Serbia: Furnace Used to Kill Dogs in Cuprija ? – Shinters Try to Take 5 Puppies From Citizen to Kill Them – The no kill law of Serbia is not being implemented anywhere !

The photos here show a shinters car from Cuprija – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%86uprija

 

Here they catch dogs and cats, as well as other towns and cities such as Svilajnac.  In Cuprija, they have a furnace for killing dogs.  We know of information which says that live dogs are killed by being burnt in these furnaces.  Cats are always dead before they arrive at the furnace, because the shinters throw live cats into the same vehicle that carries the dogs; and the dogs kill the cats.

EPAR in Subotica has received a letter about the shinters at the city pound of Pozega – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Po%C5%BEega,_Serbia

We are informed that there is only one cage at the pound, which contains around 40-50 dogs, who are all deprived of both food and water, even in temperatures of around 40 degrees C.

A letter provided by a citizen of Uzice city says that shinters have caught her little dog.  The lady in question writes that she went to look for this pound.  She understands that her dog was killed.  The lady still had 5 puppies belonging to this dog.  The next day shinters went to the house of the lady saying that they wanted to take the puppies and kill them also.

The lady threw the shinters out of her house, but the shinters then called the police.

We do not know what happened after this but telephone calls are being made to gather more information.

The no kill law of Serbia is not being implemented anywhere.

The letter provided by a the lady of Uzice city can be seen below:

 

Serbia: Latest Pictures From EPAR Shelter, Subotica.

EPAR shelter has now changed its name to Shelter Azil Alex.

See and read more at our ‘Shelters’ section (Tab at Top) –

Shelter ‘Azil Alex’ – Subotica, Serbia

Things have been happening at EPAR shelter.

This is a dog and cat rescue facility which gets no support or funding from the authorities or government, despite many attempts to have funding as a rescue shelter for stray animals from the streets.

Slavica covers all the costs herself.  If you can help with a donation, please go to the end of this post for further information.

A member of the public called about a dog who was in the forest; tied to a tree with wire around his neck.

The injury to his neck caused by the wire.

After the wire had been removed and the dog had been taken back to care at EPAR shelter.  You can clearly see the wire which was wrapped around his neck.

Another call was made by people about a dog from the street who had found cover and who was now living in an old garage with no door.  You can see her cowering under the old tractor.

These people wanted to call the shinters to catch and take the dog – to kill her;, but then a call was made to EPAR shelter.  EPAR arrived and rescued her; she in now living at the EPAR shelter.  You can see her here being rescued by Adrijana, one of the EPAR team. 

Back at the EPAR shelter, building work is happening; new wood and bags of cement are being purchased to make new corners for the new dog houses.

Because it is very hot in summer and the dogs need plenty of fresh, clean water; new drums are selected ready to be cut down into new large drinking bowls.

When the drums are cut down to size; they make clean new water dishes for all the dogs at EPAR shelter.  Below are just a few ready for dogs and the hot days of summer.

And below are a series of pictures of some of the residents at EPAR shelter; dogs which have been saved from the streets and killing by the shinter teams.

Daily costs continue – food, new shelters, drinking dishes, medicines, building materials;

See more recent pictures of the dogs by visiting:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/07/02/serbia-june-2010-new-pictures-of-the-rescued-stray-dogs-at-epar-shelter/

If you would like to give a donation to help the running costs of EPAR shelter, then please make your donation in the following way.

Thank You.

Please use the following for any donations to EPAR shelter:

One of the best and cheapest ways to send money donations internationally is by Western Union. 

Transfer costs vary and are worked out simply depending on the amount of the donation – you only pay more if you donate larger quantities. 

In most countries donations can be done on line, by telephone, or visiting a local agent. 

Please look at the web site for further info:

http://www.westernunion.com/info/selectCountry.asp

For direct donations, the following EPAR account in Hungary should be used as a preference to Serbian accounts; as taxes and costs are smaller and more goes to helping the animals:

OTP Bank

Szeged

Klauzal ter,5

Hungary,EU

Account number : 11775355-37518886

Account name : MAZAK-BESLIC JANOS

Address : Subotica 24000,Matka Vukovica, 9

IBAN : HU31117753553751888600000000

Swift : OTP VHUHB

—————————

Serbia: At Meeting With President Tadic, NGO to Ask For Exemption From Import Charges For All Donations Given To Stray Animal Welfare

Serbian campaigners have now asked permission to be given for free admission of all humanitarian supplies for dogs and cats into (entering) Serbia.

This means that there would be an exemption from charges and costs for all products which are donated and supplied to stray animals at Serbian shelters.

At her recent meeting with President Tadic, Nancy; the representative of NGO ‘SOS for Serbian Animals’, – see photograph below; was told by President Tadic that an official request would need to be made to the Veterinary Department of Serbia.

This request has now been produced and sent.  We eagerly await a response from the Veterinary Department.

At the end of this post are copies of the request letters which have been sent.

We very much hope that the request meets with approval from the Veterinary Department, as then, the strays of Serbia will be able to receive food and medicines from all over the world without the fear of large additional costs being placed on the sender once the goods arrive at the Serbian border.

More news, hopefully positive, will be provided when we have it.

Copies of letters :-

 
 
 

From: epar

To: zoran.micovic@minpolj.gov.rs ; goran.milosev@minpolj.gov.rs

Ministarstvo poljoprivrede sumarstva i vodoprivrede RS, Beograd

 

Uprava za veterinu, Beograd
19.7.2010.
 
MOLBA
 
Postovani  gospodine  Dr.vet. Zorane   Micovic  i  gospodine  Dr.vet .  Gorane Milosev,
 
Nas saradnik  i predstavnik SOS for  animals in Serbia , EU  , Brisel ,  je   na  zvanican poziv  g.Ambasadora Srbije u Belgiji , bila gost  u Ambasadi Srbije,  da bi  imala  razgovor sa g. Predsednikom Tadicem , na temu humanitarne pomoci  nevladinog sektora EU napustenim psima i mackama u Srbiji .
G.Predsednik  Tadic   je proporucio da vam se  hitno obratimo radi  sto hitnijeg pojasnjenja najjednostavnijeg  nacina  da humanitarna pomoc  u hrani za pse i macke ,koju nevladine organizacije  EU   za pomoc  napustenim zivotinjama u Srbiji ,  iz   EU  zele  kontinuirano slati azilima za napustene pse i macke  u Srbiji ,  i  nacina  da ova humanitarna  pomoc najbrze stigne do  zivotinja u Srbiji .
 
Molimo vas da nam sto je moguce pre  pozitivno odgovorite , jer je g. Nancy  Dequeker obecala g. Predsedniku Tadicu  , na njegov zahtev , da ce mu  preko g . Radomira Diklica -Ambasadora u Briselu , poslati  zvanican izvestaj  o tome da li smo : nevladin sektor iz EU  i nevladin sektor  iz Srbije ,  uspeli s vama  uspostaviti   korisnu  saradanju na ovu temu , u cemu se nadamo  da cemo uspeti .
 
Hvala na Vasem vremenu.
 
S postovanjem, srdacno
 
Dr.med.  Slavica Mazak Beslic
Prijatelj-EPAR/OIPA Srbija/Alijansa za prava zivotinja
24000 Subotica, Matka Vukovica,9
 
———————————–
 
From: epar

To: zlatko.kuzmanovic@minpolj.gov.rs ; tatjana.bozic@minpolj.gov.rs ; s.celebicanin@minpolj.gov.rs ; zoran.marinkovic@minpolj.gov.rs ; zoran.micovic@minpolj.gov.rs ; vetuprava@minpolj.gov.rs ; generalni.inspektorat@minpolj.gov.rs ; vet.uprava@minpolj.gov.rs

Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 1:17 PM
Subject: Zahtev 12.7.2010. informacije u vezi humanitarna pomoci : hrana za napustene pse i macke u Srbiji
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, sumarstva i vodoprivrede RS
-Veterinarska inspekcija
Generalni inspektorat
-Fitosanitarna inspekcija
12.7.2010.
 
Zahtev  ovlašćenom  licu u skladu sa Zakonom o slobodnom pristupu informacijama od javnog značaja
 
S obzirom na tekst celog predmeta – molimo pogledajte dole-
 
1.   da li je potrebno  raditi  i to  svaki put raditi  veterinarske analize i fitosanitarne analize  hrane  za pse i mačke spakovane u originalnom  fabričkom pakovanju  koju  humanitarne organizacije i pojedinci  šalju iz EU  kao humanitarnu pomoć napuštenim psima i mačkama u azilima u Srbiji , s obzirom da u Srbiji nema kulture davanja pomoći  napuštenim psima i mačkama  kako od strane pojedinaca tako ni od strane  firmi i s obzirom da jedinice lokalne samouprave  ne ispunjavaju svoju zakonsku obavezu  po čl.46.Zakona o veterinarstvu  tj ne finansiraju  zbrinjavanje  i nabavku hrane ,
2 . S obzirom da se u ovom slučaju  pomenutom u tački 1. ovog Zahteva ,ne radi o komercijalnom uvozu  nego o humanitarnoj pomoći  od koje zavise životi  napuštenih životinja  u azilima kojima je ova humanitarna pomoć u hrani  za životinje namenjena  odgovorite nam 
kolika je cena  pojedinačne analize, tj  dostavite kopiju cenovnika analiza iz tačke 1. ovog Zahteva
i koliko se dugo čeka na rezultat, s obzirom da se radi o  slučajevima hitne humanitarne pomoći koja je upućena  životinjama da ne bi umirale od gladi.
 
S poštovanjem
 
Prijatelj-EPAR/OIPA Srbija /Alijansa za prava životinja i ljudi
24000 Subotica, Matka Vukovića,9
 

Serbia: PART 2 – Subotica City ‘Public Competition To Control Stray Animals’ Update – Corrupt and Authority Organised As Always – So Whats New ?

Following on from part 1 of this issue which was in a recent post;

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/07/18/serbia-subotica-city-public-competition-to-control-stray-animals-update-corrupt-and-authority-organised-as-always-so-whats-new/

The Constitutional Court of Serbia decided that the killings of once a week back in Subotica in 2003 were unlawful.  The Subotica authorities decided in 2008 that they could  still kill animals more than once a month.  Again the Constitutional Court of Serbia decided that these killings were unlawful.

Now, in a futile attempt to continue with their animal killings, the Subotica authorities have established this un-elected, un-democratic and very un-professional ‘Commission’ of four people who will decide the fate of animals (strays) in the city.

We argue that despite what the city Commission says, the activities and decisions which they are undertaking are illegal and unlawful under Serbian legislation.

If an animal has to be euthanised, then this decision should be taken by a vet, and in the welfare of the animal, it should be done as soon as possible; not within the next month as is the arrangement by this commission.  There are very many concerns that healthy animals will be euthanised by this fake, un-elected commission simply because one vet is involved and probably making lots of money from the process, and no doubt still is; simply because he is a vet, then his word is gospel; when in fact it means nothing.  He is just a cover for the authorities to continue killing stray animals because he, as a vet, says that they should be euthanised.  This approach will be supported by the other members of the ‘commission’; none of whom are either veterinarians or elected by the people.  This approach will ensure one thing only, that all decisions will be documented as ‘collective’ and that the responsibility of decision making will not be given to just one person.  A united ‘kill the animals’ collaboration for which nobody in the consortium can individually be held responsible.

At this present time, the Subotica authorities appear to have have the situation completely stitched up, with everything looking very ‘formal’ with regard stray animal control, when in fact the whole system is organised and run by an un-elected commission consisting of four people who simply wish to continue killing as many animals as they can, whilst making it look correct and proper to the Subotica public as the decisions have been made by a ‘commission’.

As far as we are concerned this is fraud aimed at the citizens of Subotica city.  We hope that we can make necessary changes to this system.

We understand that the vet who is part of this corrupt commission, one Grgo Tikvicki, has a wife who is a lawyer.  Everything seems to have been very well arranged to deceive the Subotica public as we say.  Tikvicki and his lawyer wife have made a very good job in the past in relation to getting animal killings to happen.  They wish to be protected from Serbian legislation, and so now they have established this un-elected, un-democratic commission of four people which is very closely associated with the chiefs of the Communal Department of Subotica city, which includes Matilda Seker and Suzana Dulic.

Everyone in the commission and the Subotica Communal Department appear to have very close ties and are all working together to undertake the continued killing of strays which goes against Serbian legislation.

We consider that Tikvicki will always be able to hide his unlawful killings under the blanket of a decision by the four members of the un-elected commission.

Animal welfare campaigners have made representations and charges on 12/07/10 to the Special Attorney Against Organised Crime who is located in Belgrade. 

Regarding Subotica, Slavica has also now requested financial support for the 1,000 dogs which she cares for at EPAR shelter.  This is because Slavica has always had to fund the care of the animals out of her own pocket, despite legislation which declares that strays care is to be financed from the city budget – an obligation of the city budget.

The Subotica city authorities are attempting to say that despite having around 1,000 dogs at EPAR shelter, which she has taken in from the streets and is providing care for out of her own money, which has included having the dogs microchipped; EPAR shelter is NOT relevant to the community legislation relating to stray animal care, and so the city should not finance the dogs care from the city budget !

Slavica from EPAR shelter has provided the authorities with all the answers to all the questions they have asked in their attempts to get out of financing the care for any of the 1,000 ex stray dogs which now live at EPAR shelter.  The Subotica city community budget cannot work its way out of paying towards the care of strays now living at EPAR shelter; be they dogs which are 3, 5, 7 years old, male or female, or microchipped when they arrived or not. 

It currently appears that Subotica city has established this un-elected, tight knit commission of four people; all who have self interests in continuing with the city policy as it always has been of killing as many strays animals from the city streets as they possibly can.

The illegal Commission killings currently go on, but we now have to wait for the review and decision of the charges and appeal made on 12/07/10 to the Special Attorney Against Organised Crime, located in Belgrade. 

Despite the commission vet being married to a lawyer, it would appear that the commission is not up to date with existing Serbian legislation relating to the care and protection of stray animals.  The commission has been established to decide simply which strays will be killed and which will be saved from death. No doubt the Subotica public will be bribed into thinking that some of the ‘spared’ strays kept alive will be cared for at this so called shelter which is run by the Commission ‘animal welfare representative’ (see Part 1), who has this small shelter of 70 to 100 animals and who always appears to have collaborated with the city authorities; by whom they have always been funded.

Meanwhile, the EPAR shelter is provided with no funding from the city authorities for the 1,000 dogs in its care – around ten times (x10) the animals at the ‘shelter’ which is run by a member of the close knit city commission.

All that can be done now is to wait for information and news from the Special Attorney Against Organised Crime which is located in Belgrade.

After all, we would consider that this un-elected commission made up of four people with a self interest in continuing to undertake the cities wishes of killing as many strays as possible is an ‘Organised Crime’.

Based on the information, what do you think ? – we would love to hear your opinions.

Please leave comments through the normal system on the site thank you.

We are certain that the Serbian government and authorities do visit this SAV site regularly – maybe it is their only way of getting to know Serbian legislation.

If the happenings in Subotica city are anything to go by, they certainly don’t know about existing legislation for stray animals !

Serbia: PART 1 – Subotica City ‘Public Competition To Control Stray Animals’ Update – Corrupt and Authority Organised As Always – So Whats New ?

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/serbia-subotica-city-public-tender-update-090610/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/06/03/serbia-now-that-stray-animal-control-programmes-go-to-public-tender-authorites-cut-budget-by-two-thirds-to-ensure-animal-welfare-proposals-fail/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/06/02/serbia-subotica-city-now-stray-animal-control-is-opened-up-to-public-competition-including-welfare-organisations-suddenly-the-budget-for-same-is-drastically-reduced-the-closed-shop-big-money-w/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/serbia-public-competition-by-law-may-now-enable-animal-welfare-groups-to-present-proposals-to-authorities-for-their-no-kill-stray-animal-numbers-control-programmes/

At the end of May we started a series of posts – see above, in which the Constitutional Court of Serbia declared that there must be a Public Competition – Tendering for the catching of stray dogs and cats in Subotica city.

We declared in our posts that Subotica city is finally starting to / having to act in agreement with the court, by allowing public competition for the process of catching and thereafter caring strays in the city.

From the beginning of June animal welfare campaigners eagerly awaited the formal publication of the tendering process to be published in the press, as they would have a chance to tender for this.

The immediate reaction of the Subotica authorities, knowing that animal welfare organisations and the public were now going to be allowed to tender for the task, was to cut the financial budget allocated by around two thirds !

This shows the closed loop ‘look after ourselves’ attitude which the authorities have had in the past.  Money in the budget is not spent on animal welfare, but it is spent on other things not directly associated with animals.

*** Update 18/07/10   Update 18/07/10   Update 18/07/10   Update 18/07/10 ***

Some two months after being informed that the Subotica strays programme was to put out to public competition, there is still no further news or publication of the programme in the press on which the public are able to base their tender.

Originally, welfare organisations were informed that they had 30 days from 12/06/10 in which to submit their full stray control programme to the Commission of Public Competition.  On the 12/07/10 the public competition would be closed and after a review of the tenders and a further 20 days later, the Commission would decide on the winner and all participants would be informed.

And so, by the 02/08/10 all the participants in the public competition would be informed of the results.

Well, that was the schedule and plan that anyone involved and wishing to participate in was informed by the Subotica authorities.  We understand that from 30/06/10 the Subotica authorities have paid the media ready for the competition to be published, but it has not happened for almost 3 weeks since.

It appears now that prior to this whole pack of lies from the authorities, on the 18/03/10 the Subotica authorities made a new decision independently, declaring that the (stray) animal killings would only be undertaken once a month.  It appears that the listing of animals will be compiled by 4 members of a ‘Commission’; a group which has been formed to authorise the killings.

The declarations can be seen in the following documents.

 

This system and the killings are ILLEGAL and a VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT VERDICT.

We understand that the members of the ‘Commission’ which decides the fate of the animals is made up of;

One veterinarian;

one person directly involved with the city authorities;

one person from a ‘dogcatching’ firm; and

one person from an ‘animal protection’ organisation.

We can confirm that neither Slavica nor any other representative of SAV or EPAR will be involved with this Commission.  It appears the animal protection representative is from an organisation called ‘APS Subotica’ who it seems have one small shelter of 70 to 100 animals and who always appear to have collaborated with the city authorities, by whom they have always been funded.  Is it any wonder that any other animal organisation is not involved ? – the Commission animal welfare rep is from an authority funded organisation.  A do as we say type approach ?

Their (APS Subotica) position is based on 1)  education and on 2)  the humane putting to sleep of animals.  We are simply of the view that the killing of strays is their overall position and is the only way they consider controlling dog and cat populations.  Same as the authorities – what a coincidence !

Their (APS Subotica) President, Mr. Nebojsa Mihajlovic, has for many years received money from the city budget for his ‘collaboration’.  We understand that this figure is around 30,000 to 100,000 dinar per month.  Money to simply continue to give the green light for the continued killing of dogs and cats.

Mr. Nebojsa Mihajlovic appears to have established a contract with dog killers in the past.  It is alleged that in 2004, 2005 and 2006, 7,000 dinars per month was given to (Subotica) dogcatchers.  Many hundreds of animals were caught and killed, whilst the Subotica general public were told / misinformed  that the animals were being cared for at the shelter.  In fact, the animals were being killed immediately after capture.

We call this hypocrisy.  It is alleged that Mr. Nebojsa Mihajlovic always spoke about education regarding strays; but here he actually did nothing; there was never any  public education in Subotica about stray animals.

We understand that in their first article associated with this new decision, the Subotica city authorities have written declaring that the killing of dogs and cats only (not more than) once a month is ‘communal intervention’.

We declare that the illegal (Veterinary law 2005) killing of dogs and cats is euthanasia, which is ‘medical’, and not a ‘communal intervention’ policy. 

Please refer to ‘Part 2’ in another post (to be issued soon) for a continuation.

 

Serbia: ‘Dogscan’ – Pregnancy Detection in Small Animals

http://dog.draminski.com/dogscan/ 

A portable ultrasound scanner designated for quick pregnancy detection in small animals.

This equipment is now what welfare campaigners are suggesting should be purchased and used by community authority inspectors to verify if owned animals are actually pregnant and thus further adding to the numbers of animals which are within communities.

This should be especially used to check regularly on owned animals where the owners refuse to have their animals sterilised. 

The plan is simple; if owners of animals do have their animal(s) sterilised, then they are contributing towards reducing stray numbers for the future.  If animals have been sterilised then the owner should have documentation to show / prove this.  This must be provided to community inspectors.

If the owner cannot provide the documentation to support this, and by using the scanning equipment shown, then the inspector can confirm if the owned animal is actually pregnant; and as a result, the owner can be charged for not having their animal sterilised and also for contributing to the continual numbers of stray animals in any regions.

Regardless of being owned, the new offspring of owned animals will very often be turned out onto the streets by the owners.

There is only one way to reduce stray animal numbers; and that is a public education programme supported by public authority subsidised sterilisation programmes.

Community inspectors should be provided with this equipment now and they should use it to ensure that un-sterilised, owned animals are not released out on the streets to be mated with and yet produce more strays; simply continually adding to the stray numbers.

Sterilisation works to reduce numbers.  The authorities turning in the other direction does not.

Serbia: Welfare Activist Charge Made Against All 170 Authorities in Serbia over Stray Animal Treatment Policy; and Response Now Demanded by Commissioner of Public Information to Support This Request.

Slavica has now sent to the Veterinary Department of Serbia, a charge against all 170 responsible local authorities within Serbia, who are responsible for the issue and treatment of stray dogs and cats, using Article 46 of the Veterinary Law which means that all animals must be cared for and not killed.

Using Article 54 of the law for animal welfare, they have an obligation from 10/06/2009 to make a lawful programme of controlling stray dogs and cats without killing them.

Slavica has also asked for information to be provided under the ‘public importance’ sector.  She has asked that documented evidence be provided which supports that some authorities ( all ?) have not acted in accordance with their legal obligations.

All of this was undertaken during October 2009; and Slavica has not been given a response to date.  Slavica has now lodged a complaint to the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection regarding this information request.

The Commissioner has a web site at www.poverenik.rs

Slavica has an excellent working relationship with the Commissioner.  As such, he has demanded that Slavica is to be provided with all this very important documentation and information; and that the information must be provided to Slavica within 3 days and to him, the Commissioner, within 7 days.

Now it is a case of actually seeing from this request by the Commissioner if anything has actually been done, or if Article 46 and Article 54 of the Veterinary law have simply been ignored by the authorities throughout Serbia and by the Veterinary Department of Serbia.

The case continues ………………