Serbia: Animal Welfare Campaigners Make Formal Charge to State Public Attorney-General About CITES Documentation for Gypsy ‘Owned’ Bears Exported to Bulgaria

serb00013

 

This post is about a formal charge to the Public Attorney General of the State of Serbia, Belgrade, and also to the Ministerium of police of the State of Serbia, Belgrade.

 

These are part of proof  for  wild animals; Bears, and their export  from Serbia to Bulgaria.

 

Gypsies have been paid 1000 to 1500 Euros per bear.

 

The main question and issue is;

 

In order to get a CITES permit for export for an animal, it is only the owner of the animal that can do the application.  But in this case, the Gypsies who have the bears are NOT their legal owners.  We think that false claims and false information may have been provided to the Ministerium for Environment, Department  for CITES, in this case of Serbian bears exported to Bulgaria.

 

In order to be the ‘owner’ of these bears, the State of Serbia must have Court documentation, but they do not, and neither do the Gypsies who have been given money for them.

 

The ‘owner’ of  the 3 bears in this case is unknown, if there is even such a thing as an ‘owner’.  Bears are wild animals, part of the states natural environment.

 

Bears who do not have a formal registered owner cannot be exported, because the owner must put their own signature onto the CITES documentation.   In this case there are unknown owners.

 

The Ministry does not appear to care about the six bears at the ARKA Banostor shelter, but in this case of money and export, things appear to be a little ‘different’.

 

What has happened and who has been directly involved in order to obtain signatures on the CITES certificates to allow these bears to go to Bulgaria ?

 

Remember, Gypsies have been paid 1000 to 1500 Euros per bear.  Has anyone else had a share of this money to ensure that the CITES paperwork looks correct with all the necessary signatures by the ‘owner’ ?

 

Below are the formal copies of the charges made by Serbian animal welfare campaigners to the Public Attorney General of the State of Serbia, Belgrade, and also to the Ministerium of police of the State of Serbia, Belgrade.

legal1

legal2

legal3

legal4

 

We now await with interest what happens next and will be providing further updates in the coming weeks.

 

 

 

 

Subject: Re: ktr1279/08 u rjt Bgd, dopuna dokaza :Ugovori o kupovini medveda/ ko je sve , kako i za koliko eura , PO PISANIM I USMENIM ugovorima/dogovorima , prodao 3 medveda nepoznatog titulara vlasnistva / wild animal trade

Republičko javno tužilaštvo, Beograd   –   molimo vs da službenim putem prosledite mesno nadležnom javnom tužilaštvu ovaj dokazni materijal 25.2.2009.

 

Veza : predmet u Rep.javnom tuž. pod brojem ktr 1279/08

, u ojt Požarevac pod ktr 510/08 ,

nemamo podatke  u kojem  se još  tužilaštvu vodi i pod kojim brojem  isti  predmet koji se odnosi  na  dva medveda iz Kruševca

 

KUPO-PRODAJNI UGOVORI

 

Ugovori o kupovini-prodaji  medveda

 

U attachmentu Vam saljemo dva razlicita ugovora koji su sklopljeni izmedju Austrijske organizacije “Vier Pfoten” i nelegalnih vlasnika medveda – gospodina Zorana Lazarevica i gospodje Zorice Lazarevic. Na osnovu ovih ugovora je Vier Pfoten uspeo da dobije protivzakonitu CITES export dozvolu od Ministarstva zivotne sredine i prostornog planiranja, za odnosenje tri mrka medveda iz Srbije u Bugarsku ( u naucne svrhe).

Umesto ovih , tužilaštvu su dostavljeni  naknadno  pravljeni lažni Ugovori,  kojima se želi zataškati činjenica o  prodaji-kupovini , trgovini,  no kako u tom  naknadno  napravljenim ugovorima  strana koja  predaje  medveda ne dobija nista , nelogicno je da  ta fizicka lica koja su medveda koristila za sticanje prihoda i egzistenciju cele porodice   , sada   nekome  ustupaju  istog medveda ,bez bilo kakve koristi za sebe , a da pri tom  faktički nisu u  poziciji da besplatno poklanjaju svoj izvor prihoda .Stoga je logičan i realan svaki od ugovora kojim su u zamenu za medveda  lica koja su medveda predala- dobila po 1000  i 1500 eura- što  prestavlja   protivzakonitu trgovinu, a koje vam ( jedan smo vam  već ponovo dostavili) dostavljamo sada ponovo , jer  su se  izgleda , ovi ugovori pogubili iz košuljice predmeta –  barem  nije prisutan u  košuljici ktr 510/08  koja nam je u celosti dostavljena .

 

S postovanjem,

 

Prijatelj-EPAR/član OIPA/Alijansa za prava životinja/OIPA Serbia

24000 Subotica, Matka Vukovića 9

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: