Posted on September 3, 2015 by Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

Dear all,
It is very good news. Normally when animals exit the EU territory they are transported for hours and hours, even days, without being unloaded and rested after 29hrs and often with no water breaks.
At least now, when EU animals exit the EU territory, like to Turkey, we can demand legal action when animals are not given these EU minimums. As well, we can stop transports planning on going very far into third countries, when that country does not have official control posts.
Although the EU norms may not be as ideal as we want, they sure are a lot better than any other country.
This judgement is really helping us influencing and even stopping some consignments heading to Turkey. Conditions there were horrible for EU animals, now we have some extra support.
The same can be done for all the EU animals sent to Russia, Kazachstan and soon the borders will be open to go further into the Middle East by road, like Irak.
Hope everyone is well, With best regards,
Lesley
————————-
Link
Court of Justice of the European Union PRESS RELEASE
No 43/15 Luxembourg, 23 April 2015 Judgment in Case C-424/13 Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH v Stadt Kempten
Protection for animals under EU law does not stop at the outer borders of the EU The requirements relating to watering and feeding intervals and duration of journeys and resting periods also apply to those stages of the transport taking place outside the EU
Under the EU treaties, since animals are sentient beings, the EU and the Member States are to pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals. To that end, the EU legislature has laid down detailed provisions in a regulation governing the protection of animals during transport.
1 That regulation is on the principle that animals must not be transported in a way likely to cause injury or undue suffering to them and on the consideration that, for reasons of animal welfare, the transport of animals over long journeys should be limited as far as possible. A German Court, the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Administrative Court, Bavaria)
2 has referred a question asking whether the requirements pertaining to the journey log and the powers conferred on the competent authority of the place of departure enabling it to require changes in certain circumstances also apply, in the case of transport between Member States and third countries, to those stages of the journey taking place outside the EU.
By today’s judgment, the Court of Justice answers that question in the affirmative.
Thus, in order for a transport operation involving a long journey for horses, cattle, pigs, sheep or goats
3 to be authorised by the competent authority of the place of departure, the organiser of the journey must submit a realistic journey log which indicates that the provisions of the regulation will be complied with, including for the stages of the journey taking place outside the EU. The planned journey as stated in the journey log must show that the planned transport will observe, inter alia, the technical rules on watering and feeding intervals and journey times and resting periods.
4 Should the journey log not satisfy those requirements, the authority is empowered to require changes to those arrangements. The regulation does not subject the transport of animals with a point of departure within the territory of the EU and a destination in a third country to any particular approval scheme, different from that applicable to transport taking place within the EU. The organiser of a long journey must 1 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 (OJ 2005, L 3, p. 1, and corrigendum OJ 2011, L 336, p. 86). 2 The Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof is hearing a case involving the German undertaking Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH and the municipality of Kempten (Germany) regarding the decision taken by latter, as the competent authority of the place of departure, to refuse clearance for a consignment of cattle to be transported by road from Kempten to Andijan (Uzbekistan) and to require changes to the transport plans. The municipality of Kempten took the view that the journey log for the 7 000 km journey (via Poland, Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan) did not comply with the requirements under the regulation because it did not provide for any resting or transfer points for the stages of the journey which were expected to take approximately 146 hours on the territory of third countries between the cities of Brest (Belarus) and Karaganda (Kazakhstan). 3 More specifically, the animals concerned are domestic Equidae other than registered Equidae, and domestic animals of bovine, ovine, caprine and porcine species. 4 Thus, as far as cattle are concerned, subject to certain conditions, long journeys by road must include, after 14 hours of travel, a rest period of at least one hour during which they must be given liquid and if necessary fed, after which they may be transported for a further period of up to 14 hours, at the end of which animals must be unloaded, fed, watered and be rested for at least 24 hours. http://www.curia.europa.eu provide the competent authority of the place of departure with a duly completed copy of section 1 (Planning) of the journey log. The information contained in that section, concerning matters such as scheduled resting, transfer or exit points must cover the entire planned transport operation, from the place of departure to the place of destination.
Thus, in the case of a long journey with a destination in a third country, the journey log must contain the necessary information on watering and feeding intervals and journey times and resting periods both for the stages of the journey taking place in the territory of the EU and in the territory of third countries. The Court considers that, in the check to be carried out prior to the journey, the competent authority has a certain margin of discretion allowing it to take due account of the uncertainties involved in a long journey, part of which is to take place in the territory of third countries. Should it be the case that the law or administrative practice of a third country through which the transport will transit verifiably and definitely precludes full compliance with the technical rules of the regulation, the margin of discretion conferred on the competent authority of the place of departure empowers it to accept realistic planning for transport which, in the light of factors such as the means of transport used and the journey arrangements made, indicates that the planned transport will safeguard the welfare of the animals at a level equivalent to those technical rules. In any event, the authority may require, among other things, changes to the arrangements for the intended transport in order to ensure that it will pass by enough resting and transfer points to indicate that the transport will comply with the requirements as to watering and feeding intervals and journey times and resting periods. NOTE: A reference for a preliminary ruling allows the courts and tribunals of the Member States, in disputes which have been brought before them, to refer questions to the Court of Justice about the interpretation of European Union law or the validity of a European Union act. The Court of Justice does not decide the dispute itself. It is for the national court or tribunal to dispose of the case in accordance with the Court’s decision, which is similarly binding on other national courts or tribunals before which a similar issue is raised. Unofficial document for media use, not binding on the Court of Justice.
The full text of the judgment is published on the CURIA website on the day of delivery. (+352) 4303 3355(Press contact: Christopher Fretwell
——————
Our recent SAV post link regarding EU animals being exported to non EU nations:
Filed under: CAMPAIGNS - Global Animal Welfare Issues, DOCUMENTS, GENERAL NEWS - International / National / Regional, LETTERS | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 31, 2015 by Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)



One of my pictures of calves being exported from the UK in the past. Note lower rear animals sucking the trailer bars; the need for milk ! – is this not what we hear from the CIWF investigations team today in Israel and Gaza ? – please click on the photo to be able to enlarge and see more detail.

Fortunately no longer the process, but the old method – a (UK ?) calf restrained in a Dutch veal crate.
Their statement says:
Strasbourg – At today’s meeting of the Intergroup on the Conservation and Welfare of Animals, Members of the European Parliament heard about the consistent failure of member states to enforce Regulation EC 1/2005 which causes millions of animals every year to suffer unnecessarily during transport. This is compounded further with the export of live animals to the Middle East, Turkey and Africa.
Intergroup President, Janusz Wojciechowski MEP who chaired the meeting suggested: “Despite legislation governing live animal transport being in place for ten years we are still seeing animals undertaking extremely long journeys without any respect for their welfare and the Commission has a duty to pursue Member States that continually flout this legislation and cause immense suffering as a consequence.”
The invited speakers spoke about the failure to enforce regulation EC 1/2005 and the consequences this has for animal welfare. They also raised the issue that animal suffering is being exported to third countries especially at the time of slaughter and this is totally unacceptable.
Peter Stevenson, Chief Policy Advisor at Compassion in World Farming stated that; “The EU exports two million cattle and sheep a year to the Middle East, North Africa and Turkey. These animals experience great suffering at slaughter in this region. Not only is the slaughter cruel but it is in breach of the international standards on welfare at slaughter of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE).”
He added: “We have informed the Commission and the exporting Member States of this problem but they refuse to halt the trade or to take effective steps to ensure that EU animals are slaughtered in accordance with the OIE standards. This trade is in breach of Article 13 of TFEU which requires the EU to ‘pay full regard’ to animal welfare. Compassion in World Farming calls on the EU to urgently halt this trade.”
Dr Alexander Rabitsch presenting the findings of his latest report stated: “The European Commission is turning a blind eye to the issue of live animal transport. It is essential that the Commission acts today to ensure that the serious shortcomings witnessed on a daily basis across the EU are addressed immediately and that Member States are brought to task to ensure the highest levels of animal welfare are respected at all times on all transports.”
—————————
Our Action –
Today; 31st August 2015, I have written to all of my EU Members of Parliament for my region – the South East of England.
My letter mainly involves the very recent expose by Compassion In World Farming (CIWF); also based here in England – http://action.ciwf.org.uk/ea-action/action?ea.client.id=119&ea.campaign.id=41392&ea.tracking.id=05bb9ddb and the issue of very young calves being exported for slaughter from locations such as Lithuania and Romania (in the EU) to Israel and Gaza (non EU).
Journeys of over 2,600 miles; with the guarantee that they will end in a terrible death for these very young and innocent, sentient animals.
Basically, the EU; complete with its so called ‘regulations’ and its so called ‘politicians’ make me just want to vomit. I and many others; including Philip, the CEO at CIWF, have personally been involved with live calf export investigations and campaigning for around 25 years. See more at https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/about-us/ We have witnessed British calves being exported live to the Netherlands by a British Conservative government (like we have now under David Cameron) for incarceration into a veal crate system; while they have had the audacity to tell the UK public that they have banned the veal crate in the UK !. What is their way of dealing with the issue ? –export British calves to other countries to be shut in a box until their deaths ! – this is what makes me sick with politicians and their yukspeak, Party led spin to assure us all that we can sleep safe at night.
In the past, I have witnessed tens of thousands of UK calves heading for crates of the Netherlands; I have followed them on the roads; I have produced a series of reports about it all for the EU, I have photographed them (see picture here), I have smelt them; and most upsettingly, I have heard them crammed onto the trucks; their only wish to be fed fresh milk from their mothers who they were wrenched away from days before; never to see again.
As I say, it makes me want to puke now just as much as it did when I first encountered it 25+ years ago.
So this letter to my MEP’s does not praise them; quite the opposite. It is people such as this who are failing the good, caring citizens of the EU who want change for animal welfare to be better; and most importantly, they are failing the animals of Europe who remain silent but want them to be their voice.
I don’t really know what else to say apart from the fact that the EU and all its cronies; including its many MEP’s; are in reality doing nothing to improve animal welfare. They speak the EU speak, have committees for this and that; an EU animal welfare Intergroup / Eurogroup; and still we see very young (EU) calves being shipped from Lithuania to Israel and Gaza for terrifying deaths. If animals have to be slaughtered; then it should take place as near to their point of origin as possible; greatly reducing their stresses during long transport and the terrible deaths they experience in nations such as Turkey and Gaza. You export locally killed meat on the hook; NOT on the hoof !
I can understand it; campaigners can understand it; I think you can understand it; so why not the self important’s of the EU ? – this is where the EU fails its citizens. It lives in a rose colored bubble of everything is ok; there are guarantees, regulations and assurances that things are always dealt with correctly; so hey; what are we griping about ?. Wrong Mr and Mrs MEP – you are failing the people and animals of Europe. Calves being exported and your false promises of alleged EU enforcement and EU regulations for animals undergoing long distance transport are something I have had to endure from the EU for the last 25 years. Today the animals are no better off than they were then thanks to the EU.
I am sick to death of these people and their ‘yukspeak’ of legislation and rules – some kind of EU ‘fairyland’ where politicians think they can bullshit citizens off with their false verbals of ‘high standards’, monitored’ and spared unnecessary suffering’, to name but a few !. They are failing the calves and other animals of Europe. Please write to them and show them your disgust for their blemished approach to sentient beings. Lots more details of how to write to your MEP(s) can be found in the ‘European Union’ section of ‘About Us’ on this site – https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/about-us/ . The campaigning goes on until the EU does see sense and actually moves to better things – I have covered veal calf exports for 25 years so another 25 does not deter me – It is not me who has to worry; but as for the Uk and the EU, well !
Please write to be a voice for the suffering calves; and politicians – wake up to the real world !!
Thanks – Mark.

Above – Veal Calf Crated – Photo CIWF.
Below is my letter to the EU MEP’s for SE England. If they respond then the responses will be reproduced on this site.
———————-
Dear Sir / Madam;
I am writing with regard the export of live animals from within the EU to non EU nations.
A recent investigation by CIWF (England) showed very young Lithuanian calves being first sent by road to the port of Koper in Slovenia. A distance of approximately 1030 miles. Many of them were to weak to stand, but they were still loaded at the point of origin for departure to Koper.
Upon arrival at Koper they then had to endure a further sea journey of approximately 1600 hundred miles to Haifa port in Israel. Other calves which have also been sent to Israel from other EU nations such as Romania, first endured a road journey to Midia port (Romania) of some 690 miles; then enduring a further sea journey of 1530 miles, again to Haifa in Israel.
Many of these young animals were highly stressed by the time they reached their export port within the EU. As they endured such poor conditions during their loading, it is not uncommon for many of them to die during the journey.
For those that do survive the terrible sea crossing toIsrael, conditions upon their arrival are no better. At many facilities filmed by CIWF in Israel, there was no bedding on the floor for the animals and in many cases they were left to lick bare concrete floors in their pitiful search for food after enduring such a journey. These facilities are known as ‘lock up and leave’; where just this procedure is undertaken; animals are left to fend for their own survival before they are slaughtered.
Eventually some of the animals will go to Israeli slaughterhouses; where they will face inhumane slaughter without stunning. Others will be driven further across the border into Gaza for even more terrifying and painful deaths.
A recent European Court of Justice ruling said that EU laws on animal transport still apply when animals leave Europe. The very sad situation is that there is absolutely no enforcement of animal transport regulations to stop exporters from breaking the law.
Thus you, elected MEP’s, the people that EU citizens are allegedly supposed to look up to HAVE dramatically FAILED the animals of Europe seriously. So why should we have any respect for you ? You have failed dismally in your work to ensure that regulations are adhered to.
The situation is no different for EU animals being shipped to Turkey for slaughter. My friend Lesley is the founder of Eyes on Animals in the Netherlands – http://www.eyesonanimals.com/ . She has just returned from one of her many visits to the EU / Turkish border, where she witnessed EU cattle transporters standing in extreme temperatures for many days to cross the border. Lesley says – Our inspection team has just come back from Turkey, where we checked on cattle transports at the Bulgarian border. We came back upset, disappointed and angry. Not a lot has changed compared to five years ago. We did accomplish a few things, but still everyday dozens of cattle transports are waiting for hours and sometimes even days, in the burning sun, to be allowed into Turkey.
Working personally in the EU aerospace industry involved with ‘Tornado’ aircraft for some 24 years https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/about-us/ , I have always been a pro-EU person. Unfortunately now; with the failures of animal welfare regulations right across the EU, I am in a position where at the referendum promised for the UK citizens by David Cameron; I will be voting for the UK to get out of Europe.
You may tell me that this will not help the animals of the EU – I reply by asking what actual help are you and your so-called ‘Parliament’ rule makers when we are currently witnessing the vast suffering of young calves being shipped all the way from Lithuania to Israel ? – the EU is failing the animals and animal welfare big time; and I personally hold people like you responsible for not enforcing the so called regulations that exist – 1/2005 et all on the transport of live animals.
Also, lets take the situation for stray animals in Serbia – for which my organisation was founded. https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/ As you can see from the many photographs https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/category/photographs-warning-animal-suffering/ and reports on my site; again the EU is not really doing anything regard animal welfare. The EU Enlargement Commission under Hahn makes all these statements about enforcing the ‘EU Rule of Law’ – a fundamental which must be shown by all accession states. And yet, for the last 11 years at least, Serbia has never enforced any of its rules of law regarding stray animal welfare. Here are a few samples from my site to show this:
And how does the EU reprimand Serbia for non enforcement of the rule of law ? – it hands out over 1 BILLION Euros to them as a sweetner for becoming a member of the almighty club !
What with this hunting illegally in Serbia, EU live animal trasnsport to not EU nations and so many other issues in the EU at this preset time; I think it fair to say that the EU has dramatically failed / is dramatically failing EU citizens. MEP’s such as yourselves are not ensuring that as ‘our representatives’, rules that currently exist are being enforced. Thus I ask what the point of MEP’s actually are ? – you are failing EU citizens by failing to enforce existing rules with current and new accession states; or even introduce into your little club new regulations which ban the export of live animals outside of the EU. In other words I question if you really care about any of it at all !
We all know that the Conservative party (badger killers, fox hunters, bee killers etc) does not actually care about animal welfare, despite their weasel words; but I at least expect better from some other parties. I appreciate the help that Catherine Bearder has given to live animal transport campaigning; and Mr Keith Taylor for his help and support with Balkans stray animals; but sadly there is very little action to help live animals being transported outside of the EU. As EoA investigators say – Not a lot has changed compared to five years ago.
I thus deduce that the EU MEP system has failed. Is there any reason to have people in jobs when they do not act to reflect the wishes of the citizens of Europe ?
For me personally and the UK supporters of my organisation; you have until the UK referendum on Europe to do something and stop the long distance transportation of live animals and to make your voice heard with Commission Hahn regarding Serbia NOT enforcing its own legislation – or its own rules of law. Animals should be slaughtered as near to their point of origin as possible, then with meat exports only being on the hook, not the hoof. The EU is failing animals and putting finance above welfare; and I personally am sickened by this and this approach.
Please enforce changes now or be prepared to walk out of the EU come the UK referendum. The people of the UK want action from people like you, not false ‘forever in the future’ promises that will happen many years down the line; if they ever happen at all.
Yours truly,
Mark Johnson
Founder ‘Serbian Animals Voice’
Date – 31st August 2015.
———————————————————————–
Venus has left a comment on the site; here is the full transcript as sent. Thank you Venus.
We hope that people take note of what is said.
Dear Mark,
I’ll try to respond to your letter, as if I were an honest European Parliament Member.
Not one that was elected by EU citizens to earn 12,000 euros a month (at least) without bringing any benefit for it.
The European Union is the Lobby-factory of the agricultural industry.
These agribusiness knows no other purpose than to maximize their profits. It is active, where the profit is greatest.
Examples: piglets are born in Holland, fattened in Spain and slaughtered in Italy.
In this respect, animals are regarded as a profitable source, and therefore the trucks take the living charge to where the money sounds.
No matter how, injured, maimed, bleeding, half-dead or dead, the goods and the money has to be delivered.
Over thousands of kilometers, the EU Commission pays subsidies to support a lucrative business with death and suffering.
As it had promised to the agricultural industry before the elections.
To ensure its voters for the next elections, the EU has introduced some bogus rules: determining the ceiling height, transport breaks, soaking duty, etc. Rules that are never kept, and when they are discovered, the perpetrators come with ridiculous penalties thereof.
No MEP has any interest to improve the transport of animals, to stop the Dog Catcher Mafia in Romania, or to punish the violations of the Serbs against the animal rights before the country enters the EU.
Concerns depend on the highest profits, the business with the transport of animals must be running as well as in all economic sectors.
2,438,306,132 animals are transported annually as a commodity throughout Europe. Humanly seen a disgrace to the 21st century.
For the EU band just a statistic, a number.
And a profitable performance for the agricultural Mafia as promised !!
This is the situation of the EU institution of the 21st century.
By the way, a shame also.
There is an effective method against these two kinds of shame: stop eating meat, and do not go in the EU elections.
No citizen should be used as a useful idiot so MEPs deserves every month what an average citizen earns in the year and with hard work.
Namely, in order to do nothing (at best).
Regards
Venus
Filed under: CAMPAIGNS - Global Animal Welfare Issues, GENERAL NEWS - International / National / Regional, LETTERS, PHOTOGRAPHS - **WARNING** (Animal Suffering), The "Serbian Animals Voice (SAV) ALLIANCE | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 29, 2015 by Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)
Posted on August 25, 2015 by Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

Dear colleagues working in animal-welfare,
Please find attached a letter that we sent to the French Minister of Agriculture. We do not ask that you take any action, but that you are aware of our observations. We hope to hear back from the French authorities in due time.
With best wishes,
Lesley Moffat
—
Lesley Moffat, MSc Ethology
Eyes on Animals – Director
More reasons to stop the live transportation of animals over long distances !
—————————–
Past SAV posts showing links to Lesley and EoA:
I have had the real pleasure of working with the excellent Lesley regarding live animal transport work in the recent past.
Please also go to ‘About Us’ https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/about-us/ to see our work for the EU regarding an investigation report series into live calf transports.
Mark – SAV.
Filed under: CAMPAIGNS - Global Animal Welfare Issues, DOCUMENTS, GENERAL NEWS - International / National / Regional, LETTERS, PHOTOGRAPHS - **WARNING** (Animal Suffering) | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 22, 2015 by Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)


Hi Mark ,
I continue with cases : Turtle dove, massacre, North of Serbia, hunting clubs Jazovo.
Display hunting turtle doves in the North of Vojvodina, near by Kikinda, hunting clubs Jazovo who preyed upon the special nature reserves – “Pastures of great bustard”, in a zone of the reserve, where hunting is forbidden by law to the Decree of the Government of Republic of Serbia on the Protection of Special Nature Reserve, “Pastures of great bustard” Mokrin (Official Gazette of RS No.37 / 97).
The first hunt for which we filed the charge took place 26.08.2010. That same day in the evening, a large flock of turtle doves in migration were attempting to land to feed in the fields of sunflowers, get watered and then move to lands on sleeping in a nearby small forest, which is planted for this purpose.
They were chased and the Italian hunters and a few local hunters took lots of them. For those few hours, in a desperate flocks of turtle doves to feed, water and rest, hunters, according to a report of the hunting inspector killed 420 birds.

It was dark, and many did not see anything; they were not picked up, the dozens of dead birds; and several dozen left wounded on the ground to die overnight.
After the hunt , our associate who lives on the reservation, Joca Jančić, went to the place and saw a horrible scene, the field was covered with corpses of the birds and he also saw many wounded turtle doves that had dragged themselves around after being shot, at least 40 – 50 birds. Several turtle doves who were less injured were picked up and taken home to recuperate from the stress of what they had endured. Unfortunately only one of those rescued and taken away survived, the poison of the hunters lead in the bullets / shot which is absorbed by the blood causing a slow and suffering death. The one dove which survived eventually recovered after about 3 weeks and then was freed to continue its migration because they are smaller flocks that fly further South.



The Hunting inspector who acted according to our report wrote that hunters killed 420 turtle doves and they themselves determine that they can kill 500, so for her it was all right / ok. The fact that they were hunting in a prohibited place was not even considered, so nothing further was done regarding this at all – nothing !
From that whole flocks of doves undertaking a migratory flight, only one survived. A few photos from the scene (and shown here – SAV) show exactly what it looked like. Total shock, our correspondent managed to make a few pictures, the rest of the time was looking for birds in better condition / who were still alive to try to save them. Most were already dead or were facing death due to being shot but not killed by the hunters.

We have a record of hunting inspector on the hunt, but he is archived, and if need be I will find him.
The next year, hunting association Jazovo again organized hunting turtle doves in the same place on 2 occasions; 41 turtle doves were killed during the first hunt on 24.08.2011, and they killed 84 turtle dove on the second hunt. The hunting and mass killings were again undertaken in a place which according to the Serbian law is prohibited for hunting.

We have submitted the application for the other hunt of 27.08.2011. This was interrupted because the reserve guard, who was an associate of us, watched the hunting and reported it immediately, he called the police etc. The guard reserve, Zeljko Reljin, his report is shown at the end of this post, was fired from his work and he does not work any more as guardian of the reserve.
This is the corruption of the system – a reserve guard reports illegal activity by the hunters and he is the one who ends up losing his job whilst the hunting continues !
The report of the hunting inspector is also attached of the hunt from 2011, where you can see that for her it is all OK. It reports the guardian and pretends that he did not know that any hunting, including hunting turtle doves banned in A zone of the reserve called great bustard..
Then we filed a complaint about the work of the hunting inspector Ljiljana Bucalo Latinovic. In her record, according to the Italians, they issued receipt for turtle doves that were killed, birds officially according to EU law they can not take out of Serbia but were somehow presented.
After high alert about hunting turtle doves, 2012. Hunting was prohibited in the reserve, but the migratory birds were hunted elsewhere. This time, the flocks of doves migrating were smaller and smaller.
Thus, as described here, so being hunted turtle dove and quail everywhere in Serbia. Everything else is a lie.
Below is the complaint about the work of the hunting inspector, and we have since back to 2010.all the papers, just all in very large archives, and as I said, if you need, to find them and scan for SAV, we can find.
In the next sending I’ll find some case of quail hunting with decoys, or bird hunting nets. All this is happening now, as I write this, throughout Serbia. We have a lot of information about the poaching received from associates but it is difficult to arrive everywhere at the right time.




Regards V.
SAV comment:
Serbian authorities are not enforcing the rule of law as required for new EU membership nations. You do not fire a park / reserve ranger who reports hunters undertaking their blood lust in illegal no hunt areas; but the authorities appear to think this is ok; no doubt in conjunction with the hunts.
We are in the final stages now of our first report to the EU, which will cover several issues including all our hunting information. We will show the EU Parliament and Commission that Serbia is NOT enforcing the rule of law and as such is not worthy of EU membership. If Serbia wants to join the EU, then it has to stop all this government / authority / hunter / police corruption and start to show that they are actually prosecuting people for events which deserve it.
This is just the very start – Serbia is in for one big shock if it even becomes a member of the EU in future. EU animal welfare organisations, who are very strong in Europe, will go ballistic at the current events; and they will be head hunting all those in authority. It has been done in Romania, it will be done in Serbia.
People who call themselves ‘politicians’ and who may consider themselves immune from prosecution will have a change of face the day Serbia joins the EU. Those who currently turn a blind eye to the undertakings of the hunters, including the police; will themselves be hunted and prosecuted through the EU by the EU animal welfare movement.
Not a possibility, but a promise !!
Filed under: CAMPAIGNS - Global Animal Welfare Issues, DOCUMENTS, GENERAL NEWS - International / National / Regional, HUNTING - Primarily UK and Germany, LETTERS, PHOTOGRAPHS - **WARNING** (Animal Suffering) | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 18, 2015 by Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

Link:
RECOMMENDATION on measures to protect wildlife in hunting areas during periods of adverse weather conditions
Users of hunting in areas with adverse weather conditions, it is recommended that, in consultation with the competent hunting inspector:
-
reinforce control of the general condition of wildlife and its habitat in the hunting grounds and take all necessary measures for the protection of wildlife, primarily measures: continuous provision of water in the bushes, protect wildlife from illegal hunting, protection and conservation of habitats, as well as other statutory measures,
-
take the necessary measures to prevent damage caused by wildlife on the property of legal entities and individuals, to educate the local population with regard to measures taken to protect the property from damage that can by game, and to take the necessary measures regarding the prevention of damage to wildlife,
-
activate the available human and material resources to the prevention of a possible fire, as well as to assist in extinguishing the fire site active, always taking care of wildlife in hunting grounds.
We should also pay attention to the education of the local population about the dangers and risks of unsolicited and uncontrolled burning stubble fields, reeds, grasses and other vegetation in the hunting grounds.
In conditions of high temperature, pay particular attention to the proper handling of harvested game (move, transfer, or transportation of the hunted game, with the pertinent parts of the city with the shooting in the hunting ground to the place of official controls) and taking measures to manipulation and transport is performed according to the procedure and the way safe for human health.
————————————————-

Hi Mark,
Hunting quail and turtle doves, migratory species is in full force. Also on the dove and wood pigeon, wild boar and roe deer, fox hunting lasts all year.
Hunters widely used BANNED electronic decoys for Quail. Therefore, killing large numbers of quail that gather around the decoy. (electronic sound invocation, same like voice of quail. ) You know what is this?
After our letters to the Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection – Directorate for Forests of 7 August 2015 to suspend the hunt for natural disasters, finally published the poor text “Recommendations on measures to protect wildlife in hunting areas during periods of adverse weather conditions.” 12. August 2015.
How they write “unfavorable weather conditions” hunting is suspended, clearly states in Article 76, paragraph 1 Count 1. Law on Wildlife and Hunting (Official Gazette No. 18/2010).
From 1 July to 16 August 2015. mean daily temperatures were below 31 C, still about 35 C, even during July and up to 40 C, without rain. Yesterday, 17.08. outside temperature dropped to slightly below 30 C and little rain fell in Serbia, reporting to the media about the decay of the crop and the drought and the problems that people have because of natural disasters.
It was not initiated by the Forest Administration to comply with the law and the protection of wild animals from the hunting and persecution and harassment, but to protect hunting associations and hunting lobby that will trap quail and turtledove and earn a lots of money.
From which we can draw the conclusion that the laws are not respected and enforced.
Attached you can see what we wrote Forestry Administration. Use Google translation. 🙂
After all, it is clear that it will not comply with the Act, we filed criminal charges against the responsible civil servants in the Directorate for Forests ..
After finish the rest of the EU Commission, we must prepare a text about everything that’s going on here, 18 of the 25 EU countries hunting quail and turtledove is banned, Serbia is a migratory corridor and this savagery can not be tolerated. Albania has completely banned hunting and as I heard the ban will be extended to 2019. good.
We did not Cyprus, Malta or Lebanon. Migration is one of the strongest instincts of migratory birds and is very hard for them, is not humane and it is not acceptable to kill them during migration. Of course, it is not humane nor necessary to kill anyone but the reality is harsh.
I hope you’ll help us around the text.
In the next email, I’ll prepare for you and SAV, photos Massacre songbirds, 2 Italians, 89 birds, a couple of hours morning.
The two Italians were caught, and the day before they are caught, we know that because we have information, that they kill songbirds, they were in the south of Serbia in Bujanovac. That day they killed nearly 400 birds, that police did not even want to look and found no corpses. After more than 2 years we have received the documents from the case of the prosecution Vranje.
Were punished symbolically 4 policemen, the chief of hunting Bujanovac who hid the slain bird and the driver of the Italians.
Through Interpol, the two Italians have been found in Italy and gave statements, just as we heard that was going on, they are paid on all hands, and went and killed what they want and are doing, so for years.
Our prosecution did not know or did not want to apply a fine nor compensation for slaughtered birds, which then amounted to about 15,000 euros.
For hunting, they used an illicit gun with five bullets, and so they made a massacre.
Since then, year 2012. they do not come to Serbia.
p.s. Please fix mistakes, if something is not clear, I’ll explain.
Kind Regards
V.
Filed under: CAMPAIGNS - Global Animal Welfare Issues, GENERAL NEWS - International / National / Regional, HUNTING - Primarily UK and Germany, LETTERS, SERBIA (Central Serbia: Capital - Belgrade) and (Serbia | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 25, 2015 by Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)


SAV Comment
What a pity that a large organisation such as this has to put profit before animal welfare. Should they not be using their obvious large global sales influence to put further pressure on the Chinese regarding all their animal abuse legislation ? – including asking them to undertake new Chinese legislation that prevents animal cruelty in order to make women look (allegedly) more beautiful ?
To us this is an ultimate hypocrisy from an organisation that was one given some credit and respect. All this has now been lost by their new actions in China. Maybe they should have a catwalk at the next Yulin festival where all their beautiful people can gorge themselves on the meats of street dogs that have been slaughtered barbarically.
Beautiful people ? – we dont think so.
Keep watching the news to see what happens. We will give any updates we know about this in the future.
———————————————–
PETA direct link to protest letter (to send):

Victoria’s Secret, a formerly cruelty-free company, recently confirmed that it will now be selling cosmetics in China, a country that requires painful and deadly tests on animals for cosmetics.

Suffering for Victoria’s Secret ‘Beautiful People’ !!

It’s clear that the only “angels” associated with Victoria’s Secret are the sweet animals who will die on the company’s dime.
For all animals,


After years of not testing on animals, the company has confirmed that it will begin selling in China—meaning it will pay for cruel tests on animals!
Although the company fully understands the Chinese government’s requirements for tests on animals for cosmetics, it has chosen to enter this market anyway.
Victoria’s Secret has been removed from PETA’s list of companies that don’t test on animals, and will find itself on PETA’s list of companies that do test on animals until it chooses compassion over cruelty.
Fortunately, PETA has received pledges from other companies—including The Body Shop, Urban Decay, NYX Cosmetics, Yes To Inc., and more—that they will never sell in China while animal tests are required.
Please tell Victoria’s Secret that cruelty isn’t sexy and that you won’t buy its products until the company is 100 percent cruelty-free again.
PETA direct link to protest letter (to send):


Filed under: CAMPAIGNS - Global Animal Welfare Issues, GENERAL NEWS - International / National / Regional, GLOBAL PETITIONS - Anything Animal, Anywhere !, LETTERS, PHOTOGRAPHS - **WARNING** (Animal Suffering), The "Serbian Animals Voice (SAV) ALLIANCE | Leave a comment »