13th June – Exclusive Photographs of the “Death Row” Sombor Dogs Awaiting Killing by T-61

Below are exclusive photographs of some of the dogs which were held for months at the Sombor pound, and which over the last few days have all been killed. (see our report from yesterday, 12th June).

The photographs were taken before a ban was introduced and padlocks were fitted on the doors to prevent campaigners from entering. 

These pictures show some dogs which have been held since February.  All have now been killed T-61, a drug which paralyses the respiratory system and causes suffocation. 

We are sickened that rather than give treatment and the care required, the vets killed the animals using T-61. 

Now, today, Shinters are back out on the streets looking for the next set of dogs to catch and take to this pound, and which will be destroyed in the same way by veterinarians !

Serbian people are ashamed because they are the taxpayers who are funding this crime.

 

 Very, Very Cramped Conditions

 Yes, Very Cramped

 

 

 

 

 

 Awaiting Death by T-61

 

Death by a Veterinarian.

12th June – Veterinarian Mrs. Dubravka Dusanic has Killed the Dogs held at the Sombor Pound

Please refer to  https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2008/06/07/7th-june-photographs-of-the-city-pound-suffering-at-sombor/

 

 

 

 

 

12th June 2008

 

News in from Slavica

EPAR/OIPA /Alliance for Animal Rights/SAV/GAARP

 

Dear friends;

I must report you this very, very sad news.

 

Veterinarian Mrs. Dubravka Dusanic has killed all the dogs at Sombor`s city pound, all those poor victims who were in those small  dirty cages in front of eyes of  whole World.

And  they catch still today several new dogs.

It is very sad fate of these dogs who were in these tiny cages from February  2008 until the day of  their  murder. When activists of APS  ZOV  were today  in the city pound  they  found  empty  cages and workers washing out the empty cages in preparation for the next new batch of innocent victims.

 

They killed all dogs yesterday, we are shocked ….

We are desperate, because in spite international attention to these poor dogs  these pitiless killers murdered them. These 27 adult and 5 puppies were inspected by Mrs Sanja Celebicanin, for several months, and she wrote  this city pound is ok- in spite of the dogs being crammed into  very small cages.

 

These firm for garbage collection don`t want to make any meeting with us about re-homing dogs,  the Director, Mr. Andrija Penzes, banned the activists of  APS ZOV from taking photos, but there are  3 witnesses who were every day in that place and who can give us confirmation that the dogs were healthy but very hungry and thirsty, and living in their own excrement.

 

Their suffering is now over, but they lived their last month in front of  our very eyes, and they were brutally killed by T-61 – by politicians and authorities who do not care.

 

Today shinters caught new dogs again for the same fate.

 

Veterinarian Mrs. Dubravka  told us that the dogs were ill – but  how can be possible in all  27 adult dogs and  5 puppies !

 

And even if they were ill, which was not the case, why did she not attempt to try and help them by providing medical treatment ? – she did nothing, and gave not one animal any medical treatment.  No vaccination, no microchipping –   just  T-61 to kill them; that is the Veterinarian Mrs. Dubravka  – some veterinarian !.

 

Please send your protest to

Mr. Slobodan Milosavljevic-Minister of Agriculture

kabinet@minpolj.sr.gov.yu

 

Mr.  Miroslav Marinkovic -Director of Veterinary Department of Serbia and to Mrs. Sanja Celebicanin-Chief of Veterinary inspections of Serbia  It is the same address for all of them:

vetuprava@minpolj.sr.gov.yu

 

and also to Mr. Jovan Slavkovic- Mayor of Sombor

predsednik@so-sombor.com

zamenik@so-sombor.com

 

Please send your protest and help us help them –

 

CC to local mediamedia :

 

so.somborske@neobee.net,  s.novine@eunet.yu,  s.novine@sbb.co.yu

 

Main Serbian media:

 

redakcija@blic.co.yu,  redakcija@glas-javnosti.co.yu,  rajna.popovic@politika.co.yu,  anja.abramovic@b92.nrt,  redakcija@kurir-info.co.yu

 

Block addresses of authorities of Sombor city.

 

kabinet@minpolj.sr.gov.yu,  predsednik@so-sombor.com,  zamenik@so-sombor.com,  vetuprava@minpolj.sr.gov.yu

 

Thank you for your help and compassion – Slavica.

 

7th June – Photographs of the City Pound Suffering at Sombor

 

 

At the same time as there are serious animal welfare problems at the City Pound in Bor (see other article), Sombor City Pound is doing no better.

Photographs shown here are for the Sombor City Pound.
 
 
 
 

 

As can be seen, the big dog in the cage cannot even move properly.

In the pound there are 15 cages measuring just 80cm x 80cm and two cages of 100cm x 100cm.  We understand that since 17th February 2008, 30 dogs have been held in these cages ! – they are unable to move and are living in their own excrement, with little or no food and water.

Between February and now many dogs have died due to the conditions at the pound.  Because of this, it has become necessary for local welfare campaigners to bring charges demanding that a new shelter is built at Sombor.

128 dogs from Sombor city pound are currently still in the shelter run by welfare organisation EPAR, but they do not have the money necessary to build extra boxes to take the Sombor dogs, as the citizens of Sombor are bringing more dogs almost every day.

EPAR are requesting that taxpayers money both in Bor and Sombor, and right across Serbia, is used to build specific ‘No Kill’ shelters and to pledge that Sterilisation of all  animals will be undertaken at these premises.

Without a guarantee of a sterilisation program for the animals, and vaccination, microchipping and the fitting of an identification tag (to show the animal has been sterilised), there is not much point to only building a new shelter.  It is essential that the whole procedure to stop more young animals being born is carried out; if it is not, the end to stray animals on the streets of Serbia will NEVER go away.

 

At the moment, in both city pounds (Bor and Sombor), animals are neither microchipped or vaccinated.  Local campaigners believe this is because the animals are going to be killed.  Every day the campaigners fight to gain access to the pound, and they telephone Mrs. Sanja Celebicanin, the Chief of the veterinary Inspection Department for the whole of Serbia.

 

 

Contacts for Sombor City include:


Mayor – Mr. Jovan Slavkovic

E mail:   kabinet@so-somborpredsednik@so-sombor.com
zamenik@so-sombor.com
Fixed telephone  00381 25 468 111

Veterinary Inspector – Mr. Miladin Mikovic 
 
E mail:   okrugsombor@gmail.com
Mobile phone  00 381 63 573 282

Director of JKP Cistoca – (Shinters firm) – Mr. Andrija Penzes
E mail:  so.cistoca@neobee.net,   direktor@cistoca.co.yu

Mobile phone 00 381 63 381 006
 
 

 

 

 

 

Block e-mail Media Contacts for both Bor and Sombor City Pounds are:

 
 
 
 
 

 

Block e-mail addresses of the authorities FOR BOTH Bor and Sombor City Pounds are:

 
Slavica at EPAR asks you please to e mail and telephone to help both the Bor and Sombor dogs – and she sends her thanks to you.
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

7th June – New Photographs Arrive of the City Pound at Bor, Serbia

7th June 2008 – SAV have just been sent the following photographs of the City animal pound at ‘Bor’ in Serbia.  Please note the tiny sizes of the cages, and the fact that the are two storey also, which causes extra suffering for the animals on the bottom tier.  Who knows the fate of these animals and how they will be killed – T-61 (if they are ‘lucky’), mallet, Nuvan or other poision.
When we obtain more details and contact information on this situation, the data will be published immediately.
Please look at the terrible conditions these animals are being held in.

BOR City Contacts to who you can send your protests are:

The Mayor of Bor City is Mr. Branislav Rankic 

E mail:   sobor@ptt.yu
tel/fax 00381 30 423 980
Mobile phone 00381 63 480 959
                   00 381 64 89 04 300

 

Veterinary Inspector  is Mrs. Dragana Antic 
E mail:   sobor@ptt.yu
te/fax 00381 30427310
Mobile phone 00 381  63 573 257
Director of the Shinters firm – JKP 3.Oktobar is Mr. Jovan Manic
Mobil phone 00 381 63 83 159 47
E mail:  jkp3.oktobar@neobee.net

 
 
 
 
 

 

Block e-mail Media Contacts for both Bor and Sombor City Pounds are:

 
 
 
 

 

Block e-mail addresses of the authorities FOR BOTH Bor and Sombor City Pounds are:


 
 
 
 

 

 

Eurovision Song Contest – Belgrade. ? Dogs to be Rounded up and Killed before Contest ?

The Eurovision Song Contest is being held in Belgrade, Serbia this 24th May.


We ask are stray dogs in the city going to be rounded up in advance of the contest and killed off in a repeat of what happened prior to Eurobasket Belgrade 2005 ?

Eurovision have a web site which can be viewed at
http://www.eurovision.tv/page/contacts
and especially for us and the dogs, they have a Blog at

 
where we are all invited to leave comments and ask questions.

http://www.eurovision.tv/profiles/bloglist

Investigations at Ovca Shelter for Dogs and Cats

REPORT (by Tamara Popic – a graduated veterinarian) ON OPERATIONS CONDUCTED IN CITY SHELTER FOR ABANDONED DOGS AND CATS 

Period between October 2nd and October 10th 2006.

Tamara Popic – representative of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, graduated veterinarian

      The first week of my engagement in shelter for dogs and cats in Ovca came down to introduction and follow up of work of Communal zoo hygiene.

      My presence was almost passive due to two reasons: 1. time necessary for introduction of manner of their operation, 2. lack of camera which I could use to substantiate my observations.

      Even beside obvious positive result in terms of appearance and cleanliness of the facility comparing to previous period, I have to note that operation is mainly not in compliance with prescribed protocol:

  • Lack of veterinary checks of dogs and cats admitted to the shelter, as a first aid to injured animals.
  • No veterinarian is campusing the facility on daily basis or observing the animals.
  • I was not able to understand who makes a selection of animals to be sterilized and in accordance with which criteria or that animal was clinically checked before intervention.
  • Transportation of sterilized dogs from operating room to the box is inadequate. Stretchers are not used, and there are no hand barrows for smaller dogs.
  • Dogs in post-operative period are laid down to the, often wet, concrete. Waking up from anesthesia is followed by fever. By all means, mats should be provided for utilization during this brief period.
  • The question of immunization is also imposed: During the sterilization dogs are receiving an antibiotic with prolonged action; at the same time, they are vaccinated against rabies and proceed with dehelmintization. Likewise, often after dehelmintization diarrhea or softer dropping, increasing chances for infection of post-operative wound with males.
  • During the post-operative period, veterinarian is not checking the patients.
  • Five sterilized dogs are ill. Only upon my remark, they were given an antibiotic of   wide-range effect. Given there was no clinical check, it resulted in lack of an adequate therapy. Do we want sick dogs on our streets? If they are already sterilized, which causes some expenditures, let us give them chance to survive.
  • Failure to comply with prescribed post-operative stay in the shelter, 3 days for male and 5 days for female. This information can be verified in charts.
  • Lack of clinical check after animal’s release, disregarding of they are to be return to originally habitat, put in homes or submitted to shelter.
  • October 2nd: veterinarian Aleksandar Risovic executed 10 sterilizations. According to his own words, he did so under higher body temperature. He works alone, with no presence of a technician.
  • October 3rd: veterinarian Dragisa Simic executed 9 sterilizations.
  • October 4th and 5th: no sterilizations executed.
  • October 6th: veterinarian Snezana Jovic executed 6 sterilizations and was a member of triage euthanasia committee, along Milivoje Lazic and Milan Botic. Something completely unbelievable happens: dogs to be euthanised are nowhere to be found, except for completely exhausted puppies. Given that I’ve observed dogs every day, it is my free estimate that there were four dogs for euthanasia. Other dogs were not subjected to evaluation of age nor had any clinical checks, so there is a great likelihood that there are several dogs not suitable for return to the streets.
  • Admission ward is almost overcrowded, and new dogs are arriving. Just 25 dogs were sterilized in five days.
  • Collars-ribbons with pendants are completely inappropriate. They are made of satin, easy to untie, rip and come off, resulting in more difficult further treatment of dogs in the following period.
  • October 4th: two owners or guardians are returned from the shelter’s gate, because there was no attending veterinarian in charge of chipping of these dogs.
  • The shelter disposes of one computer without a database. Its purpose is a complete mystery for me.
  • In terms of sanitary and hygiene measures, my only complaints refers to admission ward where protocol procedure is only partially implemented.
  • Comparing to previous period, much better treatment of technical staff toward animals is obvious.

      It think it is necessary to have a constant presence of at least one clinical veterinarian who is able to monitor entire process, to be in charge for each patient all the way through, disregarding of whether the outcome is sterilization or euthanasia.

      I think all of the above mention can be corrected in the following manner:

    Better organization of work, protocol conformance, opening new shelters, engagement of association for animal protection on bigger scale in order of promoting faster sheltering of dogs and cats. 

Period between  October 9th to 13th 2006.

Tamara Popic – represent of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, graduated veterinarian 

I will start this report with a question. What is the reason for drafting a protocol for shelter operation if conditions for its operation are not partially satisfied? And what is the essence of protocol existence if it is not obeyed? This question relates to insufficient number of employees in the shelter.

      There are two nurses in charge of over 150 dogs, who, in spite good will and best efforts cannot completely fulfill daily obligations, in physical sense.

      We also have an issue of alimentation and clinical check of dogs and cats to be admitted to the shelter. Needles to say anything about evaluation of animal’s temper…

      Protocol on admission to the shelter clearly states that each animal entering the shelter has to be identified by photographing and detail description of identification tags, if any; same applies to health condition. Already sterilized dog has been opened, meaning no one looked if there was any tattooed number (BB1358), documented with a photo.

      There are no clearly prescribed protocol data in the event when owner is submitting his animal.

      Upon my remark that the shelter doesn’t dispose of thermometer and stethoscope, only thermometer was acquired. In what manner are the dogs checked? There is also no antihelmintics for puppies.

      Up to this week the puppies haven’t been properly fed and watered. Djordje Djokic warned nurse to correct this.

      There is no scale in the operating room, resulting in consummation of anesthetic and antibiotic at sole discretion.

      During this week, 21 adult dogs and 26 puppies were euthanised.

      October 11th: commencement of more serious rounds of sterilized dogs and better post-operative treatment. The same day, one copy of protocol was brought, with instruction to copy it and distribute to employees.

      I repeat, it is necessary to have constant presence of attending clinic veterinarian to follow up entire process guided by the protocol and engagement of association for animal protection on bigger scale in order of promoting faster sheltering of dogs and cats. 

Period between  October 16th to 21st 2006.

Tamara Popic – represent of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, graduated veterinarian 

      During this week, 42 dogs were returned to their habitats, i.e. locations from which they were removed and about 10 were taken by guardians.

      13 adult dogs and 1 puppy were euthanised.

      Highly professional sterilization has been executed on about 60 dogs.

      Admission of the animals to the facility is still not in accordance with protocol, apart from rough admission triage, immediate euthanasia is executed on very sickand injured animals. Arrival of inspection has been waited before.

      I have an objection on the very place of euthanasia execution; it is executed on the very ward, between cages. I think this should be done in separate room. For instance, removal of furnace (out of order) would create a space, and area reserved for cats could be displaced. This would provide sufficiently large room for one small ambulance, where the table would be used for clinical check of animals, give a first aid with minor injuries, and execute euthanasia, if necessary.

      Hygiene of cages on the admission ward is not on satisfactory level, resulting in unsuccessful disinfection, if any. Komanovic is also introduced with this fact. In this part are also inadequate feeder and watering vessels.

      Two warn cages were replaced with new ones.

      Puppies present a big problem. At this moment, I think that it is not possible to solve a problem without more adequate role of the Association for Animal Protection. It is necessary to organize faster takeover of puppies, if possible.

      It is also necessary to provide bigger involvement of associations in finding new locations for releasing dogs taken over from so-called undesired locations, like hospitals, kindergartens and schools.

      On Saturday, October 21st I happened to see Milorad Djordjevic and veterinarian inspector Olivera. Something very interesting to me is going on. Given I am a representative of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, accepted by the Veterinary Center Belgrade and City Secretariat, at the same time, a retired person and volunteer, my co-worker practically threw me out reasoning this act as my presence is interpretate as a supervision of her work. It am imposed by the question whether the work of veterinarian inspection is public or secret.

      Dated October 21st, number of dogs on admission ward is 26 adult dogs and 18 puppies up to 2.5 months of age and 60 dogs in post-operative section. 

Period between  October 23rd to October 27th 2006.

Tamara Popic – represent of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, graduated veterinarian 

      After a month of participating in work of the communal zoo-hygiene in the city shelter for deserted dogs and cats, we witness visible improvements in terms of hygiene and communication, i.e. cooperativeness of employees. There are still several active issues, most certainly solvable in my opinion. Employees have been introduced with my observations and suggestions. The case of a German shepherd taken by Jelena Ilic: dog has been in the shelter for several weeks; it was chipped on the unknown destination. Girl has taken it without discharge documentation. She came to the shelter and phoned several times, and in the end was told to bring the dog to read put the chip. It is my opinion that situations like this are impermissible.

      Each admission and discharge of an animal has to be recorded with complete data filled out. I also think that puppies which undergo adoption process have to be chipped, and consequently introduced into the database. It number is not vast, so this might be treated as investment into the future.

      October 23rd: sheltering of a female dachshund on which I find non-reabsorbable type of threads. Milorad Djordjevic and Djordje Djokic were notified immediately. Threads were removed with a reasoning that they ran out of reabsorbable threads. It was agreed that works in to be suspended until acquisition of necessary material.

           There are also complementaries regarding work and admission in the shelter on part of the citizens. Mrs. Dubravka Lotina, phone+ 381 64 148 49 70 from Visnjicka Banja and Mrs. Ivanka from Banovo Brdo, phone +381 063 779 65 95, are satisfied with admission and work in the shelter.

      I think that each adopter has to receive a certificate on vaccination against rabies along with discharge documents, and eventually documents regarding obligations of animal owners drafted in accordance with legal norms of Republic of Serbia, municipality, i.e. city, related to animal’s protection and keeping.

      Admission triage is still not operating in accordance with the protocol.

      It is necessary to reeducate catchers and drivers about preciseness necessary for filling out catching documents. I have an objection to impreciseness in filling out documents regarding catching or handing dogs over, in terms of exact location, for instance, in vicinity of this and that number, or between this and that. It is not acceptable to name the hospital as a reference point, and that it turns out that this location is in relative proximity of the hospital. In case of dog’s being hand over there are no exact data, i.e. reasons for handing over.

      I was told that all unwanted animals are subjected to euthanasia. What are exact reasons of being unwanted, if catching documents are not filled out and there is no correct triage on the admission? Should young, calm and healthy dog be euthanised, and dogs with enlarged livers, peritonitis and internal tumors returned to the street?

      One vehicle has holes in the floor. Komanovic is introduced with this, and promptly intervened to get it fixed. The most disputable questions is simultaneous administration of antibiotics and vaccinations during sterilization. There are cases when it is necessary to use antibiotics in post-operative recuperation. I am not sure of adequate immune response to the vaccination. I still believe that dehelmintization may be performed in the admission facility on animals foreseen for sterilization, and vaccination on departure or immediately before exiting the facility. This would satisfy basic principles of zoo-hygiene in these types of facilities, so-called ”dirty and clean” part.

      I still didn’t notice presence and utilization of a stethoscope in the facility.

           During this week, 10 dogs and 15 puppies were euthanised.

      October 27th: current status on the admission ward of the facility is 13 dogs and 9 puppies, and 48 digs in post-operative section, with total number of 62 dogs. At the end of work day ion admission ward were left 3 dogs (2 rottweilers and 1 chipped pit bull). 

Period between October 30th to November 3rd 2006.

Tamara Popic – represent of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, graduated veterinarian 

      Last two days of October pass in incredible business to reach the number of 255 sterilized dogs. Taking into consideration number of dogs on admission ward, number of sterilizations wouldn’t be so vast if animal lovers didn’t bring their pets to undergo sterilization.  Dogs were brought and immediately or day after sterilized.

      Factual condition that the capacities of admission ward is small, but this is not a justification for immediate dog sterilization, particularly when shelter is almost empty. Current status on October 31st on admission ward was 10 dogs and one kitten (in quarantine), and 20 dogs were sterilized.

      I’ve spoken with Milorad Djordjevic regarding work of Aleksandar Risovic. Risovic´s stitches are not neat and have poorly merged edges. His statement is that his performance is in accordance with amount he gets paid. Djordjevic promised me to agree with Djokic, and in the event that Risovic continues with poor performances, he will take over sterilizations.

      In period between November 1st and 3rd there were no sterilizations.

      Absolutely upmost impression of this week is taking over 25 sterilized „unwanted” dogs on part of the shelter led by Elena-Magdalena. All 25 adults were transported in Lada Niva to Surcin in one round. The following day the same happened with 30 puppies, one dog, two cats and eight kittens in the same vehicle. I think this should be considered as well. 

Period between November 9th to November 17th 2006.

Tamara Popic – represent of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, graduated veterinarian 

      One of goals stipulated in the Strategy of solving problems of stray dogs on the territory of the city is mass sterilization of the deserted, micro-chipping and vaccination against rabies, due to the stabilization of population and returning to primary habitat. During my short presence in Ovca, the first case was “catch, sterilize and let go”, then insisting on responsible ownership for three central municipalities, Vracar, Savski Venac and Stari Grad, and, in the end, responsible ownership on all municipalities.

      What have we done? By agreeing to this, without new shelters and options to take care of the dogs whose guardians are terrified with new situation, it seems as we contributed to euthanasia of 20 young, tamed dogs in one day, because they breached deadline for staying in the shelter. I am afraid that if some sort of solution is not found, this number will increase.

      Acute issue is still admission triage. Only progress is that obviously sick and hardly injured dogs are immediately euthanised, it is not pending until arrival of inspection and in this manner, suffer is shorten for dogs.

      Two female dogs bring forth pups in admission ward. They were not isolated in spite of visible progress of gravid. Each of them was in the cage with three, i.e. four dogs.  I can only assume quantity and type of stress they were under.

      By inviting citizens who take care of dogs do report or to bring their pets to sterilization (given they have an absolute priority), we reduced chances for dogs whose owners are not able to bring dogs or are afraid of now imposed responsible ownership. It seems as owners mixed breeds are in this.

      Since there is no actual admission check, few previously performed sterilizing procedures were detected on surgery table. Meaning, they have been anesthetized in order to take a vaccination shot and to be chipped. They have been reported as sterilized in Ovca.

      During this week, 37 adult dogs (number I noticed) were sterilized. This is higher number that in last month.

      The only shelter which takes over dogs is shelter led by Elena Magdalena.

      I appeal to raise a question of opening at least one shelter, help and expanding capacities of current, and of course, appeal for sheltering and finding homes for dogs, or we are facing dead-end alley. 

Period between November 20th to December 1st 2006.

Tamara Popic – represent of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, graduated veterinarian 

      Visible positive and huge shifts in the shelter, starting from animal treatment, hygiene, relationship with clients, and appearance of the shelter itself. However, there are still some unanswered questions that I am considering to be solvable with a slightly better organization, and they should be corrected now, on the very beginning. 

      My previous observations are confirmed in the case of death of female dog od Mrs. Nada Prokic: necessity of constantly present one veterinarian; yet, this should not be Aleksandar Risovic due to already familiar reasons. I also think that this death could perhaps be prevented with adequate treatment. If I hadn’t heard from Djokic that this female dogs already had peritonitis, according to Risovic´s account, I would believe that this case belong to minority of cases when dog bites threads during the post-operative treatment and injures the wound. Eventually, there should be some sort of finding, note, ambulance protocol. If she indeed had peritonitis, she also had a temperature. Is animal measured temperature, lungs and heart before the operation? Measure weight? Execute basic actions before operation? I am not sure. In this case, one dosage of Pen-strep depot is not adequate post-operative therapy.

      We have one very well designed strategy and very clear protocol, but disobey of its one segment is continuous. The issue of admission triage is still present. Remaining are probably issues in domain of veterinary ethics.

      As I stated before, during openings of female dogs there are visible liver and spleen enlargements. These can be signs of severe infections. I am opposing to the idea of releasing dogs into the streets. The solution for this matter should be found. It is necessary to consult with experts!

      On November 20th around 13:30 arrives the owner of female dog of American Stafford terrier to arrange term for sterilization of his dog given he heard that he heard from someone whose name he cannot recall that he can do it for free. There is no attending veterinarian. Story is confirmed on the 23rd if the month. I met owners who take out their sterilized Samoyed. The following day, on the 24th, was sterilized Golden Retriever in ownership. In both cases seemed that dogs were taken over from the shelter. And so on, these unfortunate ones on admission ward are breaching prescribed time of stay, which assumes their final fate.

      There is a field in lab-charts foreseen for record of whether the dog has been sterilized or not. What happens to dogs who have been sterilized previously? There isn’t this type of field.

      The most acute problems are SHELTERS in terms of further accommodation of dogs. Perhaps manner should be drafted for helping current ones, which might with a little help accept part of dogs.  

Period between December 4th to December 21st 2006.

Tamara Popic – represent of Belgrade coalition for animal protection, graduated veterinarian 

      I will make a resume in this report after nearly three months of my presence in the Center.

      As we orally agreed I will be present in the Center until the end of month, and I want to confirm this in written. I am at disposal to Belgrade coalition for less stress jobs.

      As I have stated earlier, there are visible positive shifts in terms of appearance, hygiene and treatment toward dogs and clients. However, there are actions that I think should be corrected as soon as possible, because this is already kind of a habit. It will be more difficult, but possible.

      The protocol is mainly still not obeying: lack of veterinarian check, then observation of dogs and cats admitted to the shelter, resulting in lack of clear description, clinical status, oldage and animal temper. All of the above raises the question of criteria for selection of their further destiny?

      How to solve this? During admission of dogs, veterinarian should be always present, describing and checking the animal and entering records into protocol. There is nom scale in the facility so weight estimate is subjective, imposing question of drug and anesthetic dosage.

      Puppies from different locations should not be mixed. Separate pregnant dogs. It should not be allowed to bring forth puppies in small cage in presence of several dogs.

      Take it takes 20 minutes to examine each animal, which is too much; it makes 21 dogs a day. 630 a month? I cant recall the month with this catch. With submitted dogs on part of owners or guardians, perhaps.

      Extermination of insects and dehelmintization should be executed in admission ward. In accordance with zoo-hygiene rules this would be unclean or so-called dirty part. Nutrition of puppies – three times a day. In winter conditions, the facility should be heated at night.

      Euthanasia is performed on the floor between cages. Other animals are watching and listening. Why am I stating this? In place where noise could be heard always, there is an incredible silence. In cat section which is mainly empty, could be installed one table where everything in range from clinical examination to euthanasia could be performed. Is euthanasia executed in humane way? No, not always. This could be checked by consumption of Ketamidor administered i/m and T61 which should be administered i/v. Should this be performed on the table, both drugs could be administered i/v, which would be more humane and more efficient   

      Dog sterilization. In many cases dogs don’t stay even 24 hours, and no so rarely directly from the car go to the operating table. This could be verified in documents (input and output).

      Lack of clinical check before sterilization. There are no records. Proves that dogs are not checked in here as well is opening of already sterilized dogs who had clear tattooed number on the ear (BB) or double chipping.

      Issues of immunization quality imposes, given they receive vaccination, antibiotic with prolonged effect and pass dehelmintization. Is organism in this condition able to give a full immune response? 

      Medication used in dehelmintization is Tenivet, meaning it is against tapeworms. How many city dogs have been invaded by various types of Tenya? I have personally adopted a 7 month old dog from the shelter. I received accompanying document stating that dehelmintization has been performed among other things. After ten days or so in the house it threw up affected by ascariasis. It is quite well known about the severity of invasion once your dog starts throwing up a bunch of parasites. All of my household members including myself took Mebendazol.

      Pathology encountered on the table during the process of opening dogs is shocking. In vats number of cases, liver and spleen are enlarged up to extent of practically penetrating into the pelvic cavity. As I have stated earlier, experts should be consulted (internists and pathologists). It is my opinion that these signs are quite alarming. 

      It is interesting that no veterinarian asked these questions. It means that it is imperative to execute sterilization on 255 dogs, no matter what.

      Post-operative segment. In accordance with zoo-hygienic rules this should be a clear section.

      Given that extermination of insects and dehelmintization are not executed before entering into this section, this is out of a question. Veterinarian is entering into this section only if guardian informs him about some problem. Rounds and observations are not present at all. Question raises to what extent is holder qualified and may notice symptoms which would be timely notice by veterinarian?

      Post-operative recovery period for males is 3 and females 5-7 days, yet in most cases it is not obeyed. This could be also verified in accompanying documents or protocol of the shelter.

      For brief period following waking up from anesthesia when animal is experiencing fever, I maintain the claim that mats should be provided, and not to place them on cold and often wet concrete. This particularly refers to winter period.

      Check before discharge also lacks, disregarding whether this is the case of finding home, shelter or returning to the habitat. In majority of cases, age of dog is wildly guessed.

 I think that puppies should be by all means marked, enter their records into database. In months to come they will grow up and we don’t have any records on them. This should be investment for the future.

      Another interesting question is how to educate technical staff when the bosses are completely uninterested? I haven’t seen any of the bosses, and there is quite plenty of them, engaged or get interested in manner of promoting operations while Mr. Faulkner was here.

      What is necessary? Only to obey the working protocol and to assign one person, veterinarian who would be responsible for all actions in the shelter. As long as they are responsible on two or three positions, significant omissions will occur.

      It is necessary to obtain more engagement from associations for animal protection in the sense of voluntary work. They could help with socialization of individuals and taking animals into walk.

      Shelters are acute problems. It is necessary to help current ones, particularly now in this period before opening new ones.

      After almost three months of work another devastating fact, as of December 21st catchers are selling Sedalin pasta. I was contacted by Mrs. Andjelka phone: ……, and informed me that the crew sold her pasta for 800 dinars. Djokic and Djordjevic have been informed about this matter.

      Even beside all of the above mentioned, I think it is possible to correct this if timely actions are taken. All it takes is to implement excellent program and to organize operations better.

Serbia suffering

Please sign it

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/serbia-suffering

Text:

We the undersigned wish to issue and register a formal complaint to the European Union Commission regarding animal welfare atrocities perpetrated by the Serbian Authorities.  They (the Serbian authorities) stand accused of acts in contravention of their own current Serbian Legislation Article 269.

These acts involve wilful and planned slaughter of thousands of dogs and cats in contravention of Article 46; Article 138; of the Veterinary Legal Code.  Article 269 of the Criminal Code of Serbia states that any person guilty of acting in contravention of the Criminal Code, is liable of up to 3 (three) years imprisonment, if found guilty of illegal slaughter of animals  and cruelty.  These animals are collected by dog catchers (named ‘shinters’ ) specially employed for the task by the local authorities.  Once caught both dogs and cats are held captive together and they may be kept locked in cages without food and water for several days.  This often results in aggressive and destructive behaviour, with cannibalism being the result of starvation.  Hygiene in relation to the caaptive animals welfare during detention is also very much an issue of concern.  The animals are eventually put to death by any of the following methods:-

1.  Injections of drug T-61 into the lungs causing paralysis and a prolonged and painful death.  In 1988 drug T-61 was withdrawn from manufacturer in the United States of America, as it is considered unsuitable for euthanasia.  In 1994, it was considered unsuitable for use in Canada. (ref 1.)

2.  Killing with pitchforks.

3.  Killing by the use of Mallets.  In other words, beating the animal to death.

4.  Killing with Nuvan and Kreozan poisons.  These cause death by suffocation after the following prolonged effects – headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, excessive sweating, salivation, blurred vision, tightness in the chest, weakness, muscle twitching, and confusion.  Also convulsions, severe respiratory depression, unconsciousness, and eventual death.

We are aware that dogs and cats cannot make us aware of headaches and nausea, but these have been found to be present in humans who work with these toxins.  Therefore there is no reason to doubt that animals might also suffer from these effects.

5.  Live animals are also dumped on rubbish tips in plastic bags.

6.  Live animals are also hung, hanging suspended until death.

7.  Live animals are thrown into ‘compacting’ (crushing machines).  The ‘crusher’ or ‘compactor’ is part of a refuse vehicle used by the authorities.

8.  LATEST !!29 June 2007 – It has been brought to our attention that dogs are being buried alive in the town of Novi Sad; Serbia.  A hole is dug and then the dog catchers (shinters) throw the live dogs in and cover them with soil.  This has been reported by Mrs Jelena Tinska a known Serbian actress, and also reported in the Serbian paper named as KURIR. 

All the facts listed above are in direct contravention of the Veterinary Legislation of Serbia which demands a duty of care for all animals, and forbids the killing of stray animals.  We the undersigned as full citizens of the European Union (EU) and citizens of the World,  call on the Enlargement Commission of the European Union (EU) for Serbia to be excluded from admission to the European Union, until they are able to show and prove that they are willing to abide by their own legislation.  We also ask that admission to the EU should only be considered when Serbia has maintained the ability to abide by their own Legislation for a period of time decided upon by the EU Commission.

Ref 1.  T-61 :  T-61 is an unacceptable injectable drug combination containing a local anaesthetic, a general anaesthetic, and a neuromuscular blocking agent.  It has been removed from the market by the manufacturer in the United States.  It is intended to be given intravenously at a precise rate of injection (1cc for 5 seconds) that is almost impossible to maintain.  Most importantly, if improperly administered, T-61 can cause animals  intense pain after administration and a curare-like paralysis of respiration (suffocation) before the animal loses consciousness.  Because of these limitations, T-61 is an unacceptable euthanasia agent.

Information on T-61 from reference sources at the Humane Society of the United States;  Washington DC   http://www.hsus.org