Hi Mark,
Our original charge is in link below and there is here below a translation to English, this is our charge in this case .:
Regards
Slavica
——
Prijava5.9.2014.GradSub.6,7
Ministry of Agriculture-Veterinary Directorate, Belgrade – to conduct and submit for proceeding
Republican veterinary inspection, Subotica – to conduct
05/09/2014
On the hands of the Chief, Mr. Pižurica Aleksandar and all who are superior over him, and responsible under Article 76 of the Animal Welfare Law
CHARGE
that City Subotica has no legitimate Program to control the population of stray dogs and cats because the same contains illegal measures listed under Sections 6 and 7, nor has the conditions for the legal treatment of abandoned pets which it captures and holds because the accommodation capacity of the city shelter at the address Ganjo Sor 134 as such prevents the lawful treatment of animals.
City of Subotica is the holder of dogs and cats kept in the city shelter. It is responsible for the welfare of these animals, and Republican Veterinary Inspection, Subotica is responsible for the supervision of that welfare and the legality of the animal keeping.
Dear Sir,
First, we turn to you so you can’t say you didn’t know, yet you are obliged to know.
Here, the local politicians and some close to them photographed themselves in the recently opened city shelter, yet everything still goes in circles: they still have illegal bylaws, the number of irresponsible pet keepers remained the same, led by the City that is the holder of the animals in the city shelter. For animals everything remains the same. There are new politicians in power, some were here all the time, thriving on the bodies of dead pets that they first hold in cages and operate them more or less successfully – for money or they let them massacre among themselves – either way the money goes to them, to everyone who is in that chain, the money is coming from the city budget, the state budget and from the Capital Investment Fund of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina –
MILLIONS.
They write nonsense, they work illegally, and you tolerate it despite the law that mandates what you are required to do on behalf of the Ministry, and you do not do it. You are accomplice in the crime under Article 269 of the Criminal Code of the Republic Serbia (and the perpetrator of a criminal offense under Article 234 of the Criminal Code RS) – they catch over 4,000 dogs and place them in the facility of accommodation capacity 90 and later 170 dogs. Each year they catch 800-900 new stray dogs and cats, again and again from 2006 until the date when the city shelter lost its license, but now it will do the same again.
So, who can say that the City of Subotica fulfilled the orders of Veterinary and Animal Welfare Law and who can even issue a permit for the operation of the city asylum? Did you: RVI Subotica alone gave the permission for it, or you did it on urgency from the top? Whose?
We need this information to file a criminal complaint.
http://www.yueco.rs/vest/dru-tvo/azil-for-dogs-re-work
This is a political and profiteering move because there is no connection with the law, the interests of citizens, not to mention the interests of the animals, it has nothing to do with the conditions, not even with the Regulation for the shelters for this kind of animals, but we reasonably suspect that it has to do with abuse of authority / official position.
This is not a private shelter that may have the accommodation capacity on the desire and possibilities of its owner, but it is a city shelter that MUST, in order to obtain a work permit: MUST meet all that is required by the Law and Regulations, plus it MUST have the accommodation capacity that is as big as the specific needs of the City of Subotica are. That data can be reached by analyzing the previous period, the last few years, but not in the way where the mayor or Mr. from RVI make each other’s documented favor.
The specificity of Subotica is the following: on the street arrive the new 800 dogs every year, and it indicates the number of citizens who are in category of people the City must eliminate from the circle by legal punishments, otherwise the city won’t be able to provide the lawful treatment to the new 800 dogs who come in every year. Since it isn’t done that way, they rather have ILLEGAL PROGRAM under Article 54 of the Animal Welfare Act, which enables them to have free hands for illegal activities – all paid by taxpayers and thus City allows the survival and flourishing of irresponsible pet holders, including the City itself, and obtaining illegal profit for many people. So, these people did open (thanks to RVI Subotica), not the city shelter, but the object that is the facade/mask for unlawful acquisition of profit (and as always, the one who provides the logistics for this illegal way also makes a profit).
What does the following allegation mean: “aggressive” dogs are held back in the dirty part of the shelter? Is it for a reason not to let the media and the public inside this “dirty part”? Is that what you allowed them?
That is not the purpose of the “dirty part/section”.
And where are the cats kept? What is their accommodation capacity?
Provide us with a copy of the record of the procedure and a copy of the Decision by which you allowed the City to use the facility of accommodation capacity 170-200 dogs for the job of capturing 800 pets per year regarding which the City signs a contract with its company “Čistoća i Zelenilo” and thus ensures the flow of money from the city and republican budget as well as from the Capital Investment Fund of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina – all made possible by RVI Subotica.
Regardless of the media halo given by the Mayor at the grand opening of the city shelter, we require that RVI completes the inspection over the acts of the City – a legal entity that is a holder of abandoned dogs and cats, in accordance with this charge, because the same acts of the City are illegal.
EPAR /Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9
Budi vegan-spasi sebe i Planetu
—– Original Message —–
From: EPAR
To: vetinsp@eunet.rs ; Uprava za veterinu
Cc: premijer A.Vucic
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 6:15 PM
Subject: RVI Sub omogucuje krsenje Zak o dobrobiti/Prijava5.9.2014.
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede-Uprava za veterinu , Beograd
RVI , Subotica
Na ruke Nacelnika, gospodina .Pizurica Aleksandra
5.9.2014.
PRIJAVA da Grad Subotica nema zakonit Program kontrole populacije napustenih pasa i macaka , niti ima uslove za zakonito postupanje prema napustenim kucnim ljubimcima koje hvata i drzi jer je smestajni kapacitet gradskog prihvatilista ,Ganjo sor 134 takav da onemogucuje zakonit tretmnan zivotinja
Grad Subotica je drzalac pasa i macaka koje drzi u gradskom azilu- odgovoran je za dobrobit tih zivotinja , a RVI Subotica je odgovorna za NADZOR te dobrobiti i zakonitosti drzanja
Postovani gospodine
Najpre se obracamo Vama , da posle ne kazete da niste znali, a duzni ste znati
Evo islikali su se lokalni politicari i neki njima bliski, i opet sve ide u krug, i dalje imaju nezakonite podzakonske akte, ostao je isti broj neodgovornih drzalaca kucnih ljubimaca , na celu s Gradom koji je drzalac zivotinja u gradskom azilu. Zivotinjama sve ostaje isto.Dosli su novi politicari na vlast, a neki su tu celo vreme – vlast , grebu se na lesevima kucnih ljubimaca koje najpre drze u tim kavezima i izoperisu manje ili vise uspesno – za pare ili ih puste da se sami medjusobno pokolju – njima opet idu pare , svima u lancu kojem pristizu pare iz gradskog budzeta , iz republickog budzeta i iz , FKU APV – MILIONI ; pisu nebuloze, rade nezakonito , a vi to tolerisete uprkos Zakona koji nalaze sta ste duzni raditi u ime Ministartsva , vi to ne radite , saucesnici ste u KD po clanu 269.KZ RS ( a pocinitelj KD po clanu 234 KZ RS ) – oni uhvate preko 4000 , i stave u objekat smestajnog kapaciteta 90, pa 170; svake godine uhvate novih do 800-900 napustenih pasa i macaka , opet i opet od 2006. do zabrane, a sad ce opet .
Dakle ko moze da kaze da je Grad Subotica ispunio naloge Zakona o vet i Zak o dobrobiti i da mu cak izda dozvolu za rad gradskog azila , da li ste vi : RVI Subotica , sami ste im za to dalu dozvolu, ili ste to uradili na urgenciju s vrha? Ciju ? Treba nam taj podatak za KP .
http://www.yueco.rs/vest/dru-tvo/azil-za-pse-ponovo-radi
Politikantski i profiterski potez, jer nema veze sa zakonima, sa interesima gradjana , a o interesima zivotinja da ni ne govorimo jer ih nema , nema veze ni s uslovima,ni s Pravilnikom o prihvastilistima za ove vrste zivotinja , ali opravdano sumnjamo da ima veze sa zloupotrebom sluzbenog polozaja .
To nije privatni azil koji moze imati smestajni kapacitet po zelji i mogucnostima vlasnika tog privatnog azila, nego je ovo gradski azil koji MORA , da bi dobio dozvolu za rad : MORA zadovoljavati sve sto nalaze Zakon i Pravilnik , tj.MORA imati : onoliki smestajni kapacitet koliki je specificna potreba Grada Subotica- smestajni kapacitet specifican za Grad Suboticu , a do tog podatka se dolazi analizom prethodnog perioda, prethodnik nekoliko godina , a ne tako sto se g.Gradonacelnik ili g. RVI ili obojica lupe po svom stomaku i ucine jedan drugom Simoninijevski dokumentovanu uslugu ( vidi :Prasko groblje-Umberto Eko).
Specificnost Grada Subotica jeste sledece: na ulice stize novih 800 godisnje , to ukazuje na broj gradjana koji cine kategoriju koju Grad mora kaznjavanjem eliminisati iz tog kruga ,inace Grad ne moze omoguciti zakonit tretman svake godine novih 800 , a to ne rade nego imaju NEZAKONIT PROGRAM po clanu 54.Zak o dobrobiti, kojim sebi daju odresene ruke za nezakonite radnje – sve placaju poreski obveznici , i time Grad omogucuje opstanak i cvetanje neodgovornih drzalaca u koje i sam Grad spada , i pribavljanje nezakonite dobiti mnogima – dakle ovi jesu otvorili, – zahvaljujuci RVI Subotica ,ali ne gradski azil nego objekat koji je fasada -maska za nezakonito pribavljanje dobiti drugome ( a kao i uvek : onaj ko daje logistiku za nezakonit put : omogucuje i sebi ).
Sta znaci navod: da “agresivne“ pse drze pozadi u prljavom delu ? Zato da u taj “prljavi deo“ imaju obrazlozenje ne pustati novinare ni javnost ? To ste im vi dozvolili ? Prljavi deo ne sluzi tome .
I gde drze macke ? Smestajni kapacitet?
Dostavite nam uz kopiju zapisnika o postupanju po ovoj Prijavi , i kopiju Resenja kojim ste Gradu dozvolili koriscenje objekta smestajnog kapaciteta 170-200 za poslove hvatanja godisnje 800 kucnih ljubimaca u vezi kojih sklapa Ugovor sa svojom firmom JKP“Cistoca i zelenilo“ i time obezbedjuje tokove novca iz gradskog i rep budzeta i iz FKU APV – sto je sve omogucila RVI Subotica .
Bez obzira na medijski oreol koji je otvaranju gradskog prihvatilista dao Gradonacelnik , zahtevamo da RVI izvrsi inspekcijski nadzor nad postupanjima Grada , u skladu s ovom Prijavom, jer su ista nezakonita .
EPAR /Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9
Budi vegan-spasi sebe i Planetu
Filed under: CAMPAIGNS - Global Animal Welfare Issues, GENERAL NEWS - International / National / Regional, LETTERS, SERBIA (Central Serbia: Capital - Belgrade) and (Serbia | Leave a comment »
Serbian Animals Voice (SAV) 