taj ko to promovise , umesto  zakonitog  nacina : sterilizacije  i obelezavanja  vlasnickih  pasa/macaka ,makar bio  i ministar-  cini krivicno delo  ,  i  svi oni  koji to  ubijanje – po cl 15. tacka 6  promovisu i cine  ,bez obzira na titule , polozaj  itd .  nazalost  morace u zatvor   i morace   takvima da se oduzme  veterinarska licenca  ukoliko je imaju   –  jer  tako nalazu zakoni Rep Srbije ,  Ustav nalaze  postupanje po  zakonima  – ako nismo ,kao sto nas smatraju  krsitelji zakona : nekoliko milionska  nepismena rulja ,  nego  smo organizovano  drustvo  , a mi smo uvereni  da smo  organizovano drustvo .
  
  
Zbog svega  ovde iznetog, ocekujemo  da  najzad  u 170 jedinica lokalne samouprave postupate po  zakonima , a isto ocekujemo i od  policije i  javnih tuzilaca  u Srbiji .
  
S  postovanjem, srdacno
 
 
  
EPAR-OIPA SRBIJA/Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9
  
  
Budi vegan-spasi Planetu
 
 
—– Original Message —–
From: EPAR
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:55 PM
Subject: Prijava ,10.9.2010.u 170 jedinica lok samoupr.- stanje i dalje nezakonito , sto je protivustavno i opasno po zivot i zdravlje ljudi i zivotinjaURGENTNO : Program i drugi -podzakonski akti ,Zakoni, Ustav , zivot i zdravlje gradjana i zivotinja ,6.10.2009.
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, sumarstva i vodoprivrede RS , Beograd
Uprava za veterinu, Beograd
Sektor Veterinarske inspekcija  Republike  Srbije , Beograd
10.9.2010.
 
Prijava   nezakonitog postupanja prema kucnim ljubimcima u svih 170  jedinica lokalne samouprave , usled nepostupanja  ili nezakonitog postupanja nadleznih  veterinarskih inspekcijskih sluzbi , cime  republicki budzet , budzeti  jedinica lokalne samouprave kao i licni budzeti mnogih gradjana  trpe ogromne stete,
  
usled
  
  
-nezakonite  kontrole i smanjenja brojnosti populacije  napustenih pasa i macaka  , UBIJANJEM  na osnovu nezakonitih podzakonskih akata jedinica lokalnih samouprava u Republici Srbiji,
-nezakonitog `pustanja na slobodu`  tj izbacivanja na javne povrsine, napustanje ,  na osnovu nezakonitih podzakonskih akata ,cime  se izaziva ugrozavanje zivota i zdravlja  i gradjana i  zivotinja ,
  
sto dovodi do
  
  
-nezakonitog trosenja javnog  novca iz republickog  budzeta i  budzeta  170 jedinica lokalne samouprave ,
-nezakonite , protivustavne  eksploatacije gradjana ,pojedinaca koji  su primorani da  licnim novcem  spasavaju  veliki broj zivotinja  u  svim gradovima Srbije
 
Postovani
 
Ponovo vam prijavljujemo da u svih 170 jedinica lokalne samouprave, u svih 27  okruga u Republici Srbiji , zbog nepostupanja i/ili nezakonitog postupanja   podrucno-nadleznih republickih veterinarskih inspekcija , zoohigijenske sluzbe  hedinica lokalne samouprave u saradnji sa veterinarskim sluzbama  nedozvoljeno ubijaju napustene pse i macke nepoznatih vlasnika ( ove  sluzbe najcesce  imaju 20-80 kaveza kaveza i primenjuju tacku 6. clana 15. koja se  NE odnosi na kucne ljubimce nego na DIVLJE zivotinje u zarobljenistvu koje se ne mogu prilagoditi uslovima zivota , a ne mogu se pustiti na slobodu , jer  kucne  ljubimce je  zabranjeno izbacivati , `pustati ` na slobodu`i ostavljati na javnim povrsinama , takodje  veterinari koriste  u zakonu nepostojecu terminologiju  koja  ne moze biti  dokaziva indikacija  za eutanaziju  ni pred jednim sudom , takodje  veterinari nemaju dokaze za  postavljene indikacije  kojima  mogu potvrditi zakonitost  lisavanja zivota , tj nemaju dokaze  kojima se  zakonito  lisavanje zivota moze  razluciti od nezakonitog lisavanja zivota , a  za ovu oblast nadlezna lica  u lokalnoj vlasti  jos ni danas nisu  izradila i ne primenjuju program zakonite kontrole i  zakonitog smanjenja brojnosti populacije napustenih pasa i macaka –  sto znaci da mora da se  obavlja kontrola brojnosti populacije BEZ  ubijanja-  nadzorom odgovornog vlasnistva ,BEZ  izbacivanja  na javne povrsine kako od strane pojedinaca tako i od strane pravnih lica  , jer  su ovi nacini   zakonom zabranjeni ,  dok  pravna lica -zoohigijenske sluzbe u jedinicama   tu kontrolu jos uvek  pokusavaju ostvariti   ubijanjem  – po potrebi najmanje  1 puta mesecno ili jedanput nedeljno itd –  tj  zakonom zabranjenim nacinom tj KRIVICNIM DELOM, dok nista nisu uradili  na smanjenju reprodukcije novih jedinki ,  nisu  nista uradili na stavljanju pod kontrolu  neodgovornih vlasnika kucnih ljubimaca  i kontrole reprodukcije novih jedinki kucnih ljubimaca  , cime nepostupajuce lokalne samouprave- tj nadlezni pojedinci u njima  i  rep veterinarske inspekcije koje  tolerisu njihovo nepostupanje  i  Ministarstvo     poljoprivrede, uprava za veterinu -Sektor veterinarske inspekciji  koji tolerise  nepostupanje rep veterinarskih inspekcija u 27 okruga  , nedozvoljeno :  
 
opterecuju lokalni i republicki budzet , i licni budzet  gradjana , beskrajnim ponavljanjem  troskova  vakcinacije, obelezavanja, i nezakonitog ubijanja kucnih ljubimaca-  sto jeste KRIVICNO DELO  OD 1.1.2006. i spasavanja od strane organizacija ili  fizickih lica koji  time bivaju izlozeni  nedozvoljenoj eksploataciji i diskriminaciji  , progonima i revansizmu-  STO JESTE  PROTIVUSTAVNO ,  a sve usled
 
nepostupanja i/ili nezakonitog  postupanja   veterinarske inspekcije  u svim jedinicama lokalne samouprave , STO JESTE  NEZAKONITO .
 
Molimo vas da postupite po ovoj prijavi i omogucite  u Republici Srbiji sprovodjenje  Zakona o veterinarstvu i Zakona o dobrobiti zivotinja u  svih 27 okruga , svih 170 jedinica lokalne samouprave ,kao i  zakonitog sprovodjenja Programa mera zdravstvene zastite zivotinja na  celoj povrsini Republike Srbije  ,sto znaci i u lovistima .
 
Nepostupanje republicke veterinarske inspekcije  dovodi do opetovanog , besmislenog ubijanja  3  vrste sisara( lisice, psi i macke)   – dok su svi toplokrvni kicmenjaci  jednakomerni potencijalni rezervoari virusa rabiesa u svakoj zoni  proglasenja zarazenosti besnilom  , sto dovodi  do ogromnih troskova finansiranjem  ovog  stetnog remecenja prirodnog lanca ishrane , sto  ima za posledicu  ogromne troskove  na povecanu ,stetnu po zdravlje stanovnistva ,primenu pesticida .
 
S postovanjem
 
 
 
EPAR- OIPA Srbija/Alijansa za zastitu prirode, prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica, Matka Vukovica,9
Zastupnik;Slavica Mazak Beslic
 
 
 
 
 —– Forwarded Message —-
From: epar <
epar@yunord.net>
To:
kabinet@minpolj.gov.rs; snezana.poledica@minpolj.gov.rs
Cc: s.celebicanin@minpolj.gov.rs; micovicz@minpolj.gov.rs; jzivanovic@predsednik.rs; djordje.stanicic@skgo.org; Zvonimir Rot <zvonimir.rot@minpolj.gov.rs>; mduls@mduls.gov.rs; kabinet@mduls.gov.rs
Sent: Tue, October 6, 2009 11:34:47 AM
Subject: URGENTNO : Program i drugi -podzakonski akti ,Zakoni, Ustav , zivot i zdravlje gradjana i zivotinja ,6.10.2009.
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede RS, Beograd
6.10.2009..
 
Na ruke Ministra, gospodina Saše Dragina
 
Poštovani gospodine Ministre,
 
Obraćamo Vam se u vezi vašeg dopisa broj 110-00-00198/2009-9, koji nam je dostavljen danas, 6.10.2009. i kojeg Vam šaljemo u atachmentu, kako biste ga odmah imali pred očima, radi efikasnije komunikacije. Na desnom rubu ovog akta obeležili smo pasuse Vašeg teksta  na koje se odnose naši komentari od Ad 1.  do Ad 5. koje smatramo utemeljenim u zakonima i bitnim za zastitu gradjana, njihovog -javnog novca i životinja ,u skladu s važećim zakonima i Ustavom RS.
 
 
 Ad1.
2. novembra stupio je na snagu Zakon o veterinarstvu, 1.1.2006. stupio je na snagu KZ RS , sa julskim dopunama Sl.gl.RS 72/09,  10.6.2009. stupio je na snagu Zakon o dobrobiti životinja koji članom 54. nalaže jedinicama lokalne samouprave da izrade i sprovode Program kontrole i smanjenja brojnosti populacije napuštenih pasa i mačaka, a da nadzor nad postupanjem jedinica lokalne samouprave po ovom članu vrši Ministarstvo poljoprivrede  putem područno nadležnih rep.vet.inspekcija, te da ove službe Ministarstva .poljoprivrede  moraju da postupaju po članu 83., ukoliko jedinica lokalne samouprave nije postupila po članu 54 .
 Članom 15. Zakona o dobrobiti životinja  definisane su indikacije , način i uslovi za lišavanje života . 
Ako  su se stekli uslovi da rep.veterinarski inspektor naloži lišavanje života  radi : sprečavanja širenja i suzbijanja zarazne bolesti životinja, tada  nastaje zakonska obaveza Ministra koji   mora postupiti u celosti i u skladu sa članom 64. Zakona o veterinarstvu tj. naložiti svih obaveznih 18 tačaka koje  taj član  nalaže uz mogućnost proširenja liste naloga  preko 18 ,bez  zakonske mogućnosti skraćenja ove liste od 18 tačaka  koje naredjuje zakon, jer u suprotnom, ukoliko bi postojao samo  nalog rep vet inspektora za lišavanjem života pod obrazloženjem da se isto  sprovodi radi  sprečavanja širenja zarazne bolesti ,  a bez pomenutog naloga Ministra u skladu s članom 64. , u postojećem zakonskom okviru  radilo bi se o krivično-prekršajnom delu koje čini  ili rep.veter.inspektor nalažući  lišavanje života u uslovima nepostojanja proglašenja zaraženosti tog područja , ili Ministar neproglašenjem zaraženosti  u skladu sa članom 64.u zaraženom području ili 65. u ugroženom području.Naravno u svakom od slučajeva proglašenja  nekog područja zaraženim  obavezno mora postojati  laboratorijski dokaz  izdat od ovlašćene laboratorije kao i prijava zarazne bolesti nadležnim institucijama u  Srbiji i van Srbije .
 
Ad.2.  
 Lokalna samouprava može odlučiti da li će  prihvatilište koje osniva ili već postojeće služiti za trajni smeštaj,  ili za privremeni , ali niste  perfektuirali ovaj svoj stav, ostavili ste ga nedorecenim, i stvorili uslove za korupciju i zloupotrebu zivotinja i javnog novca , jer   ukoliko odluči da isto ima služiti za privremeni smeštaj, tada je obavezna imati i odluku o drugom  načinu trajnog smeštaja ( u prihvatilište za trajni smeštaj ili reudomljavanje )jer  u postojećem zakonskom okviru trajni smeštaj ubijanjem je krivično delo kažnjivo zatvorski , stoga organ jedinice lokalne samouprave mora obezbediti zbrinjavanje po nalozima Zakona o veterinatsrvu i Zakona o dobrobiti životionja :
  –BEZ UBIJANJA , jer  smeštaj ubijanjem nije dozvoljen Zakonom o dobrobiti niti Zakonom o veterinarstvu  i predstavlja krivično delo ubijanja  životinja uz kršenje propisa kažnjivo  članom 269. KZ RS   i članom 107. Zakona o izmenama i dopunama KZ RS ( sL.GL.rts 72/09).Tacka 6. clana 15.  pustanje na slobodu  koje spominjete , odnosi se na DIVLJE zivotinje u zarobljenistvu , kucni ljubimci NE zive na slobodi , oni zive u kuci s ljudima , ili u prihvatilistu  ciji vlasnik je duzan obezbediti uslove kojima  ce zadovoljiti potrebe  svake jedinke , a ne ubiti jedinku zato sto nije stvorio uslove. Pustanje kucnih ljubimaca ` na slobodu`  je  napustanje zivotinja i zakonom je zabranjeno, tacka 6. clana 15.  ne odnosi se na  kucne ljubimce , oni se NE  pustaju na slobodu i nemaju stanista u prirodi .
 
Ad.3. 
 Ministarstvo poljoprivrede  je dužno  , u skladu sa članom 143. Zakona o veterinarstvu ,  i članom  83. Zakona o dobrobiti životinja ,putem svojih inspekcijskih službi vršiti nadzor nad sprovodjenjem Zakona o veterinarstvu i Zakona o dobrobiti životinja , vršeći nadzor nad : donošenjem podzakonskih akata koja ovi Zakoni nalažu , nad njihovom saglasnošću sa pomenutim Zakonima kao i nad njihovim sprovodjenjem u skladu sa nalozima  ovih Zakona.Tu spada i  ČL.54. I 83 .  i svi članovi pomenuta  dva zakona   kao i Program kontrole brojnosti i smanjenja  populacije  napuštenih pasa i mačaka u skladu s nalozima pomenutih zakona .
 
Ad 4. 
Tačno je da su organi jedinica lokalne samouprave dužni da postupaju u skladu s članom 54. Zakona o dobrobiti životinja, a NADZOR  ovog njihovog postupanja je zakonska obaveza Ministarstva poljoprivrede koje putem svojih inspekcijskih službi obavlja ovaj nadzor i primenjuje  kaznene odredbe u slučaju  nepostupanja jedinice lokalne samouprave  po nalogu člana 54.
 
Ad. 5.
 Finansiranje prihvatilišta za napuštene pse i mačke  jeste  zakonska obaveza jedinice lokalne samouprave,  ali  je i  zakonska obaveza Ministarstva poljoprivrede, jer je isto dužno obezbediti finansiranje i sprovodjenje  antirabične vakcinacije i mikročipovanja napuštenih pasa i mačaka smeštenih u prihvatilište novcem iz republičkog budžeta , kao i  antirabičnu vakcinaciju vlasničkih pasa i mačaka –   kao što nalaže Zakon o veterinarstvu , a SVE je u interesu zaštite života  i zdravlja ljudi  zastitom  zdravlja  zivotinja i u interesu  životinja.
U pogledu finansiranja prihvatilišta Ministarstvo poljoprivrede mora , jer to nalaže Ustav ,  poštovati i Zakon o imovinsko-pravnim  odnosima , Zakon o obligacionim odnosima , Zakon o pravima svojine , jer nije u saglasnosti s pomenutim zakonima  da fizička lica ili nevladine organizacije koje poseduju objekat prihvatilište ,  budu tretirani kao  vlasnici pansiona   koji se iz komercijalnih razloga bave  cuvanjem zivotinja u  svojim pansionima ,  a  takodje  vlasnici  prihvatilista  ne mogu prostom okupacijom da postanu vlasnici pokretne `imovine`- uličnih pasa nepoznatih vlasnika, koji su pokretna `imovina` jedinice lokalne samouprave .
 
Molimo Vas da  Vi -Ministar i Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede omogućite , jer je to vaša zakonska obaveza , da odredbe Zakona o veterinarstvu i Zakona o dobrobiti životinja budu realizovane –  jer  su oba  pomenuta Zakona  na snazi , svi  njihovi članovi izuzev člana 87. koji se odnosi isključivo na uskladjivanje funkcionisanja samog  prihvatilišta sa Zakonom o dobrobiti  , a ne na  zapocinjanje  funcionisanja prihvatilistas  – koje treba da postoji  vec od 2.11.2005.  , dok ni jedan drugi nalog oba  pomenuta zakona ne trpi odlaganje ,a po njima se još uvek ne postupa , pri čemu se takodje ne primenjuju  ni kaznene odredbe ovih zakona,krši Ustav i  veći broj drugih zakona,  što  i gradjane i jedinice lokalne samouprave  i republički i lokalne budžete dovodi u nepovoljnu, neustavnu  situaciju i   nadasve situaciju opasnu po život i zdravlje gradjana  i životinja.
 
Takodje Vas molimo da nas izvestite o merama koje ste Vi -Ministar, i Ministarstvo poljoprivrede,šumarstva i vodoprivrede –  službenici  izvršne vlasti ,  preduzeli u interesu zaštite zdravlja  i života gradjana i životinja kako biste omogućili   realizaciju  naloga zakonodavne vlasti kroz  svoje postupanje po nalozima Zakona o veterinarstvu , Zakona o dobrobiti životinja ,u skladu sa svim ostalim važećim zakonima Republike Srbije i njenim Ustavom u ovoj konkretnoj oblasti za koju ste  zakonima i Ustavom zaduženi.  .
 
S poštovanjem, srdačno
EPAR/ OIPA Srbija/Alijansa za prava zivotinja
24000 Subotica, Matka Vukovića,9
 
 

 


Serbia: Krivicna prijava 25.1.2011. BRUNO

OJT Subotica

MUP RS ,Beograd

PU Subotica

25.1.2011.

Prijava :

da je Branka Bjelica , rep veterinarski inspektor prekoracila svoja ovlascenja  kada je  Resenjem  nalozila da pas rotvajler Bruno bude odmah ubijen , bez dokaza da je imao kontakt  s besnom lisicom , pozivajuci se neosnovano na Pravilnik koji vazi u uslovima prethodno vec dokazanog i prograsenog besnila ,kao i clan 64. Zakona o veterinarstvu koji  vazi u uslovima vec dokazanog i proglasenog besnila.

Ni jedan  opravdani razlog nije postojao  zbog kojeg bi Branka Bjelica  imala pravo i  duznost  da Resenjem nalozi da  zdrav pas Bruno  bude ubijen , ona je to ucinila u suprotnosti s vazecim propisima .

Dokazni materijal nalazi se u kosuljici predmeta  KTR 71/10, i postupajuci zamenik javnog tuzioca je  aljkavo  obavio svoju sluzbenu duznost , i , uprkos  evidentnih dokaza da je Branka Bjelica  nalozila i  izvrsitelji njenog Resenja s njom  zajedno  pocinili krivicno delo ubistva  psa   u suprotnosti s  propisima, odbio  zbog navodnog ` nepostojanja elemenata krivicnog dela ` .

Zahtevamo da  OJT Subotica pokrene istrazni postupak i omoguci sankcionisanje svih  pocinitelja i  onih koji  su do sada ometali  sprovodjenje pravde   u ovom predmetu ,a zaposleni su u OJT Subotica  kao zamenici  osn.javnog tuzioca.

u ATACHMENTU JE NASA  KP – zahtevamo da najzad korektno postupate  u ovom  kristalno jasnom  slucaju i da  zamenici OJT Subotica  prestanu   namerno nipodastavati  dokaze  ,a uzimati  u obzira izjave pocinitelja  koji   tvrde  ` majke mi radili smo po zakonu`  .  Dokazi  treba da su  merodavni , a ne  zaklinjanja pocinitelja da su radili po zakonu  za cega nemaju dokaze.

Postavlja se pitanje da li OJT Subotica  kao merilo  za donosenje meritornih odluka koristi  materijalne dokaze ili  izjave  tipa : `majke mi radila sam po zakonu` – pitamo se po kojem zakonu  , ili , ` stito sam svoje ljude`  – pitamo se od cega  je g. Mrdalj  `stitio svoje ljude`,   kada besnilo nije postojalo  ni tada ni tri meseca pre ni tri meseca posle – sto je  znala Branka Bjelica ,  i kada lisica nije  ni postojala  sto je znao g Mrdalj  kojem je smetao pas Bruno – jer nije  nadjena ni ziva ni mrtva  lisica, pa i da jeste  postojala – suma je staniste lisice  i nije neobicno da se lisica nalazi u sumi , ali kakve to veze ima   sa ` sticenjem  svojih ljudi,  ubijanjem psa `  i bacanjem  lesa u  stocnu jamu ,na kojem je insistirao g. Mrdalj. 

Zakoni postoje da bi ih svi , a narocito rep vet inspektor , komandir policije  i zamenik OJT – postovali, a ne  zloupotrebljavali ,  da bi predmet zastareo , jer

1.   delo jeste  pocinjeno- pas je ubijen –  i  to  je  nalozeno i ucinjeno

2.   u suprotnosti s vazecim propisima .

Zahtevano  istrazni postupak i  sankcije za  sve pocinitelje  koji su na bilo koji nacin  involvirani u ovo kriminalno delo .

S postovanjem

 

EPAR-OIPA SRBIJA/Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9

Budi vegan-spasi Planetu

 

E P A R sa memorandumom.docBRUNO,25.1.11

 

 

 

 

 

Uk: Petition for UK Residents ONLY – Protect British Woodlands and Wildlife

 

This very important petition to save Uk forests should only really be signed by Uk residents.  Please do it today and protect British woodlands and wildlife.

 

———————————–

Our Save Our Forests campaign is creating a national sensation! We now have a quarter of a million signatures on our petition — nearly three times the capacity of Wembley Stadium.

That’s because the we understand something the Government doesn’t: our natural forests are priceless, and once they’re gone – they’re gone forever.

Our campaign is already all over the news and politicians are getting increasingly nervous. That’s why the most important thing we can do right now is spread the word and ensure our petition continues to grow as quickly as possible.

Please forward this email to your friends and ask them to sign. All they have to do is click on the link and add their names:
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/save-our-forests

Government ministers are trying to distract us with warm and fuzzy words about how much they love the forests. They’ve just announced a “consultation” on how we’d like our forests sold off – even though they already know most of us don’t want them sold off at all!

Even before this so-called consultation launches they’re busy trying to change the laws that currently protect public forests. This is blatantly clearing the way for a massive sell-off. What kind of consultation is that?

Don’t let them get away with it – tell everyone you know about our campaign right now.
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/save-our-forests

If they want consultation, here it is: 38 Degrees members chipped in to fund a national opinion poll which proved that 84% of the public want our forests kept in public hands for future generations.

Places like the Forest of Dean, the New Forest, Grizedale, Thetford, and Alice Holt are national treasures. We don’t want the natural places that belong to future generations flogged off for a quick cash grab today. But if we don’t rally together now, we may not have a choice.

Our petition already has over 250,000 names on it, including yours.

Can you help us get to 500,000? Please forward this email and ask your friends to add their name to your own:
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/save-our-forests.

Thanks for getting involved,

David, Hannah, Johnny and the 38 Degrees team

PS: On Facebook? You can also quickly alert your friends by clicking here:
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/forests-facebook-share

If you use Twitter, please tweet about the petition here:
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/forests-twitter-share

Notes:
[1] You can read articles and find links to videos about the campaign here: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/save-our-forests-media

VERY IMPORTANT – Please Read. Hunting and Timber Lobbyists in Germany May Influence EU Wide Wildlife Protection In the Future. We Must Not Let This Happen !

 

 

Further to our recent post relating to the European Court and German hunting associations:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/23/germany-update-230111-eu-hunting-court-rulings-the-german-fox-week-and-more/

we now have the following report from the Lawyer who has been involved with the case working for the defence of animals.  His name is Dominik.

We need to make it clear that the following is a translation (from German to English) which has been undertaken privately and semi-professionally.  All information is as directly translated as much as possible and is legally and technically correct.  Any bolding of text or underlining has been produced by SAV – points we consider of special importance.

The following is the report / message from Dominik:

—————————————–

Dear fellow animal lovers,

comrades in arms.

Thank you for your many e-mails.

We are all shocked about yesterday’s judgement by the European Court for Human Rights concerning German hunting associations.

Verdict:

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&documentId=880224&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649

The result of this decision is that the Human rights of land owners in Germany are considered of less importance than the Human rights of land owners in France and Luxembourg (previous judgements from 1999 by the same court). In effect, this judgement represents a discrimination, because the facts of the cases are identical.

The European court was established to harmonise jurisdiction within the territory in which the European convention of Human rights applies. What we are having now is differing decisions in the member states. This judgement therefore came as a surprise to us and caught us unawares.

I think that the lobby comprised of hunters, land owners and the timber industry in Germany is far more powerful than their counterparts in France and Luxembourg.

In Germany a “cluster” for timber is under development right now that will open the flood gates to commercial forest exploitation under an ecological cloak (“Forest rejuvenation”, “Wald vor Wild” (Forest before game), “CO2 climate protection”). Both the green party as well as established environmental organisations support this concept, which, in time, is to be extended to all of Europe.

The “charter for timber” was developed by the Bavarian ministry for agriculture and forestry. The ministry is headed by Philipp Baron of (von und zu) Guttenberg (German forestry commission). This powerful lobby, which alone in Bavaria has an annual business volume of EUR 30 billion, wants to maintain the current organisational structure in the forests (meaning the hunting associations and their uninhibited access to the land) – because approx. 44 percent of the German forest is private property.

Through the hunting associations (forced membership) the majority of the land owners can thus be directed in the interests of the timber lobby. A victory for animal welfare would therefore have broken this charter for timber apart, which in Germany as in the European Union is a kind of signature issue.

Conclusion: The emphasis of the matter at hand is no longer one of hunting. It’s about immense commercial interests. It’s about an organisational principle belonging to the ruling system. And with Guttenberg & Co. we face powerful adversaries, who command, and use their influence nationally and internationally. This we have felt yesterday.

I consider yesterday’s judgement, which, with 4 to 3 (judge’s) votes, turned out very narrowly against us, for completely indefensible. I must now explain to my client that the continued access of hunters to his property to shoot hare and foxes is in the interests of biodiversity and nature conservation (art. 20 sec. GG).

In reverse this means that if those hare and foxes were not shot the consequences for biodiversity, the climate and our entire natural resources would be dire.  !!

This argumentation clearly shows that we are now living in a completely disordered world, which does no longer command either independent parliaments or independent courts of justice. We are being dominated by lobbyists, who hang on to their old systems – at whatever cost.

As yesterday’s judgement by the small chamber of the Court stands in blatant contradiction to the two hitherto pronounced against France (16:1 votes) and Luxemburg (7:0 votes) the complainant will now call on the large chamber of the European Court of Justice.

If we fail to win there we must accept that this lobby can not be beaten with paragraphs …

Then we must look for another way. And we will find it.

We now have one chance left with the large chamber.  Then we will see how big the influence of that powerful lobby on the whole court really is.

I hope and wish that we will continue to fight for our common cause and not give up now. The fight continues and the way ahead of us is long yet.

With best wishes,

Dominik Storr
Lawyer
DE-97845 Neustadt am Main OT Erlach
Web:  www.buergeranwalt.com

 —————————-

We thank Dominik for his work acting on behalf of decent people and all wildlife.

Further, we would also like to thank all the SAV comments relating to this issue, and that of the German ‘Fox Week’ which we have been covering:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/20/germany-mass-slaughter-of-fox-week-to-start-by-february-international-appeal-for-aw-groups-to-join-the-german-protest-and-say-no-details-below/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/germany-international-animal-welfare-organisations-only-please-support-the-call-for-a-closed-season-on-fox-murder-currently-foxes-can-be-killed-all-year/

The invitation to international AW groups to support this is still open – please see the above (second) link for full details.

Below you will find a selection of comments from visitors to SAV on this issue.  We thank you for these. 

All photographs are from the ‘Fox Week’ which has taken place in Germany within the last few years.  It shows the barbarity of what happens by sick people who have nothing better to do with their time other than abuse and kill wildlife; even though the wildlife was around in the forests long before they ever set foot there.

Regards – SAV.

A selection of comments and photographs showing this sick pastime can be seen below.

—————————

Kim

Submitted on 2011/01/24 at 2:28 pm

Humans are the biggest predators……truly.

This is utterly sickening. What a degradation of life.

 

 

Katy

Submitted on 2011/01/24 at 10:13 am

Absolutely appalling!

It’s extremely concerning that a so called civilised country can allow such atrocities to go on. Haunting images    :0(

 

Paula

Submitted on 2011/01/23 at 6:09 pm

In this modern day and age such barbaric acts should not be happening.

Please stop it.

It is so cruel and so unnecessary. Thank you ,Danke Schon

 

Danny

Submitted on 2011/01/23 at 6:02 pm

The pics on here will haunt me for the rest of my life in my eyes it is murder just like what the nazis did to the jews and as I see it there is no difference but they are a so called lesser species they are still living creatures who think, feel and breath the same as we do.

 

‘M’

Submitted on 2011/01/23 at 3:17 pm

The more people who know of attrocities , the more anger against the inhumane humans.. Spread the word.

 

 

Carl

Submitted on 2011/01/23 at 1:05 pm

Disgusted and totally wondering WHY????

 

 

Rachell

Submitted on 2011/01/23 at 12:58 pm

Leave these beautiful animals alone,

I am totally disgusted, how can they do this & why???????

 

Kerry

Submitted on 2011/01/21 at 5:14 pm

This is disgraceful. Absolutely barbaric. How dare they slaughter these innocent creatures.

 

 

Caring for the animals trust

Submitted on 2011/01/21 at 9:15 am

This is barbarous and should not be permitted in any civilised country.

 

 

Nick

Submitted on 2011/01/20 at 4:05 pm

The fox pictures remind me of the holocaust.

 

Geraldine

Submitted on 2011/01/20 at 3:52 pm

I can’t put into words how I feel towards the humans that do these things. There are no words strong enough. I would sooner suffer as animals do than call myself a human being – so ashamed am I of belonging to my species!!!

 

 

Dori

Submitted on 2011/01/20 at 2:23 pm

Todo lo que le suceda a los animales,sucederá a los hombres también
Mientras el hombre siga matando, no encontrará la paz..

 

CRAVE

Submitted on 2011/01/19 at 12:36 am 

ARRETEZ CE MASSACRE……….. C EST INDIGNE ET POUR L HOMME ET POUR L ANIMAL !!!!!

 

Leslie

Submitted on 2011/01/17 at 8:05 pm

Quel horreur ! Comment cela peut il exister ! Il faut arrêter ce massacre !

 

Levert

Subm tted on 2011/01/15 at 7:16 pmi

Je trouve ca vraiment ecoeurant! Je soutien votre action.

 

Haldimann

Submitted on 2011/01/07 at 6:31 pm

Animals are NOT property!! They have feelings, emotions, souls and rights!!!All animals are sentient and should be respected and treated with compassion and empathy.
This must stop.STOP KILLING THE INNOCENT! Stop this animal cruelty!!! It is awful to see these things in Germany, how can you let this excist?

 

Terezia

Submitted on 2011/01/07 at 5:40 pm

Criminals

 

 EPAR

Submitted on 2011/01/04 at 11:54 pm

Where are addresses of responsible authorities , they are responsible for all these KILLINGS , they support these killers so-called `hunters` but in fact KILLERS .All these killers and those German authorities who support killers have an EQUAL right to live free like these poor foxes .These foxes are diamonds and their killers are smell monsters harm for whole Planet .Because these monsters- killers we now have animals extinction, human-overpopulation, global warming, climate changes- for all these harm changes responsible are nonsense politicians, `authorities` – money greedy humans-monsters . We need their addresses and names .

 

Amanda

Submitted on 2011/01/04 at 11:20 pm

Please don’t kill the poor hopeless foxes.

 

Ella

Submitted on 2011/01/24 at 11:25 pm

How absolutely sickening. Hurting animals and children- those who cannot defend themselves-it robs us all of humanity.

Goldmacher

Submitted on 2011/01/25 at 1:36 am

This is disgusting – shame on anyone killing these defenceless animals

 

Serbia: Prijava 23.1.2011. Jamarenja / Don`t Violate Human Rights – Arrest the Criminals !

Ministartstvo  zivotne sredine -Sektor inspekcije i nadzora

Ministartstvo poljoprivrede – Sektor inspekcije

Generalni inspektorat – lovna inspekcija

MUP RS,Beograd

23.1.2011.

Prijava :

da lica koja su se i ovde,kao  sto to uvek cine ,sama predstavila ,stoga niko ne moze  reci da su NN lica ,predstavili su i sebe i svoja nedela : cine  zlostavljanje , zarobljavanje i ubijanje velikog broja  zivotinja ,kako divljih   -zasticenih  i nezasticenih , tako i pitomih , borbama  na zivot i smrt  napadajuci  i  nedozvoljeno ruseci usred zime   i u svako godisnje doba ,staniste divljih zivotinja , i  organizujuci borbe  u vestackim rovovima  u svojim smrdljivim supama i dvoristima  , kladjenja  i trgovinu   nemackim lovnim  terijerima, uz utaju poreza.

Naravno , svi  znamo da su  od  postupanja organa  zasticeni samo oni  kriminalci koji placaju `proviziju`  korumpiranom pojedincu  tog  organa .Zato ocekujemo da  organi kojima  ova dela vec bezbroj puta prijavljujemo  ,identifikuju i  izbace  iz svojih redova korumpirane  mrcine i da najzad  pohapse i njih i  ove kriminalce koji sebe  i svoja zlodela predstavljaju  javnosti  bez ustrucavanja , a  koji zajedno sa korumpiranim pojedincima u  organima vlasti  KRSE  LJUDSKA PRAVA  – koja Ustav  garantuje  i ostvaruje jedino implementacijom svih  zakona  jednako prema svima .

Zahtevamo da  organi kojima dostavljamo ovu prijavu  hitno postupe po vazecim zakonima  i da  najzad  javnost dobije obavestenje : da su  kriminalci-  ceo lanac  `jamara`  privedeni  pred lice pravde, jer  za sada  javnost  gleda samo  njihove  video zapise krvolocnih  zlodela   koja nesmetano cine prema zivotinjama  i prema ljudima koji  postuju   :  ljude  ,  zivotinje , zakone i Ustav Rep Srbije .

Posebnim aktom  : Zahtevom u skladu sa Zakonom o slobodnom pristupu informacijama od javnog znacaja,  trazicemo kopije  zapisnika  i sluzbenih beleski  o postupanju  organa  po ovoj prijavi  i o svemu  cemo uredno obavestavati javnost   Srbije i sire  – jer  ima pravo da zna .

EPAR-OIPA SRBIJA/Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9

Zastupnik: Prim.mr.sci.dr.med. Slavica Mazak Beslic

E P A R sa mem-JAMARENJE ,Prijava 23.1.2011 

 

 

Germany: UPDATE 23/01/11 – ‘EU Hunting Court Rulings’, the German ‘Fox Week’ and More

Regarding our recent post on the ‘Fox Week’ in Germany:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/20/germany-mass-slaughter-of-fox-week-to-start-by-february-international-appeal-for-aw-groups-to-join-the-german-protest-and-say-no-details-below/

the message from our German animal campaigner friend finshed with the statement:

“On 20th of January we expect the decision on “forced hunting” (where hunters have the right to hunt animals on private ground) from the European Court of Justice. If that comes out in favour of our cause – which we hope – then that will be another coffin nail for the hunters and also work as a boost to our campaign”.

Well the decision has now been made by the European Court of Justice, and it has NOT found in favour of our cause.

The court’s decision for forced hunting was supplemented with a justification, and it said that the continuation of the practice is in the public interest and that hunting was necessary to protect the game stocks.

This is an Intersting twist on reality.

Going by that stated logic, and transferring it to us mere humans, any serial killer or masse murderer for that matter, would be the greatest friend of mankind we ever head. Because, in the end, by doing their killings of other humans, they, (the killer) protected the Human population.  Is it in the public interest to have the continuation of human masse killings  by serial killers to protect the human species ? – No.

 Simply one rule for the hunters and a different rule for everyone else.

Another more interesting point about the whole thing is that this very same court ruled against forced hunting in France and Luxemberg in 1999, saying that nobody could be forced to tolerate that on their private ground.

How the rules change in ten years by the very same court !

Well, the complainant (a guy from the Stuttgart area) will now go on to put his case again before the big chamber of the court; (the ruling from yesterday being by the small chamber), and we shall see with a great deal of interest what happens here.

Many people think the court decided the way it did because of pressure from the German sylviculture and the lobby behind it.  The economic value (timber prices) of German forests is high, and they are tightly managed.  Game they say, causes damage to the stock, and in many areas is seen as nothing more than ‘vermin’ that the hunters are more than, even incredibly happy, to get rid of.

Hunters are also aiming at having the (German) countys and local authorities establish bans for strollers and others wanting to use the forests for recreation. Clearly, they do not want witnesses to what they do and argue that ‘all these people disturb the game’. 

Really, is it not them who disturb the animals ? – destroying the natural reproduction cycles of animals which is based around the availability of food.  Do the hunters not put out food baits to lure their targets into the area so that they can then be shot by hunters standing high up on platforms ?

If this is not the hunting community ‘disturbing the game’, then what is ?

The hunters have currently achieved their will simply because of their connections to politics and local administrations – many hunters hold positions in these positions of power anyway.

Below is the link which provides the entire text of the court ruling on forced hunting from the 20th January.

You can read it and make your own decisions and opinions on the hunting issue:

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&documentId=880224&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649

Whatever the current situation, the campaign to stop the continued year round killing of foxes in Germany will continue.  Unfortunately, Fox Week during the next few weeks will see many, many more beautiful animals killed by hunters because of a ruling which declares that the ‘continuation of the practice is in the public interest’, that the wildlife ‘vermin’ destroy the now politically financially viable forests which the public must also be instructed to keep out of for recreational purposes !

Is the world and legislation going crazy in support of animal abusers and against the will of the majority of the public ?

–          Well yes !