Serbia: Zahtev,29.1.2011.., JKP Medijana, Nis, GDE su psi, Gde su novci

E P A R sa memorandumom

—– Original Message —–

From: epar

To: Julijana Mitic

Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 12:22 PM

Subject: Zahtev,29.1.2011.., JKP Medijana, Nis, GDE su psi, Gde su novci

JKP`Medijana`,Nis

29.1.2011.

Predmet :Zahtev  u skladu sa Zakonom o slobodnom pristupu informacijama od javnog znacaja

S obzirom da je ubijanje napustenih pasa i macaka u Srbiji zakonom zabranjeno od 2.11.2005. godine ( Zakljucak Ustavnog suda IU-27/2007, dostavite

1. Broj  uhvacenih pasa i macaka  izrazen po godinama od : 2006. godine do  dana ekspedovanja ove informacije i  GDE  se sada nalaze  ti psi  ,kao i  ukupno brojno stanje  uhvacenih pasa na dan ekspedovanja ove informacije .

2.Ukupnu sumu novca  datu JKP`Medijani`  za hvatanje zbrinjavanje  pasa iz tacke 1.ovog Zahteva  navedenu  po godinama od 2006. godine do dana ekspedovanja ove informacije .

3, Kopiju Analitike odobrenih sredstava za 2009. i 2010. i  dokumentata  – racina i dokumanata o transferu novca kojima se dokazuje namensko trosenje u skladu s  kopijom Analitike  odobrenih sredstava  za   usluge  hvatanje i zbrinjavanje napustenih pasa i macaka u 2009. i 2010. do dana ekspedovanja ove informacije. 

4. Ciji JMBG  je upisan u Centralni registar pasa Srbije za  pse uhvacene  od strane JKP`Medijana ` Nis  u Nisu ,a  ciji za pse uhvacene u drugim gradovima  u kojima je  JKP`Medijana hvatala pse  2009. i 2010. godine ,tj ko se u Centralnom registru pasa vodi kao njihov  `vlasnik`  . 

 

 

EPAR-OIPA SRBIJA/Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9

Zastupnik: Prim.mr.sci.dr.med.Slavica Mazak Beslic

Budi vegan-spasi Planetu

Serbia: Exposed – The Killer Vet of Novi Sad. He Who Kills in Excess of 4,000 Stray Dogs and Cats Each Year, Despite (Serbian National) Legislation Banning Him From 2005.

EXPOSED – THE KILLER VET OF NOVI SAD

 

This is Veterinarian Nicholas Mišljenović.

Question – What is the aim of a veterinarian ? – to save animals lives and help them in their time of most need ?

WRONG; for some Serbian veterinarians such as Mišljenović.

This man is now exposed as the veterinarian who kills 3,000 to 4,000 cats and dogs every year in the Serbian city of Novi Sad (NS).

The unfortunate stray animals which are caught on the NS streets are held for only three (3) days before they are killed by this man.  This is in direct contravention to existing Serbian legislation since the end of 2005; please see the SAV link from January 2010 below.

For further detailed information relating to the decision by the Serbian Constitutional Court  that from 02/10/2005, the killing of stray dogs and cats in Serbia is forbidden; see our old post from January 2010:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2010/01/25/serbia-constitutional-court-of-serbia-says-that-the-killing-of-stray-dogs-and-cats-in-serbia-is-forbidden-from-02102005/

All that can be said about this situation is that it very typical throughout Serbia.  Serbian government and authorities do NOT make any attempt to enforce existing nation laws when it comes to animals and animal welfare.  The system is corrupt and those involved with ignoring the enforcement of national legislation are also corrupt.

None of these veterinarians are up to date with the current legislation for animals, despite it being in existence since 2005, and neither do they want to be up tod ate, because they are still making money out of undertaking illegal activities.

As can be shown in the article and the photographs, T-61 is still being used to kill the animals after three days.  Under Article 7, the Law for Animal Welfare, the killing of stray dogs and cats is forbidden.  T-61 has been banned from use in several countries, as it causes respiratory paralysis – the unfortunate animal, when injected, experiences suffocation as the lungs become paralysed and cannot function.

Article 15 of the Law for Animal Welfare states that it is ONLY LAWFUL to euthanise dogs or cats if they have an incurable illness or in the final stages of an incurable disease.

Below is the text of an excellent investigation just completed by Serbian Radio 021.  Their investigation lifts the lid on the killing of stray animals in Novi Sad.

Copies of this article will now be sent to contacts SAV have within the EU Legal Affairs department of DG SANCO, as corruption and non compliance with the enforcement of national legislation are two issues that the EU does not wish to see.  Serbia wishes to become an EU member state, but with its own inability to enforce (Serbian) national animal welfare legislation some six years after it was legally introduced; and which has been validated by the Constitutional Court of Serbia, it could be said that it is better if Serbia continues to remain outside of the EU.

Serbian Radio 021 article link:

http://www.021.rs/Novi-Sad/Vesti/FOTO-Ko-kontrolise-ubijanje-zivotinja-u-sinteraju.html

Translation of article into English directly by Google Translate – NO changes have been made:

All photo credits – Radio 021.

Who controls the killing of animals in the dog catcher?

Prema informacijama do kojih je došao Radio 021, ne postoji nikakva stručna služba koja nadgleda rad veterinara koji ubijaju životinje u novosadskom šinteraju.

According to information obtained by Radio 021, there is no technical division that oversees the work of veterinarians who kill animals in the NS sinter. Na tenderu za izbor firme koja će se baviti eutanaziranjem pasa i mačaka lutalica u Novom Sadu, ovaj posao dobila je veterinarska stanica “Košarčić” iz Futoga.

The tender for the selection of firms to deal with the euthanasia of dogs and cats in Novi Sad, the job got the veterinary station “Košarčić from Futog. Kako za naš radio kaže jedan od veterinara zaposlenih u ovoj ustanovi, Nikola Mišljenović, dok životinjama ubrizgava smrtonosnu injekciju prisutni su samo dežurni poslovođa iz “Čistoće” i on. As our radio said one of the veterinarians employed in this institution, Nicholas Mišljenović, while animals injected lethal injection are present only on duty supervisor of the “Purity” and on.

“Moj rad prilikom eutanaziranja životinja kontroliše moja medicinska, veterinarska etika. Tu je još prisutan i službenik “Čistoće” koji je dežuran kada nas pozovu”, kaže ovaj veterinar. “My work during the euthanasia of animals controlled by my medical, veterinary ethics. There is still present and an official” purity “that was on duty when you call us,” says the vet.

Mišljenović navodi da ceo proces traje kratko i bezbolno za samu životinju, a količina sredstva za eutanaziju se procenjuje odokativno.Mišljenović states that the whole process takes a short and painless for the animal itself, and the amount of funds for euthanasia is estimated odokativno. Prema njegovim rečima, od ubrizgavanja smrtonosne injekcije do uginuća životinje prođe svega nekoliko sekundi. According to him, the injection of lethal injections to death of animal passes a few seconds.

“Psa koga niko ne udomi za ta tri dana koliko se zadržavaju u objektu za privremeni smeštaj najpre izvlačim na ivicu kaveza i otprilike procenim koliko pas može biti težak, kako bi znao koju količinu injekcije treba da koristim.U toj proceni skoro nikad ne omanem, jer se ovim poslom bavim već dosta dugo. Tada se psu daje injekcija koja se ubrizgava između rebara, u plućno tkivo, a životinja ugine mirno par sekundi nakon toga”, kaže Mišljenović.

“The dog when no one udomi for the three days that remain in the house for temporary accommodation are taken out first on the edge of the cage and approximately evaluate how a dog can be difficult to know what amount of injection should koristim.U these estimates almost never wrong, because I do this job long enough. Then he gives the dog a shot that is injected between the ribs, the lung tissue, and the animal died peacefully a few seconds after that, “says Mišljenović.

Sa druge strane, predsednica Udruženja za zaštitu zivotinja Novi Sad,Lana Đorđević navodi da oni sumnjaju da se iza zatvorenih vrata uhvaćeni psi ipak ubijaju na nehuman način.On the other hand, the president of the animal protection Novi Sad, Lana Đorđević said that they suspect that behind closed doors still caught killing dogs in an inhumane way.

“Ja sam pre nego što smo registrovali udruženje putem elektronske pošte tražila dozvolu da uđem u šinteraj,odgovor je bio da će mi javiti kada preduzeće to odobri.Naravno,to se nikad nije dogodilo. Šta drugo,nego da posumnjam da se tamo dešavaju neke stvari koje žele da sakriju od javnosti.”,kaže ova aktivistkinja za prava životinja. “I am before we register the organization via e-mail asked for permission to enter the pound, the answer was to tell me when to odobri.Naravno company, it never happened. What else but to suspect that there occur some things you want to hide from the public. “says the activist for animal rights.

Veterinar Mišljenović ipak tvrdi da se sve životinje eutanaziraju sredstvom T-61 i da za to postoje dokazi, kao i da su spekulacije da se za ubijanje koriste motke ili deterdžent neosnovane i predstavljaju atak na veterinarsku profesiju i etiku.Veterinarian Mišljenović still hard to euthanize all animals means T-61 and that there is evidence, as well as speculation that the killer used poles or detergent baseless and represent an attack on the veterinary profession and ethics. Mišljenović navodi da nikad ne bi sebi dozvolio da vidi životinju da pati. Mišljenović states that would never have allowed myself to see an animal suffer.

“Tu nema nikakve agonije, nikakve dreke, nikakve patnje. Ja prvi nikad ne bih mogao da podnesem da gledam životinju kako umire u mukama. Metod kojim se eutanaziraju životinje je brz, human i tih, i jedini na koji bih pristao”, tvrdi ovaj veterinar.“There’s no agony, no crap, no suffering. I am the first ever I could not stand to watch an animal die in agony. The method by which to euthanize animals is a fast, humane and peaceful, and the only way that I agreed,” said the vet.

Jedna flašica pomenutog sredstva za eutanaziju košta oko 3.000 dinara.

One bottle of the said funds for euthanasia costs about 3,000 dinars. Da li se ovo sredstvo zaista koristi za ubijanje lutalica, ostaje nam samo da verujemo na reč veterinarima koji se time bave. Does this tool really used to kill stray, we can only believe a word vets who do that. (Miodrag Sovilj) (Miodrag Sovilj)

Same article in Serbian (original text):

FOTO: Ko kontroliše ubijanje životinja u šinteraju?

Prema informacijama do kojih je došao Radio 021, ne postoji nikakva stručna služba koja nadgleda rad veterinara koji ubijaju životinje u novosadskom šinteraju. Na tenderu za izbor firme koja će se baviti eutanaziranjem pasa i mačaka lutalica u Novom Sadu, ovaj posao dobila je veterinarska stanica “Košarčić” iz Futoga. Kako za naš radio kaže jedan od veterinara zaposlenih u ovoj ustanovi, Nikola Mišljenović, dok životinjama ubrizgava smrtonosnu injekciju prisutni su samo dežurni poslovođa iz “Čistoće” i on.

“Moj rad prilikom eutanaziranja životinja kontroliše moja medicinska, veterinarska etika. Tu je još prisutan i službenik “Čistoće” koji je dežuran kada nas pozovu”, kaže ovaj veterinar.

Mišljenović navodi da ceo proces traje kratko i bezbolno za samu životinju, a količina sredstva za eutanaziju se procenjuje odokativno. Prema njegovim rečima, od ubrizgavanja smrtonosne injekcije do uginuća životinje prođe svega nekoliko sekundi.

“Psa koga niko ne udomi za ta tri dana koliko se zadržavaju u objektu za privremeni smeštaj najpre izvlačim na ivicu kaveza i otprilike procenim koliko pas može biti težak, kako bi znao koju količinu injekcije treba da koristim.U toj proceni skoro nikad ne omanem, jer se ovim poslom bavim već dosta dugo. Tada se psu daje injekcija koja se ubrizgava između rebara, u plućno tkivo, a životinja ugine mirno par sekundi nakon toga”, kaže Mišljenović.

Sa druge strane, predsednica Udruženja za zaštitu zivotinja Novi Sad,Lana Đorđević navodi da oni sumnjaju da se iza zatvorenih vrata uhvaćeni psi ipak ubijaju na nehuman način.

“Ja sam pre nego što smo registrovali udruženje putem elektronske pošte tražila dozvolu da uđem u šinteraj,odgovor je bio da će mi javiti kada preduzeće to odobri.Naravno,to se nikad nije dogodilo. Šta drugo,nego da posumnjam da se tamo dešavaju neke stvari koje žele da sakriju od javnosti.”,kaže ova aktivistkinja za prava životinja.

Veterinar Mišljenović ipak tvrdi da se sve životinje eutanaziraju sredstvom T-61 i da za to postoje dokazi, kao i da su spekulacije da se za ubijanje koriste motke ili deterdžent neosnovane i predstavljaju atak na veterinarsku profesiju i etiku. Mišljenović navodi da nikad ne bi sebi dozvolio da vidi životinju da pati.

“Tu nema nikakve agonije, nikakve dreke, nikakve patnje. Ja prvi nikad ne bih mogao da podnesem da gledam životinju kako umire u mukama. Metod kojim se eutanaziraju životinje je brz, human i tih, i jedini na koji bih pristao”, tvrdi ovaj veterinar.

Jedna flašica pomenutog sredstva za eutanaziju košta oko 3.000 dinara. Da li se ovo sredstvo zaista koristi za ubijanje lutalica, ostaje nam samo da verujemo na reč veterinarima koji se time bave. (Miodrag Sovilj)

——————————-

SAV Comment:

Nicholas Mišljenović, maybe now the EU should review your situation.

Your own government and authorities are incapable of enforcing national legislation which has been documented for some six years now. 

A nation showing the “Enforcement of the rule of law” is a basic requirement of EU accession (membership).  Serbia shows that it is incapable of enforcing its own national legislation for animal welfare.  Why ? – corruption or a failure of the authorities and people in government ?

Maybe time for the EU Legal Affairs department to review the case and provide us with their expert opinion.

Germany: ‘Fox Week’ Killings Are Now Under Way – We have The data For Around the Last 20 Years – Please Read On …

A typical result from one hunt during ‘Fox Week’

The ‘Fox Week’ has now started in Germany – the indiscriminate killing of tens of thousands of beautiful foxes.

From a dedicated friend, we have now obtained German hunting figures and associated data over a number of years.

A series of general maps about Germany are provided in the following link:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Atlas_of_Germany

The breakdown of German counties (Administrative divisions which should be used in direct conjunction with the statistics data tables) is shown on the following map:

The number of foxes killed per year per county:

Link: 

http://www.jagd-online.de/datenfakten/jahresstrecken/?meta_id=262

A pdf graphic showing the numbers over the last approx. 20  years can be viewed by clicking on the following link:

seiten_aus_streckefuchs2011

Here are the statistics for the number of hunters per county:

http://www.jagd-online.de/datenfakten/zahlenzurjagd/?meta_id=253

Note:

‘Jagdscheininhaber’  = those with an active license
’LJV-Mitglieder’  = a member of the county hunters’s association.

A graphic showing the open and closed seasons for various game can be viewed via the following link:

http://djv.newsroom.de/recherche/jagdundschonzeiten/index.htm

Note  – Foxes are not included, because they do not enjoy protection from a closed season.

This table is valid on the national level, but counties may alter this for their own territory as they see fit.

Previous SAV posts relating to Germany ‘Fox Week’ :

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/28/germany-280111-german-fox-week-latest-pics-links-and-even-a-message-from-jesus/ 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/very-important-please-read-hunting-and-timber-lobbyists-in-germany-may-influence-eu-wide-wildlife-protection-in-the-future-we-must-not-let-this-happen/ 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/23/germany-update-230111-eu-hunting-court-rulings-the-german-fox-week-and-more/ 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/20/germany-mass-slaughter-of-fox-week-to-start-by-february-international-appeal-for-aw-groups-to-join-the-german-protest-and-say-no-details-below/ 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/germany-international-animal-welfare-organisations-only-please-support-the-call-for-a-closed-season-on-fox-murder-currently-foxes-can-be-killed-all-year/

South Korea: Latest Animal Killing Statistics Update on Foot and Mouth – Not Good Reading; Tens of Thousands Buried Alive.

http://animalrightskorea.org/news-articles/

Latest Statistics on Korean Cull, Nov. 2010 – Feb. 2011

FMD continues to spread. Even in vaccinated areas, FMD is occurring, which suggests that vaccination will fail to contain the disease.

It is highly likely that the disease has spread to North Korea.

1. FMD Cull Numbers as of February 7, 2011

Total = 3,164,452 (5,664 farms)

Cattle = Cattle: 149,844 (3,667 farms)
Pigs = 3,006,283 (1,652 farms, 95% of the total culling and 28% of the total number of pigs raised in Korea as of December 2010.)
Goats: 5,354 (207 farms)
Deer: 2,969 (138 farms)

Number of cases: 153 in 69 cities and regions

Dogs have also been killed. A report from Chuncheon say around 60 dogs were also buried alive as a cow the farm with them was affected with FMD.

Around 100,000 animals have been buried alive every day.   The government has offered national forests for burial as local authorities are running out of suitable burial sites. This may lead animals to suffer more as they will have to be driven farther from their farms. Another serious concern is that disease spread wider and more ground water contamination will occur.

In Gyeonggi Province, the most severely affected area, more than 80% of the total number of farmed animals were killed.

2. Avian Flu Cull Numbers as of February 7, 2011

Total = 5,411,483 (243 farms, chickens and ducks)

Number of cases = 40 in 16 cities and regions.

In South Jeolla province alone, around 3 million birds were killed across 130 farms. AI is rampant especially in South Jeolla, where 37 million chickens/ducks (13,000 farms) are bred.

In 2008, 22 chicken farms and 11 duck farms were affected but in 2011, 21 out of 26 cases were from duck farms. The government has no clear answer but says that 99% of ducks are bred to be sold to large companies and these farms receive the same duck food, which could be a reason. While chickens would die of the disease soon after contagion, it takes longer for ducks to die. So it might be that the viruses were present for a long time in South Jeolla and Choongcheong areas before being discovered.

Also on Jan. 20, the rare Avian Tuberculosis was found in Gangreung, Gangwon Province, for the first time since 1961. Although the disease doesn’t spread fast, there is no cure or vaccine. So birds (around 3,000-6,000 or more) are likely to be killed and buried alive in this area.

3. Euthanasia

Succinylcholine (for human surgery) was used. This drug is a neuromuscular blocking agent that induces muscle paralysis without loss of consciousness. So this drug is not acceptable as a sole agent for euthanasia. Because cattle were the main focus of government efforts, pigs were not given succinylcholine.

The total amount of the drug available was 200,000 ampules (this is the exact number supplied by the manufacturer).

1~3 ampules are needed to kill cattle (2-6 for pigs):

1 x ampules kills through intravenous injection
3 x ampules kills through intramusclar injection

Cattle were mainly killed through muscle injection. But after one month of the FMD outbreak, the drug had run out (on December 29, 2010). At that point we can presume live burials were used exclusively for cattle and all other animals.

However, Korea is reported to have imported 33,000 ampules of Succicholine from China. But this drug has problems (gel type, not liquid type) and does not work fast and animals suffer for a long time.

As many more people criticize the government, the Ministory of Agriculture is considering alternative drugs or gas (but is not confirmed) and more muscle relaxants will be imported.

There are also unaffected farms asking the government to kill their animals (especially, new-borns) because the farmers are prohibited from transporting their animals and the animals keep breeding when there is not enough food or space for them.

Reports said that some pigs were gassed in a pit rather than buried alive. However, even this seems to have traumatized the workers.

4. Vaccinations

So far, 2 million cows (58%) and 756,000 pigs (7.6%) have been vaccinated. Nationwide vaccination began on 16 January. From 21 January, 0.5 million cows and pigs in Jejudo Island as well as 6.6 million pigs in the country will be vaccinated.

By the end of January, 11 million vaccines (for 4 million animals) will be secured. Korea will keep importing vaccines. The government plans to finish the first-round vaccination before Seoul holiday (2-6, February).

Around January 15, mass vaccinations will take place across the country (decided on 13 January). All cows, sows, boars, and fed pigs in breeding farms will be vaccinated. As 2.25 million vaccines will arrive on 15 January, 1.46 million cows and 0.65 million pigs will be vaccinated on this day. And then, the remaining fed pigs will be vaccinated. Finally, 0.5 million pigs and cows in Jeju Island will be vaccinated.

However, mass vaccination does not include piglets. It is likely that pigs will remain the least protected animals.

The country has prohibited manufacturing of vaccines for FMD as people may get affected in the manufacturing process. In addition, Korea has no special facilities that are devoted to research on these diseases.

In the meantime, the government said in a newspaper interview that the country is considering changing the status from free of disease without vaccination to free of disease with vaccination (the second-degree OIE standard). This means Korea will give up the first-grade OIE standard and keep vaccinating animals against FMD, as Taiwan did. But this is not certain yet.

The first-round vaccination is to be completed by 31 January.

Cattle: 1st round vaccination has been completed and the 2nd round vaccination is beginning; pigs: 75% complete

After 3-5 weeks from the first-round vaccination, the second-round vaccination will take place and is expected to be repeated every six months.

On January 29, Jeju Island started vaccinating animals. The OIE had last declared the island free of the disease without vaccination (the first level) in May 2001.

5. Percentage of Live Burials

At the most conservative estimate, based on pig numbers only, since all pigs were buried alive, over 90% of animals were buried alive. Many other animals, including cattle have met the same fate; however, it is unknown what percentage of those animals were buried alive.

Also, at the same time foot-and-mouth has been sweeping Korea, there were bird flu outbreaks and a separate culling operation began for that.

Based on the live burials of birds and pigs, a minimum 97% of all animals have been buried alive since November 29, 2010.

6. Human Death Toll

Seven public officials have died and 36 have been severely injured in culling operations. About 100 officials were slightly injured. Several farmers committed suicide after their farms became infected.


Korean Sources for Cull News (in English):

English newspapers in Korea seem reluctant to provide evidence of live burial while there are many more reports of live burial in Korean language newspapers.

Dec. 21, 2010: Foot and Mouth Spreading

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2929931

Dec. 23, 2010: Govt. Still Contemplation Vaccinations

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2930052

Dec. 25, 2010: Govt. Finally Starts Vaccinations

http://www.koreaherald.com/national/Detail.jsp?newsMLId=20101225000038

Dec. 28, 2010: Fight Against Food and Mouth Picking Up

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2010/12/123_78747.html

Jan. 3, 2011: Korea Expands Vaccinations to Stem FMD

http://www.koreaherald.com/business/Detail.jsp?newsMLId=20110103000860

Jan. 3, 2011: Pigs Burial Raises Concerns Over Water Contamination

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/117_79094.html

Jan. 6, 2011: Massive Culling As FMD Spreads

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/116_79256.html

Jan. 6, 2011: Govt. Finally Orders Pig Vaccinations

http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/business/2011/01/06/57/0501000000AEN20110106008900320F.HTML

Jan. 12, 2011: Healthy Animals Are Rushed to Slaughter

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2930867

Jan. 12, 2011: More FMD Cases in Central Korea

http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/business/2011/01/12/15/0501000000AEN20110112005500320F.HTML

Jan. 14, 2011: Korea Seeks to Regain FMD-Free Status

http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2011/01/14/24/0200000000AEN20110114004800320F.HTML

Jan. 16, 2011: New Disease Quarantine Team Will Be Set Up

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/116_79624.html

Jan. 17, 2011: Live Burial Brings International Boycott of Korean Goods

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/117_79843.html

Jan. 17, 2011: Alternative to FMD Culling Must Be Found

http://english.khan.co.kr/khan_art_view.html?artid=201101171510337&code=790101

Jan. 17, 2011: Disease-free Farm Due Farmer’s Own Prevention Methods

http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/459153.html

Jan. 17, 2011: Korea Gaining Over Disease Amid Harsh Criticism

http://www.voanews.com/english/news/asia/South-Korea-Claiming-Upper-Hand-in-Farm-Battle-Against-Foot-and-Mouth-Disease-113871474.html

Jan. 17, 2011: Live Burial Provokes Mass Uproar

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/117_79769.html

Jan. 21, 2011: Demonstration Over Live Burials

http://www.naeil.com/news/eboard_view.asp?location=1&mn_id=2881

Jan. 21, 2011: Rare Avian Flu Found For the First Time in 50 Years

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/117_80111.html

Jan. 25, 2011: The Massacre Needs Attention

http://edu.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2011/01/25/2011012501665.html

Jan. 25, 2011: Government Admits Faults in Countermeasures

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/117_80328.html

Jan. 26, 2011: FMD and Mass Movement for Lunar New Year

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/117_80406.html

Jan. 29, 2011: [Editorial] Brazen response to the foot-and-mouth outbreak

http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_editorial/461295.html

Jan. 30, 2011: Is Full Compensation Causing A Moral Problem?

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2011/01/123_80615.html

Jan. 30, 2011: Eerie Silence Reigns Over FMD-hit Villages

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/01/117_80584.html

Korean Vegetarians Protest Culling

With the largest cull in Korean history in progress–in fact, two culling operations, one for foot-and-mouth disease and one for avian flu–the Korean Vegetarian Association staged a cull protest and a promotion of vegetarianism in Seoul over the weekend (Jan. 8 and 9).

The culling has claimed over a million and half lives at the time of writing and perhaps a million more will be culled in the coming weeks.

Too little too late perfectly describes the Korean government’s response with vaccination measures. Typically, a large part of the problem has been economic. It takes longer to regain disease-free status from the World Organization for Animal Health if a country has been using vaccinations. That means exports suffer, so the government held back.

With a truly incompetent and flagrant lack of foresight, it gambled on beating the disease by vaccinating cattle but cruelly burying hundreds of thousands of pigs alive. The gamble did not pay off, however, and the disease continues to spread.

The government is now saying that 1.2 million pigs and cattle across the country will be vaccinated over the next few weeks and it will try to get vaccines for 6.5 million animals by the end of January.

More Killing of Farmed Animals as Bird Flu Hits Korea

Culling operations in 2008. Notice live birds sticking out of the bags. This would be the first time they have been outdoors to experience daylight.

On the back of foot-and-mouth disease, which led to over half a million hoofed animals being killed by authorities, avian flu has struck Korea. Chicken farms in the south-west were found contaminated with the H5N1 virus.

To date, more than 100,000 chickens and 10,000 ducks have been killed. The bird flu was possibly carried in by migratory birds and authorities have urged farmers to protect their flocks better. But that is easier said than done. Factory farms have the perfect conditions for quick and massive spread of diseases.

The farms hit with bird flu were near cities south of Seoul, Cheonan and Iksan, which are 90 km and 230 km away from the captial, respectively.

The Korean government was swift and brutal. All 10,700 ducks on the farm in Cheonan and 17,000 chickens at Iksan were culled and buried, along with 92,000 chickens on other farms nearby. It is likely that most of these animals were buried alive.

Update, January 10, 2011

So far 600,000 birds have been buried alive.

Here is news footage of culling operations. It shows an excavator being used to sweep bags full of birds of the back off a truck into a pit. The bags can be seen moving, with live birds inside. There’s no telling how many would be injured by this, nor how long they would remain injured while in the pits–perhaps for hours on end.

http://media.daum.net/society/view.html?cateid=1067&newsid=20110110211247567&p=sbsi

KARA has already sent an official letter to the government urging vaccinations. However, manufacturing of vaccine could take up a month to prepare.

Meanwhile, instead of the government acting in a humane way it is taking the easy option of simply burying birds alive.

Update, January 12, 2011

So far 2,700,000 birds have been buried alive.

Update, January 17, 2011

Death toll stands at 3,572,187

Update, January 30, 2011

Total dead = 5,412,465

Previous SAV posts relating to this issue:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/south-korea-counselled-distraught-farm-wives-compare-burying-piglets-alive-to-killing-their-own-children-and-still-the-government-makes-excuses/ 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/14/south-korea-foot-and-mouth-please-take-action-for-animals-who-have-been-buried-alive-sample-letter-included/ 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/01/08/south-korea-one-million-pigs-buried-alive-please-sign-the-petition/

Australia: Fraser Island Dingoes Starving; Poisoned and Prevented From Feeding From Tourists – Take Action Now – Sample Letter and Video Included.

 

 

14/02/11: **** PETITION NOW CREATED **** – PLEASE SIGN.

http://www.change.org/petitions/dingoes-starving-on-fraser-island#signatures

 

ACTION ALERT – (Australia) Fraser Island dingoes starving; ignored, poisoned; or worse, neglected, and suffering terribly.

SAV have now formally written to the Hon Kate Jones MP

Member for Ashgrove
Minister for Climate Change and Sustainability
Level 13, 400 George Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 2454, Brisbane QLD 4001
tel: 323 90841
fax: 322 76309
sustainability@ministerial.qld.gov.au  

Asking that action be taken to prevent the abuse and suffering of starving dingoes on Fraser Island.  A pdf copy of the SAV letter is shown below:

Australia Dingoes Starving 10 Feb 2011

Please write to Kate Jones asking her to kindly act on behalf of the dingoes; declaring that an emergency feeding program for the long suffering Fraser Island dingoes is established, and that action is immediately taken against those so called humans who are poisoning the animals and preventing them from taking food.

Mail Ms. Jones at  sustainability@ministerial.qld.gov.au  

Use and copy the SAV in the pdf detailed, or copy the wording and modify to your own requirements.

At the end of this post you will find a letter which has been mailed by Pamela Hayes, Australian resident concerned about the dingoes.  This is the basis of support for the SAV letter to Ms. Jones.

Please also view the video produced by Jennifer Parkhurst, long standing campaigner for the  Fraser Island dingoes.

YouTube clip, see it now…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_nHinnQ5eM

—————————————————————————- 

SAV Letter to Ms. Jones. 

                                                                                                10th February 2011

Dear Ms Jones;

I am writing to you this short mail to ask please that you very seriously consider the request detailed in the letter / mail from Pamela Hayes of the Sunshine Coast. Copy below.

I am very concerned about what appears to have happened to Jennifer Parkhurst, a lady who obviously cares about the plight of suffering animals.

It would appear that ‘DERM’ thugs are hired to stop people from feeding the animals.

How long can you go without a meal one has to ask ?

I further support the call of Pam Hayes letter that the men (? – very much doubt) who are feeding poisoned biscuits to the dingoes to deter them from taking food from tourists also be sacked.  Yes, these dragknuckles should be replaced by human beings with morals and ethics.

Although my organization is called ‘Serbian Animals Voice’, it is actually based in England, Uk.  I myself am an Englishman.  We have over six years direct campaigning and legal experience against the Serbian government relating to stray animals in the Balkans; strays which endure very similar practices and suffering that the dingoes appear to be enduring now at the hands of some men.  This is not the situation with all people; visitors wish to see and feed the animals and I trust you would support this rather than setting thugs against the animals baiting them with poisoned biscuits.

I am now posting the full article of this situation onto the SAV site, and will be asking all of our global supporters; of which we have many  – see  http://www4.clustrmaps.com/counter/maps.php?user=9b44b4e0  for further details; asking them to e mail you in support of the requests detailed in Pamela Hayes letter.

Until we hear from you declaring that an emergency feeding program for the long suffering Fraser Island dingoes has been established, and that action has been taken against those so called humans poisoning the animals and preventing them from taking food, the post will remain on the SAV site.

I trust that you may consider issuing a formal statement in the very near future declaring your intentions for the starving Fraser Island dingoes.  Once we have this, we will then consider the next stage of our campaign.

Pamela Hayes is correct in her letter content.  In addition, I have found the (bad) ear tagging issue relating to animals as shown in the Youtube video by Jennifer Parkhurst of very serious concern also.  I trust that you will also review this and take appropriate action.

Links to this situation will also be sent to contacts across Europe and the Americas.

Thank you for your time and I look forward to being the recipent of your Press Release in support of a dingoes feeding action plan in the very near future.

Yours truly,

Mark Johnson

Founder SAV;

Kent, England, Uk.

—————————————- 

Original action letter to Ms. Jones from Pamela Hayes, Sunshine Coast, Qld.
 

Dingoes starving…

From: Pam H
Subject: Dingoes starving…
To:
Date: Thursday, 10 February, 2011, 2:48

Hi All,

I realise this is mostly the kanga group but if anyone has a minute could you please drop a brief email to Kate Jones (below) letting her know that it’s wonderful to help the cassowaries but for too long the Fraser Island dingoes have been ignored, or worse, neglected, and are suffering terribly. Even if you only copy and paste a part of my email it will let her know that more people care, and will bring her attention to the plight of the dingoes.
 
Thanks,
Pam.

Pam H wrote:

I just sent the email below to:

*Hon Kate Jones MP*
 Member for Ashgrove
*Minister for Climate Change and Sustainability*
 Level 13, 400 George Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 2454, Brisbane QLD 4001
tel: 323 90841
fax: 322 76309
sustainability@ministerial.qld.gov.au  
mailto:sustainability@ministerial.qld.gov.au
 
She is organising the aerial feeding of the cassowaries.
Pam.

Dear Ms Jones,

Mission Beach has declared an emergency feeding program for the endangered Cassowary, so they don’t starve.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/yasi/8208093/new-team-set-up-to-help-cassowaries

What about setting up an emergency feeding program for the long suffering Fraser Island dingoes who are actually starving to death as I write? Many have been found dead with nothing but grass and sand in their stomachs. Yet they are guarded by hired ‘DERM’ thugs to stop people from feeding them.  This is outrageous.

Do we have to wait for another cyclone or other disaster before we see a need to stop this ongoing cruelty and suffering?

Those who are currently MIS-managing them thought it would be smart to feed them poison biscuits ‘to deter’ the dingoes from taking food from tourists. These men should be sacked and replaced with human beings with morals and ethics.

We all know what happened to Jennifer Parkhurst, a kind and compassionate woman who actually respects animals; fined $40,000 and given a suspended jail term for simply taking pity on them. The charge they came up with was “interfering with dingoes”. What sort of a country makes up such a charge in order to perpetuate suffering?  Probably one that only wants to save face.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/fraser-island-dingo-whisperer-in-the-dock/story-e6freoof-1225947079242

An excerpt from the Australian Wildlife Protection Council’s newsletter; Christmas 2010. Volume 21 Number 3:
“15 months ago, Jennifer Parkhurst, a widely respected woman and insulin-dependent diabetic, was rudely awakened at 7am by Qld Dept of Environment and Resource Management squad pounding on her door. The next 6 hours were spent in a terrified state of shock, watching her personal possessions and professional equipment being confiscated and carried off by the DERM ‘goons’. She didn’t realise the vindictiveness and persistence of the louts employed by the Qld Gov’t to manage Fraser Island and the unfortunate, hapless dingoes. They confiscated most of her belongings, including her paintings, photographs, personal documents, even Gov’t documents legally obtained under FOI. The dingo family Jennifer photographed were later killed out of sheer bloody-mindedness, although the perpetrators said they were destroyed after ‘exhibiting increasingly aggressive behaviour’. [Bullies are actually cowards beneath all the posturing].

If you haven’t yet had a chance to look at Jennifer Parkhurst’s moving Fraser Island dingo YouTube clip, see it now…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_nHinnQ5eM

Something must be done for these poor animals, we cannot sit back and allow goons to have their way simply so they can throw their weight around and feel like the alpha males of the region.

The true measure of a man is revealed in his attitude toward animals.

If you have any power at all, to make life a little easier for these starving creatures, I beg you to use it as soon as you possibly can.

Sincerely,
Pamela Hayes,
Sunshine Coast, Qld.

Links:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/11/03/3056420.htm?site=widebay

http://naturescrusaders.wordpress.com/2010/10/31/dingo-crusader-jennifer-parkhurst-for-feeding-starving-animals/

http://www.frasercoastchronicle.com.au/story/2010/07/24/hey-dingo-your-numbers-up/

http://www.care2.com/news/member/525884267/966532

http://www.gympietimes.com.au/story/2010/03/26/dingo-fraser-island-death/

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/30/2859757.htm

Things Now Looking Very Good for ‘Fluffy’ and the Romanian Dogs and Cats – Further Update 11/02/11

‘FLUFFY’

A COUPLE OF THE ROMANIAN DOGS

The latest news on the situation for both ‘Fluffy’ and for the Romanian dogs and cats who were left after the death of their owner IS VERY PROMISING ON BOTH ASPECTS !

SAV have been working directly with other European animal welfare organisers (who help Romanian animals) to find new homes for the animals across Europe; and we think that there will be some excellent final news and results in the very near future.

Obviously, we will be keeping you informed of the results; but this is just a line to say that things are moving on at pace, and that the future for all the animals is looking very, very positive.

SAV.

Past links to the stories:

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/uk-romania-050211-update-on-the-appeal-to-find-a-new-home-for-fluffy-great-news/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/urgent-appeal-to-find-new-homes-in-europe-for-romanian-animals-whos-owner-has-died-can-you-help/

Demanti na clanak u Subotickim novinama br 51 , od 24.12.2010. : Policija i komunalci sprecili pustanje 700 pasa na ulicu,

 


From: EPAR

To: info@subotickenovine.rs

Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 5:13 AM

Subject: Broj uhvacenih pasa  u 2010 .  je 627, macaka  93,  stenaca 115 .

Brojno stane   u decembru 2010. je  272 psa  2 macke i 0  stenaca.

Prethodnih godina  uhvaceno je  200-400 pasa/ macaka godisnje .

Gospodja Suzana Dulic  i dalje ponavlja da Grad postupa zakonito –  obmanjuje javnost ,jer istina je da  g.Dulic i g.Tikvicki i svi ostali koji su involvirani u poslove  sa psima i mackama `lutalicama `  cine krivicna dela kaznjiva  clanom 269 KZ RS , a Ustav  Rep Srbije nalaze  postupanje po svim vazecim zakonima i   dopusta  samo one podzakonske akte koji su saglasni s zakonima.

GDE su  sve te zivotinje  ?

Zar ljude ne interesuje na sta  ovi trose novac svake godine  5 miliona  plus  sada i 15  miliona  njihovog novca – bez obzira da li `vole `  ili  `ne vole ` pse i macke ,  kako je moguce da  su nezainteresovani za svoj novac ? Ili samo vi ne smete  da pistete  istinu ?

Sve su ih poubijali   a koje jos nisu – poubijace , dolaze novi , oni na to i racunaju ,g. Suzana Dulic i g. Grgo Tikvicki –   mada je  to krivicno delo  kaznjivo stavom 2 clana 269 KZ RS  ,  ali  ako si clan DS  u Subotici , mozes da ubijas , da  trostruko naplacujes Program mera  i da  obmanjujes  javnost  pricama  da  Grad  sa kojim sebe izjednacavas ,postupa zakonito  jer bas  je` poceo da gradi  prihvatiliste` na adresi TUK Ugarnice – gradi ga jos od 2004.

Kao da neko moze  da radi kao neurohirurg – cim  je upisao Medicinu.

Pitamo se GDE  su  psi koje su pohvatali  , zasto cuvaju ovu tezgu kad je ocigledno nezakonita  i njima  korisna, a stetna za gradjane i za zivotinje

,  zasto ne  omoguce obelezavanje  vlasnickih  pasa i macaka  i tako   prestanu s nemoralnim  postupanjem  prema javnom novcu .

Zasto  ne objavite DEMANTI ?

imate li zakonu utemeljen odgovor ili  samo strah od pomenutih  DS clanova u Subotici ?

 

EPAR-OIPA SRBIJA/Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9

Budi vegan-spasi Planetu

—– Original Message —–

From: EPAR

To: info@subotickenovine.rs

Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:48 AM

Subject: Demanti na clanak u Subotickim novinama br 51 , od 24.12.2010. : Policija i komunalci sprecili pustanje 700 pasa na ulicu,

DEMANTI   na clanak objavljen u Subotickim novinama broj 51, pod naslovom : `Policija i komunalci sprecili pustanje 700 pasa na ulicu `

zbog  neistina i kleveta  od strane g. Suzane Dulic  i neistina  iznetih od strane lica koja su ukrala identitet organizacije Prijatelj-EPAR  i `vode`  ovu organizaciju od 28.10.2010. a predstavljaju se kao da  to rade  od 2003. godine.

– jer  mi smo izgradili prihvatiliste u Titogradskoj 53 , davne 2003. godine – uz malu, ali u moralnom smislu veoma znacajnu pomoc   internacionalne  organizacije OIPA  www.oipa.org

 , ciji smo clan , mi smo  bili organizacija Prijatelj-EPAR   sve do  28.10.2010. kada nam je ukraden identitet organizacije  , nas  klevece g. Suzana Dulic , ali nas ne moze da laze o `zakonitom` postupanju gradske uprave –  i ona to zna , kao sto  ovo  znaju i ljudi koji se danas predstavljaju kao  Prijatelj-EPAR – a da su znali sto sada znaju ne bi nikada , jer su ostavljeni na `cedilu`  od strane gradske uprave  i stoga u manje  od mesec dana `vodjenja` azila  hteli  su da izbace pse na ulicu  i sve ostalo.

Gospodja Suzana Dulic imala je obavezu da istinito obavesti javnost umesto sto je u javnost iznela gomilu  neistina – neosnovano tvrdeci da Grad postupa i  da je uvek postupao zakonito  prema napustenim psima , mackama  i javnom novcu  ,i  iznoseci klevete – da je  ovo ` hobi`  organizacije Prijatelj-EPAR  , da su psi  u  gradskom prihvatilistu  na adresi Ganjo sor  134 dobro zbrinuti – zaboravlja   da kaze privremeno dok  ih ne ubiju  a ubijaju ih  najmanje  1 puta nedeljno  i 1 puta mesecno ,ili dok se medjusobno ne poubijaju  i da zakoni Srbije   ubijanje zabranjuju  kako  najmanje 1x nedeljno tako i  najmanje 1x mesecno – cak i kada g. Dulic  koristi termin `humana eutanazija` – a pri tom ne zna  sta to zaista znaci  ,da su psi  u  prihvatilistu u  Titogradskoj 53 , koji je  ko zna kako  lose  izgradjen  , ko zna kako lose  zbrinuti .

2003.  je prihvatiliste u Titogradskoj 53,  iz nuzde  izgradjeno ( jer je grad imao  jedno putnicko vozilo zastava 101  i prikolicu za krompir  sa kavezom  u kojem  su fizicki radnici  odmah  nezakonito ubijali uhvacene pse i macke  Nuvanom – pesticidom ,a  Grad je morao po starom Zakonu o zdravstvenoj zastiti zivotinja( od 1991.do 2005.)  imati prihvatiliste  za  smestaj u trajanju 7-14 dana  )- jedino prihvatiliste  u Subotici ,na adresi Titogradska 53 , izgradjeno  je  2003. uz pisanu saglasnost svih  punoletnih suseda , pa i ovih koji su  danas nahuskani , a novi su se doselili na zateceno stanje  stoga je to njihov izbor . 

 2004. godine , iz nuzde  je  , u skladu sa tada vazecim zakonima  ,registrovano prihvatiliste za zbrinjavanje napustenih pasa ,koje je  izgradjeno licnim sredstvima  fizickog  

lica ,a dato  sudski overenim Ugovorom na besplatno koriscenje  organizaciji Prijatelj-EPAR  , ciji identitet je ukraden 28.10.2010.  od strane ljudi koji  od  18.12.2003. do 28.10.2010. nisu  zeleli   imati obaveze kao sto je : brinuti  se o psima u ovom prihvatilistu  , a identitet organizacije  su ukrali  ne zato da bi  brinuli o  psima – jer onda ne bi pokusavali da ih izbace na ulicu, niti da se spale  ako im to izbacivanje ne uspe  – ,nego zato sto  im je  gradska vlast obecala  novac i ispunjenje  zelja . 

 Grad je  na uredne zahteve   za isplatom uredno placao JKP Cistoci 450 000 dinara mesecno  , cak  i  u periodu kada  ova firma od 2.9.2004. do 3.5.2006.  zbog zabrane  -jer nije imala objekat  i  NIJE obavljala poslove hvatanja i unistavanja pasa i macaka lutalica , za to vreme jedino organizacija Prijatelj-EPAR  je imala prihvatiliste i zbrinjavala pse – ali ne ovi  ljudi  koji su nam ukrali identitet  nego mi   ), sto gradskoj upravi nije odgovaralo  , ali  je  gradska vlast izneverila data obecanja – prevarila   je ove naivne ljude , vodeci   s njima neobavezujuce sastanke ,  tvrdeci  da  Gradska uprava postupa zakonito , dok postoje dokazi da je to  laz . 

Grad Subotica   nema  ni danas prihvatiliste za zbrinjavanje  napustenih pasa i macaka ,  gradska uprava   postupa nezakonito  , tj ne  preduzima mere  sprecavanja pojave novih  pasa i macaka `lutalica`, ne zbrinjava nego ubija zivotinje, one  koje se medjusobno ne poubijaju   u  skucenom objektu za  njihov PRIVREMENI SMESTAJ  u Ganjo sor 134. ,a pri tom ne radi na eliminisanju problema neodgovornih vlasnika – psi na ulicama samo su POSLEDICA , UZROK problema su  neodgovorni vlasnici pasa i macaka – ali ako  se  eliminise UZROK, nece vise moci  krasti javni novac `spasavajuci`  gradjane od `copora  pasa lutalica` . 

Ko ce nas spasiti od ovih `spasilaca` koji nam kontinuirano prazne  dzepove ? i imaju namertu  to i dalje da rade . 

 Od  3.5.2006.  ,tj   od 27.7.2007. kada je  Grad  kupio  bivsu odgajivacnicu pasa od g. Miroslava Milojevica  za 7,6 miliona dinara   ,   objekat u Ganjo sor 134 uknjizen je  kao vlasnistvo Rep Srbije , grad Subotica  ima prihvatiliste  ali  SAMO za privremeni smestaj  pasa i macaka –  mada je po zakonu od 2.11.2005.  Grad duzan da  zbrinjava   ove zivotinje  koje su njegovi  neodgovorni gradjani-poreski obveznici  izbacili  na ulicu , u prihvatilista za zbrinjavanje- BEZ ubijanja .Sta dalje  rade   sa psima i mackama  nakon isteka  vremena  PRIVREMENOG  smestaja  je : nezakonito lisavanje zivota ( da bi napravili mesto za nove  pse i macke )  a  to nezakonito lisavanje  zivota  obavlja  , a nekada samo potpisuje  i naravno naplacuje :Vet stanica`Veterinar` vlasnika g. Grge Tikvickog , partijskog  DS ( ovo ne sluzi  na cast ovoj  partiji) kolege i kucnog prijatelja gospodje Dulic Suzane  i  njenog supruga  gospodina Dulic Vlade ,zaposlenog u JKP`Cistoca i zelenilo`  , gde je   direktor   naravno clan  DS  , g.Vlada Dragin rodjak  Ministra poljoprivrede, g. Sase Dragin  , i tako  oni odrzavaju konstantan broj 200 -400 pasa u malom neuslovnom prihvatilistu za PRIVREMENI SMESTAJ  PASA I MACAKA , uprkos sto  sinteri – `hvataci`  ili lepse zvuci `zoohigijenicari`  uhvate   novih 200 do 400  pasa i macaka  godisnje  koje  onda g. Grgo Tikvicki  i njegovi veterinari uredno mikrocipuje, vakcinise, sterilise  i na kraju UBIJE ( Zakljucak Ustavnog suda : IU-27/2007 : U Srbiji je zakonom zabranjeno ubijanje  pasa i macaka  i kaznjivo je  clanom 269 KZ RS )

 sve to naplati iz gradskog budzeta , a   obaveznu vakcinaciju- Program  mera  naplati  dvostruko i  u nekim slucajevima  trostruko :  i iz gradskog i iz republickog budzeta i  treci put isti posao  naplacuje  i  iz  dzepa fizickog lica  koje  usvaja  ili uzima svog izgubljenog psa ,   i naravno naplati   `humanu eutanaziju `  kojom on pravi slobodna mesta   – odlican biznis !!!  i beskrajno siguran , stalno  ce trajati  , osiguran na ovaj nezakonit nacin – uz dobru saradnju sa  rep vet inspekcijom i Upravom za veterinu – sve same partijske kolege i  veterinari  koji su zato studirali veterinu jer ` jako vole zivotinje` , samo  sto je nezakonit, jer je  ovo ubijanje u Srbiji zabranjeno od 2.11.2005.( Zakljucak Ustavnog suda  IU-27/2007  i Odluka Ustavnog suda  Sl.gl.RS 9/2010) ,jer  smanjenje brojnosti populacije napustenih pasa i macaka MORA  zakonito biti reseno :  mikrocipovanjem i sterilizacijom  i to  na prvom mestu VLASNICKIH pasa i macaka,  kao i napustenih  u prihvatilistima , te kaznjavanjem neodgovornih vlasnika  koji  ne zele mikrocipovati i  sterilisati , a potom izbacuju nove jedinke na ulicu , a ne pravljenjem  beskrajne tezge  gospodinu Tikvickom i saradnicima .

Ustavni sud je ponistio  kao nezakonite cak  dve Opstinske odluke  grada Subotice ( Sl list grada Subotice 33/2003, i  63/2008 )  po kojima je grad Subotica postupao  sve do juna 2010. godine  – dakle NEZAKONITO , a  na isti nacin: ubijanjem najmanje  jedanput mesecno – gradska uprava, JKP `Cistoca i zelenilo`  i VS `Veterinar`  odrzavaju brojno stanje  krseci Zakon o veterinarstvu i Zakon o dobrobiti zivotinja, dakle  i Ustav RS pri cemu odrzavaju glavni  svoj cilj –  dotok stalno novih i novih  napustenih pasa i macaka , cime odrzavaju `zivom` ovu beskrajnu , veoma unosnu `tezgu`.

Mi svi koji smo 8 godina  brinuli o ovim psima , mi koji smo placali  plate radnicima `volonterima` ,nabavljali hranu i placali veterinare , izgradili  200 bokseva  –  istovremeno  insistirajuci da grad  postupa zakonito  i zaustavi piramidu reprodukcije i neodgovorne vlasnike  ,i  koji smo  saradjivali i radili sa mnogiom  srbijanskim i stranim organizacijama na zastiti prirode, prava zivotinja i prava ljudi  implementacijom vazecih i donosenjem  jos boljih zakona , radili smo sirom Srbije i sire , pod imenom Prijatelj-EPAR  ,prijavili smo policiji kradju identiteta  nase organizacije , i najavu  novog rukovodstva  da ce  21.12.2010. izvrsiti `pustanje 700 pasa` iz  legalnog prihvatilista  koje je preuzeto iz  `nepoznatih razloga` -pitamo se  zasto su  28.10.2010. preuzeli  organizaciju i brigu ,ako ih  nakon manje od mesec dana   zele  i pokusavaju izbaciti  te iste pse na ulicu ,   ali  , da ne bi bilo zastoja u radu  u velikom broju  nasih predmeta sirom Srbije , registrovali smo se kao  organizacija EPAR  i nastavili svoj rad.

Mi i dalje  svojim kamionom  snabdevamo hranom  pse u prihvatilistu za zbrinjavanje napustenih pasa donoseci 2,5 -3 tone hrane ponedeljkom, sredom i petkom – a to je posao Grada .Mi smo platili sve veterinarske troskove  i koje smo morali i one koje  po zakonu nismo morali  jer su neki zakonska  obaveza  Grada (  zbrinjavanje : lecenje i neobavezne vakcinacije , sterilizacije ) , a neki su zakonska obaveza Republike  ( antirabicna vakcinacija  pasa u interesu zastite zivota gradjana , cl 140. 141 Zakona o veterinarstvu ).

Takodje  smo obavestili  i elektronski i  dostavljanjem  na postansku adresu : Gradsku upravu i   sadasnje  rukovodstvo  `organizacije Prijatelj-EPAR`  sta  smeju i sta moraju  nadalje raditi ,jer u protivnom ce uslediti tuzba zbog zlostavljanja i /ili ubijanja velikog broja zivotinja  , sto je zakonom zabranjeno ,a u cije zbrinjavanje smo mi ulozili svoj licni  ogroman novac  u proteklih 8 godina  (jer ako  je cena zbrinjavanja 200 pasa godisnje  : 450 000  dinara mesecno,  sta mislite koliko kosta zbrinjavanje  do 1000  pasa godisnje ).

Mi smo glas ovih zivotinja  ima ih preko 700 ,koje niko nema pravo `izmestati` iz registrovanog prihvatilista za zbrinjavanje u prihvatiliste za privremeni smestaj i ubijanje najmanje 1 puta nedeljno  do 2008  i najmanje 1 puta mesecno   2010.  i 2011. ,kao sto  niko nema pravo ni da ubija  pse i macke  koji se nadju u privremenom smestaju na adresi Ganjo sor 134 ,  nego mora  po zakonu da ih zbrinjava u prihvatilista ,  i niko  po zakonu nema pravo  da zlostavlja  veliki broj pasa  drzanjem u neuslovnom objektu na adresi Segedinski Put 86 , ni da izlaze brojne  pojedince  koji postuju zivotinje i svoj  licni i  svoj  deo javnog novca -da  u svoje kuce  natrpavaju  ulicne pse i macke zbog zelje da ih spasu od   `eutanazije ` veterinarske sluzbe gospodina Tikvickog  ili ko zna  kakve nasilne smrti  u prihvatilistu sa  godinama konstantnim  brojem zivotinja  uprkos  sto se  broj  novih  svake godine  udvostrucuje -GDE SU TE ZIVOTINJE – pitamo godpodju Suzanu Dulic koja  tvrdi  da Grad postupa zakonito .

Takodje  niko nema pravo da izbacuje na ulicu pse koji su  dobro zbrinuti  i imaju  svoj legalan dom u  registrovanom  prihvatilistu za zbrinjavanje ,Titogradska 53,  u kojem cekaju  sretno reudomljenje ili svoju prirodnu smrt – na koju  kao i na  svoj zivot,  imaju jednako pravo kao i  svi vi i  svi mi ,jer tako nalazu zakoni Republike Srbije koji nalazu  jedinicama lokalne samouprave da  oforme sluzbu koja ce  obavljati  hvatanje i  zakonito zbrinjavanje  napustenih pasa i macaka  u prihvatilista za zbrinjavanje – u interesu gradjana i zivotinja  i   da  zakonito trose  javni novac  namenjen za  svrhu : zbrinjavanje  napustenih pasa i macaka  koje su njegovi  gradjani – poreski obveznici ,izbacili na ulice. 

Raspolazemo podacima  da Grad  godinama izdvaja velike sume novca za ove svrhu, ali  da ga nezakonito trosi  i to na nacin kojim odrzava ovu `tezgu`  : uhvati,  mikrocipuj, vakcinisi, sterilisi, ubij . Morbidno .

Prihvatiliste  organizacije Prijatelj-EPAR  nije nastalo u skladu s nalozima Zakona o dobrobiti  zivotinja   koji vazi od 10.6.2009.  ,   nego  je ovo prihvatiliste  nastalo  i registrovano  iz nuzde  :  davne  2004. godine ,  ali  u zakonskom  okviru koji postoji od 2005.   vise nema potrebe da bilo koja organizacija ili pojedinac  obavlja zbrinjavanje  i  da trosi , izlaze eksploataciji   licni novac   svaki onaj  pojedinac/ pojedinci koji su  zivotinjama  i svojim uverenjima najodaniji , kako bi resili problem neodgovornih vlasnika   – ukoliko  Grad  vec postupa po zakonu, a MORA ,jer implementaciju svih zakona  nalaze Ustav RS  :  dakle ako Grad  zbrinjava  napustene kucne ljubimce u prihvatilista u skladu s potrebama vrste, BEZ ubijanja i   ako Grad omogucuje  sankcionisanje neodgovornih vlasnika  koji su uzrok i izvor  svih problema i troskova  i koji odrzavaju  ovu nedozvoljenu `tezgu` – onda  je  suvisno   za principjelne  ljude  i cak i za  vrhunske fanatike , da  paralelno rade  ono sto Grad vec radi   po zakonu  – jer  tada  oni  mogu raditi nesto  drugo sto je onda korisnije i gradjanima i zivotinjama .

Veritas liberate – zato objavite istinu .

p.s. Na ova pitanja dole ,  jos nismo dobili odgovore .Teska su  ? Dostavili smo Zalbu Povereniku NS RS  i cekamo odgovore.

Hvala na paznji .

S postovanjem

 

EPAR /Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi

24000 Subotica, Matka Vukovica,9

Zastupnik: Prim.mr.sci dr.Slavica Mazak Beslic

Budi vegan-spasi Planetu

—– Original Message —–

From: EPAR

To: gunacelnik@Subotica.rs

Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2010 7:03 PM

Subject: URGENCIJA na Zahtev 23.12.2010. – GDE SU NOVCI ? GDE SU ZIVOTINJE ? CIJE SU OVE ZIVOTINJE ?

URGENCIJA 25.12.2010.,   na Zahtev od 23.12.2010.

 

EPAR-OIPA SRBIJA/Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi
24000 Subotica,Matka Vukovica,9

—– Original Message —–

From: EPAR

To: gunacelnik@Subotica.rs

Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 12:34 PM

Subject: Zahtev 23.12.2010. – lokacija i postupci GU prema zivotinjama , izjave GU javnosti, OPASNOST PO SIGURNOST GRADJANA

Grad Subotica

Gradska uprava,putem poste

23.12.2010.

hitno- u roku do 48h

Predmet: Zahtev ovlascenom licu da u zakonskom roku do 48h ,na adresu u potpisu dostavi sledece informacije:

S obzirom da  Grad Subotica nema prihvatiliste  nego samo objekat prihvatiliste za privremeni smestaj napustenih pasa i macaka  malog smestajnog kapaciteta , u kojem moze da ih drzi do smestanja u prihvatiliste ;

S obzirom na izjave date medijima od strane g.Marije Usumovic i g.Suzane Dulic , da ce  pomoci gradjanima  tako sto ce izmestiti preko 700 pasa iz  jedinog registrovanog legalnog prihvatilista u Subotici na adresi Titogradska 53, ne navodeci  lokaciju na koju ce izmestiti pse , ni ciji su to psi ,

S obzirom na nezakonita ubijanja napustenih pasa i macaka  nepoznatih vlasnika  koja vrsi grad  pomocu  vet stanice veterinara g.Grge Tikvickog ,o kojima posedujemo  dokaze  ,

S obzirom da  Drustvo Prijatelj preti  da ce  700 pasa pustiti na ulice , sto predstavlja izazivanje opasnosti po sigurnost , zivot i zdravlje gradjana i zivotinja :

trazimo hitno sledece  informacije   :

1. u  koji objekat  su g.Usumovic i g.Dulic dajuci izjave javnosti Srbije da ce grad `izmestiti` preko 700 pasa ,  imale u vidu  da izmeste preko 700 pasa  iz  legalnog prihvatilista u Titogradskoj 53, Subotica i

2.  koji  Zakon i  koji  zakonit postupak  prema  psima iz tacke 1. ovog zahteva, su  g.Usumovic i g.Dulic imale u vidu , kada su  izjavile  javnosti Srbije , putem medija, da ce grad “postupati  u skladu sa zakonom “ i  “ primeniti zakonit postupak“  i  prema  700 pasa ,nakon sto ih izmesti iz legalnog prihvatilistas Titogradska 53 ,i

3.ciji   su  ovi  psi ,   700 pasa  koje gospodja Usumovic i Dulic  zele   izmestiti  na nepostojecu lokaciju  , a Drustvo Prijatelj  ih zeli izbaciti na ulicu ?

4.Sta sprecava  grad da postupi zakonito bez premestanja preko 700 pasa   iz legalnog prihvatilista ,koje je drzava Srbija oznacila legalnim ,kad istovremeno grad , pa  i pomenute gospodje , imaju saznanje da  Subotica nema drugi legalan  osim  ovog u Titogradskoj , jedini legalan azil za  zbrinjavanje  napustenih pasa nepoznatih vlasnika , a tu je i  zakon koji nalaze da grad  mora da zbrinjava ove zivotinje u PRIHVATILISTA ,i da je  UBIJANJE od 2.11.2005. g. ZABRANJENO, kako najmanje  jedanput nedeljno sto je grad cinio po Opstinskoj odluci do 2008. , tako i najmanje jedanput mesecno sto grad cini sada  2011.,

s obzirom  pomenute gospodje neodgovorno tvrde da  Grad  , tj Gradska Uprava postupa zakonito prema uhvacenim  neobelezenim psima i mackama nepoznatih vlasnika i da ce isto tako  zakonito postupati i prema psima koji sada zive u legalnom prihvatilistu Titogradska 53,  a   znaju da grad postupa nezakonito i prema uhvacenim psima i mackama koje  uhvati   zoohigijenska sluzba grada , znaju jer to finansiraju u ime svih poreskih obveznika  –  nezakonitost   postupanja Grada dokazuje Odluka Ustavnog suda Sl.gl.RS 9/2010 , jer   grad  IH  i dalje LISAVA ZIVOTA NAJMANJE 1 PUT MESECNO koristeci usluge vet.stanicer `Veterinar`  .  Po izvestaju  zoohigijenske sluzbe grada Subotice uhvaceno je  1508  pasa  i 99 macaka od 3.5.2006. do 16.11.2010. ,  a brojno stanje je   16.11.2010. :  201 pas i  nijedna macka po izvestaju JKP`Cistoca i zelenilo` na dan16.11.2010. ,stoga  trazimo  hitan odgovor, a u pitanju je oko 100 miliona dinara javnog novca  kojim je placeno postupanje prema 1508  pasa i 99 macaka u Subotici :

5. Gde je grad smestio  pse i macke  koje je uhvatio  putem svoje zoohigijenske sluzbe, firme  koju  grad placa :  najmanje 450 000 mesecno, i kad radi i kad ne radi , plus   je Grad  pribavio ovoj  firmi i   sredstva za rad i objekat  za privremeni smestaj , OPREMIO JE  FIRMU voznim parkom  itd , pitanje glasi :

 gde su psi i macke ,osim onih koji se trenutno  sada nalaze u  subotickom gradskom prihvatilistu za privremeni smestaj na adresi Ganjo sor 134,Subotica ,  i

ciji su  psi i macke koji se nalaze  u  prihvatilistu za privremeni smestaj  : Ganjo sor 134 , Subotica? ciji su 1508 pasa i 99 macaka  koji su  usli u ovo prihvatiliste i gde su  sada oni koji fale  u brojnom stanju ?

Takodje odgovorite : CIJI  su psi  u prihvatilistu  na adresi Segedinski Put 86 , Subotica .

koji je to   `zakonit  postupak`  kojeg  pominju   g. Usumovic i g.Dulic , da je grad primenio prema  uhvacenim psima  i mackama koji  nisu  vise u ovom prihvatilistu  i gde su oni sada, jer je od 1508 uhvacenih  pasa i 99 uhvacenih macaka – u objektu za privremeni smestaj  u Subotici, Ganjo sor 134 ,na dan 16.11.2010. bilo 201 pas i ni jedna macka  .Gde je 1406 zivotinja  ,  jer  16.11.2010. je prisutno   samo : 201 pas i nijedna macka ,po izvestaju JKP`Cistoca i zelenilo` Subotica i cije su to zivotinje sa kojima nezakonito  `barata`   grad  Subotica  i JKP`Cistoca i zelenilo` Subotica  ?

6. Da li Grad ispunjava  samo obavezu da : finansira  rad JKP`Cistoca i zelenilo `  na hvatanju  i privremenom zbrinjavanju  uhvacenih pasa i macaka   ili  Grad   ispunjava  nalog  Zakona  o veterinarstvu , cl.46. koji nalaze  zbrinjavanje   napustenih pasa i macaka  na teritoriji  jedinice lokalne samouprave : u prihvatilista  – jer je to u interesu gradjana i zivotinja , i za tu svrhu Grad izdvaja  4-5,4  miliona  dinara  plus : finansiranje  dodatnih  troskovi  kupovina i gradnje, plus  drugi izvori osim gradskog budzeta ( republicki budzet- 5,8 miliona dinara , Fond za kapitalna ulaganja AP Vojvodine -15 miliona dinara   itd.

Hvala.

S postovanjem

 EPAR-OIPA SRBIJA/Alijansa za zastitu prirode,prava zivotinja i prava ljudi

24000 Subotica, Matka Vukovica,9

Zastupnik: Slavica Mazak Beslic