Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

Hi Mark,

Our original charge is in link below  and there is here below a  translation to English,  this is our charge  in this case .:

Regards

Slavica

——

 Prijava5.9.2014.GradSub.6,7

 

Ministry of Agriculture-Veterinary Directorate, Belgrade – to conduct and submit for proceeding

Republican veterinary inspection, Subotica – to conduct

05/09/2014

 

On the hands of the Chief, Mr. Pižurica Aleksandar and all who are superior over him, and responsible under Article 76 of the Animal Welfare Law

 

CHARGE

that City Subotica has no legitimate Program to control the population of stray dogs and cats because the same contains illegal measures listed under Sections 6 and 7, nor has the conditions for the legal treatment of abandoned pets which it captures and holds because the accommodation capacity of the city shelter at the address Ganjo Sor 134 as such prevents the lawful treatment of animals.

City of Subotica is the holder of dogs and cats kept in the city shelter. It is responsible for the welfare of these animals, and Republican Veterinary Inspection, Subotica is responsible for the supervision of that welfare and the legality of the animal keeping.

 

Dear Sir,

First, we turn to you so you can’t say you didn’t know, yet you are obliged to know.

Here, the local politicians and some close to them photographed themselves in the recently opened city shelter, yet everything still goes in circles: they still have illegal bylaws, the number of irresponsible pet keepers remained the same, led by the City that is the holder of the animals in the city shelter. For animals everything remains the same. There are new politicians in power, some were here all the time, thriving on the bodies of dead pets that they first hold in cages and operate them more or less successfully – for money or they let them massacre among themselves – either way the money goes to them, to everyone who is in that chain, the money is coming from the city budget, the state budget and from the Capital Investment Fund of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina –

MILLIONS.

They write nonsense, they work illegally, and you tolerate it despite the law that mandates what you are required to do on behalf of the Ministry, and you do not do it. You are accomplice in the crime under Article 269 of the Criminal Code of the Republic Serbia (and the perpetrator of a criminal offense under Article 234 of the Criminal Code RS) – they catch over 4,000 dogs and place them in the facility of accommodation capacity 90 and later 170 dogs. Each year they catch 800-900 new stray dogs and cats, again and again from 2006 until the date when the city shelter lost its license, but now it will do the same again.

So, who can say that the City of Subotica fulfilled the orders of Veterinary and Animal Welfare Law and who can even issue a permit for the operation of the city asylum? Did you: RVI Subotica alone gave the permission for it, or you did it on urgency from the top?   Whose?

We need this information to file a criminal complaint.

http://www.yueco.rs/vest/dru-tvo/azil-for-dogs-re-work

This is a political and profiteering move because there is no connection with the law, the interests of citizens, not to mention the interests of the animals, it has nothing to do with the conditions, not even with the Regulation for the shelters for this kind of animals, but we reasonably suspect that it has to do with abuse of authority / official position.

This is not a private shelter that may have the accommodation capacity on the desire and possibilities of its owner, but it is a city shelter that MUST, in order to obtain a work permit: MUST meet all that is required by the Law and Regulations, plus it MUST have the accommodation capacity that is as big as the specific needs of the City of Subotica are. That data can be reached by analyzing the previous period, the last few years, but not in the way where the mayor or Mr. from RVI make each other’s documented favor.

The specificity of Subotica is the following: on the street arrive the new 800 dogs every year, and it indicates the number of citizens who are  in category of people the City must eliminate from the circle by legal punishments, otherwise the city won’t be able to provide the lawful treatment to the new 800 dogs who come in every year. Since it isn’t done that way, they rather have ILLEGAL PROGRAM under Article 54 of the Animal Welfare Act, which enables them to have free hands for illegal activities – all paid by taxpayers and thus City allows the survival and flourishing of irresponsible pet holders, including the City itself, and obtaining illegal profit for many people. So, these people did open (thanks to RVI Subotica), not the city shelter, but the object that is the facade/mask for unlawful acquisition of profit (and as always, the one who provides the logistics for this illegal way also makes a profit).

What does the following allegation mean: “aggressive” dogs are held back in the dirty part of the shelter? Is it for a reason not to let the media and the public inside this “dirty part”? Is that what you allowed them?

That is not the purpose of the “dirty part/section”.

And where are the cats kept? What is their accommodation capacity?

Provide us with a copy of the record of the procedure and a copy of the Decision by which you allowed the City to use the facility of accommodation capacity 170-200 dogs for the job of capturing 800 pets per year regarding which the City signs a contract with its company “Čistoća i Zelenilo” and thus ensures the flow of money from the city and republican budget as well as from the Capital Investment Fund of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina – all made possible by RVI  Subotica.

Regardless of the media halo given by the Mayor at the grand opening of the city shelter, we require that RVI completes the inspection over the acts of the City – a legal entity that is a holder of abandoned dogs and cats, in accordance with this charge, because the same acts of the City are illegal.

EPAR /Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi

24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9
Budi vegan-spasi sebe i Planetu

—– Original Message —–

From: EPAR

To: vetinsp@eunet.rs ; Uprava za veterinu

Cc: premijer A.Vucic

Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 6:15 PM

Subject: RVI Sub omogucuje krsenje Zak o dobrobiti/Prijava5.9.2014.

 

Ministarstvo poljoprivrede-Uprava za veterinu , Beograd

RVI , Subotica

Na ruke Nacelnika, gospodina  .Pizurica Aleksandra

5.9.2014.

PRIJAVA   da Grad  Subotica  nema zakonit Program kontrole populacije  napustenih pasa i macaka , niti  ima uslove za zakonito postupanje prema napustenim kucnim ljubimcima koje hvata i drzi  jer je  smestajni kapacitet   gradskog prihvatilista  ,Ganjo sor 134  takav da onemogucuje  zakonit tretmnan zivotinja

Grad Subotica  je drzalac pasa i macaka koje drzi u gradskom azilu- odgovoran je za dobrobit  tih zivotinja , a RVI  Subotica je odgovorna za NADZOR  te dobrobiti i zakonitosti  drzanja

Postovani gospodine

Najpre se obracamo Vama , da posle ne kazete da niste znali, a duzni ste znati

Evo islikali su se lokalni politicari i neki njima bliski, i opet sve ide u krug, i dalje imaju nezakonite podzakonske akte,  ostao je isti broj neodgovornih drzalaca kucnih ljubimaca , na celu s Gradom  koji je drzalac zivotinja u gradskom azilu. Zivotinjama sve  ostaje isto.Dosli su novi politicari  na vlast, a neki su tu celo vreme – vlast , grebu  se na  lesevima kucnih ljubimaca  koje najpre drze u tim kavezima  i izoperisu  manje ili vise uspesno – za pare ili ih puste da se sami medjusobno pokolju – njima opet idu pare , svima u lancu  kojem pristizu pare iz gradskog budzeta , iz republickog budzeta i iz  , FKU APV  – MILIONI   ;   pisu nebuloze, rade nezakonito ,  a vi to  tolerisete uprkos Zakona koji  nalaze sta ste duzni raditi  u ime Ministartsva , vi to ne radite , saucesnici ste u KD  po clanu 269.KZ RS (  a pocinitelj KD po clanu 234 KZ RS ) –  oni  uhvate preko 4000 , i stave u objekat smestajnog kapaciteta 90, pa  170; svake godine  uhvate novih do 800-900 napustenih pasa i macaka , opet i opet od 2006. do zabrane, a sad ce opet .

Dakle  ko moze da kaze da je Grad Subotica  ispunio  naloge Zakona o vet i Zak o dobrobiti  i da mu  cak izda dozvolu za rad  gradskog azila ,  da li  ste vi : RVI Subotica , sami  ste im za to dalu dozvolu, ili ste to uradili  na urgenciju s vrha? Ciju ?   Treba nam   taj podatak za KP .

 

http://www.yueco.rs/vest/dru-tvo/azil-za-pse-ponovo-radi

Politikantski  i profiterski  potez, jer nema veze sa  zakonima, sa interesima  gradjana , a o interesima zivotinja  da  ni ne govorimo jer ih nema , nema veze  ni  s uslovima,ni s Pravilnikom  o prihvastilistima za ove vrste zivotinja , ali  opravdano sumnjamo da ima veze sa zloupotrebom sluzbenog polozaja .

To nije privatni azil koji moze imati  smestajni kapacitet po zelji i mogucnostima  vlasnika tog  privatnog azila, nego je  ovo gradski azil koji MORA , da bi dobio dozvolu za rad : MORA   zadovoljavati  sve sto nalaze Zakon i Pravilnik , tj.MORA imati : onoliki  smestajni kapacitet koliki je specificna potreba Grada Subotica- smestajni kapacitet specifican za Grad Suboticu  , a do tog podatka se  dolazi analizom prethodnog perioda, prethodnik nekoliko godina  , a ne tako sto se g.Gradonacelnik  ili g. RVI   ili obojica lupe  po svom stomaku i ucine jedan drugom  Simoninijevski dokumentovanu  uslugu  ( vidi :Prasko groblje-Umberto Eko).

Specificnost Grada Subotica  jeste sledece: na ulice stize novih  800 godisnje , to ukazuje na broj gradjana koji cine kategoriju koju Grad mora  kaznjavanjem eliminisati iz tog kruga ,inace Grad  ne moze omoguciti zakonit tretman svake godine novih 800 ,  a to ne rade nego  imaju NEZAKONIT PROGRAM po clanu 54.Zak o dobrobiti, kojim sebi daju odresene ruke za nezakonite radnje – sve  placaju poreski obveznici , i  time Grad  omogucuje opstanak i cvetanje  neodgovornih drzalaca u koje i sam Grad spada , i pribavljanje  nezakonite dobiti  mnogima – dakle  ovi jesu otvorili, – zahvaljujuci  RVI Subotica ,ali ne  gradski azil nego objekat koji je  fasada -maska za nezakonito pribavljanje dobiti drugome ( a kao i uvek :  onaj ko  daje logistiku za nezakonit put : omogucuje i sebi ).

Sta znaci  navod: da  “agresivne“ pse  drze pozadi u prljavom delu ?  Zato da u taj “prljavi deo“ imaju  obrazlozenje ne pustati novinare  ni javnost ? To ste im vi dozvolili ? Prljavi deo ne sluzi tome .

I gde drze macke ? Smestajni kapacitet?

Dostavite nam  uz kopiju zapisnika  o postupanju po ovoj Prijavi ,  i kopiju Resenja kojim ste  Gradu dozvolili koriscenje objekta smestajnog kapaciteta 170-200  za poslove hvatanja godisnje  800 kucnih ljubimaca u vezi kojih sklapa Ugovor sa svojom  firmom JKP“Cistoca i zelenilo“ i  time obezbedjuje tokove novca iz  gradskog i rep budzeta i iz FKU APV – sto je sve omogucila RVI Subotica .

Bez obzira na medijski oreol koji je otvaranju gradskog prihvatilista dao Gradonacelnik , zahtevamo da  RVI  izvrsi  inspekcijski nadzor nad postupanjima Grada , u skladu s ovom Prijavom, jer su ista nezakonita .

EPAR /Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi

24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9
Budi vegan-spasi sebe i Planetu

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed under: CAMPAIGNS - Global Animal Welfare Issues, GENERAL NEWS - International / National / Regional, LETTERS, SERBIA (Central Serbia: Capital - Belgrade) and (Serbia |